Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable

En este trabajo se presenta un enfoque de selección de portafolios óptimos socialmente responsables, a través de la incorporación de los criterios ASG –ambiente (A), social (S) y de buen gobierno (G)– al modelo media-varianza (MV) de Markowitz. Para ello, se revisan algunas formulaciones del probl...

Full description

Autores:: Zapata Q., Carlos Andrés

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_d4a7be25e950651faf42bdbb791ce3b7
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/15344
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Mean-Variance Model and ESG criteria: From Markowitz to the socially responsible portfolio
title	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable
spellingShingle	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable optimal portfolio; ESG criteria; socially responsible investment portafolio óptimo; criterios ASG; inversión socialmente responsable
title_short	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable
title_full	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable
title_fullStr	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable
title_full_unstemmed	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable
title_sort	Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Zapata Q., Carlos Andrés
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Zapata Q., Carlos Andrés
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	optimal portfolio; ESG criteria; socially responsible investment
topic	optimal portfolio; ESG criteria; socially responsible investment portafolio óptimo; criterios ASG; inversión socialmente responsable
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	portafolio óptimo; criterios ASG; inversión socialmente responsable
description	En este trabajo se presenta un enfoque de selección de portafolios óptimos socialmente responsables, a través de la incorporación de los criterios ASG –ambiente (A), social (S) y de buen gobierno (G)– al modelo media-varianza (MV) de Markowitz. Para ello, se revisan algunas formulaciones del problema de optimización MV, así como su ajuste, para incorporar estos indicadores en la construcción y optimización del portafolio. Este nuevo enfoque, conocido como modelo MV-ASG, permite la construcción de un conjunto completo de portafolios óptimos factibles a partir de las tres relaciones: retorno, riesgo e indicador ASG, que dan como resultado una superficie eficiente (SE) en un plano tridimensional. Los resultados muestran que la consecución de un indicador ASG cada vez mayor, no solo reduce el desempeño del portafolio respecto al portafolio MV, sino que disminuye su capacidad de diversificación del riesgo. Sin embargo, se resalta el hecho de que la incorporación de los criterios ASG les permite a los inversionistas incorporar sus preferencias para minimizar el impacto social y ambiental de sus inversiones, ya que el portafolio óptimo MV-ASG genera mejores indicadores que cualquier portafolio que persiga solo la relación óptima retorno-riesgo, además de superar el desempeño del benchmark.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2022-12-14T10:23:26Z 2024-06-07T07:30:59Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2022-12-14T10:23:26Z 2024-06-07T07:30:59Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2022-12-14
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/17941113.n21.04
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2140
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	1794-1113
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15344
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/17941113.n21.04
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/17941113.n21.04 2346-2140 1794-1113
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15344 https://doi.org/10.18601/17941113.n21.04
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/odeon/article/download/8489/13485 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/odeon/article/download/8489/13486
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 21 , Año 2021 : Julio-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	79
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	21
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	55
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	ODEON
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Acuerdo de París (2015). United Nations framework convention on climate change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf Alessandrini, F. y Jondeau, E. (2021). Optimal strategies for ESG portfolios. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(6), 114-138. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.241 Ballestero, E., Bravo, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M. y Pla-Santamaría, D. (2012). Socially responsible investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives. European Journal of Ope¬rational Research, 216(2), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.011 Bender, J., He, C., Ooi, C., y Sun, X. (2020). Reducing the Carbon Intensity of Low Volatility Portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 46(3), 108-22. https://doi. org/10.3905/jpm.2020.46.3.108 Branch, M., Goldberg, L. y Hand, P. (2019). A guide to ESG portfolio construction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(4), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.3905/ jpm.2019.45.4.061 Caballero, A., Garcia, A., Salcedo, J. y Vercher, M. (2020). Tri-criterion model for cons-tructing low-carbon mutual fund portfolios: A preference-based multi-objective genetic algorithm approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176324 Calvo, C., Ivorra, C. y Liern, V. (2015). Finding socially responsible portfolios close to conventional ones. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 52-63. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.03.014 Cesarone, F., Martino, M. y Carleo, A. (2022). Does ESG impact really enhance port¬folio profitability? Sustainability, 14(4), 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042050 Chen, L., Zhang, L., Huang, J., Xiao, H. y Zhou, Z. (2021). Social responsibility port¬folio optimization incorporating ESG criteria. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.02.005 Coqueret, G. (2022). Perspectives in sustainable equity investing. CRC Press. De Spiegeleer, J., Höcht, S., Jakubowski, D., Reyners, S. y Schoutens, W. (2021). esg: A new dimension in portfolio allocation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & In¬vestment, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1923336 Fabozzi, F., Kolm, P., Pachamanova, D. y Focardi, S. (2007). Robust Portfolio Opti¬mization and Management. John Wiley & Sons. Francis, C. J. y Kim, D. (2013). Modern Portfolio Theory: Foundation, Analysis, and New Developments. Wiley Finance. Gasser, S. M., Rammerstorfer, M. y Weinmayer, K. (2017). Markowitz revisited: Social portfolio engineering. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(3), 1181- 1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.043 Gil-Bazo, J., Ruiz-Verdú, P. y Santos, A. A. (2010). The performance of socially res-ponsible mutual funds: The role of fees and management companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0260-4 Hartzmark, S. M. y Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789-2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841 Henke, H. M. (2016). The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund perfor¬mance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 67(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbankfin.2016.01.010 Henriksson, R., Livnat, J., Pfeifer, P. y Stumpp, M. (2019). Integrating esg in portfolio construction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(4), 67-81. https://doi. org/10.3905/jpm.2019.45.4.067 Hirschberger, M., Steuer, R. E., Utz, S., Wimmer, M. y Qi, Y. (2013). Computing the nondominated surface in tri-criterion portfolio selection. Operations Research, 61(1), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1140 Kolm, P., Tütüncü, R. y Fabozzi, F. (2014). 60 Years of portfolio optimization: Prac¬tical challenges and current trends. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(2), 356-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.060 Lagerkvist, C. J., Edenbrandt, A. K., Tibbelin, I. y Wahlstedt, Y. (2020). Preferences for sustainable and responsible equity funds-A choice experiment with Swedish private investors. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 28(1), 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100406 Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley. Naffa, H. y Fain, M. (2022). A factor approach to the performance of esg leaders and laggards. Finance Research Letters, 44(1), 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. frl.2021.102073 Nofsinger, J. y Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016 Ortas, E., Moneva, J. M., Burritt, R. y Tingey-Holyoak, J. (2014). Does sustainability investment provide adaptive resilience to ethical investors? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013- 1873-1 Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S. y Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The esg-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001 Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964. tb02865.x Utz, S., Wimmer, M., Hirschberger, M., y Steuer, R. (2014). Tri-criterion inverse port¬folio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds. Euro¬pean Journal of Operational Research, 234(2), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejor.2013.07.024
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Carlos Andrés Zapata Q. - 2022
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv	Carlos Andrés Zapata Q. - 2022 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/odeon/article/view/8489
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/a306129f-3a59-4cb6-9acb-9c9908ae416c/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	7d9fa2555d31b3db2e0132064341e8ff
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1814100359246774272
spelling	Zapata Q., Carlos Andrés2022-12-14T10:23:26Z2024-06-07T07:30:59Z2022-12-14T10:23:26Z2024-06-07T07:30:59Z2022-12-14En este trabajo se presenta un enfoque de selección de portafolios óptimos socialmente responsables, a través de la incorporación de los criterios ASG –ambiente (A), social (S) y de buen gobierno (G)– al modelo media-varianza (MV) de Markowitz. Para ello, se revisan algunas formulaciones del problema de optimización MV, así como su ajuste, para incorporar estos indicadores en la construcción y optimización del portafolio. Este nuevo enfoque, conocido como modelo MV-ASG, permite la construcción de un conjunto completo de portafolios óptimos factibles a partir de las tres relaciones: retorno, riesgo e indicador ASG, que dan como resultado una superficie eficiente (SE) en un plano tridimensional. Los resultados muestran que la consecución de un indicador ASG cada vez mayor, no solo reduce el desempeño del portafolio respecto al portafolio MV, sino que disminuye su capacidad de diversificación del riesgo. Sin embargo, se resalta el hecho de que la incorporación de los criterios ASG les permite a los inversionistas incorporar sus preferencias para minimizar el impacto social y ambiental de sus inversiones, ya que el portafolio óptimo MV-ASG genera mejores indicadores que cualquier portafolio que persiga solo la relación óptima retorno-riesgo, además de superar el desempeño del benchmark.This paper presents an approach for socially responsible investment portfolio selection through the incorporation of ESG criteria: environment (A), social (S) and of good governance (G); to the Markowitz’s mean-variance (MV) model. For that, different formulations of the MV optimization problem are revised, as well as its adjustment to incorporate these indicators in the construction and optimization of the portfolio. This new approach, known as the MV-ESG model, allows the construction of a complete set of feasible optimal portfolios based on the three relationships: return, risk and the ESG score; resulting in an efficient surface (ES) on a three-dimensional space. Results show that the achievement of an increasingly higher ESG indicator not only reduces the performance of the portfolio with respect to the MV portfolio, but also reduces its risk diversification capacity. However, the fact that the incorporation of ESG criteria allows investors to incorporate their preferences to minimize the social and environmental impact of their investments is highlighted, since the optimal ESG portfolio generates better indicators than any portfolio that pursue only the optimal risk-return ratio, in addition to outperforming the benchmark.application/pdftext/html10.18601/17941113.n21.042346-21401794-1113https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15344https://doi.org/10.18601/17941113.n21.04spaUniversidad Externado de Colombiahttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/odeon/article/download/8489/13485https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/odeon/article/download/8489/13486Núm. 21 , Año 2021 : Julio-Diciembre792155ODEONAcuerdo de París (2015). United Nations framework convention on climate change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdfAlessandrini, F. y Jondeau, E. (2021). Optimal strategies for ESG portfolios. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(6), 114-138. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.241Ballestero, E., Bravo, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M. y Pla-Santamaría, D. (2012). Socially responsible investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives. European Journal of Ope¬rational Research, 216(2), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.011Bender, J., He, C., Ooi, C., y Sun, X. (2020). Reducing the Carbon Intensity of Low Volatility Portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 46(3), 108-22. https://doi. org/10.3905/jpm.2020.46.3.108Branch, M., Goldberg, L. y Hand, P. (2019). A guide to ESG portfolio construction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(4), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.3905/ jpm.2019.45.4.061Caballero, A., Garcia, A., Salcedo, J. y Vercher, M. (2020). Tri-criterion model for cons-tructing low-carbon mutual fund portfolios: A preference-based multi-objective genetic algorithm approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176324Calvo, C., Ivorra, C. y Liern, V. (2015). Finding socially responsible portfolios close to conventional ones. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 52-63. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.03.014Cesarone, F., Martino, M. y Carleo, A. (2022). Does ESG impact really enhance port¬folio profitability? Sustainability, 14(4), 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042050Chen, L., Zhang, L., Huang, J., Xiao, H. y Zhou, Z. (2021). Social responsibility port¬folio optimization incorporating ESG criteria. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.02.005Coqueret, G. (2022). Perspectives in sustainable equity investing. CRC Press.De Spiegeleer, J., Höcht, S., Jakubowski, D., Reyners, S. y Schoutens, W. (2021). esg: A new dimension in portfolio allocation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & In¬vestment, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1923336Fabozzi, F., Kolm, P., Pachamanova, D. y Focardi, S. (2007). Robust Portfolio Opti¬mization and Management. John Wiley & Sons.Francis, C. J. y Kim, D. (2013). Modern Portfolio Theory: Foundation, Analysis, and New Developments. Wiley Finance.Gasser, S. M., Rammerstorfer, M. y Weinmayer, K. (2017). Markowitz revisited: Social portfolio engineering. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(3), 1181- 1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.043Gil-Bazo, J., Ruiz-Verdú, P. y Santos, A. A. (2010). The performance of socially res-ponsible mutual funds: The role of fees and management companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0260-4Hartzmark, S. M. y Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789-2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841Henke, H. M. (2016). The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund perfor¬mance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 67(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbankfin.2016.01.010Henriksson, R., Livnat, J., Pfeifer, P. y Stumpp, M. (2019). Integrating esg in portfolio construction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(4), 67-81. https://doi. org/10.3905/jpm.2019.45.4.067Hirschberger, M., Steuer, R. E., Utz, S., Wimmer, M. y Qi, Y. (2013). Computing the nondominated surface in tri-criterion portfolio selection. Operations Research, 61(1), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1140Kolm, P., Tütüncü, R. y Fabozzi, F. (2014). 60 Years of portfolio optimization: Prac¬tical challenges and current trends. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(2), 356-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.060Lagerkvist, C. J., Edenbrandt, A. K., Tibbelin, I. y Wahlstedt, Y. (2020). Preferences for sustainable and responsible equity funds-A choice experiment with Swedish private investors. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 28(1), 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100406Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley.Naffa, H. y Fain, M. (2022). A factor approach to the performance of esg leaders and laggards. Finance Research Letters, 44(1), 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. frl.2021.102073Nofsinger, J. y Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016Ortas, E., Moneva, J. M., Burritt, R. y Tingey-Holyoak, J. (2014). Does sustainability investment provide adaptive resilience to ethical investors? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013- 1873-1Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S. y Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The esg-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964. tb02865.xUtz, S., Wimmer, M., Hirschberger, M., y Steuer, R. (2014). Tri-criterion inverse port¬folio optimization with application to socially responsible mutual funds. Euro¬pean Journal of Operational Research, 234(2), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejor.2013.07.024Carlos Andrés Zapata Q. - 2022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/odeon/article/view/8489optimal portfolio;ESG criteria;socially responsible investmentportafolio óptimo;criterios ASG;inversión socialmente responsableModelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsableMean-Variance Model and ESG criteria: From Markowitz to the socially responsible portfolioArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2549https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/a306129f-3a59-4cb6-9acb-9c9908ae416c/download7d9fa2555d31b3db2e0132064341e8ffMD51001/15344oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/153442024-06-07 02:30:59.718http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Carlos Andrés Zapata Q. - 2022https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Modelo Media-Varianza y criterios ASG: de Markowitz al portafolio socialmente responsable

Publicaciones similares