Parameter Recognition of Engineering Constants of CLSMs in Civil Engineering Using Artificial Neural Networks

Controlled low-strength materials (CLSMs) had been widely applied to excavation and backfill in civil engineering. However, the engineering properties of CLSM in these embankments vary dramatically due to different contents involved. This study is proposed to employ the ANSYS software and two differ...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Book
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
Repositorio:
Expeditio: repositorio UTadeo
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:expeditiorepositorio.utadeo.edu.co:20.500.12010/16830
Acceso en línea:
https://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-applications-for-artificial-neural-networks/parameter-recognition-of-engineering-constants-of-clsms-in-civil-engineering-using-artificial-neural
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/16830
Palabra clave:
Ingeniería civil
ingeniería de CLSM
Redes neuronales artificiales
Reconocimiento de parámetros
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:Controlled low-strength materials (CLSMs) had been widely applied to excavation and backfill in civil engineering. However, the engineering properties of CLSM in these embankments vary dramatically due to different contents involved. This study is proposed to employ the ANSYS software and two different artificial neural networks (ANNs), that is, back-propagation artificial neural network (BPANN) and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), to determine the engineering properties of CLSM by considering an inverse problem in which elastic modulus and the Poisson’s ratio can be identified from inputting displacements and stress measurements. The PLANE42 element of ANSYS was first used to investigate a 2D problem of a retaining wall with embankment, with E = 0.02~3 GPa, ν= 0.1~0.4 to obtain totally 270 sampling data for two earth pressures and two top surface settlements of embankment. These data are randomly divided into training and testing set for ANNs. Practical cases of three kinds of backfilled materials, soil, and two kinds of CLSMs (CLSM-B80/30% and CLSM-B130/30%) will be used to check the validity of ANN prediction results. Results showed that maximal errors of CLSM elastic parameters identified by well-trained ANNs can be within 6%.