Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción
La innovación se ha consolidado como un factor esencial para el crecimiento y el éxito empresarial en un entorno globalizado y competitivo. Las empresas deben implementar productos, procesos y prácticas organizativas novedosas para mantenerse competitivas en un mercado en constante cambio. En este c...
- Autores:
-
Baquero Tobias, Andrea Paola
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2024
- Institución:
- Universidad Simón Bolívar
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Digital USB
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/14764
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/14764
- Palabra clave:
- Innovación
Comportamiento innovador
Relaciones interorganizacionales
Empresas agroalimentarias
Yuca
Innovation
Innovative behavior
Interorganizational relationships
Agrifood companies
Cassava
- Rights
- embargoedAccess
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
| id |
USIMONBOL2_bd6ddf0636a052d0a4026fde6a0a4eb5 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/14764 |
| network_acronym_str |
USIMONBOL2 |
| network_name_str |
Repositorio Digital USB |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción |
| title |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción |
| spellingShingle |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción Innovación Comportamiento innovador Relaciones interorganizacionales Empresas agroalimentarias Yuca Innovation Innovative behavior Interorganizational relationships Agrifood companies Cassava |
| title_short |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción |
| title_full |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción |
| title_fullStr |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción |
| title_sort |
Efectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorción |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Baquero Tobias, Andrea Paola |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Naranjo Africano, Gloria Maria Salcedo Mendoza, Jairo Guadalupe |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Baquero Tobias, Andrea Paola |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Innovación Comportamiento innovador Relaciones interorganizacionales Empresas agroalimentarias Yuca |
| topic |
Innovación Comportamiento innovador Relaciones interorganizacionales Empresas agroalimentarias Yuca Innovation Innovative behavior Interorganizational relationships Agrifood companies Cassava |
| dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv |
Innovation Innovative behavior Interorganizational relationships Agrifood companies Cassava |
| description |
La innovación se ha consolidado como un factor esencial para el crecimiento y el éxito empresarial en un entorno globalizado y competitivo. Las empresas deben implementar productos, procesos y prácticas organizativas novedosas para mantenerse competitivas en un mercado en constante cambio. En este contexto, el comportamiento innovador se define como la capacidad de una empresa para desarrollar nuevas ideas y aprovechar oportunidades en su entorno para impulsar su desarrollo sostenible. Particularmente, las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas desempeñan un papel fundamental en las economías de todo el mundo, especialmente en países en desarrollo. Sin embargo, enfrentan desafíos significativos debido a recursos limitados y a una falta de investigación específica y contextualizada sobre su comportamiento innovador. A diferencia de las grandes empresas, las pymes deben abordar la innovación de manera estratégica, aprovechando al máximo sus interacciones interorganizacionales, entre otros, para obtener acceso a conocimientos, tecnologías y recursos que les permitan competir de manera efectiva. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-06-24T15:23:37Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-06-24T15:23:37Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 |
| dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| dc.type.spa.none.fl_str_mv |
Tesis de doctorado |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/14764 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/14764 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf |
| dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar |
| institution |
Universidad Simón Bolívar |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/a6194e99-d50e-4ff7-bcc3-bdaa86734bc9/download https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/23729e91-a6c4-414a-a77c-24d448704e77/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
2f656a26de8af8c32aaacd5e2a33538c 2a1661e5960a7bab4fd8dda692fb677c |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívar |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1812100479537119232 |
| spelling |
Naranjo Africano, Gloria MariaSalcedo Mendoza, Jairo GuadalupeBaquero Tobias, Andrea Paola7a79b8e3-5a5d-4ff5-8cca-a384a65f66c22024-06-24T15:23:37Z2024-06-24T15:23:37Z2024https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/14764La innovación se ha consolidado como un factor esencial para el crecimiento y el éxito empresarial en un entorno globalizado y competitivo. Las empresas deben implementar productos, procesos y prácticas organizativas novedosas para mantenerse competitivas en un mercado en constante cambio. En este contexto, el comportamiento innovador se define como la capacidad de una empresa para desarrollar nuevas ideas y aprovechar oportunidades en su entorno para impulsar su desarrollo sostenible. Particularmente, las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas desempeñan un papel fundamental en las economías de todo el mundo, especialmente en países en desarrollo. Sin embargo, enfrentan desafíos significativos debido a recursos limitados y a una falta de investigación específica y contextualizada sobre su comportamiento innovador. A diferencia de las grandes empresas, las pymes deben abordar la innovación de manera estratégica, aprovechando al máximo sus interacciones interorganizacionales, entre otros, para obtener acceso a conocimientos, tecnologías y recursos que les permitan competir de manera efectiva.Innovation has established itself as an essential factor for business growth and success in a globalized and competitive environment. Companies must implement novel products, processes, and organizational practices to remain competitive in an ever-changing market. In this context, innovative behavior is defined as the ability of a company to develop new ideas and take advantage of opportunities in its environment to drive its sustainable development. Particularly, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises play a fundamental role in economies around the world, especially in developing countries . However, they face significant challenges due to limited resources and a lack of specific and contextualized research on their innovative behavior. Unlike large companies, SMEs must approach innovation strategically, making the most of their inter-organizational interactions , among others, to gain access to knowledge, technologies and resources that allow them to compete effectively.pdfspaEdiciones Universidad Simón BolívarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfInnovaciónComportamiento innovadorRelaciones interorganizacionalesEmpresas agroalimentariasYucaInnovationInnovative behaviorInterorganizational relationshipsAgrifood companiesCassavaEfectos de las relaciones interorganizacionales en el comportamiento innovador, desde una perspectiva ecológica en empresas agroalimentarias, en contextos de baja capacidad de absorcióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisTesis de doctoradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06(MADR). Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Sostenible. (2021). Cifras Sectoriales. Indicadores e Instrumentos del Sector productivo de yuca y ñame en Colombia. Cadena Productiva de La Yuca, https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Yuca/Pages/Documentos.aspxAcosta Mesa, R., Alean Pico, A., Prieto Flórez, J., & Tordecilla Acevedo, V. (2020). Sucre en algunas cifras y datos básicos. Construyendo Escenarios Prospectivos Para Los Desafíos Del Desarrollo Competitivo Del Departamento de Sucre, Colombia. https://doi.org/10.21892/9789585547834.1Agronet. (2019). Comparativo de Área, Producción, Rendimiento y Participación Departamental por Cultivo. https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=1Águila, O., Rosa, A., & Meléndez, P. (2010). Factores derminantes de la innovación en empresas de economía social . La importancia de la formación y de la actitud estratégica Ana Rosa del Águila ObraAmar-sepulveda, P. (2016). Comportamiento Innovador del sector alimentos del distrito de Barranquilla (Issue March).Bekkers, Victor Edelenbos, Jurian Steijn, B. (2011). Innovación en el Sector PúblicoBenito, S., Platero, M., & Rodríguez, A. (2012). Factores determinantes de la innovación en las mcroempresas españolas: La importancia de los factores internos. Universia Business Review, 33, 104–121.Bush, V. (1999). Ciencia, al frontera sin fin. Un informe al presidente. Redes 14 , 89–137.Calvo, J. L. (2005). ¿Son las actividades de I+D una buena aproximación a la innovación tecnológica? Economía Industrial, 5, 173–184Camagni, R. (2003). Incertidumbre, capital social y desarrollo local: enseñanzas para una gobernabilidad sostenible del territorio. Investigaciones Regionales, 31–57Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2019). Enfoque territorial y análisis dinámico de la ruralidad: alcances y límites para el diseño de políticas de desarrollo rural innovadoras en América Latina y el Caribe. Repositorio, 1–15. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/48052/1/S2200214_es.pdfCorchuelo, B., & Mesías, F. J. (2017). Disposición a innovar y competitividad en la agroindustria extremeña. ITEA Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria, 113(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2017.011DANE. (2021a). Boletín Ténico: Encuesta de desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica: Industria manufacturera 2019 - 2020. 1–67. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-einnovacion/encuesta-de-desarrollo-e-innovacion-tecnologica-editDANE. (2021b). Evaluaciones Agropecuarias Municipales EVA. https://www.datos.gov.co/Agricultura-y-Desarrollo-Rural/EvaluacionesAgropecuarias-Municipales-EVA/2pnw-mmgeDANE. (2022). Producto Interno Bruto -PIB- nacional trimestral. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/cuentasnacionales/cuentas-nacionales-trimestrales/historicos-producto-interno-brutopibDepartamento Nacional de Planeación. (2021). Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia (IDIC) 2020. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, 3–335. https://www.dnp.gov.co/programas/desarrolloempresarial/Competitividad/Paginas/Indice-Departamental-de-Innovacion-paraColombia.aspxFAO. (2019). El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación. Progresos en la lucha contra la pérdida y el desperdicio de alimentos. In El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación 2020FAOSTAT. (2018). Valor de la Producción Agrícola. https://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QV.Fundación Demuca. (2009). Desarrollo económico local. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/guia_herramientas_municipales_demuc a.pdfGobernación de Sucre. (2020). Plan Departamental De Extension Agropecuaria Diputados Del Departamento De Sucre Periodo 2020-2023. 87. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/ministerio/direcciones/PublishingImages/Pagi nas/PDEA/Sucre.pdfGonzález-Campo, C. H. (2010). Interacción teórica para la caracterización de redes empresariales. Innovar, 20(37), 117–132.Hernández Sampieri, R. (2014). Metodología de la investigación - Sexta Edición.Huerta, Arribas; Bayo, Moriones; García, Olaverri & Merino, D. de C. (2003). Los desafios de la competitividad (p. 95).Isabel, M., Lovera, M. I., Castro, E., Smith, H., & Mujica, M. (2008). Evolucionismo económico desde la perspectiva de Nelson y Winter.Jaramillo, H., Lugones, G., & Salazar, M. (2001). Innovación Tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe MANUAL DE BOGOTÁ Innovación Tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe MANUAL DE BOGOTÁ. Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología/Organización de Estados Americanos, 102. http://www.ricyt.org/manuales/doc_view/5-manual-de-bogotaJiménez, J.D, Sanz, V. R. (2014). Determinantes del éxito de la innovación. Rev. EmpresaLario, N. A. (2002). Contribución de las cooperativas agrarias de segundo grado a la orientación al mercado de sus cooperativas asociadas: efectos en el desempeño de la relación. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 41, 139–161. http://www.ciriec-revistaeconomia.es/banco/06_Arcas_41.pdfLópez-García, U. T., Álvarez-Coque, J. M., & Sánchez, G. M. (2013). Comportamiento innovador del sistema agroalimentario en la Comunidad Valenciana : cadena de valor , vínculos intersectoriales y territorio. 153MADR. (2015). Cadena de suministro de la yuca. 9. https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Yuca/Documentos/2015-09-30 Cifras Sectoriales.pdfMADR, M. de A. y D. R. (2017). Pectia (2017-2027). Plan Estratégico de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Del Sector AgropecuarioMADR, M. de A. y D. R. (2020). Subsector productivo de la Yuca. Minagricultura, 18. https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Yuca/Documentos/2019-06-30 Cifras Sectoriales.pdfMarín Arbeláez, J. O. (2015). Análisis del sector agroalimentario en Colombia – Bogotá Una mirada retro y prospectiva del sector periodo 2004 -2014 Analysis of food industry in Colombia - Bogotá a retro and forward view to the industry for the period 2004 - 2014. 1, 1–14.Martínez Carazo, P. C. (2006). El método de estudio de caso: Estrategia metodológica de la investigación científica. Pensamiento y Gestión: Revista de La División de Ciencias Administrativas de La Universidad Del Norte, 20, 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1217568Martinez Garcia, J. (2017). Análisis de Inteligencia Competitiva de la Agroindutria en Procesados de Yuca y Posicionamiento en Mercados Nacional e Internacional. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 01, 1–7. http://www.albayan.aeMendoza Meza, D. L. (2017). Retos y oportunidades en ciencia, tecnología e innovación para la región Caribe colombiana. Revista Prospectiva, 15(1), 5–6.Mendoza Ortega, G. P., Hernández Hernández, G. C., & Rodríguez Vergara, C. J. (2019). Cadena de suministro agroalimentaria de la yuca en el departamento de Sucre. Apuestas Del Departamento de Sucre En Sectores Agroindustria y Minería, 30–49. https://doi.org/10.21892/9789585547254.2Minagricultura. (2018). Reporte:Área, Producción y Rendimiento Nacional por Cultivo. Agronet. https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=1Minagricultura. (2021). Cadena Productiva de la Yuca.Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2018). Cifras Sectoriales YUCA, 2018.Mogollón, R. H., De, A., & Vaquero, C. (2016). Estudio sobre el comportamiento innovador de la empresa. Revista de Estudios Económicos y Empresariales. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10662/2689Moncaut, Nicolas;Robert, Verónica; Yoguel, G. (2017). El rol de las capacidades en la relacion entre difusión de las TIC y productividad en empresas manufactureras argentinas. Una revisión de la hipótesis de complementariedad. January 2018.Montoya, R. L. A., & Montoya, R. I. A. (2022). Inclusive business. A biological metaphor model for the agricultural sector[Negocios inclusivos. Un modelo de metáfora biológica para el sector agropecuario]. Retos(Ecuador), 12(23), 25–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n23.2022.02Montoya Suárez, O. (2004). Schumpeter, innovación y determinismo tecnológico. Scientia et Technica, 10(25), 209–213.Morales Romero, A., & Duque Oliva, E. J. (2012). Formas y categorización de las relaciones entre las organizaciones sin fines de lucro y el sector privado: una revisión. Administración & Desarrollo, 40(55), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.22431/25005227.130Muñoz, G., & Espinosa, D. (2018). La innovación: baluarte fundamental para las organizaciones. INNOVA Research Journal, 3(10), 212–229.Noguera, Á. (2013). Las interacciones organizacionales desde la visión ecologica : la depredación.OCDE/Eurostat. (2005). Manual de Oslo. Directrices para la recogida e interpretación de información relativa a innovación. In OECD/Comunidades Europeas (Vol. 66). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-enOCyT. (2021). Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología e Innovación Colombia 2021.Oddone, N. (2016). Manual para el fortalecimiento de cadenas de valor. Cepal, Fida.OECD. (2020). Innovación: Conceptos y tipos. Agencia Vasca de La Innovación, Innobasque, 6. https://www.innobasque.eus/uploads/attachment_files/conceptos-idi_v4pdf-5e1c451d5ee49.pdfParra-Peña, R., Puyana, R., & Yepes, F. (2021). Análisis De La Productividad Del Sector Agropecuario En Colombia Y Su Impacto En Temas Como: Encadenamientos Productivos, Sostenibilidad E Internacionalización, En El Marco Del Programa Colombia Más Competitiva. Fedesarrollo, 1, 135. http://hdl.handle.net/11445/4092Peraza, E., Gómez, J., & Aleixandre, G. (2016). Los factores determinantes del comportamiento innovador de las cooperativas: Un análisis para el caso de castilla y león. REVESCO : Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 122, 252–284. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/REVE/article/download/52025/48095/Pessoa de Matos, M. G., Borin, E., Cassiolato, J. E., de Arruda, D. R., & Sanchez Marcellino, I. (2016). La evolución de los arreglos productivos locales en una década. J. Núñez Jover & A. Alcazar Quiñores (Eds.), Universidad y Desarrollo Local: Contribuciones Latinoamericanas, 33–52.Pineda Serna, L. (2009). Enfoques alrededor de la gestión estratégica de la innovación Documento de Investigación No. 57. 36 p. http://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10336/3808/01248219-2009-57.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yPretty, J. N., Morison, J. I. L., & Hine, R. E. (2003). Reducción de la pobreza alimentaria mediante el aumento de la sostenibilidad agrícola en los países en desarrollo. Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countries. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 95(1), 217–234.Rotundo, G. J. Z., & Aymara Hernández Arias. (2018). Capacidad de absorción: revisión de la literatura y un modelo de sus determinantes.Salcedo Mendoza, J. G., & Contreras Lozano, K. P. (2017). Agroindustria de productos amiláceos I. Yuca (Manihot esculente Crantz) y ñame (Dioscorea spp.). In Archivo Pdf (Issue December). https://repositorio.unisucre.edu.co/handle/001/1101Sandoval, R. R. (2016). Investigación sobre los factores determinantes de la innovación y el uso de servicios intensivos en conocimiento en la producción agraria. https://doi.org/10.4995/thesis/10251/94623Sarrate, M. L., García, J. L., & Pérez, G. (2013). Metodología de investigación en pedagogía social (avance cualitativo y modelos mixtos). Pedagogia Social Revista Interuniversitaria, 1723(22), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRISchumpeter, J. A. (1996). Biblioteca de capitalismo, socialismo y democracia (Tomo II) (Issue Tomo II).SeelyBrown, J., & Duguid, P. (2001). The Social Life of Information. Prensa de La Escuela de Negocios de Harvard, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00065-3Suárez, E. M., & Lasso, M. A. O. (2017). Análisis de la Cadena Productiva y la Implementación de Tecnología en el Cultivo de la Yuca en Colombia. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 01, 1–7. http://www.albayan.aeAbouzeedan, A. (2011). Linköping Studies in Science and Technology SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation (Issue 1364). http://liu.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:447516/FULLTEXT01.pdf%0Ahttp://urn.kb.se/resolv e?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-71349Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 4, Issue PART B). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. (1988). Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1935950Adakuia, A. A., & Amanor-Boadu, V. (2022). Typology and performance of interorganizational relationships among Ghanaian farmers. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 25(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2020.0170Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.xAgarwal, R., & Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Does Entry Size Matter? The Impact of the Life Cycle and Technology on Firm Survival. XLIX(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00136Aghion, P., Antonin, C., Bunel, S., Aghion, P., Antonin, C., Bunel, S., Intelligence, A., The, E., Aghion, P., Antonin, C., & Bunel, S. (2019). Artificial Intelligence , Growth and Employment : The Role of Policy. Economie et Statistique.Agostini, L., & Nosella, A. (2019). Inter-organizational relationships involving SMEs: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art. Long Range Planning, 52(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.12.003Alarcón, S., & Sánchez, M. (2013). External and internal R&D, capital investment and business performance in the Spanish agri-food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 654–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477- 9552.12015Alhusen, H., Bennat, T., Bizer, K., Cantner, U., Horstmann, E., Kalthaus, M., Sternberg, R., & Töpfer, S. (2019). Measuring the “doing-using-interacting mode” of innovation in SMEs-A qualitative approach. 23. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/214844Ali, J., Reed, M. R., & Saghaian, S. H. (2017). Determinants of Product Innovation in Food and Agribusiness Small and Medium enterprises: Evidence from Enterprise Survey Data of India. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 24(5), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2019.0210Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.388Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128Antoncic, B. (2007). Intrapreneurship: a comparative structural equation modeling study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710734244Antoncic, B., Hisrich, R. D., & Western, C. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement And Cross-Cultural Validation. 9026(99), 495–527Apanasovich, N. (2016a). Modes of innovation : a grounded meta-analysis ( Technical report ). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, November, 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0237-0Apanasovich, N. (2016b). Modes of Innovation: A Grounded Meta-Analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0237-0Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2016). Constructing Regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126Audretsch, D. B. (2002). The innovative advantage of US cities. European Planning Studies, 10(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120114472Audretsch, D. B., Cunningham, J. A., Kuratko, D. F., Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9690-4Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280956Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.xAvermaete, T. (2002). Systems of innovation: The case of small food firms in the EU. Proceedings of the DRUID PhD Winter ConferenceBaldwin, J. R., & Johnson, J. (1996). Business strategies in more- and lessinnovative firms in Canada. Research Policy, 25(5), 785–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00875-6Bansal, P., & Mcknight, B. (2009). Looking forward, pushing back and peering sideways: Analyzing the sustainability of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745- 493X.2009.03174.xBaregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook, S., Davies, D. (2012). Innovation in food sector SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19 (2), 300–321Barnett, W. P., Carroll, G. R., Barnett, W. P., & Carroll, G. R. (1987). Competition and Mutual- ism among Early Tele- phone Companies. 32(3), 400–421Bartel, A. P., & Sicherman, N. (1998). (1998). Technological change and the skill acquisi- tion of young workers. 1–23.Batterink, M. H., Wubben, E. F. M., Klerkx, L., & Omta, S. W. F. (2010). Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agrifood sector. In Entrepreneurship and Regional Development (Vol. 22, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903220512Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation, 26(5–6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016Besley, T. (1995). Property rights and investment incentives: theory and evidence from Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 903–937. https://doi.org/10.1086/262008Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2011). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market And Organizational Change. January 2011, 1–59Bhaskaran, S. (2006). Incremental innovation and business performance: Small and medium-size food enterprises in a concentrated industry environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00154.xBhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014453.94445.deBos-nehles, A., & Renkema, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour : a systematic literature review Article information : November. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257Boschma, R. A., & Wenting, R. (2007). The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm004Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq053Breslin, D., Kask, J., Schlaile, M., & Abatecola, G. (2021). Developing a coevolutionary account of innovation ecosystems. Industrial Marketing Management, 98(July), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.016Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Organizational Improvisation, 42(1), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361603-18Bruce Traill, W., & Meulenberg, M. (2002). Innovation in the food industry. Agribusiness, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.10002Calvo Valverde, L. A., & Mena Arias, J. A. (2020). Evaluation of different text representation techniques and distance metrics using KNN for documents classification. Tecnologia En Marcha, 33(1), 64–79.Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., & BoronatNavarro, M. (2004). A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040039Capitanio, F., Coppola, A., Pascucci, S. (2010). Product and process innovation in the Italian food industry. Agribusiness.Capitanio, F., Coppola, A., & Pascucci, S. (2010). Product and process innovation in the Italian food industry. Agribusiness, 26(4), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20239Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610652853Carnahan, S., Agarwal, R., & Campbell, B. (2010). The Effect of Firm Compensation Structures on the Mobility and Entrepreneurship of Extreme Performers. Business, 920(October), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smjCarree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R & D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1237–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R & D and firm performance ଝ. Research Policy, 33(May), 1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003Castaneda, E. H. P., & Mendizábal, G. A. (2021). Innovation behavior of salvadoran food & beverage industry firms. Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, 13(2), 439–472. https://doi.org/10.14718/REVFINANZPOLITECON.2983Castillo-Valero, J. S., & García-Cortijo, M. C. (2021). Factors that determine innovation in agrifood firms. Agronomy, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050989Chaddad, F., & Rodriguez-Alcalá, M. E. (2010). Inter-Organizational relationships in agri-food systems: A transaction cost economics approach. AgriFood Chain Relationships, July 2010, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936426.0045Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002Cheng, J. (2011). International Journal of Information Management Interorganizational relationships and information sharing in supply chains. International Journal of Information Management, 31(4), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.09.004Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation - Open Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, 2006(193), 1–9. http://www.openinnovation.eu/openinnovatie.phpChristensen, J. L., Rama, R., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (1996). Study on Innovation in the European Food Products and Beverages Industry. European Innovation Monitoring System, 153.Chudnovsky, D., López, A., & Pupato, G. (2006). Innovation and productivity in developing countries: A study of Argentine manufacturing firms’ behavior (1992- 2001). Research Policy, 35(2), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.10.002Ciliberti, S., Carraresi, L., & Bröring, S. (2016). Drivers of innovation in Italy: Food versus pharmaceutical industry. British Food Journal, 118(6), 1292–1316. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2015-0405Clauss, T., & Kesting, T. (2017). How businesses should govern knowledgeintensive collaborations with universities: An empirical investigation of university professors. Industrial Marketing Management, 62(November), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.09.001Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on and Innovation Learning. 35(1), 128–152.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1994). Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm. September 2015.Colurcio, M., Wolf, P., Kocher, P. Y., & Spena, T. R. (2012). Asymmetric relationships in networked food innovation processes. British Food Journal, 114(5), 702–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701211229981Contreras, F., Juarez, F., Cuero Acosta, Y. A., Dornberger, U., Soria-Barreto, K., Corrales-Estrada, M., Ramos-Garza, C., Steizel, S., Portalanza, A., Jauregui, K., Iwashita da Silva, L., & Yshikawa Salusse, M. A. (2020). Critical factors for innovative work behaviour in Latin American firms: Test of an exploratory model. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1812926Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990). Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. Management Science, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research. Microbe Magazine, 4(11), 485–485. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effectc Of Determinants And Moderators. 34(3), 555–590.Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300304Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8551.2009.00628.xDamanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption : the role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M.Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational Performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.xDe Noronha Vaz, M. T., Cesário, M., & Fernandes, S. (2006). Interaction between innovation in small firms and their environments: An exploratory study. European Planning Studies, 14(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500339893Demaria, F., & Zezza, A. (2020). Drivers and barriers of process innovation in the EU manufacturing food processing industry: Exploring the role of energy policies. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 9(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.13128/bae-9936Dembla, P., & Krishnan, B. C. (2007). Understanding the Adoption of WebEnabled Transaction Processing by Small Businesses. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, June.Diederen, P., Van Meijl, H., Wolters, A., & Bijak, K. (2003). Innovation adoption in agriculture : innovators, early adopters and laggards. Cahiers d’Economie et Sociologie Rurales, 67(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.3406/reae.2003.1714Do, T. H. (2014). Determinants of innovation commercialization management and anticipated returns: An exploratory typology of SMEs. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 11(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877014500424Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2017). The role of stimulating employees’ creativity and idea generation in encouraging innovation behaviour in Irish firms. The Irish Journal of Management, 36(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijm-2017-0005Dosi. (1988). Technical Change and Economic Theory.Dupuy, C., & Gilly, J. P. (1996). Collective learning and territorial dynamics: A new approach to the relations between industrial groups and territories. Environment and Planning A, 28(9), 1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1068/a281603Dyer, J. H., & Hatch, N. W. (2006). Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.543Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660. https://doi.org/10.2307/259056Ebbekink, M., & Lagendijk, A. (2013). What’s Next in Researching Cluster Policy: Place-Based Governance for Effective Cluster Policy. European Planning Studies, 21(5), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.734460Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows : The moderating role of absorptive capacity. 38, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.022Fanelli, R. M. (2018). Rural Small and Medium Enterprises Development in Molise (Italy). European Countryside, 10(4), 566–589. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0032Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008). Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 13(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810850300Fearne, A., María García Álvarez‐Coque, J., López‐García Usach Mercedes, T., & García, S. (2013). Innovative firms and the urban/rural divide: the case of agro‐food system. Management Decision, 51(6), 1293–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2011-0482Feldman, M. P. (1994). The Geography of Innovation. In Springer Países Bajos. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3333-5Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009Freel, M. S. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation , networking and proximity. Política de Investigación, 32, 751–770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7Frenkel, A., Shefer, D., Koschatzky, K., & Walter, G. H. (2001). Firm characteristics, location and regional innovation: A comparison between Israeli and German industrial firms. Regional Studies, 35(5), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400123360Friesenbichler, K., & Peneder, M. (2016). Innovation, competition and productivity: Firm-level evidence for Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Economics of Transition, 24(3), 535–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12100Fritsch, M., & Meschede, M. (2001). Product Innovation , Process Innovation , and Size. Review of Industrial Organization, February 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011856020135Fritsch, M., & Sorgner, A. (2013). Entrepreneurship and Creative Professions - A Micro-Level Analysis. The Jena Economic Research Papers.Fuglie, K., Gautam, M., Goyal, A., & Maloney, W. F. (2019). Harvesting Prosperity: Technology and Productivity Growth in Agriculture. In Harvesting Prosperity: Technology and Productivity Growth in Agriculture (Issue February 2021). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1393-1Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4Galende, & Fuente. (2003). Internal factors determining a rm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32, 715–736.Galizzi, G., & Venturini, L. (1996). Product Innovation in the Food Industry: Nature, Characteristics and Determinants. 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-642-50001-5_8Galizzi, G., & Venturini, L. (2012). Economics of Innovation: The Case of Food Industry. Physica-Verlag HD. https://books.google.com.co/books?id=NBjsCAAAQBAJGarcía-Cortijo, M. C., Castillo-Valero, J. S., & Carrasco, I. (2019). Innovation in rural Spain. What drives innovation in the rural-peripheral areas of southern Europe? Journal of Rural Studies, 71(July 2018), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.027García Álvarez-Coque, J. M., López-García Usach, T., & Sanchez García, M. (2013). Territory and innovation behaviour in agri-food firms: Does rurality matter? New Medit, 12(3), 2–10.Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167- 7187(95)00498-XGhazalian, P. L., & Fakih, A. (2017). R&D and Innovation in Food Processing Firms in Transition Countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(2), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12186Gimeno, J. (2004). Competition within and between Networks: The Contingent Effect of Competitive Embeddedness on Alliance Formation. 47(6), 820–842Glaeser, E. L., & Kerr, W. R. (2009). Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18(3), 623–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00225.xGonzález-Pernía, J. L., Parrilli, M. D., & Peña-Legazkue, I. (2015). STI–DUI learning modes, firm–university collaboration and innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9352- 0Gooroochurn, N., & Hanley, A. (2007). A tale of two literatures: Transaction costs and property rights in innovation outsourcing. Research Policy, 36(10), 1483–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.001Grimpe, C., Sofka, W., Bhargava, M., & Chatterjee, R. (2017). R&D, Marketing Innovation, and New Product Performance: A Mixed Methods Study*. 34(3), 360–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12366Hadjimanolis Athanasios. (2000). An investigation of innovation antecedents in small firms in the context of a small developing country. R and D Management, 30(3), 235–246.Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (1st ed., Vol. 2, Issue 1). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02008-3Hall, J. K., & Martin, M. J. C. (2005). Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value-added chain: A framework for evaluating radical technology development. R and D Management, 35(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00389.xHawley, H. A. (1950). Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. New York: The Ronald Press CompanyHelfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549Herstad, S. J., & Brekke, T. (2012). Globalization , Modes of Innovation and Regional Knowledge Diffusion Globalization , Modes of Innovation and Regional Knowledge Diffusion Infrastructures. European Planning Studies, April 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713334Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Albors Garrigos, J., & Gil-Pechuan, I. (2011). Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: A forgotten lesson for policymakers. Technovation, 31(9), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.006Hervás-Oliver, J. L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 20(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/249475Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: A literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00102-8Huergo, Elena; Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How Does Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age? 34(October 2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/BHurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251742Iacobucci, D., & Perugini, F. (2023). Innovation performance in traditional industries: Does proximity to universities matter. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189(September 2022), 122340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122340Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Organizations : and Impact Adoption of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465– 485.Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: Case studies of two regional industries in Norway. European Planning Studies, 18(12), 1993–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.516523Isasi, J. (2023). Sentiment Analysis with “syuzhet” using R. Programming Historian. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46430/phen0110Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038Janz, N., Lööf, H., & Peters, B. (2004). Firm level innovation and productivityIs there a common story across countries? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 2(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.416444Jaskyte, K., & Lee, M. (2006). Interorganizational relationships. Administration in Social Work, 30(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v30n03Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006Jörg Thomä, & Zimmermann, V. (2019). Non-R & D , interactive learning and economic performance : Revisiting innovation in small and medium enterprises. SeptemberKafetzopoulos, D., Gotzamani, K., & Gkana, V. (2015). Relationship between quality management, innovation and competitiveness. Evidence from Greek companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(8), 1177– 1200. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2015-0007Kanter, R. (1996). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organizations. Knowledge Management and Organisational Design, 93–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-9749- 1.50010-7Kearney, C., Hisrich, R. D., & Antoncic, B. (2013). The Mediating Role Of Corporate Entrepreurship For External Enviroment Effects On Performance. 14(Supplement 1). https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.720592King, A. A., Lakhani, K. R., & King, A. A. (2011). The Contingent Effect of Absorptive Capacity : An Open Innovation Analysis.Kör, B. (2016). The mediating effects of self-leadership on perceived entrepreneurial orientation and innovative work behavior in the banking sector. SpringerPlus, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3556-8Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity , innovation , and fi nancial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.005Krndzija, L., & Pilav-Velic, A. (2022). Innovative behavior of Small and Medium Enterprises: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 13(3), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2022-3-309Kupets, O. (2018). Employer-provided training, innovation and skills in postSoviet countries. Economics of Transition, 26(4), 725–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12162Kussainov, G. B., Saghaian, S. H., & Reed, M. R. (2021). Innovation behavior of agri-food small and medium-sized enterprises: The case of Europe’s emerging economies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 24(2), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2020.0016Laforet, S. (2008). Size, strategic, and market orientation affects on innovation. Journal of Business Research, 61(7), 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.08.002Lager, T., & S-Å, H. (2002). Success factors for improvement and innovation of. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, May. https://doi.org/10.1108/0957606021041660Lampe, R., & Moser, P. (2010). Do patent pools encourage innovation? Evidence from the nineteenth-century sewing machine industry. Journal of Economic History, 70(4), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050710000768Läpple, D., Renwick, A., Cullinan, J., & Thorne, F. (2016). What drives innovation in the agricultural sector? A spatial analysis of knowledge spillovers. Land Use Policy, 56, 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.032Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2006). Open for Innovation : The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among U . K . Manufacturing Firms OPEN FOR INNOVATION : THE ROLE OF OPENNESS IN EXPLAINING INNOVATION PERFORMANCE AMONG U . K . MANUFACTURING FIRMS. October. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing Innovation Capability in Organisations: a Dynamic Capabilities Approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(03), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919601000427Le, T. T., Behl, A., & Graham, G. (2023). The Role of Entrepreneurship in Successfully Achieving Circular Supply Chain Management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(4), 537–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00353-0Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open Innovation in SMEs – An Intermediated Network Model Open innovation in SMEs — An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009Lelo de Larrea, G., Altin, M., Koseoglu, M. A., & Okumus, F. (2021). An integrative systematic review of innovation research in hospitality and tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 37(February), 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100789Levenburg, N., Magal, S., & Kosalge, P. (2006). An Exploratory Investigation of Organizational Factors and e‐Business Motivations Among SMFOEs in the US. Electronic Markets, 16(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10196780500491402Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2 S), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009Liarte, S. (2006). Mutualisme , prédation et parasitisme : la concurrence comme critère de choix de la zone d ’ implantation Mutualisme , prédation et parasitisme : la concurrence comme critère de choix de la zone d ’ implantationLiebman, N., & Gergle, D. (2016). Capturing turn-by-turn lexical similarity in text-based communication. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 27, 553–559. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820062Lundvall, B.-Å. (1985). Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. In Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction (Issue January 1985). https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/31613/626406.pdf#page=36Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247–264Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A, 34(3), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3457Marotta, G., & Nazzaro, C. (2020). Public goods production and value creation in wineries: a structural equation modelling. British Food Journal, 122(5), 1705–1724. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2019-0656Martínez-Azúa, B. C., López-Salazar, P. E., & Sama-Berrocal, C. (2020). Determining factors of innovative performance: Case studies in extremaduran agri-food companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219098Martínez-Filgueira, X. M., Peón, D., & López-Iglesias, E. (2022). Determinants of innovation by agri-food firms in rural Spain: an MCA PLS-SEM analysis. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 25(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2021.0015Martínez-Román, J. A., Gamero, J., & Tamayo, J. A. (2011). Analysis of innovation in SMEs using an innovative capability-based non-linear model: A study in the province of Seville (Spain). Technovation, 31(9), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.005Martínez-Román, J. A., Tamayo, J. A., & Gamero, J. (2017). Innovativeness and its influence on growth and market extension in construction firms in the Andalusian region. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 43, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.11.002Mateut, S. (2018). Subsidies, financial constraints and firm innovative activities in emerging economies. In Small Business Economics (Vol. 50, Issue 1). Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9877-3McAdam, R., & McClelland, J. (2002). Sources of new product ideas and creativity practices in the UK textile industry. Technovation, 22(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00002-5McPherson, M. (1983). An Ecology of Affiliation. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 519–532.Menrad, K. (2004). Innovations in the food industry in Germany. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 845–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.012Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative Work Behaviour in Vocational Colleges: Understanding How and Why Innovations Are Developed. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9049-yMichie, J., & Sheehan, M. (2003). Labour market deregulation , ‘ flexibility ’ and innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 123–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/27.1.123Milesi, D., & Petelski, N. (2011). The Determinants of Innovation in Developing Countries: Evidence From Argentine Manufacturing Firms. Merit.Unu.Edu, 20. http://www.merit.unu.edu/MEIDE/papers/2011/1299544820_DM.pdfMinarelli, F., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2014). Distinguishing the innovation behaviour of micro, small and medium food enterprises. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 14(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2014.x004Minarelli, F., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2015). Innovation in European food SMEs: Determinants and links between types. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 4(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.13128/BAE-14705Molero, J. (1998). Patterns of internationalization of Spanish innovatory firms. Research Policy, 27(5), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00064-XMolero, J., & Buesa, M. (1996). Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: The case of the Madrid region. Research Policy, 25(4), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00873-XMontani, F., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2014). Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work behaviour: Proactive goal generation matters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12066Moore, J. F. (1993). A New Ecology of Competition. May 1999.Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733Mowery, David C, Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century AmericaMundaiz, E., & Sebast, S. (2003). El método delphi. 1–14.Nassimbeni, G. (2001). Technology, innovation capacity, and the export attitude of small manufacturing firms: A logit/tobit model. Research Policy, 30(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00114-6Naylor, T. D., & Florida, R. (2003). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques, 29(3), 378. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552294Nelson, R. R. (1991). Firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(1 991), 61–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121006Niosi, J., & Bellon, B. (2002). The absorptive capacity of family firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 5(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-05-2014-0012Nunes, S., & Lopes, R. (2015). Firm Performance, Innovation Modes and Territorial Embeddedness. European Planning Studies, 4313(September). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1021666O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002OCDE. (2005). The Measurement of scientific and technological activities: proposed ... http://books.google.com/books?id=Q132qLPtfsQC&pgis=1OCDE. (2016). Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level OECD Innovation Strategy 2015 An Agenda For Policy Action. June, 1–2. www.oecd.orgtel.:+33OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. In The Measurement of Scientific; Technological and Innovation ActivitiesOjeda Gómez, J. (2009). Interfirm cooperation as a strategy of SMEs in the environmental sector. Estudios Gerenciales, 25(110), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(09)70061-0Pansiri, J. (2005). Pragmatism: A methodological approach to researching strategic alliances in tourism. Tourism and Hospitality, Planning and Development, 2(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790530500399333Park, Y. T., Kim, C. H., & Lee, J. H. (1999). On the Characteristics of Innovative Firms in Korea: the Role of R&D and Innovation Type. International Journal of Innovation Management, 03(01), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919699000062Parrilli, M. D., & Alcalde Heras, H. (2016). STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances. Research Policy, 45(4), 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.001Pavitt, K. and S. W. (1971). The conditions for success in technological innovation. Organisation for Economic Co- Operation and Development, Paris, France, 169.Peneder, M. (2009). The meaning of entrepreneurship: A modular concept. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-009-0052-7Pilav-Velić, A., & Marjanovic, O. (2016). Integrating open innovation and business process innovation: Insights from a large-scale study on a transition economy. Information and Management, 53(3), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.12.004Pippel, G. (2014). Economics of Innovation and New Technology R & D cooperation for non-technological innovations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, November, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2013.871167Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage of nations: creating and sustaining superior performance.Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition To Sell Information Work And Life: The End Of Managing Professionals. Harvard Business Review.Porter, M. E. (2008). Clusters and Competition. On Competition, Updated and Expanded Edition, 213–304Porter M E. (2000). Location , Competition , and Economic Development : Local Clusters in a Global. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Knowledge and Strategy, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198781806.003.0017Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? Strategic Management Journal, 15(2 S), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151002Prajogo, D., & Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.001Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. The International Journal Management Science, 27. https://doi.org/Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, 27(4), 467–484. doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00071-1Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., Spielkamp, A., Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation Success of Non-R & D-Performers Substituting Technology by Management in SMEs Innovation Success of Non-R & D-Performers Substituting Technology by Management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 08.Reardon, T., Echeverria, R., Berdegué, J., Minten, B., Liverpool-Tasie, S., Tschirley, D., & Zilberman, D. (2019). Rapid transformation of food systems in developing regions: Highlighting the role of agricultural research & innovations. Agricultural Systems, 172(December 2017), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.022Revez, J., & Borges, L. C. (2018). Pragmatic Paradigm in Information Science Research: a Literature Review. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 7(4), 583–593. http://qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/504Rigby, D. L., & Essletzbichler, J. (2006). Technological variety, technological change and a geography of production techniques. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi015Roberts, N., Galluch, P. S., Dinger, M., & Grover, V. (2012). Absortive capacity and information systems research: review, synthesis and directions for future research. MIS Quarterly, November 2014. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703470Roco, L., Bravo-Ureta, B., Engler, A., & Jara-Rojas, R. (2017). The impact of climatic change adaptation on agricultural productivity in Central Chile: A stochastic production frontier approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091648Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014451.99047.69Roper, S. (1997). Product Innovation and Small Business Growth: A Comparison of the Strategies of German, U.K. and Irish Companies. Small Business Economics, 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSC.2011.6042909Rothwell, R. (1983). Innovation and Firm Size: A Case for Dynamic Complementarity; or, is Small Really so Beautiful? Journal of General Management, 8(3), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630708300800301Rubera, G., & Droge, C. (2013). Technology versus design innovation’s effects on sales and tobin’s Q: The moderating role of branding strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12012Sadowski, B. M., Maitland, C., & Dongen, J. Van. (2002). Strategic use of the Internet by small- and medium-sized companies : an exploratory study. Information Economics and Policy, 14, 75–93.Schumpeter, J. A. (2017). Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, 3(2), 1–255. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135564Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006). The Theory of Economic Development. Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 61–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3Sharma, N. (2017). Innovative Behavior of Indian Micro Small and Medium Enterprises: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(7), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961750061XShaw, E. (1999). A guide to the qualitative research process : evidence from a small firm study. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 2(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522759910269973Silva, G., & Di Serio, L. C. (2021). Innovation in small businesses: Towards an owner-centered approach to innovation. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 23(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V.23I3.4117Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The Collaborative Supply Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090210806333Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1273–1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1273Skipworth, H., Godsell, J., Wong, C. Y., Saghiri, S., & Julien, D. (2015). Supply chain alignment for improved business performance: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management, 20(5), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2014-0188Soto, A. J., Mohammad, A., Albert, A., Islam, A., Milios, E., & Doyle, M. (2015). Similarity-based support for text reuse in technical writing. DocEng 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/2682571.2797068Stierand, M. B., & Dörfler, V. (2012). Reflecting on a phenomenological study of creativity and innovation in haute cuisine. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(6), 946–957. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111211247254Suárez, D., Yoguel, G., Robert, V., & Barletta, F. (2014). The Argentinean Innovation System Micro Determinants and Meso-Macro Disarticulation.Tang, J. T. E., Shee, D. Y., & Tang, T. I. (2001). Conceptual model for interactive buyer-supplier relationship in electronic commerce. International Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00050-5Teece, D. J. (1986). Profoting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. School of Business Administratio N. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 920(August), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, 18(April 1991), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_689-1Tellis, G. J. (2006). Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership?? Product Innovation Management, 30(12), 34–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00179.xTether, B. S. (2010). The sources and aims of innovation in services: Variety between and within sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(6), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859022000029221Thomä, J. (2017). DUI mode learning and barriers to innovation—A case from Germany. Research Policy, 46(7), 1327–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.004Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing Innovation : Integrating CO Managing Innovation. January 2011, 58.Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.002Toro, R., Peña-Sarmiento, M., Avendaño-Prieto, B. L., Mejía-Vélez, S., & Bernal-Torres, A. (2022). Empirical Analysis of Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient as a Function of Question Response Options, Sample Size and Outliers. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica, 63(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP63.2.02Tóth, J., Migliore, G., Balogh, J. M., & Rizzo, G. (2020). Exploring innovation adoption behavior for sustainable development: The case of Hungarian food sector. Agronomy, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040612Triguero, Á., & Córcoles, D. (2013). Understanding innovation: An analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 42(2), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.003Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2017). An examination of product innovation in low- and medium-technology industries: Cases from the UK packaged food sector. Research Policy, 46(3), 605–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.007Tubin, D., & Levin-Rozalis, M. (2008). Interorganizational cooperation: The structural aspect of nurturing trust. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(7), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810904523Uddin, N. (2017). Inter-organizational relational mechanism on firm performance The case of Australian agri-food industry supply chain. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(9), 1934–1953. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2016-0093Un, C. A., & Asakawa, K. (2015). Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12229Un, C. A., Cuervo-cazurra, A., & Asakawa, K. (2010). R&D Collaborations and Product Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 673–689. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00744.xUn, C. A., Hall, H., & Avenue, H. (2016). Types of R&D Collaborations and Process Innovation: The Benefit of Collaborating Upstream in the Knowledge Chain. Northeastern U. D’Amore-McKim School of Business Research Paper No. 2747128, 1–26.Valentim, L., Lisboa, J. V., & Franco, M. (2016). Knowledge management practices and absorptive capacity in small and medium‐sized enterprises.pdf. R&D Management, 46(4), 711–725. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/radm.12108van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6–7), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001Van der Borgh, M., Cloodt, M., & Romme, A. G. L. (2012). Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems: Evidence from a field study. R and D Management, 42(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00673.xVan Dijk, B., Den Hertog, R. D., Menkveld, B., & Thurik, R. (1997). Some New Evidence on the Determinants of Large- and Small-Firm Innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007995919950Van Fleet, D. D., & Albanese, R. (1985). Rational The Free Behavior Riding Groups : in. 10(2), 244–255.Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., & Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008). The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation. Research Policy, 37(4), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.001Vesperi, W., & Coppolino, R. (2023). Inter-organizational relationships in agri-food sector: a bibliometric review and future directions. British Food Journal, 125(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2021-0712Vrgović, P., Glassman, B., Walton, A., & Vidicki, P. (2012). Open innovation for SMEs in developing countries – an intermediated communication network model for collaboration beyond obstacles (revision). Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, October 2018, 587–614. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.587Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26(7–8), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00051-6Wang, E. T. G., & Wei, H. L. (2007). Interorganizational governance value creation: Coordinating for information visibility and flexibility in supply chains. Decision Sciences, 38(4), 647–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00173.xWest, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. John Wiley & Sons.Wiśniewska-Paluszak, J. A., & Paluszak, G. T. (2021). Development of sustainable resource ties in the agrifood industry: The case for the Polish fruit and vegetable industry. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 24(2), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2019.0149Yam, R. C. M., Lo, W., Tang, E. P. Y., & Lau, A. K. W. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 40(3), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.013Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351Zingone, A., Alelio, D. D., Mazzocchi, M. G., & Sarno, D. (2017). Time series and beyond : multifaceted plankton research at a marine Mediterranean LTER site. Nature Conservation, 310, 273–310. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.34.30789Sede BarranquillaDoctorado en Gestión de la Tecnología y la InnovaciónORIGINALCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8905https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/a6194e99-d50e-4ff7-bcc3-bdaa86734bc9/download2f656a26de8af8c32aaacd5e2a33538cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-83000https://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/bitstreams/23729e91-a6c4-414a-a77c-24d448704e77/download2a1661e5960a7bab4fd8dda692fb677cMD5320.500.12442/14764oai:bonga.unisimon.edu.co:20.500.12442/147642024-08-14 21:52:40.067http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United Statesmetadata.onlyhttps://bonga.unisimon.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Simón Bolívarrepositorio.digital@unisimon.edu.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 |