Competitive Benchmarking with four Companies in the Pork Industry
(Eng) This article is the result of a research of the pork industry. One of the projects was the formulation of the strategic plan for the industry from 2015-2018, whose objective was to design competitive strategies to improve the companies productiv - ity and address competition successfully. Appl...
- Autores:
-
Betancourt Guerrero, Benjamín
Franco Ricaurte, Angélica M.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad del Valle
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Digital Univalle
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bibliotecadigital.univalle.edu.co:10893/18070
- Acceso en línea:
- https://hdl.handle.net/10893/18070
- Palabra clave:
- Competitividad
Sector Cárnico Porcícola
Benchmarking
Competitiveness
Pork Industry
Benchmarking
- Rights
- closedAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
Summary: | (Eng) This article is the result of a research of the pork industry. One of the projects was the formulation of the strategic plan for the industry from 2015-2018, whose objective was to design competitive strategies to improve the companies productiv - ity and address competition successfully. Applying an exploratory-descriptive type methodology with a qualitative and quantitative focus and resorting to primary and secondary sources. Tabulation of the results is collected in the competitive profile matrix -CPM-, which allows the graphing of the comparative values for its interpretation in the spider diagram. Performance factors as well as the deficiencies of each one. Organization A has a better performance in: management and environmental protection, a deficient result in: quality management system, logistic distribution, food sustainabil - ity and management; B is successful in: production technology management, brand positioning, productive linkage, competent staff and raw material management, and shows an acceptable result in: management in the reproduction process, environmental management; C is successful in: management in the reproduction process, purchasing logistics, inventory, consumables, environmental management and food sustainability, however, it has flaws in: brand position - ing and management, and acceptable in production technology, quality management, logistic distribution, productive linkage, technical and professional training; finally, D has an excellent performance in: management of reproduction processes, higher in: production technology, food sustainability, productive linkage, technical and professional training of its staff; acceptable in logistic distribution, environmental management, brand positioning and management. |
---|