The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: a defense

The article compares two different interpretations of Kant’s categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interp...

Full description

Autores:
Dimitriu, Cristian
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Repositorio:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/38475
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/38475
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28568/
http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/28568/2/
Palabra clave:
Ethics
epistemology
Logic
Philosophy
B. Herman
C. Korsgaard
I. Kant
O. O’Neill
categorical imperative.
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional