El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa
Con el propósito de identificar los eventos en los que se debe aplicar la regulación del Derecho del Trabajo, La Organización Internacional del Trabajo ha establecido a la Relación Laboral como la institución definitoria para delimitar el espectro de aplicación de los Estándares Internacionales del...
- Autores:
-
Silva Monroy, Javier Antonio
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2023
- Institución:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/84393
- Palabra clave:
- 340 - Derecho::341 - Derecho internacional
340 - Derecho::344 - Derecho laboral, social , educativo, cultural
Derecho laboral
Seguridad social
Labor law
Social security
Organización Internacional del Trabajo
Recomendación No. 198
Relación Laboral
Dependencia Económica
Principio General de Derecho Internacional
International Labor Organization
General Principle of International Law
Economic Dependency
Employment Relationship
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
| id |
UNACIONAL2_b028e383b39f039a7cd4dfe866c87dd4 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/84393 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNACIONAL2 |
| network_name_str |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Elements of discussion on Economic Dependency as a General Principle of International Labor Law to determine the existence of a Employment Relationship |
| title |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa |
| spellingShingle |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa 340 - Derecho::341 - Derecho internacional 340 - Derecho::344 - Derecho laboral, social , educativo, cultural Derecho laboral Seguridad social Labor law Social security Organización Internacional del Trabajo Recomendación No. 198 Relación Laboral Dependencia Económica Principio General de Derecho Internacional International Labor Organization General Principle of International Law Economic Dependency Employment Relationship |
| title_short |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa |
| title_full |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa |
| title_fullStr |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa |
| title_full_unstemmed |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa |
| title_sort |
El concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía Colaborativa |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Silva Monroy, Javier Antonio |
| dc.contributor.advisor.none.fl_str_mv |
Cortés Riaño, Carlos Alberto |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Silva Monroy, Javier Antonio |
| dc.subject.ddc.spa.fl_str_mv |
340 - Derecho::341 - Derecho internacional 340 - Derecho::344 - Derecho laboral, social , educativo, cultural |
| topic |
340 - Derecho::341 - Derecho internacional 340 - Derecho::344 - Derecho laboral, social , educativo, cultural Derecho laboral Seguridad social Labor law Social security Organización Internacional del Trabajo Recomendación No. 198 Relación Laboral Dependencia Económica Principio General de Derecho Internacional International Labor Organization General Principle of International Law Economic Dependency Employment Relationship |
| dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derecho laboral Seguridad social |
| dc.subject.lemb.eng.fl_str_mv |
Labor law Social security |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Organización Internacional del Trabajo Recomendación No. 198 Relación Laboral Dependencia Económica Principio General de Derecho Internacional |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
International Labor Organization General Principle of International Law Economic Dependency Employment Relationship |
| description |
Con el propósito de identificar los eventos en los que se debe aplicar la regulación del Derecho del Trabajo, La Organización Internacional del Trabajo ha establecido a la Relación Laboral como la institución definitoria para delimitar el espectro de aplicación de los Estándares Internacionales del Trabajo en las interacciones económicas entre el capital y el trabajo. Los modelos de contratación de mano de obra surgidos en las economías colaborativas se constituyen como un caso paradigmático que evidencia los problemas de aplicación de los Estándares Internacionales del Trabajo en los Estados Nacionales que basan el concepto de Relación Laboral en el criterio de subordinación. Con el propósito de solucionar este problema de implementación, en el año 2006 la Conferencia Internacional del Trabajo expidió la recomendación 198, que define diversos indicios para establecer la existencia de una Relación Laboral. Al carecer este instrumento de un carácter vinculante, el principio de Dependencia Económica ha sido utilizado para establecer relaciones laborales no subordinadas. Teniendo presente lo anterior, el presente documento pretende estudiar si el principio de Dependencia Económica puede constituirse como un Principio General del Derecho Internacional del Trabajo. Para ello, se aplicará el test elaborado por Comisión de Derecho Internacional de las Naciones Unidas sobre la materia, lo que conllevará el estudio de la Dependencia Económica en las principales familias jurídicas. (Texto tomado de la fuente) |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-01T16:50:00Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-01T16:50:00Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-03 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Trabajo de grado - Maestría |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TM |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84393 |
| dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| url |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84393 https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/ |
| identifier_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Allen, R. C. (2011). Why the industrial revolution was British: commerce, induced invention, and the scientific revolution1. In Economie History Review (Vol. 64). Appel, H., & Orenstein, M. A. (2016). Why did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World? 48(3), 313–331. Arthurs, H. (2018). The False Promise of the Sharing Economy. In M. Derek, M. Finn, & S. Teresa (Eds.), Law and the “Sharing Economy”: Regulating Online Market Platforms (pp. 55–72). University of Ottawa Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv5vdczv.6 Ban, X. (2018). Classifying Employment Relationship of the SharingEconomy in China. Revista Internacional y Comparada de Relaciones Laborales y Derecho Del Empleo, 11, 1–3. Bassiouni, M. C. (1990). A Functional Approach to “General Principles of International Law.” Michigan Journal of International Law, 11, 768–818. Bauer, S. (1895). Quesnay’s Tableau Économique. Source: The Economic Journal, 5(17), 1–21. Beigbeder, Y. (1979). The United States’ Withdrawal from the International Labor Organization. Industrial Relations, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.7202/028959ar Berg, J. (2016). CONDITIONS OF WORK AND EMPLOYMENT SERIES No. 74 Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Bernaciak, M. (2012). Social dumping: political catchphrase or threat to labour standards? (No. 6). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208393 Bonefeld, W. (2011). Primitive Accumulation and Capitalist Accumulation: Notes on Social Constitution and Expropriation. 75(3), 379–399. Bordin, F. L. (2014). REFLECTIONS OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE AUTHORITY OF CODIFICATION CONVENTIONS AND ILC DRAFT ARTICLES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW. 63(3), 535–567. Brameshuber, E. (2019). The ‘personal work relationship’ in Austria. European Labour Law Journal, 10(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519865390 Bureau, M.-C., & Corsani, A. (2016). The Precariousness of knowledge workers (Part 1): hybridisation, self-employment and subjectification. 10(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.10.2.0101 Calhoun, C. (1993). “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century. History, 17(3), 385–427. Carver, T. N. (1894). The Theory of Wages Adjusted to Recent Theories of Value. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 8(4), 377–402. Cavalieri, D. (1992). ALFRED MARSHALL ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL. PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS, 10(1), 601–626. Centeno, M. A., & Cohen, J. N. (2012). The Arc of Neoliberalism. Source: Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-1502 Chacaltana, J., Dema, G., & Ruiz, C. (2017). The future of work we want I. What do youth from Latin America and the Caribbean think about the future of work? Results of recent surveys. International Labour Organization. Church, R. A. (1971). Profit-Sharing and Labour Relations in England in the Nineteenth Century. International Review of Social History, 16(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0020859000003989 Concluding Remarks by Pavel Šturma The International Law Commission and Its Impact: Some Comments. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004434271_017 Coriat, B. (1993). El taller y el cronómetro. Ensayo sobre el taylorismo, el fordismo y la producción en masa. Siglo XXI. Countouris, N. (2019). Defining and regulating work relations for the future of work (Issue February). De Stefano, V. (2016). Crowdsourcing, the Gig-Economy, and the Law. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 36. Deakin, S. (1986). Labour law and the developing employment relationship in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 10(3), 225–246. Douglas, P. H. (1927). Smith’s Theory of Value and Distribution. University Journal of Business, 5(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1086/506887 Eggett, C. (2019). The Role of Principles and General Principles in the “Constitutional Processes” of International Law. Netherlands International Law Review, 66, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-019-00139-1 Etzrodt, C. (2008). Weber’s Protestant-Ethic Thesis, the Critics, and Adam Smith. 49–78. Fernández Brignoni, H. (2001). Los Límites a la Protección del Trabajo El concepto de subordinación frente a las nuevas realidades. Gaceta Laboral, 07(1), 5–18. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. H. Martin & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self. A seminar with Michael Foucault (pp. 1–85). University of Massachiseets Press. Franklin, R. S. (1962). The French Socio‐economic Environment in the Eighteenth Century and Its Relation to the Physiocrats. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 21(3), 299–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1962.tb00850.x Frenken, K., & Schor, J. (2017). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003 Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (1980). Free To Choose: A Personal Statement. Friedmann, W. (1963). The Uses of “General Principles” in the Development of International Law. Source: The American Journal of International Law, 57(2), 279–299. Galilei, G. (1632). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. In Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342941 Goldín, A., & Feldman, S. (n.d.). PROTECCION DE LOS TRABAJADORES INFORME ARGENTINO RESPUESTAS AL CUESTIONARIO. Gómez Mejía, A. (2017). The concept of Technology in the History of Economic Thought. From the Classics to Schumpeter, Evolutionism and today. Libre Empresa, 14(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.18041/1657-2815/libreempresa.2017v14n2.3039 Gramano, E., & Stolzenberg, H. (2021). Platform work and the notion of “employee” under the German legal System: possible consequences at a systematic level. 1–9. Gras, N. S. B. (1942). Capitalism-Concepts and History. Bulletin of the Business Historical Society, 16(2), 21–42. Gutteridge, H. (1952). The Meaning and Scope of Article 38 (1) (c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. Transactions of the Grotius Society, 38, 125–134. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford Uni). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 Hollander, J. H. (1911). The Work and Influence of Ricardo. 1(2), 71–84. HUBERMAN, L. E. O. (1930). Man’s Worldly Goods - The Story of The Wealth of Nations. Hull, C. H. (1900). Petty’s Place in the History of Economic Theory. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 14(3). ILO Conditions of Work and Equality Department. (2015). Non-standard forms of employment Report for discussion at the Meeting of Experts on Non-Standard Forms of Employment. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@travail/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_336934.pdf India, S. (1960). Counter Memorial. Pleadings Case concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India). International Labour Office/ International Labour Organization. (2006). The employment relationship Fifth item on the agenda International Labour Office. International Labour Office. International Labour Organization. (2016). NON-STANDARD EMPLOYMENT AROUND THE WORLD Understanding challenges, shaping prospects. www.ifrro.org International Labour Organization. (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook. 2021 : the role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work.: Vol. Report III Part B. Jassir, D. J. (2010). Presente Y Futuro Del Derecho Del Trabajo: Breve Historia Jurídica Del Derecho Del Trabajo En Colombia. Opinión Jurídica, 9(18), 57–74. Kaiser, T. E. (1979). Feudalism and the French Revolution. 12(2), 203–216. Klausinger, H. (2016). The Austrian School of Economics and its Global Impact. In G. Bischof, F. Plasser, A. Pelinka, & A. Smith (Eds.), Global Austria: Austria’s place in Europe and the World (pp. 100–116). Kolakowski, L. (1983). Marxism and Human Rights. Source: Daedalus , Fall, 112(4), 81–92. Kott, S. (2019). ILO: Social Justice in a Global World? A History in Tension. In C. Gironde & G. Carbonnier (Eds.), The ILO @ 100, Addressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection. https://doi.org/10.1163/j.ctvrxk4c6.9 Lauterpacht, H. (1932). The Nature of International Law and General Jurisprudence. 37, 301–320. Leahey, T. H. (1995). Waiting for Newton. Source: The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16(1), 9–19. Lucassen, J. (2013). Outlines of a History of Labour. In International Institute of Social History (Issue Research Paper 51). Macdonald, R. A. (1912). Ricardo’s Criticisms of Adam Smith. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 26(4), 549–592. Macnaughton, G., & Frey, D. F. (n.d.). DECENT WORK FOR ALL: A HOLISTIC HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH. Martins, N. O. (2015). Interpreting the capitalist order before and after the marginalist revolution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39, 1109–1127. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev037 Marx, K. (1863). Theories of Surplus-Value. Maul, D. (2019a). The International Labour Organization. Maul, D. (2019b). The International Labour Organization. 100 Years of Global Social Policy (First). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. MCGOVERN, M. (2007). WILLIAM PETTY: AN UNLIKELY INFLUENCE ON KARL MARX. Student Economic Review, Trinity College Dublin, 21, 2–8. Mill, J. S. (1873). Autobiography. Murgas Torrazza, R., & Torres De León, V. (2001). LA RELACION DE TRABAJO (Campo de aplicación) ESTUDIOS NACIONALES 2001 (Panamá). Naldi, N. (1989). PETTY’S LABOUR THEORY OF PRICES. Economia Politica, 7(1), 3–36. Neill, T. P. (1949). The Physiocrats’ Concept of Economics. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63(4), 532–553. Ning, D. (2016). Rethinking the “Marginal Revolution” in the History of Economic Thought: A Brief Examination of the Marginal Utility Theory Before and in the 1870s. North, C. C. (n.d.). THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF RICARDO’S ECONOMICS. Ojeda Avilés, A. (2010). La deconstrucción del Derecho del Trabajo. La Ley. Pagis, J. (2018). The long-term consequences of May ’68. In May ’68 Book Shaping Political Generations. Amsterdam University Press. Park, J.-H. (n.d.). Employment Situations and Workers Protection in Korea. Parry, B. E. (2018). The Revolution of Capitalist Relations Induced by the Technological Revolution of Electronics. Source: World Review of Political Economy, 9(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.2.0164 Peetz, D. (n.d.). THE REALITIES AND FUTURES OF WORK. Piqueras, A. (2005). La mutua conformación del capital y el trabajo desde el capitalismo maduro al capitalismo senil, y las formas sociales a que da lugar. POLIS, Revista Latinoamericana, 4(12), 0. Potter, D. S. (1910). The Movement For International Labour Legislation. Source: The Economic Journal, 20(79), 347–357. Racciatti, O. (2005). Las Transformaciones en el Mundo del Trabajo y el Derecho Laboral. Revista de Derecho (Valdivia), 18(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-09502005000100002 Radice, H. (2008). The Developmental State under Global Neoliberalism. Source: Third World Quarterly, 29(6), 1153–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802201121 Términos y Condiciones de Uber , https://www.uber.com/legal/es/document/?name=general-terms-of-use&country=colombia&lang=es (2020). Términos y Condiciones del Programa Uber Pro, (2020). Ravenelle, A. J. (2017). Sharing economy workers: selling, not sharing. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw043 Regulating the employment relationship in Europe: A guide to Recommendation No. 198. (n.d.). Retrieved December 13, 2018, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_209280.pdf Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston Lee, & Van Daele, J. (2019). The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009. International Labour Office. Rodgers, G., Lee, E., & Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and Social Justice. Cornell University Press. Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. 47(1), 139–174. Rosioru, F., & Kiss, G. (2013). The Changing Concept of Subordination. Recent Developments in a Labour Law, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/130.3.211 Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. Source: The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159. Sewall, H. R. (1901). The Theory of Value before Adam Smith. Association, 2(3), 1–128. Simpson, W. R. (1994). The ILO and tripartism: some reflection. Monthly Labor Review, 117(9), 40–45. Skousen, M. (n.d.). Big Three in Economics: Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature ands Causes of the Wealth of Nations: Vol. I,II,III & (S. M. Soares, Ed.; 2007th ed.). MetaLibri Digital Library. Supiot, A. (2005). Standards-Related Activities and Decent Work: Prospects in the Field of Social Security Summary Report. https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/gess/RessourcePDF.action?id=8514 Supiot, A. (2010). ILO Century Project: The Declaration of Philadelphia Today. International Labour Organization. Supreme Court, T. (2021). Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents). Tapiola, K. (2018). The teeth of the ILO - The impact of the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamentals Principles and Rights at Work. International Labour Office. Tauss, A. (2012). Contextualizing the current crisis: Post-fordism, neoliberal restructuring, and financialization. Colombia Internacional, 76, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint76.2012.03 Tucker, G. S. L. (1961). Ricardo and Marx. Economica, 28(111), 252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601601 Van der Linden, M. (2019). The Social Question in Western Europe: Past and Present. In The Social Question in the Twenty-First Century: A Global View (pp. 188–207). https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.74.l Vardi, L. (1988). The Abolition of the Guilds during the French Revolution. French Historical Studies, 15(4), 707–717. Vaughn, K. I. (1918). JOHN LOCKE AND THE LABOR THEORY OF VALUE. 2(4). Vázquez-Bermúdez, M. (2020). Second report on general principles of law (Vol. 13, Issue 2). Voigt, A. C., & Voigt, C. (n.d.). The Role of General Principles in International Law and their Relationship to Treaty Law. Walsh, A., & Lynch, T. (2003). The development of price formation theory and subjectivism about ultimate values. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0264-3758.2003.00252.x Wank, R. (2006). Worker’s Protection National Study f or Germany fo r the ILO. Weisdorf, J. L. (2006). From domestic manufacture to Industrial Revolution: Long-run growth and agricultural development. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(2), 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpl001 Williamson, J. (2004). The Strange History of the Washington Consensus. Source: Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(2), 195–206. Wood, E. M. (1997). Modernity, postmodernity or capitalism? Source: Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 539–560. Young, J. T. (2002). Adam Smith and the Physiocrats: Contrasting Views of the Law of Nature. History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), 7–28. |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.license.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv |
xiv, 98 páginas |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá - Derecho, Ciencias Humanas y Sociales - Maestría en Derecho |
| dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv |
Facultad de Derecho, Ciencias Políticas y Sociales |
| dc.publisher.place.spa.fl_str_mv |
Bogotá,Colombia |
| dc.publisher.branch.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84393/2/1033712322.2023.pdf https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84393/1/license.txt https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84393/3/1033712322.2023.pdf.jpg |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f60f310ee8e219d4907c5d37c0d2c0a5 eb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4a a043163cd35993fa075452662a317748 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio_nal@unal.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1814089934950105088 |
| spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Cortés Riaño, Carlos Albertob24c03c61af798d62eeccc4e90f0dda8Silva Monroy, Javier Antoniod0f7a2c1e797e6c28c80dceaa4897da52023-08-01T16:50:00Z2023-08-01T16:50:00Z2023-03-03https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/84393Universidad Nacional de ColombiaRepositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiahttps://repositorio.unal.edu.co/Con el propósito de identificar los eventos en los que se debe aplicar la regulación del Derecho del Trabajo, La Organización Internacional del Trabajo ha establecido a la Relación Laboral como la institución definitoria para delimitar el espectro de aplicación de los Estándares Internacionales del Trabajo en las interacciones económicas entre el capital y el trabajo. Los modelos de contratación de mano de obra surgidos en las economías colaborativas se constituyen como un caso paradigmático que evidencia los problemas de aplicación de los Estándares Internacionales del Trabajo en los Estados Nacionales que basan el concepto de Relación Laboral en el criterio de subordinación. Con el propósito de solucionar este problema de implementación, en el año 2006 la Conferencia Internacional del Trabajo expidió la recomendación 198, que define diversos indicios para establecer la existencia de una Relación Laboral. Al carecer este instrumento de un carácter vinculante, el principio de Dependencia Económica ha sido utilizado para establecer relaciones laborales no subordinadas. Teniendo presente lo anterior, el presente documento pretende estudiar si el principio de Dependencia Económica puede constituirse como un Principio General del Derecho Internacional del Trabajo. Para ello, se aplicará el test elaborado por Comisión de Derecho Internacional de las Naciones Unidas sobre la materia, lo que conllevará el estudio de la Dependencia Económica en las principales familias jurídicas. (Texto tomado de la fuente)In order to identify the events in which the regulation of Labor Law must be applied, the International Labor Organization has established the Employment Relationship as the defining institution to delimit the spectrum of application of International Labor Standards in the economic interactions between capital and labor. The labor contracting models that have emerged in the collaborative economies constitute a paradigmatic case that evidences the problems of application of the International Labor Standards in the Nation States that base the concept of Labor Relationship on the criterion of subordination. In order to solve this implementation problem, in 2006 the International Labor Conference issued Recommendation 198, which defines various indicators to establish the existence of an Employment Relationship. Since this instrument is not binding, the principle of Economic Dependence has been used to establish non-subordinate labor relationships. With this in mind, the present paper aims to study whether the principle of Economic Dependency can be constituted as a General Principle of International Labor Law. For this purpose, the test elaborated by the International Law Commission of the United Nations on the subject will be applied, which will entail the study of Economic Dependency in the main legal families.MaestríaMaestría en Derechoxiv, 98 páginasapplication/pdfspa340 - Derecho::341 - Derecho internacional340 - Derecho::344 - Derecho laboral, social , educativo, culturalDerecho laboralSeguridad socialLabor lawSocial securityOrganización Internacional del TrabajoRecomendación No. 198Relación LaboralDependencia EconómicaPrincipio General de Derecho InternacionalInternational Labor OrganizationGeneral Principle of International LawEconomic DependencyEmployment RelationshipEl concepto de "Relación Laboral" como costumbre internacional de los miembros de la OIT frente a las "formas de trabajo no estandarizado" de la economía ColaborativaElements of discussion on Economic Dependency as a General Principle of International Labor Law to determine the existence of a Employment RelationshipTrabajo de grado - Maestríainfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TMBogotá - Derecho, Ciencias Humanas y Sociales - Maestría en DerechoFacultad de Derecho, Ciencias Políticas y SocialesBogotá,ColombiaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede BogotáAllen, R. C. (2011). Why the industrial revolution was British: commerce, induced invention, and the scientific revolution1. In Economie History Review (Vol. 64).Appel, H., & Orenstein, M. A. (2016). Why did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World? 48(3), 313–331.Arthurs, H. (2018). The False Promise of the Sharing Economy. In M. Derek, M. Finn, & S. Teresa (Eds.), Law and the “Sharing Economy”: Regulating Online Market Platforms (pp. 55–72). University of Ottawa Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv5vdczv.6Ban, X. (2018). Classifying Employment Relationship of the SharingEconomy in China. Revista Internacional y Comparada de Relaciones Laborales y Derecho Del Empleo, 11, 1–3.Bassiouni, M. C. (1990). A Functional Approach to “General Principles of International Law.” Michigan Journal of International Law, 11, 768–818.Bauer, S. (1895). Quesnay’s Tableau Économique. Source: The Economic Journal, 5(17), 1–21.Beigbeder, Y. (1979). The United States’ Withdrawal from the International Labor Organization. Industrial Relations, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.7202/028959arBerg, J. (2016). CONDITIONS OF WORK AND EMPLOYMENT SERIES No. 74 Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers.Bernaciak, M. (2012). Social dumping: political catchphrase or threat to labour standards? (No. 6). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2208393Bonefeld, W. (2011). Primitive Accumulation and Capitalist Accumulation: Notes on Social Constitution and Expropriation. 75(3), 379–399.Bordin, F. L. (2014). REFLECTIONS OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE AUTHORITY OF CODIFICATION CONVENTIONS AND ILC DRAFT ARTICLES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW. 63(3), 535–567.Brameshuber, E. (2019). The ‘personal work relationship’ in Austria. European Labour Law Journal, 10(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952519865390Bureau, M.-C., & Corsani, A. (2016). The Precariousness of knowledge workers (Part 1): hybridisation, self-employment and subjectification. 10(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.10.2.0101Calhoun, C. (1993). “New Social Movements” of the Early Nineteenth Century. History, 17(3), 385–427.Carver, T. N. (1894). The Theory of Wages Adjusted to Recent Theories of Value. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 8(4), 377–402.Cavalieri, D. (1992). ALFRED MARSHALL ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL. PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS, 10(1), 601–626.Centeno, M. A., & Cohen, J. N. (2012). The Arc of Neoliberalism. Source: Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-1502Chacaltana, J., Dema, G., & Ruiz, C. (2017). The future of work we want I. What do youth from Latin America and the Caribbean think about the future of work? Results of recent surveys. International Labour Organization.Church, R. A. (1971). Profit-Sharing and Labour Relations in England in the Nineteenth Century. International Review of Social History, 16(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0020859000003989Concluding Remarks by Pavel Šturma The International Law Commission and Its Impact: Some Comments. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004434271_017Coriat, B. (1993). El taller y el cronómetro. Ensayo sobre el taylorismo, el fordismo y la producción en masa. Siglo XXI.Countouris, N. (2019). Defining and regulating work relations for the future of work (Issue February).De Stefano, V. (2016). Crowdsourcing, the Gig-Economy, and the Law. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 36.Deakin, S. (1986). Labour law and the developing employment relationship in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 10(3), 225–246.Douglas, P. H. (1927). Smith’s Theory of Value and Distribution. University Journal of Business, 5(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1086/506887Eggett, C. (2019). The Role of Principles and General Principles in the “Constitutional Processes” of International Law. Netherlands International Law Review, 66, 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-019-00139-1Etzrodt, C. (2008). Weber’s Protestant-Ethic Thesis, the Critics, and Adam Smith. 49–78.Fernández Brignoni, H. (2001). Los Límites a la Protección del Trabajo El concepto de subordinación frente a las nuevas realidades. Gaceta Laboral, 07(1), 5–18.Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In L. H. Martin & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self. A seminar with Michael Foucault (pp. 1–85). University of Massachiseets Press.Franklin, R. S. (1962). The French Socio‐economic Environment in the Eighteenth Century and Its Relation to the Physiocrats. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 21(3), 299–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1962.tb00850.xFrenken, K., & Schor, J. (2017). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (1980). Free To Choose: A Personal Statement.Friedmann, W. (1963). The Uses of “General Principles” in the Development of International Law. Source: The American Journal of International Law, 57(2), 279–299.Galilei, G. (1632). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. In Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342941Goldín, A., & Feldman, S. (n.d.). PROTECCION DE LOS TRABAJADORES INFORME ARGENTINO RESPUESTAS AL CUESTIONARIO.Gómez Mejía, A. (2017). The concept of Technology in the History of Economic Thought. From the Classics to Schumpeter, Evolutionism and today. Libre Empresa, 14(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.18041/1657-2815/libreempresa.2017v14n2.3039Gramano, E., & Stolzenberg, H. (2021). Platform work and the notion of “employee” under the German legal System: possible consequences at a systematic level. 1–9.Gras, N. S. B. (1942). Capitalism-Concepts and History. Bulletin of the Business Historical Society, 16(2), 21–42.Gutteridge, H. (1952). The Meaning and Scope of Article 38 (1) (c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. Transactions of the Grotius Society, 38, 125–134.Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford Uni). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001Hollander, J. H. (1911). The Work and Influence of Ricardo. 1(2), 71–84.HUBERMAN, L. E. O. (1930). Man’s Worldly Goods - The Story of The Wealth of Nations.Hull, C. H. (1900). Petty’s Place in the History of Economic Theory. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 14(3).ILO Conditions of Work and Equality Department. (2015). Non-standard forms of employment Report for discussion at the Meeting of Experts on Non-Standard Forms of Employment. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@travail/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_336934.pdfIndia, S. (1960). Counter Memorial. Pleadings Case concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India).International Labour Office/ International Labour Organization. (2006). The employment relationship Fifth item on the agenda International Labour Office.International Labour Office. International Labour Organization. (2016). NON-STANDARD EMPLOYMENT AROUND THE WORLD Understanding challenges, shaping prospects. www.ifrro.orgInternational Labour Organization. (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook. 2021 : the role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work.: Vol. Report III Part B.Jassir, D. J. (2010). Presente Y Futuro Del Derecho Del Trabajo: Breve Historia Jurídica Del Derecho Del Trabajo En Colombia. Opinión Jurídica, 9(18), 57–74.Kaiser, T. E. (1979). Feudalism and the French Revolution. 12(2), 203–216.Klausinger, H. (2016). The Austrian School of Economics and its Global Impact. In G. Bischof, F. Plasser, A. Pelinka, & A. Smith (Eds.), Global Austria: Austria’s place in Europe and the World (pp. 100–116).Kolakowski, L. (1983). Marxism and Human Rights. Source: Daedalus , Fall, 112(4), 81–92.Kott, S. (2019). ILO: Social Justice in a Global World? A History in Tension. In C. Gironde & G. Carbonnier (Eds.), The ILO @ 100, Addressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection. https://doi.org/10.1163/j.ctvrxk4c6.9Lauterpacht, H. (1932). The Nature of International Law and General Jurisprudence. 37, 301–320.Leahey, T. H. (1995). Waiting for Newton. Source: The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16(1), 9–19.Lucassen, J. (2013). Outlines of a History of Labour. In International Institute of Social History (Issue Research Paper 51).Macdonald, R. A. (1912). Ricardo’s Criticisms of Adam Smith. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 26(4), 549–592.Macnaughton, G., & Frey, D. F. (n.d.). DECENT WORK FOR ALL: A HOLISTIC HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH.Martins, N. O. (2015). Interpreting the capitalist order before and after the marginalist revolution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39, 1109–1127. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev037Marx, K. (1863). Theories of Surplus-Value.Maul, D. (2019a). The International Labour Organization.Maul, D. (2019b). The International Labour Organization. 100 Years of Global Social Policy (First). Walter de Gruyter GmbH.MCGOVERN, M. (2007). WILLIAM PETTY: AN UNLIKELY INFLUENCE ON KARL MARX. Student Economic Review, Trinity College Dublin, 21, 2–8.Mill, J. S. (1873). Autobiography.Murgas Torrazza, R., & Torres De León, V. (2001). LA RELACION DE TRABAJO (Campo de aplicación) ESTUDIOS NACIONALES 2001 (Panamá).Naldi, N. (1989). PETTY’S LABOUR THEORY OF PRICES. Economia Politica, 7(1), 3–36.Neill, T. P. (1949). The Physiocrats’ Concept of Economics. Source: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63(4), 532–553.Ning, D. (2016). Rethinking the “Marginal Revolution” in the History of Economic Thought: A Brief Examination of the Marginal Utility Theory Before and in the 1870s.North, C. C. (n.d.). THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF RICARDO’S ECONOMICS.Ojeda Avilés, A. (2010). La deconstrucción del Derecho del Trabajo. La Ley.Pagis, J. (2018). The long-term consequences of May ’68. In May ’68 Book Shaping Political Generations. Amsterdam University Press.Park, J.-H. (n.d.). Employment Situations and Workers Protection in Korea.Parry, B. E. (2018). The Revolution of Capitalist Relations Induced by the Technological Revolution of Electronics. Source: World Review of Political Economy, 9(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.9.2.0164Peetz, D. (n.d.). THE REALITIES AND FUTURES OF WORK.Piqueras, A. (2005). La mutua conformación del capital y el trabajo desde el capitalismo maduro al capitalismo senil, y las formas sociales a que da lugar. POLIS, Revista Latinoamericana, 4(12), 0.Potter, D. S. (1910). The Movement For International Labour Legislation. Source: The Economic Journal, 20(79), 347–357.Racciatti, O. (2005). Las Transformaciones en el Mundo del Trabajo y el Derecho Laboral. Revista de Derecho (Valdivia), 18(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-09502005000100002Radice, H. (2008). The Developmental State under Global Neoliberalism. Source: Third World Quarterly, 29(6), 1153–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802201121Términos y Condiciones de Uber , https://www.uber.com/legal/es/document/?name=general-terms-of-use&country=colombia&lang=es (2020).Términos y Condiciones del Programa Uber Pro, (2020).Ravenelle, A. J. (2017). Sharing economy workers: selling, not sharing. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw043Regulating the employment relationship in Europe: A guide to Recommendation No. 198. (n.d.). Retrieved December 13, 2018, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@dialogue/documents/publication/wcms_209280.pdfRodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston Lee, & Van Daele, J. (2019). The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919–2009. International Labour Office.Rodgers, G., Lee, E., & Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and Social Justice. Cornell University Press.Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. 47(1), 139–174.Rosioru, F., & Kiss, G. (2013). The Changing Concept of Subordination. Recent Developments in a Labour Law, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/130.3.211Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. Source: The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159.Sewall, H. R. (1901). The Theory of Value before Adam Smith. Association, 2(3), 1–128.Simpson, W. R. (1994). The ILO and tripartism: some reflection. Monthly Labor Review, 117(9), 40–45.Skousen, M. (n.d.). Big Three in Economics: Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes.Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature ands Causes of the Wealth of Nations: Vol. I,II,III & (S. M. Soares, Ed.; 2007th ed.). MetaLibri Digital Library.Supiot, A. (2005). Standards-Related Activities and Decent Work: Prospects in the Field of Social Security Summary Report. https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/gess/RessourcePDF.action?id=8514Supiot, A. (2010). ILO Century Project: The Declaration of Philadelphia Today. International Labour Organization.Supreme Court, T. (2021). Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents).Tapiola, K. (2018). The teeth of the ILO - The impact of the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamentals Principles and Rights at Work. International Labour Office.Tauss, A. (2012). Contextualizing the current crisis: Post-fordism, neoliberal restructuring, and financialization. Colombia Internacional, 76, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint76.2012.03Tucker, G. S. L. (1961). Ricardo and Marx. Economica, 28(111), 252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601601Van der Linden, M. (2019). The Social Question in Western Europe: Past and Present. In The Social Question in the Twenty-First Century: A Global View (pp. 188–207). https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.74.lVardi, L. (1988). The Abolition of the Guilds during the French Revolution. French Historical Studies, 15(4), 707–717.Vaughn, K. I. (1918). JOHN LOCKE AND THE LABOR THEORY OF VALUE. 2(4).Vázquez-Bermúdez, M. (2020). Second report on general principles of law (Vol. 13, Issue 2).Voigt, A. C., & Voigt, C. (n.d.). The Role of General Principles in International Law and their Relationship to Treaty Law.Walsh, A., & Lynch, T. (2003). The development of price formation theory and subjectivism about ultimate values. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0264-3758.2003.00252.xWank, R. (2006). Worker’s Protection National Study f or Germany fo r the ILO.Weisdorf, J. L. (2006). From domestic manufacture to Industrial Revolution: Long-run growth and agricultural development. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(2), 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpl001Williamson, J. (2004). The Strange History of the Washington Consensus. Source: Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(2), 195–206.Wood, E. M. (1997). Modernity, postmodernity or capitalism? Source: Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 539–560.Young, J. T. (2002). Adam Smith and the Physiocrats: Contrasting Views of the Law of Nature. History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), 7–28.InvestigadoresORIGINAL1033712322.2023.pdf1033712322.2023.pdfTesis de Maestría en Derechoapplication/pdf797291https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84393/2/1033712322.2023.pdff60f310ee8e219d4907c5d37c0d2c0a5MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85879https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84393/1/license.txteb34b1cf90b7e1103fc9dfd26be24b4aMD51THUMBNAIL1033712322.2023.pdf.jpg1033712322.2023.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5614https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/unal/84393/3/1033712322.2023.pdf.jpga043163cd35993fa075452662a317748MD53unal/84393oai:repositorio.unal.edu.co:unal/843932023-08-15 23:04:15.266Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de Colombiarepositorio_nal@unal.edu.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 |