La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos.
Este estudio comparó la eficiencia de un procedimiento de Discriminación Simple-Condicional (DSC) que empleó bloques de ensayos y tres estímulos desde su inicio, con la de uno de Discriminación Condicional (DC) en la enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para tres niños con autismo. Cada niño fue entrena...
- Autores:
-
Oliveira-Costa, Glaucy
Barbosa-Alves de Souza, Carlos
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/27947
- Palabra clave:
- Autism
Receptive language
Simple discrimination
Conditional discrimination
Autismo
Lenguaje receptivo
Discriminación simple
Discriminación condicional
Autismo
Linguagem receptiva
Discriminação simples
Discriminação condicional.
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Glaucy Oliveira Costa - 2015
id |
UCATOLICA2_8ba5365ff8760fed8fbc657eb5ffe577 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/27947 |
network_acronym_str |
UCATOLICA2 |
network_name_str |
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. |
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Comparing two procedures for teaching receptive language to children with autism. |
title |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. |
spellingShingle |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. Autism Receptive language Simple discrimination Conditional discrimination Autismo Lenguaje receptivo Discriminación simple Discriminación condicional Autismo Linguagem receptiva Discriminação simples Discriminação condicional. |
title_short |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. |
title_full |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. |
title_fullStr |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. |
title_full_unstemmed |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. |
title_sort |
La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos. |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira-Costa, Glaucy Barbosa-Alves de Souza, Carlos |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira-Costa, Glaucy Barbosa-Alves de Souza, Carlos |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Autism Receptive language Simple discrimination Conditional discrimination |
topic |
Autism Receptive language Simple discrimination Conditional discrimination Autismo Lenguaje receptivo Discriminación simple Discriminación condicional Autismo Linguagem receptiva Discriminação simples Discriminação condicional. |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Autismo Lenguaje receptivo Discriminación simple Discriminación condicional Autismo Linguagem receptiva Discriminação simples Discriminação condicional. |
description |
Este estudio comparó la eficiencia de un procedimiento de Discriminación Simple-Condicional (DSC) que empleó bloques de ensayos y tres estímulos desde su inicio, con la de uno de Discriminación Condicional (DC) en la enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para tres niños con autismo. Cada niño fue entrenado en nueve relaciones palabra hablada-figura en cada tipo de procedimiento. El procedimiento DSC consistió en seis bloques de tres ensayos en la Fase 1, en nueve bloques de dos ensayos en la Fase 2, y en ensayos aleatorizados en la Fase 3. El procedimiento DC fue idéntico a la Fase 3 del DSC, pero con otros estímulos. El procedimiento DC fue más eficiente para el establecimiento de lenguaje receptivo, pero el DSC fue más eficaz para el mantenimiento del repertorio. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados para el área aplicada y direcciones para futuras investigaciones. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-01 00:00:00 2023-01-23T15:35:27Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-01 00:00:00 2023-01-23T15:35:27Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-01 |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.content.none.fl_str_mv |
Text |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
dc.type.redcol.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.4 |
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
1909-9711 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0123-9155 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/27947 |
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.4 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.4 1909-9711 0123-9155 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10983/27947 https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.4 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
|
language_invalid_str_mv |
|
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/113/Portugu%C3%A9s%2C%20Brasil |
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 2 , Año 2015 |
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
50 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
2 |
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
41 |
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
18 |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acta Colombiana de Psicología |
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. Barros, R. S., Souza, C. B. A., & Assis, G. J. A. (2012). APRENDE: Atendimento e Pesquisa sobre Aprendizagem e Desenvolvimento. Projeto de Pesquisa apresentado ao Programa de Pósgraduação em Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento. UFPA. Brown, S. M., & Bebko, J. M. (2012). Generalization, overselectivity, and discrimination in the autism phenotype: A review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 733-740. DeWiele, L. A., & Martin, G. L. (1998). The Kerr-Meyerson Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities: A self-instructional manual. Manual não publicado. Disponibilizado por G. Martin, Psychology Department, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Doan, L. A., Martin, T. L., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2007). Do ABLA test results predict performance on three-choice discriminations for persons with developmental disabilities? Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 13, 1-11. Dube, W. V., & Serna, R. W. (1998). Re-evaluation of a programmed method to teach generalized identity matching to sample. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 347–379. Eldevik, S., Hastings, R. P., Hughes, J. C., Jahr, E., Eikeseth, S., & Cross, S. (2010). Using participant data to extend the evidence base for intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 381-405. Eldevik , S., Hastings, R. P., Jahr, E., & Hughes, J. C. (2012). Outcomes of behavioral intervention for children with autism in mainstream pre-school settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 210-220. Fields, L., Garruto, M., & Watanabe, M. (2010). Varieties of stimulus control in matching-to-sample: A kernel analysis. The Psychological Record, 60, 3–26. Green, G. (2001). Behavioral analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72-85. Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. New York: Pearson Education. Grow, L. L., Carr, J. E., Kodak, T. M., Jostad, C. M, & Kisamore, A. N. (2011). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 475-498. Grow, L. L., Kodak, T. M., & Carr, J. E. (2014). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 600–605. Gutierrez, A., Hale, M. N., O’Brien, H. A., Fischer, A. J., Durocher, J. S., & Alessandri, M. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 630-638. Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65. Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Love, J. R., Carr, J. E., Almason, S. M., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). Early and intensive behavioral intervention for autism: A survey of clinical practices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 421–428. Reichow, B. (2012). Overview of meta-analyses on early intensive behavioral intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 512-520. Saunders, K., & Spradlin, J. (1990). Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: The development of generalized skills. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 239–250. Vedora, J., & Grandelski, K. (2015). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive language to toddlers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 188–193. Virués-Ortega, J. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose–response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 387–399. |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Glaucy Oliveira Costa - 2015 |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Glaucy Oliveira Costa - 2015 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.mimetype.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/113 |
institution |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/e24135f3-6087-4ab0-8e3f-d2b695240800/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
6c2e5aaeaca372ebe8618df3dd355126 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdigital@metabiblioteca.com |
_version_ |
1812183296123076608 |
spelling |
Oliveira-Costa, Glaucya317f240-d06b-4c11-b76b-64876f5c4a9cBarbosa-Alves de Souza, Carlos5aca8466-6866-4694-ba10-ca1d22ae99d92015-07-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:35:27Z2015-07-01 00:00:002023-01-23T15:35:27Z2015-07-01Este estudio comparó la eficiencia de un procedimiento de Discriminación Simple-Condicional (DSC) que empleó bloques de ensayos y tres estímulos desde su inicio, con la de uno de Discriminación Condicional (DC) en la enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para tres niños con autismo. Cada niño fue entrenado en nueve relaciones palabra hablada-figura en cada tipo de procedimiento. El procedimiento DSC consistió en seis bloques de tres ensayos en la Fase 1, en nueve bloques de dos ensayos en la Fase 2, y en ensayos aleatorizados en la Fase 3. El procedimiento DC fue idéntico a la Fase 3 del DSC, pero con otros estímulos. El procedimiento DC fue más eficiente para el establecimiento de lenguaje receptivo, pero el DSC fue más eficaz para el mantenimiento del repertorio. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados para el área aplicada y direcciones para futuras investigaciones.This study compared the efficiency of a Simple-Conditional Discrimination (SCD) procedure that from the start used trial blocks and three stimuli, with another procedure of Conditional Discrimination (CD) in teaching receptive language to three autistic children. Each child was trained in nine spoken-word/figure relations contained in each type of procedure. The SCD procedure consisted of six blocks of three trials in Phase 1, nine blocks of two trials in Phase 2, and randomized trials in Phase 3. The CD procedure was identical to Phase 3 of SCD, but with other stimuli. The CD procedure was more efficient for establishing receptive language, but the SCD was more effective for maintaining the repertoire. The implications of these results for the applied area and directions for future research are discussed.application/pdf10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.41909-97110123-9155https://hdl.handle.net/10983/27947https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2015.18.2.4Universidad Católica de Colombiahttps://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/download/113/Portugu%C3%A9s%2C%20BrasilNúm. 2 , Año 20155024118Acta Colombiana de PsicologíaAmerican Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Barros, R. S., Souza, C. B. A., & Assis, G. J. A. (2012). APRENDE: Atendimento e Pesquisa sobre Aprendizagem e Desenvolvimento. Projeto de Pesquisa apresentado ao Programa de Pósgraduação em Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento. UFPA.Brown, S. M., & Bebko, J. M. (2012). Generalization, overselectivity, and discrimination in the autism phenotype: A review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 733-740.DeWiele, L. A., & Martin, G. L. (1998). The Kerr-Meyerson Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities: A self-instructional manual. Manual não publicado. Disponibilizado por G. Martin, Psychology Department, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.Doan, L. A., Martin, T. L., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2007). Do ABLA test results predict performance on three-choice discriminations for persons with developmental disabilities? Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 13, 1-11.Dube, W. V., & Serna, R. W. (1998). Re-evaluation of a programmed method to teach generalized identity matching to sample. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 347–379.Eldevik, S., Hastings, R. P., Hughes, J. C., Jahr, E., Eikeseth, S., & Cross, S. (2010). Using participant data to extend the evidence base for intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 381-405.Eldevik , S., Hastings, R. P., Jahr, E., & Hughes, J. C. (2012). Outcomes of behavioral intervention for children with autism in mainstream pre-school settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 210-220.Fields, L., Garruto, M., & Watanabe, M. (2010). Varieties of stimulus control in matching-to-sample: A kernel analysis. The Psychological Record, 60, 3–26.Green, G. (2001). Behavioral analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72-85.Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. New York: Pearson Education.Grow, L. L., Carr, J. E., Kodak, T. M., Jostad, C. M, & Kisamore, A. N. (2011). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 475-498.Grow, L. L., Kodak, T. M., & Carr, J. E. (2014). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 600–605.Gutierrez, A., Hale, M. N., O’Brien, H. A., Fischer, A. J., Durocher, J. S., & Alessandri, M. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 630-638.Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65.Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Love, J. R., Carr, J. E., Almason, S. M., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). Early and intensive behavioral intervention for autism: A survey of clinical practices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 421–428.Reichow, B. (2012). Overview of meta-analyses on early intensive behavioral intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 512-520.Saunders, K., & Spradlin, J. (1990). Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: The development of generalized skills. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 239–250.Vedora, J., & Grandelski, K. (2015). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive language to toddlers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 188–193.Virués-Ortega, J. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose–response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 387–399.Glaucy Oliveira Costa - 2015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://actacolombianapsicologia.ucatolica.edu.co/article/view/113AutismReceptive languageSimple discriminationConditional discriminationAutismoLenguaje receptivoDiscriminación simpleDiscriminación condicionalAutismoLinguagem receptivaDiscriminação simplesDiscriminação condicional.La enseñanza del lenguaje receptivo para niños con autismo : comparación de dos procedimientos.Comparing two procedures for teaching receptive language to children with autism.Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2679https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstreams/e24135f3-6087-4ab0-8e3f-d2b695240800/download6c2e5aaeaca372ebe8618df3dd355126MD5110983/27947oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/279472023-03-24 15:09:45.61https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Glaucy Oliveira Costa - 2015https://repository.ucatolica.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia - RIUCaCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com |