Análisis del discurso didáctico usando una tarea de igualación de la muestra de segundo orden
Learning to teach seems to be a product of direct experiential learning. Therefore, in this study, a second-order matching-to-sample task was used to evaluate the didactic discourse that a person can elaborate from his own learning. The research design involved two different phases, learning and tea...
- Autores:
-
Rodríguez-Pérez, María Elena
Castellanos-Meza, Félix Alejandro
Díaz-Gámez, Liliana Leticia
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2008
- Institución:
- Universidad Católica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/589
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10983/589
- Palabra clave:
- DISCURSO DIDÁCTICO
DISCRIMINACIÓN CONDICIONAL
IGUALACIÓN DE LA MUESTRA DE SEGUNDO ORDEN
DIDACTIC DISCOURSE
CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION
SECOND-ORDER MATCHING-TO-SAMPLE
DISCURSO DIDÁTICO
DISCRIMINAÇÃO CONDICIONAL
IGUALAÇÃO DA AMOSTRA DE SEGUNDA ORDEM
APRENDIZAJE-ENSEÑANZA
PSICOLOGÍA DEL APRENDIZAJE
CAPACITACIÓN DOCENTE
DISCURSOS
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2008
Summary: | Learning to teach seems to be a product of direct experiential learning. Therefore, in this study, a second-order matching-to-sample task was used to evaluate the didactic discourse that a person can elaborate from his own learning. The research design involved two different phases, learning and teaching. During the learning phase, the participants were trained in the matching task with a procedure that gradually increased its complexity .During the teaching phase, each trained participant had to teach another two participants on how to perform effectively in similar tasks. Results were analyzed in terms of the trained participants performance on the task, transference of learning, processes involved in the elaboration of didactic discourse, and the effects of teaching on he apprentices. Data suggest that all participants learned the matching task, either by direct training or by being exposed to didactic discourse. However, differences on performance during transfer tests were found among participants due to the different ways of verbalizing task criteria and effective performance involved in didactic discourse. |
---|