Autoeficacia y vivencias académicas en estudiantes universitarios

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the dimensions of the self-efficacy construct in academic behaviors and academic experiences with undergraduate students. 405 students of Psychology, Engineering and Pedagogy from various Chilean universities participated. The sampling wa...

Full description

Autores:
Borzone-Valdebenito, María Andrea
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:
eng
spa
por
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/15534
Acceso en línea:
http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15534
Palabra clave:
Autoeficacia académica
ivencias académicas
Adaptación universitaria
Academic self-efficacy
Academic experiences
University adaptation
Autoeficácia acadêmica
Vivências acadêmicas
Adaptação universitária
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2017
Description
Summary:The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the dimensions of the self-efficacy construct in academic behaviors and academic experiences with undergraduate students. 405 students of Psychology, Engineering and Pedagogy from various Chilean universities participated. The sampling was non probabilistic. The Self-efficacy Scale in Academic Behaviors and the Academic Experiences Questionnaire were applied. Analysis of correlations between variables and canonical correlations were performed. Direct relationships were found between the dimensions of self-efficacy in academic behaviors and academic experiences, except in academic self-efficacy and personal difficulties, where an inverse relationship was found. The findings were consistent with previous studies which refer to correlations between variables. There were three canonical dimensions describing students according to their university studies: real self-efficacy vs. academic experience based on study strategy; communication style and excellence vs. personal and interpersonal style, and general attention vs. assessment of the studies and the institution.