A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity

The configuration of a bachelor’s program in performing arts (previously a bachelor’s degree in arts education with an emphasis on dance and theater) promotes the constructionof a field of study that is recent in our country. In that sense, building alegacy implies recognizing our own face in the mi...

Full description

Autores:
Llerena Avendaño, Francisco Alexánder
Nieves Gil, Angélica del Pilar
Sepúlveda Medina, Carlos Eduardo
Guzmán Urrego, Edwin Armando
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad Antonio Nariño
Repositorio:
Repositorio UAN
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uan.edu.co:123456789/5362
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/papeles/article/view/495
http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/5362
Palabra clave:
legacy
teacher-artist
performing arts
tradition
contemporaneity
cultural construction
legado
maestro-artista
artes escénicas
tradición
contemporaneidad
Rights
openAccess
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Description
Summary:The configuration of a bachelor’s program in performing arts (previously a bachelor’s degree in arts education with an emphasis on dance and theater) promotes the constructionof a field of study that is recent in our country. In that sense, building alegacy implies recognizing our own face in the mirror of history. Although German historiography - so important in the nineteenth century - stopped at the historical as a narrative of great stories and heroics, in the XX and XXI centuries the Annales School will investigate the fleeting, the transitory and the allowance. History is constituted by those intimate and fragmentary stories that help to consolidate the destinyof nations. Thus, our story starts with building a memory that allows us to leave sensitive evidence of the construction of a field that is vanishing nowadays: tradition. Thecrisis of representation, the anguish of images, the passion aroused by networks, the virtuality and the desire for permanent technological innovation, seem to leave outthe constitution of the historical personality, for that reason our program promotes a controversial field between tradition and contemporaneity. The tradition, thought from a wide perspective, is not conceived as everything that remains static and probably cornered and closed in the walls of the museum. Tradition was not a becoming;it remains being as a cultural construction that defines us as humans although the speed of our present time insists on subjugate us. What we are today comes from faraway, in the Hegelian sense of recognizing the historical trajectory as the unfolding of the spirit. Our traditions are legacies that remain alive and that continue up tobe built in an open look to the future. Therefore, we insist on our program to leave evidences of a memory that we have built for thirty years.