Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.

El estudio que se documenta en esta tesis doctoral presenta el análisis del aprendizaje colaborativo entre estudiantes que fueron agrupados por su similitud y diferencia de estilo cognitivo en la dimensión Independencia- Dependencia de Campo en un entorno virtual de aprendizaje. La colaboración se a...

Full description

Autores:: García Chitiva, María del Pilar

Tipo de recurso:: Doctoral thesis

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional UPN

Idioma:: spa

id	RPEDAGO2_da08be03b426af89897639db587432dd
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/13321
network_acronym_str	RPEDAGO2
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional UPN
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Collaboration process analysis between students of different cognitive style in virtual learning environments.
title	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.
spellingShingle	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Sistema de Memoria Transactiva (TMS) Aprendizaje colaborativo ACEVA Comunicación Interacción Entornos virtuales de aprendizaje Transactive Memory System (TMS) Collaborative learning ACEVA Communication Interaction Virtual Learning Environment (VLE)
title_short	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.
title_full	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.
title_fullStr	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.
title_full_unstemmed	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.
title_sort	Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	García Chitiva, María del Pilar
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv	Hederich Martínez, Christian
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	García Chitiva, María del Pilar
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Sistema de Memoria Transactiva (TMS) Aprendizaje colaborativo ACEVA Comunicación Interacción Entornos virtuales de aprendizaje
topic	Sistema de Memoria Transactiva (TMS) Aprendizaje colaborativo ACEVA Comunicación Interacción Entornos virtuales de aprendizaje Transactive Memory System (TMS) Collaborative learning ACEVA Communication Interaction Virtual Learning Environment (VLE)
dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv	Transactive Memory System (TMS) Collaborative learning ACEVA Communication Interaction Virtual Learning Environment (VLE)
description	El estudio que se documenta en esta tesis doctoral presenta el análisis del aprendizaje colaborativo entre estudiantes que fueron agrupados por su similitud y diferencia de estilo cognitivo en la dimensión Independencia- Dependencia de Campo en un entorno virtual de aprendizaje. La colaboración se analizó bajo dos supuestos teóricos, el Sistema de memoria transactiva TMS para analizar la cognición distribuida y compartida de las parejas de aprendizaje y la Teoría de la Relevancia para comprender los tipos de comunicación empleada por los integrantes de las parejas colaborativas en los procesos de interacción. Se empleó un diseño no experimental, mixto, de medidas repetidas. Los principales hallazgos mostraron que el TMS que se genera entre los equipos de aprendizaje incide en el logro y que la naturaleza de la tarea determina los niveles de comunicación y tipos de mensaje que se intercambian en el proceso de aprender colaborativamente
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-06-22T22:07:54Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-06-22T22:07:54Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Monografía - Doctorado
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/13321
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv	repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/13321
identifier_str_mv	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv	Afacan, G., y Afacan, G. (2019). Detecting topics of chat discussions in a computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.522398 Afacan, G. (2017). Achievement of joint perception in a computer supported collaborative learning environment: A case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340387 Aguilar, S. y Barroso, J. (2015). La triangulación. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 47, 73–88. https://doi.org/Aguilar, S., y Barroso, J. (2015). La triangulación. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 47, 73–88. Al-Sharhan, S., Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Alhajri, R. y Al-Huwail, N. (2020). Utilization of Learning Management System (LMS) Among Instructors and Students. In Z. Zakaria y R. Ahmad (Eds.), Advances in Electronics Engineering Proceedings of the ICCEE 2019, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Vol. 1, pp. 15–24). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1038/163893a0 Alavi, M. y Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10107 Angeli, C. y Valanides, N. (2004). Examining the effects of text-only and text-and-visual instructional materials on the achievement of field-dependent and field-independent learners during problem-solving with modeling software. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504715 Arias-Velandia, N., Rodriguez-Granobles, H. y Castro-Martínez, J. (2017). 1o . Encuentro Nacional de Investigación en Educación Virtual y a Distancia. Avances En La Indentificación y Conceptualización de Variables y Factores Relacionados Con La Deserción En Educación Presencial y Virtual. Ariff, M., Milton, S. K., Bosua, R., Sharma, R., Mohamed Ariff, M. I., Milton, S. K., Bosua, R., y Sharma, R. (2011). Exploring the role of ICT in the formation of transactive memory systems in virtual teams. PACIS 2011 - 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality Research in Pacific. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84855834298ypartnerID=40ymd5=32e1abebd9c1ea6ec2e0143551f0d689 Ariff, M., Sharma, R. y Arshad, N. (2015). Exploring the role of Transactive Memory Systems in virtual teams: Review and synthesis of literature. 2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research, (ISMSC) - Proceedings, 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594070 Bahamón, J., Vianchá, M., Alarcón, L. y Bohórquez, C. (2013). Estilos y estrategias de aprendizaje relacionados con el logro académico en estudiantes universitarios. Pensamiento Psicológico, 11(1), 115–129. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=801/801270000051ysid=f33d3860-8970-42ea-bf21-8813f80ed10b%40sessionmgr4007 Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory (A. Bandura (Ed.); 1er ed.). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Baran, M. (2016). Mixed methods research for improved scientific study. IGI Global. Barnier, A., Harris, C., Morris, T, y Savage, G. (2018). Collaborative facilitation in older couples: Successful joint remembering across memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02385 Beerenwinkel, A. y Von Arx, M. (2017). Constructivism in Practice: an Exploratory Study of Teaching Patterns and Student Motivation in Physics Classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9497-3 Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S. y Matsuo, A. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774 Bodemer, D. y Dehler, J. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.014 Bradford, B. y Peck, M. (1997). Achieving AECC Outcomes Through the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Journal of Education for Business, 72(6), 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1997.10116872 Braithwaite, D., Schrodt, P. y Carr, K. (2015). Introduction. Meta-Theory and Theory in Inr¿terpersonal Communication Research. In D. Braithwaite y P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication. Multiple perspectives (pp. 18–42). SAGE Publications Inc. Brandon, D. P. y Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People. Organization Science, 15(6), 644–644. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc. Britez, M. (2020). La educación ante el avance del COVID-19 en Paraguay. La educación ante el avance del COVID-19 en Paraguay. Comparativo con países de la Triple Frontera. https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/22 Brown, A. (2014). Implementing Active Learning in an Online Teacher Education Course. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.924695 Brown, K. y Cole, M. (2002). Cultural historical activity theory and the expansion of opportunities for learning after school. En G. Wells y G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st centrury : Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Blackwell publishers Ltd. Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V. y Hiebert, J. (2018). Editorial: The role of replication studies in educational research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 2–8. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042107403ypartnerID=40ymd5=4801021745238006f2d5ffa89caac1a7 Campbell, D. T. y Stanley, J. C. (1966). Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social. Amorrortu Ed. Castellanos-Ramírez, J. C., Niño-Carrasco, S. A. y Parra-Encinas, K. L. (2020). Discurso socioemocional y construcción compartida del conocimiento en tareas colaborativas en línea. Revista Electrónica Educare, 24(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.24-2.4 Castellanos-Ramírez, J. y Niño, S. (2018). Aprendizaje colaborativo y fases de construcción compartida del conocimiento en entornos tecnológicos de comunicación asincróna. Innovación Educativa, 18(76), 69–88. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1665-26732018000100069yscript=sci_arttext Castellanos, J. C., Niño, S. A., Viloria, E. y Santillán, V. E. (2019). Aprendizaje colaborativo en línea; impacto del discurso socioemocional en los procesos cognitivos de los estudiantes. Revista Espacios, 40(23), 22. http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n23/19402322.html Chand, R., Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Tiwari, P., Rajnish, R. y Mishra, S. (2019). Advanced communication technologies for collaborative learning in telemedicine and tele-care. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference On Cloud Computing, Data Science and Engineering, Confluence 2019, 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2019.8776970 Chang, B., Chen, S. y Jhan, S.N. (2015). The influences of an interactive group-based videogame: Cognitive styles vs. prior ability. Computers and Education, 88, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.006 Chen, S. y Chang, L. P. (2014). The influences of cognitive styles on individual learning and collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.931242 Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi Network Visualization (1st ed.). Packt Publishing Ltd Chickering, A. y Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. In AAHE bulletin (Vol. 3, Issue 7). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001 Coll, C. (2014). Constructivismo y educación: la concepción constructivista de la enseñanza y del aprendizaje. In C. Coll, J. Palacios, y Á. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (2nd ed., pp. 157–186). Alianza Editores, S.A. www.alianzaeditorial.es Coll, C., De Gispert, I. y Rochera, M. (2010). Tópicos y cadenas: Una aproximación al análisis de la construcción conjunta de significados en foros de conversación en línea. Cultura y Educacion, 22(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564010793351885 Collazos, C., Guerrero, L., Pino, J., Renzi, S., Klobas, J., Ortega, M., Redondo, M. y Bravo, C. (2007). Evaluating collaborative learning processes using system-based measurement. Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168450 Colomina, R., y Onrubia, J. (2014). Interacción educativa y aprendizaje escolar: la interacción entre alumnos. In C. Coll, J. Palacios, y A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 415–435). Alianza Editores, S.A Colomina, R., Onrubia, J y Rochera, M. J. (2014). Interactividad, mecanismos de influencia educativa y construcción de conocimiento en el aula. In C. Coll, J. Palacios, y A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 437–458). Alianza Editores, S.A. Csizmadia, A., Standl, B. y Waite, J. (2019). Integrating the constructionist learning theory with computational thinking classroom activities. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.03 Curtis, D. D. y Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2007.08.004 Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ’ collaborative learning ’? En P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative -learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (Vol. 1, Issue 6, pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1.1.167.4896 Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D. y Synteta, P. (2002). Virtual Learning Environments. 3rd Hellenic Conference “Information y Communication Technologies in Education,” 3–18. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190701 Dooly, M. (2018). Collaborative Learning. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (First Edit, pp. 1–7). John Wiley y Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0394 Epskamp, S. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in a Fast-Paced Methodological World. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847421 Estévez, J. A., Castro-Martínez, J. y Granobles, H. R. (2015). La educación virtual en Colombia: exposición de modelos de deserción. Apertura: Revista de Innovación Educativa, 7(1), 1–9. http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/apertura/index.php/apertura/article/view/583 Fernández-Pampillón, A. (2012). Las plataformas e-learning para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje universitario en Internet. In Las plataformas de aprendizaje. Del mito a la realidad (Biblioteca, pp. 45–73). http://eprints.ucm.es/10682/ Ford, N. y Chen, S. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation, and Learning: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.0000/www.learntechlib.org/9546 Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J. y Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001 García-Chitiva, M. P. (2019). Análisis bibliométrico de la investigación sobre Sistema de Memoria Transactiva en Educación Superior. En EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/2sxpe García-Chitiva, M. y Suárez-Guerrero, C. (2019). Estado de la investigación sobre la colaboración en Entornos Virtuales de Aprendizaje. Píxel-BIT Revista de Medios y Educación, 56, 169–191. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i56.09 García, J. (1989). Los estilos cognitivos y su medida: estudios sobre la dimensión dependencia - independencia de campo. Centro de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: C.I.D.E. Gillies, R. M. (2014). Developments in Cooperative Learning : Review of Research. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201191 Goulão, M. de F., Seabra, F., Melaré, D., Henriques, S. y Cardoso, T. (2015). Sucesso, Permanência e Persistência dos Estudantes do Ensino Superior a Distância Online Success,. Adaptation of Self-Efficacy Scales for the Writing and the Spanish Language. (English), 1, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2015.0.0 Guitert, M. y Pérez-Mateo, M. (2013). La colaboración en la red: hacia una definición de Aprendizaje colaborativo en entornos virtuales. Teoría de La Educación. Educación y Cultura En La Sociedad de La Información, 14(1), 10–31. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2010/201025739004.pdf Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., Montejo-Gámez, J., Ma, L., Chen, B., De Escalona-Fernández, M. M., Scardamalia, M. y Bereiter, C. (2018). Exploring collective cognitive responsibility through the emergence and flow of forms of engagement in a knowledge building community. Didactics of Smart Pedagogy: Smart Pedagogy for Technology Enhanced Learning, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_11 Gutu, G., Dascalu, M., Rebedea, T. y Trausan-Matu, S. (2017). Time and semantic similarity – what is the best alternative to capture implicit links in cscl conversations? Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 1, 223–230. https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/235/1/32.pdf Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Riyanto, Y., Prasojo, L. D., Sulistiyo, U., Sofwan, M. y Saudagar, F. (2018). Building an online community: Student teachers’ perceptions on the advantages of using social networking services in a teacher education program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.382663 Hederich-Martínez, C. y Camargo-Uribe, A. (2001). Estilos cognitivos en el contexto escolar. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Hederich-Martínez, C. y Camargo-Uribe, A. (2015). Cognitive style and educational performance. The case of public schools in Bogotá, Colombia. Educational Psychology, 36(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1091916 Hederich, C. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia-independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Hederich, C. (2013). Estilística educativa. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 64, 21–56. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=413634076002 Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (1998). Estilos cognitivos como modalidades de procesamiento de la información una exploración en las áreas de matemáticas y lenguaje. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (2000). Estilo cognitivo y logro en el sistema educativo de la ciudad de Bogotá. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Instituto para la Investigación Educativa y el Desarrollo Pedagógico IDEP. Hederich, Camargo, Á., López, O. y Rincón, L. (2015). Proyecto de Autorregulación del Aprendizaje en Ambientes Web -Informe Final-. Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C. y González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers and Education, 138(February), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012 Hernández, A. (2014). La dimensión independencia dependencia de campo en educación : una revisón bibliométrica ( 2003-2013 ). Revista Colombiana de Educación, 66, 149–170. https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/2592/2431 Higuchi, K. (2015). KH Coder 2.x reference manual. https://khcoder.net/en/ Hillen, S. A. (2014). The role of discussion boards in e-collaborative learning environments (CSCL) - What kind of support can they provide?: A conceptual discussion and a qualitative case study. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(2), 128–147. https://www.idunn.no/dk/2014/02/the_role_of_discussion_boards_in_e-collaborative_learning_e Hodges, C. B. (2015). Replication studies in educational technology. TechTrends, 59(4), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0862-2 Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1358 Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Retrieval Processes in Transactive Memory Systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.659 Hollingshead, A. B. (2000). Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships. Group Processes y Intergroup Relations, 3(3), 257–267. Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080 Hommes, J., den Bossche, P., de Grave, W., Bos, G., Schuwirth, L. y Scherpbier, A. (2014). Understanding the effects of time on collaborative learning processes in problem based learning: a mixed methods study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9487-z Hong, H.Y. y Scardamalia, M. (2014). Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment. Computers and Education, 71, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.009 Howard, L. (2016). An exploration of autonetnography as an eresearch methodology to examine learning and teaching scholarship in networked learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(5), 293–335. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011117658ypartnerID=40ymd5=b46aa5d037a217ef9fc2abafbafd9f5e Howell, D. (2012). Statistical Methods for Psychology (8va Ed.). Cengage Learning. Iinuma, M., Matsuhashi, T., Nakamura, T. y Chiyokura, H. (2016). Student Awareness Change in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.730 Iiskala, T., Volet, S., Lehtinen, E. y Vauras, M. (2015). Socially Shared Metacognitive Regulation in Asynchronous CSCL in Science: Functions, Evolution and Participation. Socially Shared Metacognitive Regulation in Asynchronous CSCL in Science: Functions, Evolution and Participation., 3(1), 78–111. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i1.159 Ivic, I. (1994). Lev Semionovich Vygotski (1896-1934). Perspectivas: Revista Trimestral de Educación Comparada (París, 24(3–4), 773–799. http://papelesdesociedad.info/IMG/pdf/vygotskys_unesco.pdf Jackson, M. y Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive Memory in the Classroom. Small Group Research, 40(5), 508–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409340703 Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G. y Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers and Education, 49(4), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004 Jardines, F. J. (2009). Educación a Distancia: desarrollo histórico de la educación a distancia (Historical development of distance education). Innovaciones de Negocios, 6(2), 225–236. http://eprints.uanl.mx/id/eprint/12521 Jelfs, A. y Whitelock, D. (2000). Environments : What Makes the Environment “ Real ” British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00145 Jermann, P. y Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Computers and Education, 51(1), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.012 Johnson, D. y Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.4.285-358 Johnson, D. y Johnson, R. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057 Johnson, D. y Johnson, R. (2013). The impact of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning environments on academic achievement. En E. Hattie, J. y Anderman (Ed.), International handbook of student achievement (pp. 372–374). Routledge. Johnson, D. W. y Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative Learning in 21st Century. Anales de Psicologia, 30(3), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201241 Kerlinger, F. y Lee, H. (2001). Investigacion Del Comportamiento (Cuarta Edi). McGraw Hill. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. A. y Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.001 Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F. y Zambrano, J. (2018). From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y Kopish, M. y Marques, W. (2020). Leveraging Technology to Promote Global Citizenship in Teacher Education in the United States and Brazil. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.01.3 Korthauer, R. y Koubek, R. (1994). An Empirical Evaluation of Knowledge, Cognitive Style, and Structure upon the Performance of a Hypertext Task. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6(4), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319409526102 Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and collaborative learning. En C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. Chan y A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (1st ed., pp. 153–170). Taylor y Francis. Koudenburg, N. (2018). Regulating shared reality with micro-dynamics in the form of conversation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.002 Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464 Kozlowski, S. W. J. y Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science, 5, 77–124. Kreijns, K. y Kirschner, P. A. (2002). The Sociability of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Educational Technology y Society, 5(1), 1–19. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. y Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2 Kromrey, J. y Purdom, D. (1995). A Comparison of lecture, cooperative learning and programmed instruction at the college level. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381605 Kuo, F.R., Hwang, G.J., Chen, S.C. y Chen, S. (2012). A Cognitive Apprenticeship Approach to Facilitating Web-based Collaborative Problem Solving Fan-Ray. Educational Technology y Society, 5(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.15.4.319%0AREFERENCES Kusmiarti, R., Yuniati, I., y Noermanzah. (2020). Improving student communication skills in learning indonesian language through collaborative learning. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 207–211. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078751221ypartnerID=40ymd5=8aeb280aa35bf1e818f082fe1b3346f1 Labrador, M. M., Vargas, G., Alvarado, J. y Caicedo, M. (2019). Survival and Risk Analysis in MOOCS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 400(October), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640561 Leader, L, y Klein, J. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300537 Levine, J. M. (2018). Socially-shared cognition and consensus in small groups. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.003 Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587 Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams : A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams : A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519–1533. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257 Lewis, Kyle, Belliveau, M., Herndon, B. y Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005 Lewis, Kyle, Lange, D. y Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0143 Liang, D. W., Moreland, R. y Argote, L. (1995). Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory. Journal of Composite Materials, 21(4), 384–393. https://doi.org/0803973233 Liao, J., Jimmieson, N., O’Brien, A. y Restubog, S. (2012). Developing Transactive Memory Systems: Theoretical Contributions From a Social Identity Perspective. Group y Organization Management, 37(2), 204–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112443976 López-Vargas, O., Ortiz-Vásquez, J. e Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J. (2020). Autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en un ambiente B-learning. Pensamiento Psicológico, 18(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI18-1.alae López, O. y Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 58(58), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.632 López, O., Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (2011). Estilo cognitivo y logro acádemico. Educ.Educ., 14(1), 67–82. López, O., Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (2012). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlps/v44n2/v44n2a01.pdf#page=13 Lopez, O. y Valencia, N. (2012). Diferencias individuales en el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y el logro académico: el efecto de un andamiaje computacional. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15(2), 29–41. Mahn, H. (1999). Vygotsky’s methodological contribition to sociocultural theory. Remedial and Special Education, 20(6), 341–350. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ599265 Mehta, S. (1998). Cooperative learning strategies for large classes. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1–7. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cooperative-Learning-Strategies-For-Large-Classes-Mehta/74e9206aa00ba2692ac0153d36583aa233363d82 Messick, S. (1984). The Nature of Cognitive Styles: Problems and Promise in Educational Practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283 Michinov, E. (2007). Validation ofa French version of the Transactive Memory Scale and its adaptation to an academic context. European Review of Applied Psychology, 57(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2006.03.001 Michinov, Estelle, Michinov, N. y Huguet, P. (2009). Effects of gender role and task content on performance in same-gender dyads: Transactive memory as a potential mediator. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(2), 155–168. Michinov, N. y Michinov, E. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.01.003 Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2019). Educación virtual o educación en línea. Ministerio de Educación Nacional - Mineducación-. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/Educacion-superior/Informacion-Destacada/196492:Educacion-virtual-o-educacion-en-linea Miyake, N. (1986). Constructive lnteraction and the Iterative Process of Understanding. Cognitive Science, 10, 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1002_2 Mo, S. y Xie, X. (2010). Team learning, transactive memory system and team performance: A longitudinal study based on the IMOI approach. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 4(3), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0104-1 Moreland, R. L., Argote, L. y Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially Shared Cognition at Work: Transactive Memory and Group Performance. In J. L. y Nye y A.M. Brower (Eds.), What’s Social about Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (pp. 57–84). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327648.n3 Moreno-Caro, J. (2020). Regulación interpersonal y trabajo colaborativo en ambientes computacionales: conformación grupal y estilo cognitivo [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional]. http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/handle/20.500.12209/11917 Morris, S., Farran, E. K. y Dumontheil, I. (2019). Field Independence Associates with Mathematics and Science Performance in 5- to 10-Year-Olds after Accounting for Domain-General Factors. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12214 Navarro, R. (2003). El rendimiento académico: concepto, investigación e ydesarrollo. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 1(2), 1–15. http://www.ice.deusto.es/rinace/reice/vol1n2/Edel.pdf Navo, E., Hmelo-Silver, C. y McKeown, J. (2017). Technology Affordances for CSCL: A Premliminary Review. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, y K. yon Lim (Eds.), Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL. 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 767–768). Drexel University School Education. https://cscl17.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/finalvol1cscl2017.pdf Ngaleka, A. y Uys, W. (2013). M-learning with WhatsApp: A conversation analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Learning, ICEL, January 2013, 282–291. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/3159042 Niño-Ramos, M. (2019). Personalización de un ambiente educativo digital y su efecto sobre el logro de aprendizaje y la percepción en estudiantes de primaria diferenciados por su estilo cognitivo [Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional]. http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/handle/20.500.12209/11371 Nisiotis, L., Kleanthous, S., Beer, M. y Uruchurtu, E. (2017). The Development of Transactive Memory Systems in Collaborative Educational Virtual Worlds. In D. Beck, C. Allison, L. Morgado, J. Pirker, F. Khosmood, J. Richter, y C. Gütl (Eds.), Immersive Learning Research Network. Third International Conference, iLRN 2017 (pp. 35–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60633-0_4 Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M. y Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.002 Nyembe, B. Z. M. y Howard, G. R. (2019). The utilities of prominent learning theories for mobile collaborative learning (MCL) with reference to WhatsApp and M-learning. En S. U. G. Maharaj M. (Ed.), icABCD 2019 - 2nd International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABCD.2019.8851042 Nyikos, M., y Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist Theory Applied to Collaborative Learning in Teacher Education: En Search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05518.x O’Donnell, A. M. y Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Introduction: What is Collaborative Learning? En The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 15–28). Routledge. Peltokorpi, V. y Hood, A. C. (2019). Communication in Theory and Research on Transactive Memory Systems: A Literature Review. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 644–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12359 Peltokorpi, V. y Manka, M.-L. (2008). Antecedents and the Performance Outcome of Transactive Memory in Daycare work groups. European Psychologist, 13(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.103 Piotrowski, M. (2010). What is an E-Learning Platform? En Y. Kats (Ed.), Learning management system technologies and software solutions for online teaching. Tools and applications (1st ed., pp. 20–36). Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-853-1.ch002 Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovic, V. M. y Jovanovic, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. COMPUTERS y EDUCATION, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002 Quero-Virla, M. (2010). Confiabilidad y coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. Telos, 12(2), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2004.1370608 R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/ Rama, C. (2016). La fase actual de expansión de la educación en línea o virtual en América Latina. Universidades, 70, 27–39. http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/MINEDU/5114 Rama, C. y Cevallos, M. (2015). The Metamorphosis of Distance Education in Latin America. A New Fase with the Entry of International Suppliers. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 26(2015), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.26.2015 Ramos, F. (1998). A decade of relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(3), 305–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00015-0 Real Academia Española. (n.d.). Diccionario de La Lengua Española 23.a Ed., [Versión 23.3 En Línea]. Recuperado el 30 de octubre de 2020 de https://dle.rae.es/contenido/actualización-2019 Ren, Y. y Argote, L. (2011). Transactive Memory Systems 1985-2010: An Integrative Framework of Key Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590300 Resta, P. y Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7 Rodríguez, J. (2001). Aprendizaje colaborativo en entornos virtuales. Anuario de Psicología, 32(2), 63.75. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/Anuario-psicologia/article/view/8826/11092 Rogoff, B. y Chavajay, P. (2009). Las bases culturales del desarrollo cognitivo. Evolución de la investigación en este campo en Norteamérica. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, XVI(39), 121–160. http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/revistaeyp/article/view/6005 Romero, E. y Soria, B. (2010). Introduction: Explicit Communication and Relevance Theory Pragmatics. En Explicit Communication (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_1 Roschelle, J. y Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5 Roselli, N. (2016). Los beneficios de la regulación externa de la colaboración sociocognitiva entre pares: Ilustraciones experimentales. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 27(2), 354–367. https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/6175 Rummel, N. y Spada, H. (2005). Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402 Sanz-Martínez, L., Er, E., Martínez-Monés, A., Dimitriadis, Y. y Bote-Lorenzo, M. L. (2019). Creating collaborative groups in a MOOC: a homogeneous engagement grouping approach. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(11), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1571109 Saracho, O. N. (2003). Matching Teachers’ and Students’ Cognitive Styles. Early Child Development and Care, 173(2–3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430303097 Scardamalia, M. y Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. En K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.61.2.5 Schnaubert, L. y Bodemer, D. (2019). Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(1), 7–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9293-y Schunk, D. (2012). Teorías del aprendizaje. Una perspectiva educativa. In Naucalpan de Juárez, Estado de México (Sexta edic). Pearson Educación. www.pearsonenespañol.com Serrano, J. M. y Pons, R. M. (2014). Introduction : Cooperative Learning. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 801–804. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201251 Shen, Y. (2007). Transactive memory system development in virtual teams: the potential role of shared identity and shared context. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference, 228–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/1235000.1235054 Shukor, N., Tasir, Z., Van der Meijden, H. y Harun, J. (2014). Exploring students’ knowledge construction strategies in computer-supported collaborative learning discussions using sequential analysis. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 216–228. https://www.ds.unipi.gr/etys/journals/17_4/14.pdf Silva-Ordaz, M., García-Ramírez, C., Guzmán-Flores, T. y Chaparro-Ramírez, R. (2016). Estudio de herramientas Moodle para desarrollar habilidades del siglo XXI. Campus Virtuales, 5(2), 58–69. http://www.uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/campusvirtuales/article/view/126 Stahl, G. (2017). Group practices: a new way of viewing CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9251-0 Stahl, G., Koschmann, T, y Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855 Suárez, C. (2010). Aprendizaje cooperativo e interacción asíncrona textual en contextos educativos virtuales. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 36, 53–67. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/22608 Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y Tai, D., Shen, S., Lin, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, J. y Tai, V. (2011). The study of heterogeneous cooperative learning towards blended learning performance. WMSCI 2011 - The 15th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings, 3(March), 119–123. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ren-cheng_Zhang/publication/289438831_The_study_of_heterogeneous_cooperative_learning_towards_blended_learning_performance/links/5c8739e6458515b59e4547e6/The-study-of-heterogeneous-cooperative-learning-towards-blended- Tudge, J. y Scrimcher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on Education: A Cultural-Historical, Interpersonal, and Individual Approach to Development. In B. Zimmerman y D. Shunk (Eds.), Educational psychology. A century of contributions (pp. 207–228). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Urien, B., Erro-Garcés, A. y Osca, A. (2019). WhatsApp usefulness as a communication tool in an educational context. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2585–2602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09876-5 Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O. y Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018a). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: Self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.5 Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O. y Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018b). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: Self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.5 Vega, M. L., Vidal, D. y García, M. del P. (2013). Avances acerca de los efectos del aprendizaje cooperativo sobre el logro académico y las habilidades sociales en relación con el estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 155–174. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S0120-39162013000100007 Vuopala, E., Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J. y Järvelä, S. (2019). Knowledge co-construction activities and task-related monitoring in scripted collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.011 Warne, R. T. (2014). Two Additional Suggested Reforms to Encourage Replication Studies in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 465. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14562294 Wegner, D. M., Giuliano T. y Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_12 Wegner, D. (1987). Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind. In B. Mullen y G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 185–208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 Wegner, D. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Wegner, D., Erber, R. y Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive Memory in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923 Wibowo, W. C., Dayanti, I. S., Hidayanto, A. N., Eitiveni, I. y Phusavat, K. (2018). Prioritizing solutions for overcoming knowledge transfer barriers in software development using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 10(2), 217–249. Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag. http://ggplot2.org Wilson, D. y Sperber, D. A. N. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. Horn y G. Ward (Eds.), The Hanbook of Pragmatics (1st ed., pp. 608–632). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. www blackwellpublishing.com Witkin, H. y Asch, S. (1948). Studies in space orientation IV. Further experiments on perception of the up-right with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(6), 762–782. http://www.mbfys.ru.nl/staff/j.vangisbergen/endnote/endnotepdfs/frame_effect/Witkin-Asch_studies-in-space-perception_IV_1948.pdf Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D. y Cox, P. (1975). Field-development and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1975.tb01065.x Yilmaz, R., Yilmaz, F. G. K., Cakmak, E. K. y Kilic, C. (2016). The impact of transactive memory system and interaction platform in collaborative knowledge construction on social presence and self-regulation. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820(September 2016), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1224905 Yuen, A., Cheng, M. y Chan, F. (2019). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A growth model of belief and use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2520–2535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12830 Yus, F. (2010). Relevance Theory. En A. Barber y R. Stainton (Eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 648–655). Elservier Ltd. https://books.google.com/books?id=2boGE2NKtpsCypgis=1 Zhang, X., Chen, H., de Pablos, P. O., Lytras, M. D. y Sun, Y. (2016). Coordinated implicitly? An empirical study on the role of social media in collaborative learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(6), 121–144. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85008168830ypartnerID=40ymd5=ef5cd2200447949030a5304b4cb262a2 Zhao, Y., Wang, A. y Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus–organism–response perspective. Computers and Education, 144 (October 2019), 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721 Zheng, L., Huang, R. y Yu, J. (2014). Identifying Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) research in selected journals published from 2003 to 2012: A content analysis of research topics and issues. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 335–351. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f39/d9669b27da2b7a9dace911c61f11b0476239.pdf Zheng, Y. y Subramaniyan, A. (2019). Personality-Aware Collaborative Learning: Models and Explanations. En L. et al Barolli (Ed.), International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (Vol. 1, pp. 834–845). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7 Zurita, G. y Nussbaum, M. (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.x
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.access.spa.fl_str_mv	Acceso abierto
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv	PDF
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.coverage.spatial.spa.fl_str_mv	Bogotá, Colombia
dc.coverage.temporal.spa.fl_str_mv	Colombia - 2018-2021
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Doctorado Interinstitucional en Educación
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Doctorado en Educación
institution	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/6/AN%c3%81LISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACI%c3%93N_%20ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_%20DIFERENTE_%20ESTILO_%20COGNITIVO_%20EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE%20%281%29.pdf.jpg http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/5/AN%c3%81LISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACI%c3%93N_%20ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_%20DIFERENTE_%20ESTILO_%20COGNITIVO_%20EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE%20%281%29.pdf http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/3/license.txt http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/4/202103780077733-17JUN2021%20MAR%c3%8dA%20DEL%20PILAR.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	9a088741c7125197d4dd31bb276428f1 013b9cc4d7c6bb96d66ac91974554eb2 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 061587f92b07df21ae34bdc14557bc21
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio@pedagogica.edu.co
_version_	1814445145638043648
spelling	Hederich Martínez, ChristianGarcía Chitiva, María del PilarBogotá, ColombiaColombia - 2018-20212021-06-22T22:07:54Z2021-06-22T22:07:54Z2021http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/13321instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalreponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/El estudio que se documenta en esta tesis doctoral presenta el análisis del aprendizaje colaborativo entre estudiantes que fueron agrupados por su similitud y diferencia de estilo cognitivo en la dimensión Independencia- Dependencia de Campo en un entorno virtual de aprendizaje. La colaboración se analizó bajo dos supuestos teóricos, el Sistema de memoria transactiva TMS para analizar la cognición distribuida y compartida de las parejas de aprendizaje y la Teoría de la Relevancia para comprender los tipos de comunicación empleada por los integrantes de las parejas colaborativas en los procesos de interacción. Se empleó un diseño no experimental, mixto, de medidas repetidas. Los principales hallazgos mostraron que el TMS que se genera entre los equipos de aprendizaje incide en el logro y que la naturaleza de la tarea determina los niveles de comunicación y tipos de mensaje que se intercambian en el proceso de aprender colaborativamenteSubmitted by María del Pilar García Chitiva (mgarcia@pedagogica.edu.co) on 2021-06-17T22:45:25Z No. of bitstreams: 2 ANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE.pdf: 7381631 bytes, checksum: 8dd01bb27125839dd6edae126a39c6b0 (MD5) licencia_uso_trabajos_y_tesis_grado_ MARÍA DEL PILAR AGRCÍA CHITIVA.pdf: 160878 bytes, checksum: 061587f92b07df21ae34bdc14557bc21 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Biblioteca UPN (repositoriobiblioteca@pedagogica.edu.co) on 2021-06-18T14:50:05Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 ANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE.pdf: 7381631 bytes, checksum: 8dd01bb27125839dd6edae126a39c6b0 (MD5) licencia_uso_trabajos_y_tesis_grado_ MARÍA DEL PILAR AGRCÍA CHITIVA.pdf: 160878 bytes, checksum: 061587f92b07df21ae34bdc14557bc21 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Elsy Carolina Martínez (ecmartinezb@pedagogica.edu.co) on 2021-06-22T22:07:54Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 ANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE.pdf: 7381631 bytes, checksum: 8dd01bb27125839dd6edae126a39c6b0 (MD5) licencia_uso_trabajos_y_tesis_grado_ MARÍA DEL PILAR AGRCÍA CHITIVA.pdf: 160878 bytes, checksum: 061587f92b07df21ae34bdc14557bc21 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-22T22:07:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 ANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE.pdf: 7381631 bytes, checksum: 8dd01bb27125839dd6edae126a39c6b0 (MD5) licencia_uso_trabajos_y_tesis_grado_ MARÍA DEL PILAR AGRCÍA CHITIVA.pdf: 160878 bytes, checksum: 061587f92b07df21ae34bdc14557bc21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021Universidad Pedagógica NacionalDoctor en EducaciónDoctoradoThis doctoral dissertation presents the analysis of collaborative learning among students who were grouped by their similarity and difference of cognitive style in the Field Independence-Dependence dimension in a virtual learning environment. Collaboration was analyzed under two theoretical assumptions. First, the concept of Transactive Memory System TMS was used to analyze the distributed and shared cognition between the pairs. Second, Relevance Theory was used to understand the types of communication employed by the members of the collaborative pairs in the interaction processes. A non-experimental, mixed, repeated measures design was used. The main findings showed that the TMS generated between the learning teams affects achievement and that the nature of the task determines the levels of communication and types of messages exchanged in the collaborative learning process.PDFapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Pedagógica NacionalDoctorado Interinstitucional en EducaciónDoctorado en Educaciónhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceso abiertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalSistema de Memoria Transactiva (TMS)Aprendizaje colaborativoACEVAComunicaciónInteracciónEntornos virtuales de aprendizajeTransactive Memory System (TMS)Collaborative learningACEVACommunicationInteractionVirtual Learning Environment (VLE)Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.Collaboration process analysis between students of different cognitive style in virtual learning environments.info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionMonografía - Doctoradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAfacan, G., y Afacan, G. (2019). Detecting topics of chat discussions in a computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.522398Afacan, G. (2017). Achievement of joint perception in a computer supported collaborative learning environment: A case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340387Aguilar, S. y Barroso, J. (2015). La triangulación. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 47, 73–88. https://doi.org/Aguilar, S., y Barroso, J. (2015). La triangulación. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 47, 73–88.Al-Sharhan, S., Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Alhajri, R. y Al-Huwail, N. (2020). Utilization of Learning Management System (LMS) Among Instructors and Students. In Z. Zakaria y R. Ahmad (Eds.), Advances in Electronics Engineering Proceedings of the ICCEE 2019, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Vol. 1, pp. 15–24). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1038/163893a0Alavi, M. y Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10107Angeli, C. y Valanides, N. (2004). Examining the effects of text-only and text-and-visual instructional materials on the achievement of field-dependent and field-independent learners during problem-solving with modeling software. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504715Arias-Velandia, N., Rodriguez-Granobles, H. y Castro-Martínez, J. (2017). 1o . Encuentro Nacional de Investigación en Educación Virtual y a Distancia. Avances En La Indentificación y Conceptualización de Variables y Factores Relacionados Con La Deserción En Educación Presencial y Virtual.Ariff, M., Milton, S. K., Bosua, R., Sharma, R., Mohamed Ariff, M. I., Milton, S. K., Bosua, R., y Sharma, R. (2011). Exploring the role of ICT in the formation of transactive memory systems in virtual teams. PACIS 2011 - 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality Research in Pacific. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84855834298ypartnerID=40ymd5=32e1abebd9c1ea6ec2e0143551f0d689Ariff, M., Sharma, R. y Arshad, N. (2015). Exploring the role of Transactive Memory Systems in virtual teams: Review and synthesis of literature. 2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research, (ISMSC) - Proceedings, 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594070Bahamón, J., Vianchá, M., Alarcón, L. y Bohórquez, C. (2013). Estilos y estrategias de aprendizaje relacionados con el logro académico en estudiantes universitarios. Pensamiento Psicológico, 11(1), 115–129. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=801/801270000051ysid=f33d3860-8970-42ea-bf21-8813f80ed10b%40sessionmgr4007Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory (A. Bandura (Ed.); 1er ed.). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Baran, M. (2016). Mixed methods research for improved scientific study. IGI Global.Barnier, A., Harris, C., Morris, T, y Savage, G. (2018). Collaborative facilitation in older couples: Successful joint remembering across memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02385Beerenwinkel, A. y Von Arx, M. (2017). Constructivism in Practice: an Exploratory Study of Teaching Patterns and Student Motivation in Physics Classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9497-3Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S. y Matsuo, A. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774Bodemer, D. y Dehler, J. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1043–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.014Bradford, B. y Peck, M. (1997). Achieving AECC Outcomes Through the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Journal of Education for Business, 72(6), 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1997.10116872Braithwaite, D., Schrodt, P. y Carr, K. (2015). Introduction. Meta-Theory and Theory in Inr¿terpersonal Communication Research. In D. Braithwaite y P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication. Multiple perspectives (pp. 18–42). SAGE Publications Inc.Brandon, D. P. y Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People. Organization Science, 15(6), 644–644. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.Britez, M. (2020). La educación ante el avance del COVID-19 en Paraguay. La educación ante el avance del COVID-19 en Paraguay. Comparativo con países de la Triple Frontera. https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/22Brown, A. (2014). Implementing Active Learning in an Online Teacher Education Course. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.924695Brown, K. y Cole, M. (2002). Cultural historical activity theory and the expansion of opportunities for learning after school. En G. Wells y G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st centrury : Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Blackwell publishers Ltd.Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V. y Hiebert, J. (2018). Editorial: The role of replication studies in educational research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 2–8. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042107403ypartnerID=40ymd5=4801021745238006f2d5ffa89caac1a7Campbell, D. T. y Stanley, J. C. (1966). Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social. Amorrortu Ed.Castellanos-Ramírez, J. C., Niño-Carrasco, S. A. y Parra-Encinas, K. L. (2020). Discurso socioemocional y construcción compartida del conocimiento en tareas colaborativas en línea. Revista Electrónica Educare, 24(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.24-2.4Castellanos-Ramírez, J. y Niño, S. (2018). Aprendizaje colaborativo y fases de construcción compartida del conocimiento en entornos tecnológicos de comunicación asincróna. Innovación Educativa, 18(76), 69–88. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1665-26732018000100069yscript=sci_arttextCastellanos, J. C., Niño, S. A., Viloria, E. y Santillán, V. E. (2019). Aprendizaje colaborativo en línea; impacto del discurso socioemocional en los procesos cognitivos de los estudiantes. Revista Espacios, 40(23), 22. http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n23/19402322.htmlChand, R., Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Tiwari, P., Rajnish, R. y Mishra, S. (2019). Advanced communication technologies for collaborative learning in telemedicine and tele-care. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference On Cloud Computing, Data Science and Engineering, Confluence 2019, 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2019.8776970Chang, B., Chen, S. y Jhan, S.N. (2015). The influences of an interactive group-based videogame: Cognitive styles vs. prior ability. Computers and Education, 88, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.006Chen, S. y Chang, L. P. (2014). The influences of cognitive styles on individual learning and collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.931242Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi Network Visualization (1st ed.). Packt Publishing LtdChickering, A. y Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. In AAHE bulletin (Vol. 3, Issue 7). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdfCohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001Coll, C. (2014). Constructivismo y educación: la concepción constructivista de la enseñanza y del aprendizaje. In C. Coll, J. Palacios, y Á. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (2nd ed., pp. 157–186). Alianza Editores, S.A. www.alianzaeditorial.esColl, C., De Gispert, I. y Rochera, M. (2010). Tópicos y cadenas: Una aproximación al análisis de la construcción conjunta de significados en foros de conversación en línea. Cultura y Educacion, 22(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564010793351885Collazos, C., Guerrero, L., Pino, J., Renzi, S., Klobas, J., Ortega, M., Redondo, M. y Bravo, C. (2007). Evaluating collaborative learning processes using system-based measurement. Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168450Colomina, R., y Onrubia, J. (2014). Interacción educativa y aprendizaje escolar: la interacción entre alumnos. In C. Coll, J. Palacios, y A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 415–435). Alianza Editores, S.AColomina, R., Onrubia, J y Rochera, M. J. (2014). Interactividad, mecanismos de influencia educativa y construcción de conocimiento en el aula. In C. Coll, J. Palacios, y A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 437–458). Alianza Editores, S.A.Csizmadia, A., Standl, B. y Waite, J. (2019). Integrating the constructionist learning theory with computational thinking classroom activities. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.03Curtis, D. D. y Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2007.08.004Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ’ collaborative learning ’? En P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative -learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (Vol. 1, Issue 6, pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1.1.167.4896Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D. y Synteta, P. (2002). Virtual Learning Environments. 3rd Hellenic Conference “Information y Communication Technologies in Education,” 3–18. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190701Dooly, M. (2018). Collaborative Learning. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (First Edit, pp. 1–7). John Wiley y Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0394Epskamp, S. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in a Fast-Paced Methodological World. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847421Estévez, J. A., Castro-Martínez, J. y Granobles, H. R. (2015). La educación virtual en Colombia: exposición de modelos de deserción. Apertura: Revista de Innovación Educativa, 7(1), 1–9. http://www.udgvirtual.udg.mx/apertura/index.php/apertura/article/view/583Fernández-Pampillón, A. (2012). Las plataformas e-learning para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje universitario en Internet. In Las plataformas de aprendizaje. Del mito a la realidad (Biblioteca, pp. 45–73). http://eprints.ucm.es/10682/Ford, N. y Chen, S. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation, and Learning: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.0000/www.learntechlib.org/9546Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J. y Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001García-Chitiva, M. P. (2019). Análisis bibliométrico de la investigación sobre Sistema de Memoria Transactiva en Educación Superior. En EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/2sxpeGarcía-Chitiva, M. y Suárez-Guerrero, C. (2019). Estado de la investigación sobre la colaboración en Entornos Virtuales de Aprendizaje. Píxel-BIT Revista de Medios y Educación, 56, 169–191. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i56.09García, J. (1989). Los estilos cognitivos y su medida: estudios sobre la dimensión dependencia - independencia de campo. Centro de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: C.I.D.E.Gillies, R. M. (2014). Developments in Cooperative Learning : Review of Research. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201191Goulão, M. de F., Seabra, F., Melaré, D., Henriques, S. y Cardoso, T. (2015). Sucesso, Permanência e Persistência dos Estudantes do Ensino Superior a Distância Online Success,. Adaptation of Self-Efficacy Scales for the Writing and the Spanish Language. (English), 1, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2015.0.0Guitert, M. y Pérez-Mateo, M. (2013). La colaboración en la red: hacia una definición de Aprendizaje colaborativo en entornos virtuales. Teoría de La Educación. Educación y Cultura En La Sociedad de La Información, 14(1), 10–31. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2010/201025739004.pdfGutiérrez-Braojos, C., Montejo-Gámez, J., Ma, L., Chen, B., De Escalona-Fernández, M. M., Scardamalia, M. y Bereiter, C. (2018). Exploring collective cognitive responsibility through the emergence and flow of forms of engagement in a knowledge building community. Didactics of Smart Pedagogy: Smart Pedagogy for Technology Enhanced Learning, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_11Gutu, G., Dascalu, M., Rebedea, T. y Trausan-Matu, S. (2017). Time and semantic similarity – what is the best alternative to capture implicit links in cscl conversations? Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 1, 223–230. https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/235/1/32.pdfHabibi, A., Mukminin, A., Riyanto, Y., Prasojo, L. D., Sulistiyo, U., Sofwan, M. y Saudagar, F. (2018). Building an online community: Student teachers’ perceptions on the advantages of using social networking services in a teacher education program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.382663Hederich-Martínez, C. y Camargo-Uribe, A. (2001). Estilos cognitivos en el contexto escolar. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.Hederich-Martínez, C. y Camargo-Uribe, A. (2015). Cognitive style and educational performance. The case of public schools in Bogotá, Colombia. Educational Psychology, 36(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1091916Hederich, C. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia-independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.Hederich, C. (2013). Estilística educativa. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 64, 21–56. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=413634076002Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (1998). Estilos cognitivos como modalidades de procesamiento de la información una exploración en las áreas de matemáticas y lenguaje. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (2000). Estilo cognitivo y logro en el sistema educativo de la ciudad de Bogotá. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Instituto para la Investigación Educativa y el Desarrollo Pedagógico IDEP.Hederich, Camargo, Á., López, O. y Rincón, L. (2015). Proyecto de Autorregulación del Aprendizaje en Ambientes Web -Informe Final-.Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C. y González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers and Education, 138(February), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012Hernández, A. (2014). La dimensión independencia dependencia de campo en educación : una revisón bibliométrica ( 2003-2013 ). Revista Colombiana de Educación, 66, 149–170. https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/2592/2431Higuchi, K. (2015). KH Coder 2.x reference manual. https://khcoder.net/en/Hillen, S. A. (2014). The role of discussion boards in e-collaborative learning environments (CSCL) - What kind of support can they provide?: A conceptual discussion and a qualitative case study. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(2), 128–147. https://www.idunn.no/dk/2014/02/the_role_of_discussion_boards_in_e-collaborative_learning_eHodges, C. B. (2015). Replication studies in educational technology. TechTrends, 59(4), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0862-2Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1358Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Retrieval Processes in Transactive Memory Systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.659Hollingshead, A. B. (2000). Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships. Group Processes y Intergroup Relations, 3(3), 257–267.Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080Hommes, J., den Bossche, P., de Grave, W., Bos, G., Schuwirth, L. y Scherpbier, A. (2014). Understanding the effects of time on collaborative learning processes in problem based learning: a mixed methods study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9487-zHong, H.Y. y Scardamalia, M. (2014). Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment. Computers and Education, 71, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.009Howard, L. (2016). An exploration of autonetnography as an eresearch methodology to examine learning and teaching scholarship in networked learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(5), 293–335. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011117658ypartnerID=40ymd5=b46aa5d037a217ef9fc2abafbafd9f5eHowell, D. (2012). Statistical Methods for Psychology (8va Ed.). Cengage Learning.Iinuma, M., Matsuhashi, T., Nakamura, T. y Chiyokura, H. (2016). Student Awareness Change in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.730Iiskala, T., Volet, S., Lehtinen, E. y Vauras, M. (2015). Socially Shared Metacognitive Regulation in Asynchronous CSCL in Science: Functions, Evolution and Participation. Socially Shared Metacognitive Regulation in Asynchronous CSCL in Science: Functions, Evolution and Participation., 3(1), 78–111. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i1.159Ivic, I. (1994). Lev Semionovich Vygotski (1896-1934). Perspectivas: Revista Trimestral de Educación Comparada (París, 24(3–4), 773–799. http://papelesdesociedad.info/IMG/pdf/vygotskys_unesco.pdfJackson, M. y Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive Memory in the Classroom. Small Group Research, 40(5), 508–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409340703Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G. y Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers and Education, 49(4), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004Jardines, F. J. (2009). Educación a Distancia: desarrollo histórico de la educación a distancia (Historical development of distance education). Innovaciones de Negocios, 6(2), 225–236. http://eprints.uanl.mx/id/eprint/12521Jelfs, A. y Whitelock, D. (2000). Environments : What Makes the Environment “ Real ” British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00145Jermann, P. y Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Computers and Education, 51(1), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.012Johnson, D. y Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.4.285-358Johnson, D. y Johnson, R. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057Johnson, D. y Johnson, R. (2013). The impact of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning environments on academic achievement. En E. Hattie, J. y Anderman (Ed.), International handbook of student achievement (pp. 372–374). Routledge.Johnson, D. W. y Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative Learning in 21st Century. Anales de Psicologia, 30(3), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201241Kerlinger, F. y Lee, H. (2001). Investigacion Del Comportamiento (Cuarta Edi). McGraw Hill.Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. A. y Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.001Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F. y Zambrano, J. (2018). From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-yKopish, M. y Marques, W. (2020). Leveraging Technology to Promote Global Citizenship in Teacher Education in the United States and Brazil. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.01.3Korthauer, R. y Koubek, R. (1994). An Empirical Evaluation of Knowledge, Cognitive Style, and Structure upon the Performance of a Hypertext Task. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6(4), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319409526102Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and collaborative learning. En C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. Chan y A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (1st ed., pp. 153–170). Taylor y Francis.Koudenburg, N. (2018). Regulating shared reality with micro-dynamics in the form of conversation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.002Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464Kozlowski, S. W. J. y Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science, 5, 77–124.Kreijns, K. y Kirschner, P. A. (2002). The Sociability of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Educational Technology y Society, 5(1), 1–19.Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. y Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2Kromrey, J. y Purdom, D. (1995). A Comparison of lecture, cooperative learning and programmed instruction at the college level. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381605Kuo, F.R., Hwang, G.J., Chen, S.C. y Chen, S. (2012). A Cognitive Apprenticeship Approach to Facilitating Web-based Collaborative Problem Solving Fan-Ray. Educational Technology y Society, 5(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.15.4.319%0AREFERENCESKusmiarti, R., Yuniati, I., y Noermanzah. (2020). Improving student communication skills in learning indonesian language through collaborative learning. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 207–211. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85078751221ypartnerID=40ymd5=8aeb280aa35bf1e818f082fe1b3346f1Labrador, M. M., Vargas, G., Alvarado, J. y Caicedo, M. (2019). Survival and Risk Analysis in MOOCS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 400(October), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640561Leader, L, y Klein, J. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300537Levine, J. M. (2018). Socially-shared cognition and consensus in small groups. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.003Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams : A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams : A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519–1533. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257Lewis, Kyle, Belliveau, M., Herndon, B. y Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005Lewis, Kyle, Lange, D. y Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0143Liang, D. W., Moreland, R. y Argote, L. (1995). Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory. Journal of Composite Materials, 21(4), 384–393. https://doi.org/0803973233Liao, J., Jimmieson, N., O’Brien, A. y Restubog, S. (2012). Developing Transactive Memory Systems: Theoretical Contributions From a Social Identity Perspective. Group y Organization Management, 37(2), 204–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112443976López-Vargas, O., Ortiz-Vásquez, J. e Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J. (2020). Autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en un ambiente B-learning. Pensamiento Psicológico, 18(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI18-1.alaeLópez, O. y Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 58(58), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.632López, O., Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (2011). Estilo cognitivo y logro acádemico. Educ.Educ., 14(1), 67–82.López, O., Hederich, C. y Camargo, A. (2012). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlps/v44n2/v44n2a01.pdf#page=13Lopez, O. y Valencia, N. (2012). Diferencias individuales en el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y el logro académico: el efecto de un andamiaje computacional. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 15(2), 29–41.Mahn, H. (1999). Vygotsky’s methodological contribition to sociocultural theory. Remedial and Special Education, 20(6), 341–350. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ599265Mehta, S. (1998). Cooperative learning strategies for large classes. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1–7. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cooperative-Learning-Strategies-For-Large-Classes-Mehta/74e9206aa00ba2692ac0153d36583aa233363d82Messick, S. (1984). The Nature of Cognitive Styles: Problems and Promise in Educational Practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283Michinov, E. (2007). Validation ofa French version of the Transactive Memory Scale and its adaptation to an academic context. European Review of Applied Psychology, 57(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2006.03.001Michinov, Estelle, Michinov, N. y Huguet, P. (2009). Effects of gender role and task content on performance in same-gender dyads: Transactive memory as a potential mediator. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(2), 155–168.Michinov, N. y Michinov, E. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.01.003Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2019). Educación virtual o educación en línea. Ministerio de Educación Nacional - Mineducación-. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/Educacion-superior/Informacion-Destacada/196492:Educacion-virtual-o-educacion-en-lineaMiyake, N. (1986). Constructive lnteraction and the Iterative Process of Understanding. Cognitive Science, 10, 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1002_2Mo, S. y Xie, X. (2010). Team learning, transactive memory system and team performance: A longitudinal study based on the IMOI approach. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 4(3), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-010-0104-1Moreland, R. L., Argote, L. y Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially Shared Cognition at Work: Transactive Memory and Group Performance. In J. L. y Nye y A.M. Brower (Eds.), What’s Social about Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (pp. 57–84). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327648.n3Moreno-Caro, J. (2020). Regulación interpersonal y trabajo colaborativo en ambientes computacionales: conformación grupal y estilo cognitivo [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional]. http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/handle/20.500.12209/11917Morris, S., Farran, E. K. y Dumontheil, I. (2019). Field Independence Associates with Mathematics and Science Performance in 5- to 10-Year-Olds after Accounting for Domain-General Factors. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12214Navarro, R. (2003). El rendimiento académico: concepto, investigación e ydesarrollo. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 1(2), 1–15. http://www.ice.deusto.es/rinace/reice/vol1n2/Edel.pdfNavo, E., Hmelo-Silver, C. y McKeown, J. (2017). Technology Affordances for CSCL: A Premliminary Review. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, y K. yon Lim (Eds.), Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL. 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 767–768). Drexel University School Education. https://cscl17.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/finalvol1cscl2017.pdfNgaleka, A. y Uys, W. (2013). M-learning with WhatsApp: A conversation analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Learning, ICEL, January 2013, 282–291. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/3159042Niño-Ramos, M. (2019). Personalización de un ambiente educativo digital y su efecto sobre el logro de aprendizaje y la percepción en estudiantes de primaria diferenciados por su estilo cognitivo [Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional]. http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/handle/20.500.12209/11371Nisiotis, L., Kleanthous, S., Beer, M. y Uruchurtu, E. (2017). The Development of Transactive Memory Systems in Collaborative Educational Virtual Worlds. In D. Beck, C. Allison, L. Morgado, J. Pirker, F. Khosmood, J. Richter, y C. Gütl (Eds.), Immersive Learning Research Network. Third International Conference, iLRN 2017 (pp. 35–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60633-0_4Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M. y Chizari, M. (2013). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learning and Instruction, 25, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.002Nyembe, B. Z. M. y Howard, G. R. (2019). The utilities of prominent learning theories for mobile collaborative learning (MCL) with reference to WhatsApp and M-learning. En S. U. G. Maharaj M. (Ed.), icABCD 2019 - 2nd International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABCD.2019.8851042Nyikos, M., y Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist Theory Applied to Collaborative Learning in Teacher Education: En Search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05518.xO’Donnell, A. M. y Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Introduction: What is Collaborative Learning? En The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 15–28). Routledge.Peltokorpi, V. y Hood, A. C. (2019). Communication in Theory and Research on Transactive Memory Systems: A Literature Review. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 644–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12359Peltokorpi, V. y Manka, M.-L. (2008). Antecedents and the Performance Outcome of Transactive Memory in Daycare work groups. European Psychologist, 13(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.103Piotrowski, M. (2010). What is an E-Learning Platform? En Y. Kats (Ed.), Learning management system technologies and software solutions for online teaching. Tools and applications (1st ed., pp. 20–36). Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-853-1.ch002Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovic, V. M. y Jovanovic, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. COMPUTERS y EDUCATION, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002Quero-Virla, M. (2010). Confiabilidad y coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. Telos, 12(2), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2004.1370608R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/Rama, C. (2016). La fase actual de expansión de la educación en línea o virtual en América Latina. Universidades, 70, 27–39. http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/MINEDU/5114Rama, C. y Cevallos, M. (2015). The Metamorphosis of Distance Education in Latin America. A New Fase with the Entry of International Suppliers. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 26(2015), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.26.2015Ramos, F. (1998). A decade of relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(3), 305–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00015-0Real Academia Española. (n.d.). Diccionario de La Lengua Española 23.a Ed., [Versión 23.3 En Línea]. Recuperado el 30 de octubre de 2020 de https://dle.rae.es/contenido/actualización-2019Ren, Y. y Argote, L. (2011). Transactive Memory Systems 1985-2010: An Integrative Framework of Key Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590300Resta, P. y Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7Rodríguez, J. (2001). Aprendizaje colaborativo en entornos virtuales. Anuario de Psicología, 32(2), 63.75. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/Anuario-psicologia/article/view/8826/11092Rogoff, B. y Chavajay, P. (2009). Las bases culturales del desarrollo cognitivo. Evolución de la investigación en este campo en Norteamérica. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, XVI(39), 121–160. http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/revistaeyp/article/view/6005Romero, E. y Soria, B. (2010). Introduction: Explicit Communication and Relevance Theory Pragmatics. En Explicit Communication (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_1Roschelle, J. y Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5Roselli, N. (2016). Los beneficios de la regulación externa de la colaboración sociocognitiva entre pares: Ilustraciones experimentales. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 27(2), 354–367. https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/6175Rummel, N. y Spada, H. (2005). Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402Sanz-Martínez, L., Er, E., Martínez-Monés, A., Dimitriadis, Y. y Bote-Lorenzo, M. L. (2019). Creating collaborative groups in a MOOC: a homogeneous engagement grouping approach. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(11), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1571109Saracho, O. N. (2003). Matching Teachers’ and Students’ Cognitive Styles. Early Child Development and Care, 173(2–3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430303097Scardamalia, M. y Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology. En K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.61.2.5Schnaubert, L. y Bodemer, D. (2019). Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(1), 7–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9293-ySchunk, D. (2012). Teorías del aprendizaje. Una perspectiva educativa. In Naucalpan de Juárez, Estado de México (Sexta edic). Pearson Educación. www.pearsonenespañol.comSerrano, J. M. y Pons, R. M. (2014). Introduction : Cooperative Learning. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 801–804. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201251Shen, Y. (2007). Transactive memory system development in virtual teams: the potential role of shared identity and shared context. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference, 228–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/1235000.1235054Shukor, N., Tasir, Z., Van der Meijden, H. y Harun, J. (2014). Exploring students’ knowledge construction strategies in computer-supported collaborative learning discussions using sequential analysis. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 216–228. https://www.ds.unipi.gr/etys/journals/17_4/14.pdfSilva-Ordaz, M., García-Ramírez, C., Guzmán-Flores, T. y Chaparro-Ramírez, R. (2016). Estudio de herramientas Moodle para desarrollar habilidades del siglo XXI. Campus Virtuales, 5(2), 58–69. http://www.uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/campusvirtuales/article/view/126Stahl, G. (2017). Group practices: a new way of viewing CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9251-0Stahl, G., Koschmann, T, y Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124855Suárez, C. (2010). Aprendizaje cooperativo e interacción asíncrona textual en contextos educativos virtuales. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 36, 53–67. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/22608Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9660-yTai, D., Shen, S., Lin, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, J. y Tai, V. (2011). The study of heterogeneous cooperative learning towards blended learning performance. WMSCI 2011 - The 15th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings, 3(March), 119–123. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ren-cheng_Zhang/publication/289438831_The_study_of_heterogeneous_cooperative_learning_towards_blended_learning_performance/links/5c8739e6458515b59e4547e6/The-study-of-heterogeneous-cooperative-learning-towards-blended-Tudge, J. y Scrimcher, S. (2003). Lev S. Vygotsky on Education: A Cultural-Historical, Interpersonal, and Individual Approach to Development. In B. Zimmerman y D. Shunk (Eds.), Educational psychology. A century of contributions (pp. 207–228). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Urien, B., Erro-Garcés, A. y Osca, A. (2019). WhatsApp usefulness as a communication tool in an educational context. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2585–2602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09876-5Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O. y Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018a). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: Self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.5Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O. y Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018b). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: Self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.5Vega, M. L., Vidal, D. y García, M. del P. (2013). Avances acerca de los efectos del aprendizaje cooperativo sobre el logro académico y las habilidades sociales en relación con el estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 155–174. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S0120-39162013000100007Vuopala, E., Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J. y Järvelä, S. (2019). Knowledge co-construction activities and task-related monitoring in scripted collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.011Warne, R. T. (2014). Two Additional Suggested Reforms to Encourage Replication Studies in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 465. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14562294Wegner, D. M., Giuliano T. y Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_12Wegner, D. (1987). Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind. In B. Mullen y G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 185–208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9Wegner, D. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Wegner, D., Erber, R. y Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive Memory in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923Wibowo, W. C., Dayanti, I. S., Hidayanto, A. N., Eitiveni, I. y Phusavat, K. (2018). Prioritizing solutions for overcoming knowledge transfer barriers in software development using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 10(2), 217–249.Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag. http://ggplot2.orgWilson, D. y Sperber, D. A. N. (2004). Relevance Theory. In L. Horn y G. Ward (Eds.), The Hanbook of Pragmatics (1st ed., pp. 608–632). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. www blackwellpublishing.comWitkin, H. y Asch, S. (1948). Studies in space orientation IV. Further experiments on perception of the up-right with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(6), 762–782. http://www.mbfys.ru.nl/staff/j.vangisbergen/endnote/endnotepdfs/frame_effect/Witkin-Asch_studies-in-space-perception_IV_1948.pdfWitkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D. y Cox, P. (1975). Field-development and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1975.tb01065.xYilmaz, R., Yilmaz, F. G. K., Cakmak, E. K. y Kilic, C. (2016). The impact of transactive memory system and interaction platform in collaborative knowledge construction on social presence and self-regulation. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820(September 2016), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1224905Yuen, A., Cheng, M. y Chan, F. (2019). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A growth model of belief and use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2520–2535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12830Yus, F. (2010). Relevance Theory. En A. Barber y R. Stainton (Eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 648–655). Elservier Ltd. https://books.google.com/books?id=2boGE2NKtpsCypgis=1Zhang, X., Chen, H., de Pablos, P. O., Lytras, M. D. y Sun, Y. (2016). Coordinated implicitly? An empirical study on the role of social media in collaborative learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(6), 121–144. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85008168830ypartnerID=40ymd5=ef5cd2200447949030a5304b4cb262a2Zhao, Y., Wang, A. y Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus–organism–response perspective. Computers and Education, 144 (October 2019), 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721Zheng, L., Huang, R. y Yu, J. (2014). Identifying Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) research in selected journals published from 2003 to 2012: A content analysis of research topics and issues. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 335–351. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f39/d9669b27da2b7a9dace911c61f11b0476239.pdfZheng, Y. y Subramaniyan, A. (2019). Personality-Aware Collaborative Learning: Models and Explanations. En L. et al Barolli (Ed.), International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (Vol. 1, pp. 834–845). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7Zurita, G. y Nussbaum, M. (2004). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(4), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00089.xTHUMBNAILANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE (1).pdf.jpgANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE (1).pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6554http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/6/AN%c3%81LISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACI%c3%93N_%20ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_%20DIFERENTE_%20ESTILO_%20COGNITIVO_%20EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE%20%281%29.pdf.jpg9a088741c7125197d4dd31bb276428f1MD56ORIGINALANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE (1).pdfANÁLISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACIÓN_ ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_ DIFERENTE_ ESTILO_ COGNITIVO_ EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE (1).pdfapplication/pdf7440235http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/5/AN%c3%81LISIS_DEL_PROCESO_DE_COLABORACI%c3%93N_%20ENTRE_ESTUDIANTES_DE_%20DIFERENTE_%20ESTILO_%20COGNITIVO_%20EN_ENTORNOS_VIRTUALES_DE_APRENDIZAJE%20%281%29.pdf013b9cc4d7c6bb96d66ac91974554eb2MD55LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/3/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53202103780077733-17JUN2021 MARÍA DEL PILAR.pdf202103780077733-17JUN2021 MARÍA DEL PILAR.pdfapplication/pdf160878http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/13321/4/202103780077733-17JUN2021%20MAR%c3%8dA%20DEL%20PILAR.pdf061587f92b07df21ae34bdc14557bc21MD5420.500.12209/13321oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/133212023-12-07 15:05:55.062Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalrepositorio@pedagogica.edu.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

Análisis del proceso de colaboración entre estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje.

Publicaciones similares