Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.

El trabajo de grado se propone hacer un análisis estadístico y sistemático de ambientes computacionales los cuales tienen como objetivo desarrollar habilidades en diferentes dimensiones del proceso de aprendizaje en los estudiantes como lo son; autorregulación, aprendizaje autorregulado, estilos de...

Full description

Autores:: Fajardo Ríos, Joan David

Tipo de recurso:: Trabajo de grado de pregrado

Fecha de publicación:: 2019

Institución:: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional UPN

Idioma:: spa

id	RPEDAGO2_4ca1e1c2fbbed1cbb4b983ab904ba6f7
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/12361
network_acronym_str	RPEDAGO2
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional UPN
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
title	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
spellingShingle	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales. Autorregulación Aprendizaje autorregulado Estilos de aprendizaje Estilo cognitivo Ambientes computacionales Self-regulation
title_short	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
title_full	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
title_fullStr	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
title_full_unstemmed	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
title_sort	Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Fajardo Ríos, Joan David
dc.contributor.advisor.spa.fl_str_mv	López Vargas, Omar
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Fajardo Ríos, Joan David
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Autorregulación Aprendizaje autorregulado Estilos de aprendizaje Estilo cognitivo Ambientes computacionales
topic	Autorregulación Aprendizaje autorregulado Estilos de aprendizaje Estilo cognitivo Ambientes computacionales Self-regulation
dc.subject.keywords.eng.fl_str_mv	Self-regulation
description	El trabajo de grado se propone hacer un análisis estadístico y sistemático de ambientes computacionales los cuales tienen como objetivo desarrollar habilidades en diferentes dimensiones del proceso de aprendizaje en los estudiantes como lo son; autorregulación, aprendizaje autorregulado, estilos de aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo, estas dimensiones mencionadas anteriormente son evaluadas mediante un programa estadístico spss con datos recogidos previamente de una investigación realizada en el año 2010 en un colegio público de Bogotá y otra realizada para hacer una validación de un cuestionario “Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire”, para estudiantes colombianos. Gracias a los datos recogidos se puede hacer una discusión de resultados en el cual se menciona la manera en que influyo cada uno de estos instrumentos en los estudiantes en relación con las dimensiones del proceso de aprendizaje mencionadas anteriormente.
publishDate	2019
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2020-08-18T18:59:36Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2020-08-18T18:59:36Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía – Pregrado
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f
status_str	acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.other.spa.fl_str_mv	TE-24135
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/12361
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN
dc.identifier.repourl.none.fl_str_mv	repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv	TE-24135 instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional reponame: Repositorio Institucional UPN repourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/12361
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Angeli, C., Valanides, N. & Kirschner, P. (2009). Field dependence–independence and instructional design effects on learners’ performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior. No 25, pp. 1355–1366. Alexander P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Alonso, C. M., Gallego, D. J. & Honey, P. (2000). Los estilos de aprendizaje: procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. Bilbao: Mensajero. 5ª edición Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate Students’ Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude toward Computers. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 289-297 Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 261-271 Armstrong, A. M. (1989). Persistence and the causal perception of failure: Modifying cognitive attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 154-166. Armstrong, S. J. & Priola, V. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research, 32(3), 283–312 Aron, A. & Aron E.N. (2001). Estadística para psicología. Prentice Hall, Pearson Educaciòn. Sao Pablo – Brasil Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin,120(3), 338-375 Ayersman, D.J. & von Minden, A. (1995). Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior (Special issue on Hypermedia: Theory, research, and application), 11, 371-390 Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197. Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209. Azevedo, R. Cromley, J.G., Seibert, D., & Tron, M. (2003). The role of co-regulated learning during students’ understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Paper to be presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344–370. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., Wang, H., & Mulhern, J. (2001). Do different instructional interventions facilitated students´ ability to shift to more sophisticated mental models of complex systems?. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, W.A. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., y Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87–111 Azevedo, R., Moos, D., Greene, J., Winters, F. & Cromley, J. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?. Education Tech Research, 56:45–72. Azevedo, R., Verona, M.E., & Cromley, J.G. (2001). Fostering students` Collaborative problema solving with RiverWeb. In J.D. Moore, C.L. Redfield, & W.L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future (pp. 166-175). Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A. (1989). The perceived controllability and performance standards on selfregulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 805-814 Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148 Beers, P. J. (2005). Negotiating common ground: Tools for multidisciplinary teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open University of The Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17, 427–435 Berndt, T. J., Perry, T. B., & Miller, K. E. (1988). Friends’ and classmates’ interaction on academic tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 506–513. Berndt, T.J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66 , 1312–1329 Boekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioural change. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 377-397 Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 3(4), 195-200 Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researcher, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 7 (2): 161-186 Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research 31 (6): 445-457 Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic. Butler, D., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback as self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Review, 65, 245–281 Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C. y Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, pp. 317–329. Boutin, F., & Chinien, C. A. (1992). Synthesis of research on student selection criteria in formative evaluation. Educational Technology, 32(8), 28-31 Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behaviour among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530 Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition In A. Sinclair, R., J. Jarvelle, and W. J. M. Levelt (eds.) The Child's Concept of Language. New York: Springer-Verlag Bruning, R. H., Shraw, G. J., & Ronning R. R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (2nd ed.). Engle Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333-356 Burns, H.L. & Capps, C.G. (1988). “Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Introduction”. En M. Polson & Richardson (eds). Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lawrwncw Erlbaum Associates Publishers, USA Burton, J. K., Moore, D. M. & Holmes, G. A. (1995). Hypermedia concepts and research: An overview. Computers in Human Behavior, II (3/4), pp. 345-369. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback on self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, pp: 245-281. Campanizzi, J. A. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computer-assisted instruction sequence. Association for Educational Data Systems (AEDS) Journal, 12(l), 21-30. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L. Ferrara, R. A,, & Bryant, N. R. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences in learning. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), New directions for child developnent: "Children S leanling in the zone of proximal development" (pp. 77-9 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583-595 Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583-595 Chen, M. (1995). A methodology for characterizing computer-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 23, 183–220. Chi, M. T.H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser, R. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (vol.5) (pp. 161-238). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum Chi, M. T.H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-534 Chinien, C. & Boutin, F. (1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21(4), 303-311 Chou, C., & Lin, H. (1998). The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 151-176 Cobb, R. (2003). The relationship between self-regulated learning behaviors and academic performance in web-based courses. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Curriculum and Instruction Corno, L. & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation, Educational Psychologist, 18, 1. Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning : A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.111-142). New York: Springer-Verlag Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, (pp. 191-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Covington, M. V., & Mueller, K. J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 157- 176. Crozier W. R. (2001). Diferencias individuales en el aprendizaje: Personalidad y Rendimiento Escolar. Ed. Narcea, S.A. Madrid – España Curry, L. (1987). Integrating concepts of cognitive of learning style: A review with attention to psychometric standards. Ottawa: Canadian College of Health Services Executives Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540 Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540. Davis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: cognitive style across the lifespan (pp.149-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates De Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., van der Meijden, H., Staarman, J. K., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 645–670 De Westelinck, K., Valcke, M., De Craene, B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2005). Multimedia learning in social sciences: Limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 555–573 Demetriadis, S. N., & Pombortsis, A. (1999). Novice student learning in case based hypermedia environment: A quantitative study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 241–269 Demetriadis, S. N., Papadopoulos, P. M., Stamelos, I. G., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Computers & Education, 51, 939–954 Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In H. Spada, & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley. Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519 Eom, W., & Reiser, R. A. (2000). The effects of self-regulation and instructional control on performance and motivation in computer-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(3), 247–260 Epstein, J. L. (1983). The influence of friends on achievement and affective outcomes. In J. L. Epstein & N. Karweit (Eds.), Friends in school: Patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools (pp. 177–200). New York: Academic. Ercikan, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Constructing data. In C. Conrad & R. Serlin (Eds.), SAGE Handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 451–475). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (2002). Social relations and academic achievement in innercity early elementary classrooms. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 518–528. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grasel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232 Fisher, M. D., Blackwell, L. R., Garcia, A. B., & Greene, J. C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in a CAI arithmetic task in a low-income school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(6), 776-783 Fritz, R. L. (1994). Gender differences in field-dependence and educational style. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 19(1), 1-21. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 127-153. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Gordon, H.R.D. (1998). Identifying Learning Styles. Paper presented at the annual Summer Workshop for Beginning Vocational Education Teachers, West Virginia University Institute of Technology, July 20, 1998 Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through PointyQuery, AutoTutor and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225–234. Graesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., & Kruez, R. (2000). AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 35–51. Gray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(2), 54-56. Greene, B. & Land, S. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23(2): 151–179. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(2), 125–148 Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers and Education, 50, 1069–1083. Gros, B. (2000). El ordenador invisible. Gedisa. Barcelona – España Guisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F, Tinajero C, & Almeida, L.S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema. Vol. 19, nº 4, pp. 572-577. Hadwin, A. F. & Winne, P.H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. Vol. 7, No. 2-3, pp. 313-334. Hagen, A. S. & Weinstein, C. E. (1995). Achievement goals, self-regulated learning, and the role of classroom context. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Fall): 43-55. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.F., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2007). Análisis multivariante. Quinta edición. Pearson, Prentice Hall., España Hall J. K. (2000). Field Dependence-Independence and Computer-based Instruction in Geography. Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Teaching and Learning. Handal, B., & Herrington, T. (2004). On being dependent and independent in computer based learning environments. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, (7)2. Hannafin, M. & Land, S. (1997). The foundations and assumption of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202. Hannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1999). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99 Hartley, K. & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). The use of comprehension aids in a hypermedia environment: Investigating the impact of metacognitive awareness and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 275-289. Hartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 285–305. Hederich, C. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia-independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Bogotá-Colombia Hederich, C. & Camargo, A (1999). Estilos Cognitivos en Colombia. Resultados en cinco regiones culturales. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional-Colciencias Hederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2000). Estilo cognitivo en la educación. Itinerario Educativo: Revista de la Facultad de Educación. Universidad de San Buenaventura. Bogotá. No 36.43-75 Hederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2001). Estilo cognitivo y logro educativo en la ciudad de Bogotá. Bogotá: Centro de investigaciones de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Ciup. Instituto para la investigación educativa y el desarrollo pedagógico, IDEP Hederich, C., Camargo, A., Guzmán, L. & Pacheco, J.C. (1995) Regiones Cognitivas en Colombia. Santafé de Bogotá : Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - Colciencias Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley. Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: a stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 402-429. Hiemstra, R. (1996). Self-directed learning. In T. Plomp & R. Ely (Eds.), International encyclopedia of educational technology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. Pp. 347-352 Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books. Honey, P. & Munford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles (versión revisada). Maidenhead: Peter Honey Hunter-Blanks, P., Ghatala, E. S., Pressley, M. & Levin, J. R. (1988). Comparison of monitoring during testing on a sentence-learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 279-283. Inkpen, K., Booth, K. & Klawe M., (1996). Cooperative Learning In The Classroom: The Importance of a Collaborative. Environment for Computer-Based Education. Department of Computer Science. University of British Columbia. Vancouver, British Columbia. V6T 1Z4 Jackson, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). MODEL-IT: A design retrospective. In M. Jacobson, y R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 77-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Jacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145–199. Järvelä, S., & Salovaara, H. (2004). The interplay of motivational goals and cognitive strategies in a new pedagogical culture: a context-oriented and qualitative approach. European Psychologist, 9(4), 232–244 Jonassen, D. H. (1989). Hypertext - hypermedia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp.694-719). New York: Macmillan Jones, M., Estell, D. & Alexander, J. (2008). Friends, classmates, and self-regulated learning: discussions with peers inside and outside the classroom. Metacognition and Learning. Springer Science + Business Media. Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17. Kandel, D. B., & Andrews, K. (1987). Processes of adolescent socialization by parents and peers. The International Journal of the Addictions, 22, 319–342. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology. En M. D. Dunnette y Hough, L. M (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol 1). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc Karabenick, S. A. (1996). Social influences on metacognition: Effects of colearner questioning on comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 689–703 Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1&2), 139–161. Kaya, S. (2007). The influences of student views related to mathematics and self-regulated learning on achievement of algebra I students. Dissertation. Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Kini, A. S. (1994). Effects of cognitive style and verbal and visual presentation modes on concept learning in cbi. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 18. Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. C. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 299-303 Kirschner F., Paas F. & Kirschner P.A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 306–314 Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 306–314. Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 403–420. Kolb, D. A. (1977). Aprendizaje y solución de problemas. En Kolb, D. A; Rubin, I. M. & Mc Intyre, J. M. (Eds.), Psicología de las organizaciones: problemas contemporáneos ( 1ª edición en español, pp. 18-34). Madrid: Prentice-Hall. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs. Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2005). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33. Kramarski, B., & Hirsch, C. (2003). Using computer algebra systems in mathematical classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 35–45. Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006a). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218–230. Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006b). Online interactions in a mathematical classroom. Educational Media International, 43(1), 43. Kuhl, J . (1992). A theory of self-regulation: action versus state orientation, self discrimination and some applications. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 41(2), 97-129 Kush, J.C. (1984). Cognitive processing differences in Mexican-American and Anglo-American student. Dissertation abstract international,45,1075 Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2007). Using Computers to Individually-generate vs. Collaboratively-generate Concept Maps. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 269-280. Lajoie, P. (2000). Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls, Vol. II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 803–821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Land, S. y Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research y Development, 48(3), 61-78 Land, S.M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(4), 65-84. Lazakidou, G. & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54 (2010) 3–13 Leader, L. F., & Klein, J.D. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 5-15. Lee, I.S. (1999). An analysis of learners' perspectives and learning styles in a Web-based environment mixed with a traditional classroom.Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE'99), the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Chiba, Japan, November 4–7, 468–475. Lepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., & O’Donnell-Johnson, T. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan y M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 108–144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline. Lepper, M., & Wolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aranson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education. New York, NY: Academic Press Lin, X. D., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 36(7), 1–22. Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning Styles in hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior 10, (4), 419 434. Lopez, O. (2010). Aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales. Tesis Doctoral.. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Lozano, R.A. (2006). Estilos de aprendizaje y enseñanza: Un panorama de la estilística educativa. Editotal Trillas. México Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 121-139. Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 121-139 Lumpe, A. T., & Staver, J.R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (1), 71-98. Lyons-Lawrence, C.L. (1994). Effect of learning style on performance in using computer-based instruction in office systems. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. 36(3), 166-175. Mace, F., Belfiore, P., & Shea, M. (1989). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 27-50). New York: Springer-Verlag MacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 189–206. Mainemelis, C.; Boyatzis, R.E. & Kolb, D.A. (2002). Learning styles and daptive flexibility. Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning. 33, 5-33. Mäkitalo, K., Weinberger, A., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic cooperation scripts in online learning environments: Fostering learning by reducing uncertainty in discourse? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 603–622. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L.W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337 Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press McCaslin, M. (2004). Coregulation of opportunity, activity, and identity in student motivation. In D. McInerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited, Vol. 4 (pp. 249e274). Greenwich, CT: Information Age McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A vygotskian view. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 51-82). New York: Springer-Verlag McIsaac, M.S. & Gunawardena, C.N. (1996). Distance Education. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed) . Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a proyect of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. New York, N.Y: Simon & Schuster-Macmillan, pp. 403-437. McManus, T. F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment: nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 219–251 Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 261-285).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Meece, J. L. (1994). The role of motivation in self-regulated learning. In SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 25-44. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Melara, G.E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertexts environments: hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 313-328. Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Merrill, S. K., & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 315–372 Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Reconceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 377-390. Moos, D. C. & Azevedo, R. (2006). The Role of Goal Structure in Undergraduates' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes in Two Hypermedia Learning Tasks. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15 no1 49-86 Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 1686–1706. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: the role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298 Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Baldwin, W. (1992). Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(l), 5-13. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. Murphy, H. J., Casey, B., Day, D. A., & Young, J. D. (1997). Scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test by undergraduates in information management. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1135-1138 Myint S. K. (1996). The interaction of cognitive styles with varying levels of feedback in multimedia presentation. International Journal of Instructional Media v23, No 3, pp. 229-37. Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144 Nesbit, J. C., Winne, P. H., Jamieson‐Noel, D., Code, J., Zhou, M., MacAllister, K., Bratt, S., Wang, W., & Hadwin, A. F. (2006). Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 339–358. Nichols, J. D., & White, J. (2001). Impact of peer networks on achievement of high school algebra students. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 267–273 O'Neil, H. F., & Drillings, M. (1994). Motivation : Theory and Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8. Packard, A. L., Holmes, G. A., Viveiros, D. M., & Fortune, J. C. (1997). Incorporating individual learning styles into computer assisted environments for instruction basic research and statistical concepts. Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, 6. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner, (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences: Self perception (Vol. 2) Westport CT: Ablex Publishing Pape, S.J., & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behavior: lassification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419-449. Paris, S.G. & Byrnes, J.P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. En B.J. Zimmerman y D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag. Paris, S.G., & Paris, A.H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451. Pintrich P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning Pintrich P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53: 801-813 Pintrich, P. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames and M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments (pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Pintrich, P. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In R. J. Menges & M. D. Svinicki (Eds.), Understanding self-regulated learning, New Directions for teaching and learning (pp. 3-12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. international Journal ofEducationa1 Research, 31,459-470. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & De Groot, E. A. M. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161 Pintrich, P., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in college classroom. In M. Mahr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Vol. 6: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 371-403). Greenwich, CT: JAI. Pintrich, P., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Pi-Sui-Hsu y Dwyer F. (2004). Effect of level of adjunct questions on achievement of field independent/field dependent learners. International Journal of Instructional Media 31 No 1, pp. 99-106. Pressley, M. (1995). More about the development of self regulation: complex, long term and thoroughly social. Educational Psychologist, 34 (4), 207-212 Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 265–286, 2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Proske, A., Narciss, S., & Korndle, H. (2007). Interactivity and learners’ achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 511–531. Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12 Ramirez, M. & Castañeda, A. (1974). Cultural democracy, bicognitive development, and education. New York: Academic Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87–98 Reeve, J. (1996). Motivating Others: Nurturing Inner Motivational Resources. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Reiff, J. (1996). At-risk middle level students or field dependent learners. Clearing House, 69(4), 231-234 Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304. Reiser, B.J,, Tabak, I., Sandoval, W., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. Carver y D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Reiser, B.J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the CSCL (pp. 255-264). Reusser, K. (2001). Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice. In N. J. Smelser, P. Baltes, & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2058e2062). Oxford, UK: Pergamon/Elsevier Science Riding, R. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles - an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11 (3-4), 193-215 Riding, R. & Rayner. (1997). Towards a Categorization of Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles. Educational Psychology, Vol. 17, Nos. 1 and 2, 5-27. Roces C. & González M. (1998). Capacidad de autorregulación del proceso de aprendizaje. En Dificultades de aprendizaje escolar. Ed. Piramide. Madrid-España Roces, C., González, M. C. & Tourón, J. (1997). Expectativas de aprendizaje y rendimiento de los alumnos universitarios. Revista de Psicología de la Educación, 22, 99-123. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press. Rohrkemper, M. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygostskian view. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 143-167). New York: Springer Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-197). Berlin: Springer Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 80, Whole No. 609 Rouet, J.F. (2000). Hypermedia and learning- cognitive perspectives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 97-101. Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescents motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150 Rydell A, Altermatt, E., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111–123 Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction e what can it tell us about metacognition and co-regulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199-208 Salovaara, H. (2005). An exploration of students’ strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 39–52. Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 77-96. Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 71-86. Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist 26 (3 and 4): 207-231. Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 75-99. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382 Schunk, D. H. (1997). Self-monitoring as a motivator during instruction with elementary school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159- 172 Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 251–260 Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208 Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and the ends. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 349–367, 2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Schwartz, L. R. & Gredler, M. E. (1998). The effects of self-instructional materials on goal setting and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education (Winter): 83-89 Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relevance of hierarchies to learning biology from hypertext. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 215–243 Shapiro, A. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from electronic texts. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57–78. Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Shin, M. (1998). Promoting students' self-regulation ability: Guidelines for instructional design. Educational Technology (Jan-Feb): 38-44. Sins, P. H. M., Joolingen, W. R. van, Savelsbergh, E. R., & Hout-Wolters, B. V. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 58–77. Smith, P.A. (2001). Understanding self-regulated learning and its implications for accounting educators and researchers. Issues In Accounting Education. Vol. 16, 4; pp. 663-700. Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs, and metacognitive calibration: an exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338 Summerville, J. (1999). Role of awareness of cognitive style in hypermedia. International Journal of Educational Technology. 1(1). Sweet, M. & Pelton-Sweet, L. (2008). The Social Foundation of Team-Based Learning: Students Accountable to Students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 116. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online in Wiley InterScience. Revisada en agosto 20, 2009 en www.interscience.wiley.com Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and Adult Learning. London: Routledge. Tennyson, C. L., Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. (1980). Content structure and instructional control strategies as design variables in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4). 499-50. Tennyson, R. D., Park, O. C., & Christensen, D. L. (1985). Adaptive control of learning time and content sequence in concept learning using computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 481-491. Tergan, S.O. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3), 209-235 Tinajero, C & Páramo, M.F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement : a re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 199-212. Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students´ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122 Van Blerkom, M. (1988). Field dependence, sex role self-perceptions, and mathematics achievement. College student: A Closer examination, En:Contemporany Educational Psychology 13, 339-347. Van Boxtel, C. A. M., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311–330. Van Bruggen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12, 121–138. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567. Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C. A. M., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 575–602 VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T. y Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition y Instruction 21(3): 209-250. Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: a case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19-37. Volet, S. E., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4), 341-356 Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?. Learning and Instruction 19, 128-143. Vye, N., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., Barron, B., Zech, L., & CTGV. (1998). SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, y A. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305-346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Wang, S. L., & Lin, S. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 2256–2268 Weiner, B., L. Frieze, A. Kukla, L. Reed, S. Rest, &. Rosenbaum, R. (1971). Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure. In Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, edited by E. E. Jones et al. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third edition, edited by M. C. Wittrock, 315-327. New York, NY: Macmillan. Weinstein, C., Schulte, A., & Cascallar, E. (1983). The learning and studies strategies inventory (LASSI): initial design and development, Technical Report, U. S. Army Research Institute for the social and behavioral sciences, Alexandria, VA Weinstein, C.; J. Husman & Dierking, D.(2000). Self regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. En Boekaerts, M.; P. Pintrich y M. Zeidner 2000 Handbook of Self-regulation. San Diego. Academic Press. Weller, H. G., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. E. (1994). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive style in hypermedia based instruction: implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 10(3/4), 401-420. Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209 Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22. White, B.Y., Shimoda, T.A., & Frederiksen, J.R. (2000). Facilitating students’ inquiry learning and metacognitive development through modifiable software advisers. In S.P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls: Theory change, paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes (pp. 97-132). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum Whyte, M. M., Knirk, F. G., Casey, R. J., & Willard, M. L. (1991). Individualistic vs. paired/cooperative computer assisted instruction: matching instructional method with cognitive style. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(4), 299-312 Whyte, M., Karolick, D., & Taylor, M. D. (1996). Cognitive learning styles and their impact on curriculum development and instruction. Proceedings of the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 783-799 Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research of educational communications and technology (pp. 957–983). New York: Macmillan Williams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71–82. Wilson, J. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory. Revisado en Diciembre de 2009 from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/wilson/wilson.html Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 51–572. Winne, P.H. & Hadwin, A.F. (1998). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing (p. 164). In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2 ed., pp. 153-189). Winne, P.H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187 Winne, P.H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397-410. Winne, P.H., & Perry, N.E. (1999). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press Winter, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 369–372 Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189–217. Witkin, H. & Asch, S.E. (1948). Studies in Space Orientation. III Perception of the Upright in the Absence of a Visual Field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 603-614. Witkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D. R. (1977a). Psychological differentiation: Current status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84,661-689. Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977b). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661-689 Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins, NY: International University Press Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1979). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64. Witkin, H., Goodenough, D. & Oltman, K. (1979). Psychological differentiation: Current Status. En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 7, 1127-1145. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Vol. 17, pp. 89-100 Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 17–27. Zehavi, N. (1995). Integrating software development with research and teacher education. Computers in the Schools, 11(3), 11-24. Zhang, L.F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? – validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295-1311 Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339 Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 3-17. Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 3-21. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University Press Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning : from teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford Press Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman y D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical Background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 166-183 Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628 Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 284290 Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. En D. H. Schunk y J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: causes and consequences (pp. 185-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer Zimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Zimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Zimmerman, B., y Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum Zimmerman, B.J., & Paulson, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Fall) 63: 13-27 Zimmerman, B.J., A. Bandura, A. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal 29: 663-676 Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner S. y Kovach R. (1996). Developing Self-Regulated Learners: Beyond Achievement to Self-Efficacy. Psychology in the classroom: A series on Applied Educational Psychology. USA Zydney, J. M. (2010). The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students’ understanding, consideration of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem. Computers & Education 54, 360–370
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.access.spa.fl_str_mv	Acceso abierto
dc.rights.creativecommons.none.fl_str_mv	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Acceso abierto Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv	PDF
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
dc.publisher.program.spa.fl_str_mv	Licenciatura en Diseño Tecnológico
dc.publisher.faculty.spa.fl_str_mv	Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
instname_str	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
institution	Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
reponame_str	Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
collection	Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/4/TE-24135.pdf.jpg http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/2/license.txt http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/3/TE-24135%20LIC.%20DE%20USO.pdf http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/1/TE-24135.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	36a509f80fbcc616a42e79f70fd9a78d 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 f67a7bc12080094ba8ddf406bc3e5a50 6a9b70afaaa5ad45f70ce25d8173c4e6
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	repositorio@pedagogica.edu.co
_version_	1814445082210729984
spelling	López Vargas, OmarFajardo Ríos, Joan David2020-08-18T18:59:36Z2020-08-18T18:59:36Z2019TE-24135http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12209/12361instname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalinstname:Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalreponame: Repositorio Institucional UPNrepourl: http://repositorio.pedagogica.edu.co/El trabajo de grado se propone hacer un análisis estadístico y sistemático de ambientes computacionales los cuales tienen como objetivo desarrollar habilidades en diferentes dimensiones del proceso de aprendizaje en los estudiantes como lo son; autorregulación, aprendizaje autorregulado, estilos de aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo, estas dimensiones mencionadas anteriormente son evaluadas mediante un programa estadístico spss con datos recogidos previamente de una investigación realizada en el año 2010 en un colegio público de Bogotá y otra realizada para hacer una validación de un cuestionario “Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire”, para estudiantes colombianos. Gracias a los datos recogidos se puede hacer una discusión de resultados en el cual se menciona la manera en que influyo cada uno de estos instrumentos en los estudiantes en relación con las dimensiones del proceso de aprendizaje mencionadas anteriormente.Submitted by Melissa Giselle Cuastuza Arango (mcuastuza@pedagogica.edu.co) on 2020-08-18T18:52:05Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TE-24135.pdf: 2850727 bytes, checksum: 6a9b70afaaa5ad45f70ce25d8173c4e6 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Biblioteca UPN (repositoriobiblioteca@pedagogica.edu.co) on 2020-08-18T18:58:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TE-24135.pdf: 2850727 bytes, checksum: 6a9b70afaaa5ad45f70ce25d8173c4e6 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Melissa Giselle Cuastuza Arango (mcuastuza@pedagogica.edu.co) on 2020-08-18T18:59:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TE-24135.pdf: 2850727 bytes, checksum: 6a9b70afaaa5ad45f70ce25d8173c4e6 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-08-18T18:59:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TE-24135.pdf: 2850727 bytes, checksum: 6a9b70afaaa5ad45f70ce25d8173c4e6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019Licenciado en Diseño TecnológicoTesis de pregradoPDFapplication/pdfspaUniversidad Pedagógica NacionalLicenciatura en Diseño TecnológicoFacultad de Ciencia y Tecnologíahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceso abiertoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalinstname:Universidad Pedagógica NacionalAutorregulaciónAprendizaje autorreguladoEstilos de aprendizajeEstilo cognitivoAmbientes computacionalesSelf-regulationAnálisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía – Pregradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1finfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionAngeli, C., Valanides, N. & Kirschner, P. (2009). Field dependence–independence and instructional design effects on learners’ performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior. No 25, pp. 1355–1366.Alexander P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAlonso, C. M., Gallego, D. J. & Honey, P. (2000). Los estilos de aprendizaje: procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora. Bilbao: Mensajero. 5ª ediciónAltun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate Students’ Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude toward Computers. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 289-297Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 261-271Armstrong, A. M. (1989). Persistence and the causal perception of failure: Modifying cognitive attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 154-166.Armstrong, S. J. & Priola, V. (2001). Individual differences in cognitive style and their effects on task and social orientations of self-managed work teams. Small Group Research, 32(3), 283–312Aron, A. & Aron E.N. (2001). Estadística para psicología. Prentice Hall, Pearson Educaciòn. Sao Pablo – BrasilAustin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin,120(3), 338-375Ayersman, D.J. & von Minden, A. (1995). Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior (Special issue on Hypermedia: Theory, research, and application), 11, 371-390Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197.Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.Azevedo, R. Cromley, J.G., Seibert, D., & Tron, M. (2003). The role of co-regulated learning during students’ understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Paper to be presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523–535.Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379.Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344–370.Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., Wang, H., & Mulhern, J. (2001). Do different instructional interventions facilitated students´ ability to shift to more sophisticated mental models of complex systems?. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, W.A.Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., y Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87–111Azevedo, R., Moos, D., Greene, J., Winters, F. & Cromley, J. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?. Education Tech Research, 56:45–72.Azevedo, R., Verona, M.E., & Cromley, J.G. (2001). Fostering students` Collaborative problema solving with RiverWeb. In J.D. Moore, C.L. Redfield, & W.L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future (pp. 166-175).Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Bandura, A. (1989). The perceived controllability and performance standards on selfregulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 805-814Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148Beers, P. J. (2005). Negotiating common ground: Tools for multidisciplinary teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open University of The Netherlands, Heerlen, The NetherlandsBeers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17, 427–435Berndt, T. J., Perry, T. B., & Miller, K. E. (1988). Friends’ and classmates’ interaction on academic tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 506–513.Berndt, T.J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66 , 1312–1329Boekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioural change. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 377-397Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 3(4), 195-200Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researcher, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 7 (2): 161-186Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research 31 (6): 445-457Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic. Butler, D., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback as self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Review, 65, 245–281Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C. y Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, pp. 317–329.Boutin, F., & Chinien, C. A. (1992). Synthesis of research on student selection criteria in formative evaluation. Educational Technology, 32(8), 28-31Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behaviour among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressBruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition In A. Sinclair, R., J. Jarvelle, and W. J. M. Levelt (eds.) The Child's Concept of Language. New York: Springer-VerlagBruning, R. H., Shraw, G. J., & Ronning R. R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (2nd ed.). Engle Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333-356Burns, H.L. & Capps, C.G. (1988). “Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Introduction”. En M. Polson & Richardson (eds). Foundation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lawrwncw Erlbaum Associates Publishers, USABurton, J. K., Moore, D. M. & Holmes, G. A. (1995). Hypermedia concepts and research: An overview. Computers in Human Behavior, II (3/4), pp. 345-369.Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback on self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, pp: 245-281.Campanizzi, J. A. (1978). Effects of locus of control and provision of overviews in a computer-assisted instruction sequence. Association for Educational Data Systems (AEDS) Journal, 12(l), 21-30.Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L. Ferrara, R. A,, & Bryant, N. R. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences in learning. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), New directions for child developnent: "Children S leanling in the zone of proximal development" (pp. 77-9 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey BassCarr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583-595Carr, M., Alexander, J., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1994). Metacognition and mathematics strategy use. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 583-595Chen, M. (1995). A methodology for characterizing computer-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 23, 183–220.Chi, M. T.H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser, R. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (vol.5) (pp. 161-238). Mawah, NJ: ErlbaumChi, M. T.H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-534Chinien, C. & Boutin, F. (1993). Cognitive Style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21(4), 303-311Chou, C., & Lin, H. (1998). The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2/3), 151-176Cobb, R. (2003). The relationship between self-regulated learning behaviors and academic performance in web-based courses. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Curriculum and InstructionCorno, L. & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation, Educational Psychologist, 18, 1.Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning : A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.111-142). New York: Springer-VerlagCorno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, (pp. 191-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesCovington, M. V., & Mueller, K. J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 157- 176.Crozier W. R. (2001). Diferencias individuales en el aprendizaje: Personalidad y Rendimiento Escolar. Ed. Narcea, S.A. Madrid – EspañaCurry, L. (1987). Integrating concepts of cognitive of learning style: A review with attention to psychometric standards. Ottawa: Canadian College of Health Services ExecutivesDabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540.Davis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: cognitive style across the lifespan (pp.149-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesDe Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., van der Meijden, H., Staarman, J. K., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 645–670De Westelinck, K., Valcke, M., De Craene, B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2005). Multimedia learning in social sciences: Limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 555–573Demetriadis, S. N., & Pombortsis, A. (1999). Novice student learning in case based hypermedia environment: A quantitative study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 241–269Demetriadis, S. N., Papadopoulos, P. M., Stamelos, I. G., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Computers & Education, 51, 939–954Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In H. Spada, & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York, NY: Cambridge University PressEccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519Eom, W., & Reiser, R. A. (2000). The effects of self-regulation and instructional control on performance and motivation in computer-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(3), 247–260Epstein, J. L. (1983). The influence of friends on achievement and affective outcomes. In J. L. Epstein & N. Karweit (Eds.), Friends in school: Patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools (pp. 177–200). New York: Academic.Ercikan, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Constructing data. In C. Conrad & R. Serlin (Eds.), SAGE Handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 451–475). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageEricsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (2002). Social relations and academic achievement in innercity early elementary classrooms. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 518–528.Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grasel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232Fisher, M. D., Blackwell, L. R., Garcia, A. B., & Greene, J. C. (1975). Effects of student control and choice on engagement in a CAI arithmetic task in a low-income school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(6), 776-783Fritz, R. L. (1994). Gender differences in field-dependence and educational style. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 19(1), 1-21.Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 127-153. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGordon, H.R.D. (1998). Identifying Learning Styles. Paper presented at the annual Summer Workshop for Beginning Vocational Education Teachers, West Virginia University Institute of Technology, July 20, 1998Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through PointyQuery, AutoTutor and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225–234.Graesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., & Kruez, R. (2000). AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 35–51.Gray, S. H. (1987). The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(2), 54-56.Greene, B. & Land, S. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research 23(2): 151–179.Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(2), 125–148Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers and Education, 50, 1069–1083.Gros, B. (2000). El ordenador invisible. Gedisa. Barcelona – EspañaGuisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F, Tinajero C, & Almeida, L.S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema. Vol. 19, nº 4, pp. 572-577.Hadwin, A. F. & Winne, P.H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation. Vol. 7, No. 2-3, pp. 313-334.Hagen, A. S. & Weinstein, C. E. (1995). Achievement goals, self-regulated learning, and the role of classroom context. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Fall): 43-55.Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.F., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2007). Análisis multivariante. Quinta edición. Pearson, Prentice Hall., EspañaHall J. K. (2000). Field Dependence-Independence and Computer-based Instruction in Geography. Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Teaching and Learning.Handal, B., & Herrington, T. (2004). On being dependent and independent in computer based learning environments. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, (7)2.Hannafin, M. & Land, S. (1997). The foundations and assumption of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.Hannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1999). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99Hartley, K. & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). The use of comprehension aids in a hypermedia environment: Investigating the impact of metacognitive awareness and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 275-289.Hartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 285–305.Hederich, C. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensión de dependencia-independencia de campo. Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Bogotá-ColombiaHederich, C. & Camargo, A (1999). Estilos Cognitivos en Colombia. Resultados en cinco regiones culturales. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional-ColcienciasHederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2000). Estilo cognitivo en la educación. Itinerario Educativo: Revista de la Facultad de Educación. Universidad de San Buenaventura. Bogotá. No 36.43-75Hederich, C. & Camargo, A. (2001). Estilo cognitivo y logro educativo en la ciudad de Bogotá. Bogotá: Centro de investigaciones de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Ciup. Instituto para la investigación educativa y el desarrollo pedagógico, IDEPHederich, C., Camargo, A., Guzmán, L. & Pacheco, J.C. (1995) Regiones Cognitivas en Colombia. Santafé de Bogotá : Universidad Pedagógica Nacional - ColcienciasHeider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: a stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 402-429.Hiemstra, R. (1996). Self-directed learning. In T. Plomp & R. Ely (Eds.), International encyclopedia of educational technology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. Pp. 347-352Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Honey, P. & Munford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles (versión revisada). Maidenhead: Peter HoneyHunter-Blanks, P., Ghatala, E. S., Pressley, M. & Levin, J. R. (1988). Comparison of monitoring during testing on a sentence-learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 279-283.Inkpen, K., Booth, K. & Klawe M., (1996). Cooperative Learning In The Classroom: The Importance of a Collaborative. Environment for Computer-Based Education. Department of Computer Science. University of British Columbia. Vancouver, British Columbia. V6T 1Z4Jackson, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). MODEL-IT: A design retrospective. In M. Jacobson, y R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 77-116). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumJacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145–199.Järvelä, S., & Salovaara, H. (2004). The interplay of motivational goals and cognitive strategies in a new pedagogical culture: a context-oriented and qualitative approach. European Psychologist, 9(4), 232–244Jonassen, D. H. (1989). Hypertext - hypermedia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational TechnologyJonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp.694-719). New York: MacmillanJones, M., Estell, D. & Alexander, J. (2008). Friends, classmates, and self-regulated learning: discussions with peers inside and outside the classroom. Metacognition and Learning. Springer Science + Business Media.Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17.Kandel, D. B., & Andrews, K. (1987). Processes of adolescent socialization by parents and peers. The International Journal of the Addictions, 22, 319–342.Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology. En M. D. Dunnette y Hough, L. M (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol 1). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, IncKarabenick, S. A. (1996). Social influences on metacognition: Effects of colearner questioning on comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 689–703Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1&2), 139–161.Kaya, S. (2007). The influences of student views related to mathematics and self-regulated learning on achievement of algebra I students. Dissertation. Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State UniversityKini, A. S. (1994). Effects of cognitive style and verbal and visual presentation modes on concept learning in cbi. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 18.Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. C. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 299-303Kirschner F., Paas F. & Kirschner P.A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 306–314Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 306–314.Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 403–420.Kolb, D. A. (1977). Aprendizaje y solución de problemas. En Kolb, D. A; Rubin, I. M. & Mc Intyre, J. M. (Eds.), Psicología de las organizaciones: problemas contemporáneos ( 1ª edición en español, pp. 18-34). Madrid: Prentice-Hall.Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2005). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33.Kramarski, B., & Hirsch, C. (2003). Using computer algebra systems in mathematical classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 35–45.Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006a). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218–230.Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006b). Online interactions in a mathematical classroom. Educational Media International, 43(1), 43.Kuhl, J . (1992). A theory of self-regulation: action versus state orientation, self discrimination and some applications. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 41(2), 97-129Kush, J.C. (1984). Cognitive processing differences in Mexican-American and Anglo-American student. Dissertation abstract international,45,1075Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2007). Using Computers to Individually-generate vs. Collaboratively-generate Concept Maps. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 269-280.Lajoie, P. (2000). Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls, Vol. II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumLajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 803–821). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumLand, S. y Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research y Development, 48(3), 61-78Land, S.M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(4), 65-84.Lazakidou, G. & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54 (2010) 3–13Leader, L. F., & Klein, J.D. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 5-15.Lee, I.S. (1999). An analysis of learners' perspectives and learning styles in a Web-based environment mixed with a traditional classroom.Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE'99), the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Chiba, Japan, November 4–7, 468–475.Lepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., & O’Donnell-Johnson, T. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan y M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 108–144). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.Lepper, M., & Wolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aranson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education. New York, NY: Academic PressLin, X. D., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 36(7), 1–22.Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning Styles in hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior 10, (4), 419 434.Lopez, O. (2010). Aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales. Tesis Doctoral.. Universidad Pedagógica NacionalLozano, R.A. (2006). Estilos de aprendizaje y enseñanza: Un panorama de la estilística educativa. Editotal Trillas. MéxicoLucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 121-139.Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 121-139Lumpe, A. T., & Staver, J.R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (1), 71-98.Lyons-Lawrence, C.L. (1994). Effect of learning style on performance in using computer-based instruction in office systems. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. 36(3), 166-175.Mace, F., Belfiore, P., & Shea, M. (1989). Operant theory and research on self-regulation. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 27-50). New York: Springer-VerlagMacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 189–206.Mainemelis, C.; Boyatzis, R.E. & Kolb, D.A. (2002). Learning styles and daptive flexibility. Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning. 33, 5-33.Mäkitalo, K., Weinberger, A., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic cooperation scripts in online learning environments: Fostering learning by reducing uncertainty in discourse? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 603–622.Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L.W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University PressMcCaslin, M. (2004). Coregulation of opportunity, activity, and identity in student motivation. In D. McInerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited, Vol. 4 (pp. 249e274). Greenwich, CT: Information AgeMcCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A vygotskian view. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 227–252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 51-82). New York: Springer-VerlagMcIsaac, M.S. & Gunawardena, C.N. (1996). Distance Education. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed) . Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a proyect of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. New York, N.Y: Simon & Schuster-Macmillan, pp. 403-437.McManus, T. F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment: nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 219–251Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 261-285).Greenwich, CT: JAI PressMeece, J. L. (1994). The role of motivation in self-regulated learning. In SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 25-44. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Melara, G.E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertexts environments: hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 313-328.Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Merrill, S. K., & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 315–372Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Reconceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 377-390.Moos, D. C. & Azevedo, R. (2006). The Role of Goal Structure in Undergraduates' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes in Two Hypermedia Learning Tasks. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15 no1 49-86Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 1686–1706.Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: the role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Baldwin, W. (1992). Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(l), 5-13.Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.Murphy, H. J., Casey, B., Day, D. A., & Young, J. D. (1997). Scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test by undergraduates in information management. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1135-1138Myint S. K. (1996). The interaction of cognitive styles with varying levels of feedback in multimedia presentation. International Journal of Instructional Media v23, No 3, pp. 229-37.Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144Nesbit, J. C., Winne, P. H., Jamieson‐Noel, D., Code, J., Zhou, M., MacAllister, K., Bratt, S., Wang, W., & Hadwin, A. F. (2006). Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 339–358.Nichols, J. D., & White, J. (2001). Impact of peer networks on achievement of high school algebra students. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 267–273O'Neil, H. F., & Drillings, M. (1994). Motivation : Theory and Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8.Packard, A. L., Holmes, G. A., Viveiros, D. M., & Fortune, J. C. (1997). Incorporating individual learning styles into computer assisted environments for instruction basic research and statistical concepts. Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, 6.Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner, (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences: Self perception (Vol. 2) Westport CT: Ablex PublishingPape, S.J., & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behavior: lassification and relation to academic achievement and mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 31, 419-449.Paris, S.G. & Byrnes, J.P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. En B.J. Zimmerman y D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.Paris, S.G., & Paris, A.H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451.Pintrich P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and LearningPintrich P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53: 801-813Pintrich, P. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames and M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments (pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI PressPintrich, P. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In R. J. Menges & M. D. Svinicki (Eds.), Understanding self-regulated learning, New Directions for teaching and learning (pp. 3-12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass PublishersPintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40.Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. international Journal ofEducationa1 Research, 31,459-470.Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic PressPintrich, P. R., Roeser, R. W., & De Groot, E. A. M. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161Pintrich, P., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in college classroom. In M. Mahr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Vol. 6: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 371-403). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Pintrich, P., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumPintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Pi-Sui-Hsu y Dwyer F. (2004). Effect of level of adjunct questions on achievement of field independent/field dependent learners. International Journal of Instructional Media 31 No 1, pp. 99-106.Pressley, M. (1995). More about the development of self regulation: complex, long term and thoroughly social. Educational Psychologist, 34 (4), 207-212Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 265–286, 2nd ed.). San Diego: AcademicProske, A., Narciss, S., & Korndle, H. (2007). Interactivity and learners’ achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 511–531.Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12Ramirez, M. & Castañeda, A. (1974). Cultural democracy, bicognitive development, and education. New York: AcademicReed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41, 87–98Reeve, J. (1996). Motivating Others: Nurturing Inner Motivational Resources. Boston: Allyn and BaconReiff, J. (1996). At-risk middle level students or field dependent learners. Clearing House, 69(4), 231-234Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304.Reiser, B.J,, Tabak, I., Sandoval, W., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. Carver y D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-306). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumReiser, B.J. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the CSCL (pp. 255-264).Reusser, K. (2001). Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice. In N. J. Smelser, P. Baltes, & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2058e2062). Oxford, UK: Pergamon/Elsevier ScienceRiding, R. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles - an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11 (3-4), 193-215Riding, R. & Rayner. (1997). Towards a Categorization of Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles. Educational Psychology, Vol. 17, Nos. 1 and 2, 5-27.Roces C. & González M. (1998). Capacidad de autorregulación del proceso de aprendizaje. En Dificultades de aprendizaje escolar. Ed. Piramide. Madrid-EspañaRoces, C., González, M. C. & Tourón, J. (1997). Expectativas de aprendizaje y rendimiento de los alumnos universitarios. Revista de Psicología de la Educación, 22, 99-123.Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Rohrkemper, M. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygostskian view. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 143-167). New York: SpringerRoschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-197). Berlin: SpringerRotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 80, Whole No. 609Rouet, J.F. (2000). Hypermedia and learning- cognitive perspectives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 97-101.Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescents motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150Rydell A, Altermatt, E., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111–123Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction e what can it tell us about metacognition and co-regulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199-208Salovaara, H. (2005). An exploration of students’ strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 39–52.Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 77-96.Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 71-86.Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist 26 (3 and 4): 207-231.Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 75-99. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumSchunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382Schunk, D. H. (1997). Self-monitoring as a motivator during instruction with elementary school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, ILSchunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159- 172Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 251–260Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumSchunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and the ends. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 349–367, 2nd ed.). San Diego: AcademicSchwartz, L. R. & Gredler, M. E. (1998). The effects of self-instructional materials on goal setting and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education (Winter): 83-89Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relevance of hierarchies to learning biology from hypertext. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 215–243Shapiro, A. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from electronic texts. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57–78.Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumShin, M. (1998). Promoting students' self-regulation ability: Guidelines for instructional design. Educational Technology (Jan-Feb): 38-44.Sins, P. H. M., Joolingen, W. R. van, Savelsbergh, E. R., & Hout-Wolters, B. V. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 58–77.Smith, P.A. (2001). Understanding self-regulated learning and its implications for accounting educators and researchers. Issues In Accounting Education. Vol. 16, 4; pp. 663-700.Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs, and metacognitive calibration: an exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338Summerville, J. (1999). Role of awareness of cognitive style in hypermedia. International Journal of Educational Technology. 1(1).Sweet, M. & Pelton-Sweet, L. (2008). The Social Foundation of Team-Based Learning: Students Accountable to Students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 116. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online in Wiley InterScience. Revisada en agosto 20, 2009 en www.interscience.wiley.comTennant, M. (1988). Psychology and Adult Learning. London: Routledge.Tennyson, C. L., Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. (1980). Content structure and instructional control strategies as design variables in concept acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4). 499-50.Tennyson, R. D., Park, O. C., & Christensen, D. L. (1985). Adaptive control of learning time and content sequence in concept learning using computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 481-491.Tergan, S.O. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3), 209-235Tinajero, C & Páramo, M.F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement : a re-examination of their relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 199-212.Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students´ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122Van Blerkom, M. (1988). Field dependence, sex role self-perceptions, and mathematics achievement. College student: A Closer examination, En:Contemporany Educational Psychology 13, 339-347.Van Boxtel, C. A. M., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311–330.Van Bruggen, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12, 121–138.Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567.Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C. A. M., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 575–602VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T. y Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition y Instruction 21(3): 209-250.Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: a case analysis. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 19-37.Volet, S. E., & Mansfield, C. (2006). Group work at university: significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(4), 341-356Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained?. Learning and Instruction 19, 128-143.Vye, N., Schwartz, D., Bransford, J., Barron, B., Zech, L., & CTGV. (1998). SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, y A. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305-346). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumWang, S. L., & Lin, S. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 2256–2268Weiner, B., L. Frieze, A. Kukla, L. Reed, S. Rest, &. Rosenbaum, R. (1971). Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure. In Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, edited by E. E. Jones et al. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning PressWeinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, Third edition, edited by M. C. Wittrock, 315-327. New York, NY: Macmillan.Weinstein, C., Schulte, A., & Cascallar, E. (1983). The learning and studies strategies inventory (LASSI): initial design and development, Technical Report, U. S. Army Research Institute for the social and behavioral sciences, Alexandria, VAWeinstein, C.; J. Husman & Dierking, D.(2000). Self regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. En Boekaerts, M.; P. Pintrich y M. Zeidner 2000 Handbook of Self-regulation. San Diego. Academic Press.Weller, H. G., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. E. (1994). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive style in hypermedia based instruction: implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 10(3/4), 401-420.Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198–1209Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.White, B.Y., Shimoda, T.A., & Frederiksen, J.R. (2000). Facilitating students’ inquiry learning and metacognitive development through modifiable software advisers. In S.P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls: Theory change, paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes (pp. 97-132). Mawah, NJ: ErlbaumWhyte, M. M., Knirk, F. G., Casey, R. J., & Willard, M. L. (1991). Individualistic vs. paired/cooperative computer assisted instruction: matching instructional method with cognitive style. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(4), 299-312Whyte, M., Karolick, D., & Taylor, M. D. (1996). Cognitive learning styles and their impact on curriculum development and instruction. Proceedings of the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 783-799Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research of educational communications and technology (pp. 957–983). New York: MacmillanWilliams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71–82.Wilson, J. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory. Revisado en Diciembre de 2009 from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/wilson/wilson.htmlWinne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 51–572.Winne, P.H. & Hadwin, A.F. (1998). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing (p. 164). In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2 ed., pp. 153-189).Winne, P.H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187Winne, P.H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397-410.Winne, P.H., & Perry, N.E. (1999). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic PressWinter, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 369–372Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189–217.Witkin, H. & Asch, S.E. (1948). Studies in Space Orientation. III Perception of the Upright in the Absence of a Visual Field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 603-614.Witkin, H. A. & Goodenough, D. R. (1977a). Psychological differentiation: Current status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84,661-689.Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977b). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661-689Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins, NY: International University PressWitkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1979). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.Witkin, H., Goodenough, D. & Oltman, K. (1979). Psychological differentiation: Current Status. En: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 7, 1127-1145.Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Vol. 17, pp. 89-100Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 17–27.Zehavi, N. (1995). Integrating software development with research and teacher education. Computers in the Schools, 11(3), 11-24.Zhang, L.F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? – validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295-1311Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 3-17.Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, edited by D. H. Schunk, and B. J. Zimmerman, 3-21. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University PressZimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning : from teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford PressZimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic PressZimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman y D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–38). Mawah, NJ: ErlbaumZimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical Background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 166-183Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 284290Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. En D. H. Schunk y J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: causes and consequences (pp. 185-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: SpringerZimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesZimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesZimmerman, B., y Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (2nd ed.). Mawah, NJ: ErlbaumZimmerman, B.J., & Paulson, A. S. (1995). Self-monitoring during collegiate studying: An invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Fall) 63: 13-27Zimmerman, B.J., A. Bandura, A. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal 29: 663-676Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner S. y Kovach R. (1996). Developing Self-Regulated Learners: Beyond Achievement to Self-Efficacy. Psychology in the classroom: A series on Applied Educational Psychology. USAZydney, J. M. (2010). The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students’ understanding, consideration of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem. Computers & Education 54, 360–370THUMBNAILTE-24135.pdf.jpgTE-24135.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4021http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/4/TE-24135.pdf.jpg36a509f80fbcc616a42e79f70fd9a78dMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TE-24135 LIC. DE USO.pdfTE-24135 LIC. DE USO.pdfapplication/pdf185745http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/3/TE-24135%20LIC.%20DE%20USO.pdff67a7bc12080094ba8ddf406bc3e5a50MD53ORIGINALTE-24135.pdfTE-24135.pdfapplication/pdf2850727http://repository.pedagogica.edu.co/bitstream/20.500.12209/12361/1/TE-24135.pdf6a9b70afaaa5ad45f70ce25d8173c4e6MD5120.500.12209/12361oai:repository.pedagogica.edu.co:20.500.12209/123612023-05-16 13:56:28.833Repositorio Institucional Universidad Pedagógica Nacionalrepositorio@pedagogica.edu.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

Análisis estadístico (SPSS) para evaluar el aprendizaje autorregulado, estilo cognitivo y logro académico en ambientes computacionales.

Publicaciones similares