Gender and construction of scientific knowledge
The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction on the main contributions of feminism to the construction of scientific knowledge. It is evident that not methods, but strong epistemological are necessary to deconstruct positivist approaches, in order to co-construct a science that exceeds fa...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7042
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/14787
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/historia_educacion_latinamerican/article/view/5532
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/14787
- Palabra clave:
- Gender; feminism; construction of scientific knowledge; women; University; rebellion
Social Sciences
Género; feminismo; construcción científica del conocimiento; mujeres, universidad; rebelión
Ciencias Sociales
Gênero; feminismo; construção de conhecimento científico; mulheres, universitários; rebelião
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2016 Journal History of Latin American Education
Summary: | The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction on the main contributions of feminism to the construction of scientific knowledge. It is evident that not methods, but strong epistemological are necessary to deconstruct positivist approaches, in order to co-construct a science that exceeds false androcentric objectivism in favor of contextualized, inclusive and intersubjectively consensual knowledge serving as an engine for change and transformation of patriarchal power relations. The arrival of women tothe University led to a scientific revolution by incorporating their new point of view, able to detect misogynistic bias that kept them out the history by labeling them as inferior. From there, it has emerged areal rebellion in academic epistemologies –feminist perspectives, postmodern feminists, and the empirical-contextual ones– not specifically for the use of certain methods, but because of the strength of their shared democratic and egalitarian values. |
---|