Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education
This paper analyzes the process of formulation and adoption of accreditation as a component of the higher education quality policy in Costa Rica. This is done from a neoinstitutionalist approach, using the Scharpf (1997) model. Public universities are identified as promoters and directive actors, wh...
- Autores:
-
Gallardo-Allen, Eugenia
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad EAFIT
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EAFIT
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/15301
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10784/15301
- Palabra clave:
- Educational Policy
Neo-Institutionalism
Quality
Scharpf Model
Discourses Analysis
Política Educativa
Neoinstitucionalismo
Calidad
Modelo Scharpf
Análisis Del Discurso
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2019 Eugenia Gallardo-Allen
id |
REPOEAFIT2_f2839913eba9f4ecb510c71eeac6e2bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/15301 |
network_acronym_str |
REPOEAFIT2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EAFIT |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education |
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Actores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costarricense |
title |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education |
spellingShingle |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education Educational Policy Neo-Institutionalism Quality Scharpf Model Discourses Analysis Política Educativa Neoinstitucionalismo Calidad Modelo Scharpf Análisis Del Discurso |
title_short |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education |
title_full |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education |
title_fullStr |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education |
title_sort |
Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher education |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Gallardo-Allen, Eugenia |
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gallardo-Allen, Eugenia |
dc.contributor.affiliation.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Costa Rica |
dc.subject.keyword.eng.fl_str_mv |
Educational Policy Neo-Institutionalism Quality Scharpf Model Discourses Analysis |
topic |
Educational Policy Neo-Institutionalism Quality Scharpf Model Discourses Analysis Política Educativa Neoinstitucionalismo Calidad Modelo Scharpf Análisis Del Discurso |
dc.subject.keyword.spa.fl_str_mv |
Política Educativa Neoinstitucionalismo Calidad Modelo Scharpf Análisis Del Discurso |
description |
This paper analyzes the process of formulation and adoption of accreditation as a component of the higher education quality policy in Costa Rica. This is done from a neoinstitutionalist approach, using the Scharpf (1997) model. Public universities are identified as promoters and directive actors, while private universities are regarded as allied actors. Some international organizations and the government are also key actors in the formulation and adoption process. The adoption of the public interest nature of the National System of Accreditation of Higher Education (Sinaes) is carried out via Law N°8256 of the Republic. The belief and perception of the actors fundamentally lies in considering that the quality of higher education is affected by the massification and proliferation of private universities, as well as the ideas of international organizations that propose as an alternative solution the creation of national education systems accreditation and use evaluation tools to ensure quality. To carry out the analysis, it used discourse analysis, in official documents from Conare and the University of Costa Rica are used, as well as articles from the newspaper La Nación. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-09T16:01:01Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-03 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-09T16:01:01Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-03 |
dc.type.eng.fl_str_mv |
article info:eu-repo/semantics/article publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2474-2678 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/15301 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.22191/gobernar/vol3/iss4/6 |
identifier_str_mv |
2474-2678 10.22191/gobernar/vol3/iss4/6 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10784/15301 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Gobernar; Vol 3, No 4 (2019) |
dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv |
https://orb.binghamton.edu/gobernar/vol3/iss4/8 |
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://orb.binghamton.edu/gobernar/vol3/iss4/8 |
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Eugenia Gallardo-Allen |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Acceso abierto |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Eugenia Gallardo-Allen Acceso abierto http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.spatial.eng.fl_str_mv |
dc.coverage.spatial[eng] |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universidad EAFIT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad EAFIT reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gobernar; Vol 3, No 4 (2019) |
instname_str |
Universidad EAFIT |
institution |
Universidad EAFIT |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT |
collection |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/0e9fa18d-1866-40b1-9e72-a9bc361470ca/download https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/b20ae58d-5756-4bbd-8cb1-ce1aba183de9/download https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/1c654996-5ac2-4212-ab86-85725c075636/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7bfcb253f2e46163eed6724d5b11cdf5 0c185d5ef20a0cd39c0bd7b86dd7b06f f43725a044e174800e25e57ceeccf147 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@eafit.edu.co |
_version_ |
1814110455639048192 |
spelling |
dc.coverage.spatial[eng]2019-08-032019-12-09T16:01:01Z2019-08-032019-12-09T16:01:01Z2474-2678http://hdl.handle.net/10784/1530110.22191/gobernar/vol3/iss4/6This paper analyzes the process of formulation and adoption of accreditation as a component of the higher education quality policy in Costa Rica. This is done from a neoinstitutionalist approach, using the Scharpf (1997) model. Public universities are identified as promoters and directive actors, while private universities are regarded as allied actors. Some international organizations and the government are also key actors in the formulation and adoption process. The adoption of the public interest nature of the National System of Accreditation of Higher Education (Sinaes) is carried out via Law N°8256 of the Republic. The belief and perception of the actors fundamentally lies in considering that the quality of higher education is affected by the massification and proliferation of private universities, as well as the ideas of international organizations that propose as an alternative solution the creation of national education systems accreditation and use evaluation tools to ensure quality. To carry out the analysis, it used discourse analysis, in official documents from Conare and the University of Costa Rica are used, as well as articles from the newspaper La Nación.En el presente artículo se analiza, desde la corriente neoinstitucionalista, el proceso de formulación y adopción de la acreditación de carreras, como un componente de la política de calidad en educación superior costarricense. Para ello, se utilizan los elementos planteados por el modelo de Scharpf (1997). También, se identifican las universidades estatales como actores, promotores y directivos; las universidades privadas, como actores aliados; y algunos organismos internacionales y el gobierno, como actores claves en el proceso de formulación y adopción del Sistema Nacional de Acreditación de la Educación Superior (Sinaes), en Costa Rica. Se evidencia la creencia y la percepción de los actores universitarios estatales de que la calidad de la educación superior se ve afectada por la masificación y proliferación de universidades privadas. Además, se observa la influencia de las ideas de organismos internacionales, que proponen como alternativa de solución la creación de sistemas nacionales de acreditación y la utilización de herramientas de evaluación para velar por la calidad educativa. Para este estudio, adicionalmente, se utiliza el análisis del discurso, en documentos oficiales de Conare, de la Universidad de Costa Rica y en artículos del periódico La Nación.application/pdfspaUniversidad EAFITGobernar; Vol 3, No 4 (2019)https://orb.binghamton.edu/gobernar/vol3/iss4/8https://orb.binghamton.edu/gobernar/vol3/iss4/8Copyright (c) 2019 Eugenia Gallardo-AllenAcceso abiertohttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2instname:Universidad EAFITreponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFITGobernar; Vol 3, No 4 (2019)Quality policy agents in Costa Rican higher educationActores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costarricensearticleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Educational PolicyNeo-InstitutionalismQualityScharpf ModelDiscourses AnalysisPolítica EducativaNeoinstitucionalismoCalidadModelo ScharpfAnálisis Del DiscursoGallardo-Allen, EugeniaUniversidad de Costa RicaGOBERNAR34104125GOBERNARTHUMBNAILminaitura-gobernar[489].jpgminaitura-gobernar[489].jpgimage/jpeg26734https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/0e9fa18d-1866-40b1-9e72-a9bc361470ca/download7bfcb253f2e46163eed6724d5b11cdf5MD51ORIGINALActores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costar.pdfActores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costar.pdfTexto completo PDFapplication/pdf378266https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/b20ae58d-5756-4bbd-8cb1-ce1aba183de9/download0c185d5ef20a0cd39c0bd7b86dd7b06fMD52Actores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costar.htmlActores de la política de calidad en la educación superior costar.htmlTexto completo HTMLtext/html350https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstreams/1c654996-5ac2-4212-ab86-85725c075636/downloadf43725a044e174800e25e57ceeccf147MD5310784/15301oai:repository.eafit.edu.co:10784/153012020-01-27 14:10:56.255open.accesshttps://repository.eafit.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad EAFITrepositorio@eafit.edu.co |