The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life

tThis study examines the efficacy of a MOOC-format instructional program, Improvement of personal com-petencies for success, which entailed the use of four clearly differentiated instructional approaches (threeexperimental approaches and one control approach): (1) product, with an emphasis on the fi...

Full description

Autores:
García Martín, Judit
García-Sánchez, Jesús-Nicasio
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/5937
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/5937
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
e-learning
Motivation
Emotional intelligence
Self-regulation
Cursos Online Masivos y Abiertos
E-learning
Motivación
Inteligencia emocional
Autoeficacia
Rights
openAccess
License
CC0 1.0 Universal
id RCUC2_5ad3551a269d85e388e653a0295f1996
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/5937
network_acronym_str RCUC2
network_name_str REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
title The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
spellingShingle The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
e-learning
Motivation
Emotional intelligence
Self-regulation
Cursos Online Masivos y Abiertos
E-learning
Motivación
Inteligencia emocional
Autoeficacia
title_short The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
title_full The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
title_fullStr The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
title_sort The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life
dc.creator.fl_str_mv García Martín, Judit
García-Sánchez, Jesús-Nicasio
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv García Martín, Judit
García-Sánchez, Jesús-Nicasio
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
e-learning
Motivation
Emotional intelligence
Self-regulation
Cursos Online Masivos y Abiertos
E-learning
Motivación
Inteligencia emocional
Autoeficacia
topic Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
e-learning
Motivation
Emotional intelligence
Self-regulation
Cursos Online Masivos y Abiertos
E-learning
Motivación
Inteligencia emocional
Autoeficacia
description tThis study examines the efficacy of a MOOC-format instructional program, Improvement of personal com-petencies for success, which entailed the use of four clearly differentiated instructional approaches (threeexperimental approaches and one control approach): (1) product, with an emphasis on the final resultand the overall quality; (2) processes, with an emphasis on recursion and constant self-assessment ofthe processes; (3) mixed, oriented on the result and overall quality as well as to recursion, self-reflectionand self-assessment; and (4) traditional (control) focused on online instruction of the subjects and onthe accomplishment of tasks. The MOOC was designed and implemented through the Universidad deLeón’s external Moodle (Ariadne). It involved 745 people aged between 10 and 50, though only 336 com-pleted it. The results demonstrate the efficacy of the MOOC—irrespective of the instructional approachfollowed—for instruction on different contents and competencies, such as resilience, achievement moti-vation and self-esteem; they reveal a statistically significant increase in different variables such asself-efficacy and they confirm the effectiveness of Moodle for the design and development of a MOOC.The implications of these findings are discussed and evaluated.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-16
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-28T20:17:21Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-28T20:17:21Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv 1136-1034
dc.identifier.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11323/5937
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv Corporación Universidad de la Costa
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
dc.identifier.repourl.spa.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
identifier_str_mv 1136-1034
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
url https://hdl.handle.net/11323/5937
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2019.08.002
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Andone, D., Mihaescu, V., Ternauciuc, A., & Vasiu, R. (2015). Integrating MOOCs in traditional higher education. In Proceedings of the Third European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit. pp. 71–75. 44 J. García-Martín, J.-N. García-Sánchez / Revista de Psicodidáctica, 2020, 25 (1) , 36–44
Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006
Álvarez, M. L., & García, J. N. (2014). Evaluación on-line de los procesos cognitivos implicados en la composición escrita. In J. N. García (Ed.), Prevención en dificultades del desarrollo y del aprendizaje (pp. 359–378). Madrid: Pirámide.
Alturkistani, A., Lam, C., Foley, K., Stenfors, T., Blum, E., & Meinert, E. (2019). pp. 1–20. MOOC Evaluation methods: A Systematic Review (27) http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/preprints.13851
Bayeck, R. Y., & Choi, J. (2018). The influence of national culture on educational videos: The case of MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 186–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2729
Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Kou, X., Xu, S., & Sheu, F.-R. (2015). Understanding the selfdirected online learning preferences, goals, achievements, and challenges of MIT open courseware subscribers. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 349–368.
Castano,˜ C., Maiz, I., & Garay, U. (2015). Design, motivation and performance in a cooperative MOOC course. Comunicar, 22(44), 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-02
Chang, R., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12275
Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.
Clará, M., & Barberá, E. (2013). Learning online: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Education, 34(1), 129–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770428
Deursen, A., Bolle, C., Hegner, S., & Kommers, P. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039
Díez, C., García, J. N., & IPDDA. (2010). Percepción de metodologías docentes y desarrollo de competencias al EEES. Boletín de Psicología, 99, 45–69.
Frydrychova, B. (2014). Approaches to the teaching of writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 147–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1149
Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.0 04
García-Martín, J., & García, J. N. (2013). Patterns of web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people. Computers & Education, 67(3), 105–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.003
García-Martín, J., & García, J. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the service competence dimensions of digital literacy and of psychological and educational measures. Computers & Education, 106, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.010
García-Martín, J., & García, J. N. (2018). The instructional effectiveness of two virtual approaches: Processes and product. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(2), 117–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.02.002
García, J. N., Fidalgo, R., Arias, O., Marbán, J. M., De Caso, A. M., Pacheco, D. I., & Diez, H. (2014). El análisis psicolingüístico del producto textual. In Prevención en dificultades del desarrollo y del aprendizaje. pp. 301–321. Madrid: Pirámide.
García, J. N., Marbán, J., & De Caso, A. (2001). EPP y FPE [EPP and FPE]. In J. N. García (Ed.), Dificultades de aprendizaje e intervención psicopedagógica (pp. 151–155). Barcelona: Ariel.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2014). Conducting high quality writing intervention research: Twelve recommendations. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 89–123.
Hashemnezhad, H., & Hashemnezhad, N. (2012). A comparative study of product, process, and post-process approaches in Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 722–729. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4
Herodotou, C., Kambouri, M., & Winters, N. (2011). The role of trait emotional intelligence in gamer’s preferences for play and frequency of gaming. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1815–1819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.001
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. S. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to selfregulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60, 14–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.0
Lin, W. S. (2012). Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 498–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.006
Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152–1161.
Loizzo, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). MOOCocracy: The learning culture of massive open online courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1013–1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9444-7
Lorenz, A., Wittke, A., Muschal, T., & Steinert, F. (2015). From moodle to mooin: Development a MOOC platform. European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit (EMOOCs), 102–106.
Lowenthal, P., Snelson, C., & Perkins, R. (2018). Teaching massive, open, online, courses (MOOCs): Tales from the front line. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3505
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Munoz-Merino,˜ P., Ruipérez, J. A., Alario, C., Pérez, M. P., & Delgado, C. (2015). Precise effectiveness strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities in
MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 108–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.003
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, 1065–1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Oldmeadow, J. A., Quinn, S., & Kowert, R. (2013). Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1142–1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.006
Reid, A. J., Morrison, G. R., & Bol, L. (2017). Knowing what you know: Improving metacomprehension and calibration accuracy in digital text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 29–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9454-5
Robledo, P., & García, J. N. (2018). Description and analysis of strategy-focused instructional models for writing. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 38–65). Leiden: Brill.
Ruipérez, J. A., Halawa, S., & Reich, J. (2019). Multiplatform MOOC analytics: Comparing global and regional patterns in edX and Edraak Learning.
Thulasi, A. P. S., Bin, A. R., & Bte, F. (2014). Comparative analysis of process versus product approach of teaching writing in Malaysian schools: Review of literature. Middle-East Journal of Scientifc Research, 22(6), 789–795. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.22.06.21943
Van der Meij, H., Van der Meij, J., & Harmsen, R. (2015). Animated pedagogical agents effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 381–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9378-5
Yu, P. T., Liao, Y. H., & Su, M. H. (2013). A near-reality approach to improve the e-learning open courseware. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 242–257.
Zawacki, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs - an explorative content analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 242–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv CC0 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Revista de Psicodidactica
institution Corporación Universidad de la Costa
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/dfb72564-95b0-46d4-a254-1178b8826508/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/ce8c82a8-6c24-4a4f-8470-19f23e16cd35/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/75c041ab-0630-4f07-9af4-80727565f8b7/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/426d6b21-9fa8-4965-8331-00c0e48d97aa/download
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/7f21515c-e8e0-4d3d-886a-3c828636afa5/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3d80d86aa5465885122ae460f33d0fad
42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708c
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
ff270ca80865a6cad7442dee4217f6fe
6dd7b2bf192ccea36a61f9451c43e30d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repdigital@cuc.edu.co
_version_ 1811760747345084416
spelling García Martín, JuditGarcía-Sánchez, Jesús-Nicasio2020-01-28T20:17:21Z2020-01-28T20:17:21Z2019-11-161136-1034https://hdl.handle.net/11323/5937Corporación Universidad de la CostaREDICUC - Repositorio CUChttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/tThis study examines the efficacy of a MOOC-format instructional program, Improvement of personal com-petencies for success, which entailed the use of four clearly differentiated instructional approaches (threeexperimental approaches and one control approach): (1) product, with an emphasis on the final resultand the overall quality; (2) processes, with an emphasis on recursion and constant self-assessment ofthe processes; (3) mixed, oriented on the result and overall quality as well as to recursion, self-reflectionand self-assessment; and (4) traditional (control) focused on online instruction of the subjects and onthe accomplishment of tasks. The MOOC was designed and implemented through the Universidad deLeón’s external Moodle (Ariadne). It involved 745 people aged between 10 and 50, though only 336 com-pleted it. The results demonstrate the efficacy of the MOOC—irrespective of the instructional approachfollowed—for instruction on different contents and competencies, such as resilience, achievement moti-vation and self-esteem; they reveal a statistically significant increase in different variables such asself-efficacy and they confirm the effectiveness of Moodle for the design and development of a MOOC.The implications of these findings are discussed and evaluated.nEn este estudio se analiza la eficacia de un programa instruccional, Mejora de las Competencias Personalespara el Éxito (APS-ÉXITO), en formato de MOOC, con cuatro enfoques instruccionales (tres experimentalesy uno de control) claramente diferenciales: (1) producto con énfasis en el resultado final y en la calidadglobal; (2) procesos con hincapié en la recursividad, y en la autovaloración constante de los procesos; (3)mixto orientado tanto al resultado y calidad global, como a la recursividad, autorreflexión y autovalo-ración; y, (4) tradicional (control) centrado en la instrucción en línea de los temas y en la realización detareas. Todo ello, dise˜nado y aplicado a través del Moodle Externo de la Universidad de León (Ariadna)en el que participan 745 personas con edades entre los 10 y 50 a˜nos, si bien solo lo culminan 336. Losresultados demuestran la eficacia del MOOC para la instrucción en contenidos y competencias diversastales como resiliencia, motivación de logro y autoestima, con independencia del enfoque instruccionalseguido, a lo que se a˜nade un aumento estadísticamente significativo en diferentes variables como laautoeficacia. Las implicaciones de estos resultados son discutidas y valoradas.García Martín, Judit-will be generated-orcid-0000-0003-2255-9633-600García-Sánchez, Jesús-Nicasio-will be generated-orcid-0000-0002-9464-483X-600engRevista de Psicodidacticahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2019.08.002Andone, D., Mihaescu, V., Ternauciuc, A., & Vasiu, R. (2015). Integrating MOOCs in traditional higher education. In Proceedings of the Third European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit. pp. 71–75. 44 J. García-Martín, J.-N. García-Sánchez / Revista de Psicodidáctica, 2020, 25 (1) , 36–44Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006Álvarez, M. L., & García, J. N. (2014). Evaluación on-line de los procesos cognitivos implicados en la composición escrita. In J. N. García (Ed.), Prevención en dificultades del desarrollo y del aprendizaje (pp. 359–378). Madrid: Pirámide.Alturkistani, A., Lam, C., Foley, K., Stenfors, T., Blum, E., & Meinert, E. (2019). pp. 1–20. MOOC Evaluation methods: A Systematic Review (27) http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/preprints.13851Bayeck, R. Y., & Choi, J. (2018). The influence of national culture on educational videos: The case of MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 186–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2729Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Kou, X., Xu, S., & Sheu, F.-R. (2015). Understanding the selfdirected online learning preferences, goals, achievements, and challenges of MIT open courseware subscribers. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 349–368.Castano,˜ C., Maiz, I., & Garay, U. (2015). Design, motivation and performance in a cooperative MOOC course. Comunicar, 22(44), 19–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-02Chang, R., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12275Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.Clará, M., & Barberá, E. (2013). Learning online: Massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Education, 34(1), 129–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770428Deursen, A., Bolle, C., Hegner, S., & Kommers, P. (2015). Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 411–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039Díez, C., García, J. N., & IPDDA. (2010). Percepción de metodologías docentes y desarrollo de competencias al EEES. Boletín de Psicología, 99, 45–69.Frydrychova, B. (2014). Approaches to the teaching of writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 147–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1149Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.0 04García-Martín, J., & García, J. N. (2013). Patterns of web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people. Computers & Education, 67(3), 105–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.003García-Martín, J., & García, J. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the service competence dimensions of digital literacy and of psychological and educational measures. Computers & Education, 106, 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.010García-Martín, J., & García, J. N. (2018). The instructional effectiveness of two virtual approaches: Processes and product. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(2), 117–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.02.002García, J. N., Fidalgo, R., Arias, O., Marbán, J. M., De Caso, A. M., Pacheco, D. I., & Diez, H. (2014). El análisis psicolingüístico del producto textual. In Prevención en dificultades del desarrollo y del aprendizaje. pp. 301–321. Madrid: Pirámide.García, J. N., Marbán, J., & De Caso, A. (2001). EPP y FPE [EPP and FPE]. In J. N. García (Ed.), Dificultades de aprendizaje e intervención psicopedagógica (pp. 151–155). Barcelona: Ariel.Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2014). Conducting high quality writing intervention research: Twelve recommendations. Journal of Writing Research, 6(2), 89–123.Hashemnezhad, H., & Hashemnezhad, N. (2012). A comparative study of product, process, and post-process approaches in Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 722–729. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4Herodotou, C., Kambouri, M., & Winters, N. (2011). The role of trait emotional intelligence in gamer’s preferences for play and frequency of gaming. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1815–1819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.001Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. S. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to selfregulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60, 14–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.0Lin, W. S. (2012). Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 498–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.006Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152–1161.Loizzo, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). MOOCocracy: The learning culture of massive open online courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1013–1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9444-7Lorenz, A., Wittke, A., Muschal, T., & Steinert, F. (2015). From moodle to mooin: Development a MOOC platform. European MOOCs Stakeholder Summit (EMOOCs), 102–106.Lowenthal, P., Snelson, C., & Perkins, R. (2018). Teaching massive, open, online, courses (MOOCs): Tales from the front line. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3505Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005Munoz-Merino,˜ P., Ruipérez, J. A., Alario, C., Pérez, M. P., & Delgado, C. (2015). Precise effectiveness strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities inMOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 108–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.003Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, 1065–1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016Oldmeadow, J. A., Quinn, S., & Kowert, R. (2013). Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1142–1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.006Reid, A. J., Morrison, G. R., & Bol, L. (2017). Knowing what you know: Improving metacomprehension and calibration accuracy in digital text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 29–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9454-5Robledo, P., & García, J. N. (2018). Description and analysis of strategy-focused instructional models for writing. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing (pp. 38–65). Leiden: Brill.Ruipérez, J. A., Halawa, S., & Reich, J. (2019). Multiplatform MOOC analytics: Comparing global and regional patterns in edX and Edraak Learning.Thulasi, A. P. S., Bin, A. R., & Bte, F. (2014). Comparative analysis of process versus product approach of teaching writing in Malaysian schools: Review of literature. Middle-East Journal of Scientifc Research, 22(6), 789–795. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.22.06.21943Van der Meij, H., Van der Meij, J., & Harmsen, R. (2015). Animated pedagogical agents effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 381–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9378-5Yu, P. T., Liao, Y. H., & Su, M. H. (2013). A near-reality approach to improve the e-learning open courseware. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 242–257.Zawacki, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs - an explorative content analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 242–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356CC0 1.0 Universalhttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)e-learningMotivationEmotional intelligenceSelf-regulationCursos Online Masivos y AbiertosE-learningMotivaciónInteligencia emocionalAutoeficaciaThe effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in lifeArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionPublicationORIGINALThe effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOCpromoting personal skills for success in life.pdfThe effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOCpromoting personal skills for success in life.pdfapplication/pdf995233https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/dfb72564-95b0-46d4-a254-1178b8826508/download3d80d86aa5465885122ae460f33d0fadMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8701https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/ce8c82a8-6c24-4a4f-8470-19f23e16cd35/download42fd4ad1e89814f5e4a476b409eb708cMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/75c041ab-0630-4f07-9af4-80727565f8b7/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD53THUMBNAILThe effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOCpromoting personal skills for success in life.pdf.jpgThe effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOCpromoting personal skills for success in life.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg62373https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/426d6b21-9fa8-4965-8331-00c0e48d97aa/downloadff270ca80865a6cad7442dee4217f6feMD55TEXTThe effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOCpromoting personal skills for success in life.pdf.txtThe effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOCpromoting personal skills for success in life.pdf.txttext/plain50876https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/bitstreams/7f21515c-e8e0-4d3d-886a-3c828636afa5/download6dd7b2bf192ccea36a61f9451c43e30dMD5611323/5937oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/59372024-09-17 10:56:57.202http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/CC0 1.0 Universalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.cuc.edu.coRepositorio de la Universidad de la Costa CUCrepdigital@cuc.edu.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