Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilizat...
- Autores:
-
Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Corpoica
Ortiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoica
Rivera, Diego; Corpoica
Kloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, Auburn
Bonilla, Ruth; Corpoica
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2013
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/31640
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640
- Palabra clave:
- Microbiología
Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation
Fisiología de Microorganismos
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id |
JAVERIANA2_0bae58cce8ea15a0f70f7f2bd3c03e23 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/31640 |
network_acronym_str |
JAVERIANA2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2nullRojas Tapias, Daniel; CorpoicaOrtiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoicaRivera, Diego; CorpoicaKloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, AuburnBonilla, Ruth; Corpoica2018-02-24T16:00:23Z2020-04-15T18:08:05Z2018-02-24T16:00:23Z2020-04-15T18:08:05Z2013-05-31http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/440410.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmp2027-13520122-7483http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640PDFapplication/pdftext/htmlengPontificia Universidad Javerianahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/4618http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/6495http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1088http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1090Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139MicrobiologíaAzotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixationFisiología de MicroorganismosColombianullnullhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleexperimentalEvaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandiiBecause the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze-drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus.10554/31640oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/316402023-03-28 16:15:47.526Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javerianarepositorio@javeriana.edu.co |
dc.title.english.eng.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii |
dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Corpoica Ortiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoica Rivera, Diego; Corpoica Kloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, Auburn Bonilla, Ruth; Corpoica |
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Corpoica Ortiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoica Rivera, Diego; Corpoica Kloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, Auburn Bonilla, Ruth; Corpoica |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
null |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Microbiología Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation Fisiología de Microorganismos |
topic |
Microbiología Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation Fisiología de Microorganismos |
spellingShingle |
Microbiología Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation Fisiología de Microorganismos |
description |
Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze-drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-05-31 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-24T16:00:23Z 2020-04-15T18:08:05Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-24T16:00:23Z 2020-04-15T18:08:05Z |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv |
experimental |
format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404 10.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmp |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2027-1352 0122-7483 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640 |
url |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404 http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmp 2027-1352 0122-7483 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/4618 http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/6495 http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1088 http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1090 |
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv |
Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139 |
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139 |
dc.relation.citationissue.por.fl_str_mv |
Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139 |
dc.rights.licence.*.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv |
PDF |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Colombia null null |
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
institution |
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@javeriana.edu.co |
_version_ |
1811671126890250240 |