Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilizat...

Full description

Autores:
Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Corpoica
Ortiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoica
Rivera, Diego; Corpoica
Kloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, Auburn
Bonilla, Ruth; Corpoica
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2013
Institución:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Repositorio:
Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/31640
Acceso en línea:
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640
Palabra clave:
Microbiología
Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation
Fisiología de Microorganismos
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
id JAVERIANA2_0bae58cce8ea15a0f70f7f2bd3c03e23
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/31640
network_acronym_str JAVERIANA2
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
repository_id_str
spelling Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2nullRojas Tapias, Daniel; CorpoicaOrtiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoicaRivera, Diego; CorpoicaKloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, AuburnBonilla, Ruth; Corpoica2018-02-24T16:00:23Z2020-04-15T18:08:05Z2018-02-24T16:00:23Z2020-04-15T18:08:05Z2013-05-31http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/440410.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmp2027-13520122-7483http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640PDFapplication/pdftext/htmlengPontificia Universidad Javerianahttp://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/4618http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/6495http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1088http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1090Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139MicrobiologíaAzotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixationFisiología de MicroorganismosColombianullnullhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleexperimentalEvaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandiiBecause the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze-drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus.10554/31640oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/316402023-03-28 16:15:47.526Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javerianarepositorio@javeriana.edu.co
dc.title.english.eng.fl_str_mv Evaluation of three methods for preservation of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azotobacter vinelandii
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Corpoica
Ortiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoica
Rivera, Diego; Corpoica
Kloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, Auburn
Bonilla, Ruth; Corpoica
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Rojas Tapias, Daniel; Corpoica
Ortiz-Vera, Mabel; corpoica
Rivera, Diego; Corpoica
Kloepper, Joseph; Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, 209 Life Science Building, Auburn University, Auburn
Bonilla, Ruth; Corpoica
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv null
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Microbiología
Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation
Fisiología de Microorganismos
topic Microbiología
Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation
Fisiología de Microorganismos
spellingShingle Microbiología
Azotobacter; bacterial preservation; cryopreservation; freeze-drying; immobilization in polymers; bacterial nitrogen fixation
Fisiología de Microorganismos
description Because the use of bacteria for biotechnological processes requires maintaining their viability and genetic stability, preserving them becomes essential. Here, we evaluated three preservation methods for A. chroococcum C26 and A. vinelandii C27; preservation methods: cryopreservation and immobilization in dry polymers for 60 days, and freeze-drying for 30. We evaluated their efficiency by counting viable cells and measuring nitrogen fixation activity. Additionally, we assessed the effect of three protective agents for freeze-drying, three for cryopreservation, and four polymers. Freeze-drying proved the best technique to maintain viability and activity, followed by immobilization and cryopreservation. Bacterial nitrogen fixing ability remained unchanged using the freeze-drying method, and bacterial survival exceeded 80%; S/BSA was the best protective agent. Immobilization maintained bacterial survival over 80%, but nitrogen fixation was decreased by 20%. Lastly, cryopreservation resulted in a dramatic loss of viability for C26 (BSR approx. 70%), whereas C27 was well preserved. Nitrogen fixation for both strains decreased regardless of the cryoprotective agent used (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the success of Azotobacter preservation methods depend on the technique, the protective agent, and the strain used. Our results also indicated that freeze-drying using S/BSA is the best technique to preserve bacteria of this genus.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.created.none.fl_str_mv 2013-05-31
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-24T16:00:23Z
2020-04-15T18:08:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-24T16:00:23Z
2020-04-15T18:08:05Z
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.hasversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv experimental
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404
10.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmp
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2027-1352
0122-7483
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640
url http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31640
identifier_str_mv 10.11144/Javeriana.SC18-2.etmp
2027-1352
0122-7483
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/4618
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/4404/6495
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1088
http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/downloadSuppFile/4404/1090
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139
dc.relation.citationissue.por.fl_str_mv Universitas Scientiarum; Vol 18, No 2 (2013); 129-139
dc.rights.licence.*.fl_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.spa.fl_str_mv PDF
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Colombia
null
null
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
institution Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@javeriana.edu.co
_version_ 1811671126890250240