Working memory and fluid intelligence: the role executive processes, age and school type in children
The aim of this study was to verify which components of the working memory (WM) model (phonological, visuospatial and central executive) predict the performance in fluid intelligence (FI), considering age, schooling and school type. The participants were 419 children aged between six and 12 years ol...
- Autores:
-
Burges Sbicigo, Juliana; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
da Rosa Piccolo, Luciane; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Paz Fonseca, Rochele; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Fumagalli de Salles, Jerusa; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2014
- Institución:
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio Universidad Javeriana
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.javeriana.edu.co:10554/33320
- Acceso en línea:
- http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/3758
http://hdl.handle.net/10554/33320
- Palabra clave:
- memoria operativa; inteligencia; neuropsicología
Working memory; intelligence; neuropsychology
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional
Summary: | The aim of this study was to verify which components of the working memory (WM) model (phonological, visuospatial and central executive) predict the performance in fluid intelligence (FI), considering age, schooling and school type. The participants were 419 children aged between six and 12 years old, from the first year to the sixth grade of Primary School from public and private schools of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The WM subtests of the NEUPSILIN-Inf – Brazilian Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Battery – for children – were administered, and Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices Test served as FI measure. In the linear regression analysis, the executive component primarily explained the relationship between WM and FI in children, rather than phonological component. When sociodemographic variables were included, age, school type and the executive component explained 47% of FI variance, but the predictive power of the executive component was reduced. The results reinforce the primary relationship between executive processing of WM and FI, as well as the importance of taking into account sociodemographic variables, so the relationship between these constructs are not overestimated. |
---|