How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study
This paper aims to measure what are the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after finishing their clinical engineering major courses. This is a pre- post-test with no control group study design. Forty students were involved in this pilot study. A paper-based survey composed of a demogr...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24258
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_6
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24258
- Palabra clave:
- Biomedical engineering
Biophysics
Education
Statistical tests
Students
Surveys
Clinical engineering
Control groups
Learning outcome
Mann-Whitney U test
Perceived learning outcomes
Pilot studies
Post test
Signed rank
Engineering education
Biomedical engineering
Clinical engineering
Engineering education
- Rights
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id |
EDOCUR2_fe0324617f4f2450f08c4986cc1ca29f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/24258 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot studyBiomedical engineeringBiophysicsEducationStatistical testsStudentsSurveysClinical engineeringControl groupsLearning outcomeMann-Whitney U testPerceived learning outcomesPilot studiesPost testSigned rankEngineering educationBiomedical engineeringClinical engineeringEngineering educationThis paper aims to measure what are the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after finishing their clinical engineering major courses. This is a pre- post-test with no control group study design. Forty students were involved in this pilot study. A paper-based survey composed of a demographic section and a 5-point Likert (“1” is strongly disagree and “5” is strongly agree) section measured the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after exposing them to clinical engineering major courses. A Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U test statistics were conducted to test the two hypotheses of this study. Our analysis showed statistically significant results between the pre-survey mean and SD: 21.10 SD 3.54; and between the postsurvey mean and SD: 22.75 SD 3.68 (Z=-2.12, p less than 0.033), indicating that overall, students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after exposing them to clinical engineering major courses had significantly improved by the end of the major. Also, statistically significant results were found between the post-survey mean and SD: 3.94 SD 0.61 learning outcome perceptions and between the students’ actual marks mean and SD: 4.53 SD 0.22 (-5.00, p less than 0.000), indicating the students had low confidence in their learning outcomes after completing their clinical engineering major. © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017.Springer Verlag20172020-05-26T00:10:47Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94fapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_62006https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24258instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURenghttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018427839&doi=10.1007%2f978-981-10-4086-3_6&partnerID=40&md5=249c9b41fe4b510cd479bc8e75dc67a4http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Cruz A.M.Torres D.A.Q.Presiga A.M.Luna N.F.oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/242582022-05-02T07:37:21Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study |
title |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study |
spellingShingle |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study Biomedical engineering Biophysics Education Statistical tests Students Surveys Clinical engineering Control groups Learning outcome Mann-Whitney U test Perceived learning outcomes Pilot studies Post test Signed rank Engineering education Biomedical engineering Clinical engineering Engineering education |
title_short |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study |
title_full |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study |
title_fullStr |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study |
title_sort |
How do our students learn clinical engineering? A pilot study |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Biomedical engineering Biophysics Education Statistical tests Students Surveys Clinical engineering Control groups Learning outcome Mann-Whitney U test Perceived learning outcomes Pilot studies Post test Signed rank Engineering education Biomedical engineering Clinical engineering Engineering education |
topic |
Biomedical engineering Biophysics Education Statistical tests Students Surveys Clinical engineering Control groups Learning outcome Mann-Whitney U test Perceived learning outcomes Pilot studies Post test Signed rank Engineering education Biomedical engineering Clinical engineering Engineering education |
description |
This paper aims to measure what are the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after finishing their clinical engineering major courses. This is a pre- post-test with no control group study design. Forty students were involved in this pilot study. A paper-based survey composed of a demographic section and a 5-point Likert (“1” is strongly disagree and “5” is strongly agree) section measured the students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after exposing them to clinical engineering major courses. A Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U test statistics were conducted to test the two hypotheses of this study. Our analysis showed statistically significant results between the pre-survey mean and SD: 21.10 SD 3.54; and between the postsurvey mean and SD: 22.75 SD 3.68 (Z=-2.12, p less than 0.033), indicating that overall, students’ perceived learning outcome achievements after exposing them to clinical engineering major courses had significantly improved by the end of the major. Also, statistically significant results were found between the post-survey mean and SD: 3.94 SD 0.61 learning outcome perceptions and between the students’ actual marks mean and SD: 4.53 SD 0.22 (-5.00, p less than 0.000), indicating the students had low confidence in their learning outcomes after completing their clinical engineering major. © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2020-05-26T00:10:47Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_6 2006 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24258 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_6 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/24258 |
identifier_str_mv |
2006 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018427839&doi=10.1007%2f978-981-10-4086-3_6&partnerID=40&md5=249c9b41fe4b510cd479bc8e75dc67a4 |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
instname_str |
Universidad del Rosario |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
reponame_str |
Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
collection |
Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803710481155751936 |