Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs

In a dynamic competition model where firms initially share half of the market and consumers have switching costs, consumers’ sophistication, lifespan and concentration impact the possibility to set collusive prices. I first show that with strategic long-run consumers, collusion is harder to implemen...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2017
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/13453
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_13453
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/13453
Palabra clave:
Costes de cambio
Colision de precios
Consumidores estratégicos
Producción
D43
L13
L12
Switching cost
Price collusion
Strategic consumers
Oligopolios
Mercados
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id EDOCUR2_98ce24b5a8ec55a6ccaced9d154fa719
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/13453
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
spelling Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costsCostes de cambioColision de preciosConsumidores estratégicosProducciónD43L13L12Switching costPrice collusionStrategic consumersOligopoliosMercadosIn a dynamic competition model where firms initially share half of the market and consumers have switching costs, consumers’ sophistication, lifespan and concentration impact the possibility to set collusive prices. I first show that with strategic long-run consumers, collusion is harder to implement than when consumers are not strategic: with sophisticated consumers, a deviating firm can cash-in the rents that a buyer obtains after switching. I then study the consequences of relaxing buyers concentration and show that collusion is then easier to maintain than with non-strategic consumers: with strategic consumers a firm must offer a low price at the moment of deviation as consumers can benefit from increased competition, emerging from an asymmetric market structure, without having to pay switching costs. The paper suggests simple policy recommendations: it does not suffice to educate consumers about the competitive effects of their current purchasing decisions, but central purchasing agencies also need to be promoted.2017-05-262017-06-01T21:17:39Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_804250application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48713/10336_13453 http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/13453Abreu, D., 1986, Extremal equilibria of oligopolistic supergames, Journal of Economic Theory 39, 191-225.Abreu, D., 1988, On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting, Econometrica 56, 383-96.Anderson, E., Kumar, N, and Rajiv, S., 2004, A comment on: Revisiting dynamic duopoly with consumer switching costs, Journal of Economic Theory 116, 177-186.Fabra, N. and Garc´ıa, A. 2015, Dynamic price competition with switching costs, Dynamic Games Applications.Friedman, J. W., 1971, Oligopoly and the theory of games, Amsterdam: North Holland.Padilla, A.J., 1995, Revising dynamic duopoly with customer switching costs, Journal of Economic Theory 67, 520-530.Shilony, Y., 1977, Mixed pricing in oligopoly, Journal of Economic Theory 14, 373-388.Somaini, P. and Einav, L., 2013, A model of market power in customer markets. Journal of Industrial Economics. 61, 938-986To, T., 1996, Multi-period competition with switching costs: an overlapping generation formulation, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 44, 81-87.instname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURspahttps://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000092/015621.htmlhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Roig Roig, Guillemoai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/134532019-09-19T07:37:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
title Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
spellingShingle Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
Costes de cambio
Colision de precios
Consumidores estratégicos
Producción
D43
L13
L12
Switching cost
Price collusion
Strategic consumers
Oligopolios
Mercados
title_short Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
title_full Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
title_fullStr Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
title_full_unstemmed Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
title_sort Duopolistic competition in markets where consumers have switching costs
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Costes de cambio
Colision de precios
Consumidores estratégicos
Producción
D43
L13
L12
Switching cost
Price collusion
Strategic consumers
Oligopolios
Mercados
topic Costes de cambio
Colision de precios
Consumidores estratégicos
Producción
D43
L13
L12
Switching cost
Price collusion
Strategic consumers
Oligopolios
Mercados
description In a dynamic competition model where firms initially share half of the market and consumers have switching costs, consumers’ sophistication, lifespan and concentration impact the possibility to set collusive prices. I first show that with strategic long-run consumers, collusion is harder to implement than when consumers are not strategic: with sophisticated consumers, a deviating firm can cash-in the rents that a buyer obtains after switching. I then study the consequences of relaxing buyers concentration and show that collusion is then easier to maintain than with non-strategic consumers: with strategic consumers a firm must offer a low price at the moment of deviation as consumers can benefit from increased competition, emerging from an asymmetric market structure, without having to pay switching costs. The paper suggests simple policy recommendations: it does not suffice to educate consumers about the competitive effects of their current purchasing decisions, but central purchasing agencies also need to be promoted.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-26
2017-06-01T21:17:39Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_13453
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/13453
url https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_13453
http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/13453
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000092/015621.html
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 50
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Abreu, D., 1986, Extremal equilibria of oligopolistic supergames, Journal of Economic Theory 39, 191-225.
Abreu, D., 1988, On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting, Econometrica 56, 383-96.
Anderson, E., Kumar, N, and Rajiv, S., 2004, A comment on: Revisiting dynamic duopoly with consumer switching costs, Journal of Economic Theory 116, 177-186.
Fabra, N. and Garc´ıa, A. 2015, Dynamic price competition with switching costs, Dynamic Games Applications.
Friedman, J. W., 1971, Oligopoly and the theory of games, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Padilla, A.J., 1995, Revising dynamic duopoly with customer switching costs, Journal of Economic Theory 67, 520-530.
Shilony, Y., 1977, Mixed pricing in oligopoly, Journal of Economic Theory 14, 373-388.
Somaini, P. and Einav, L., 2013, A model of market power in customer markets. Journal of Industrial Economics. 61, 938-986
To, T., 1996, Multi-period competition with switching costs: an overlapping generation formulation, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 44, 81-87.
instname:Universidad del Rosario
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
instname_str Universidad del Rosario
institution Universidad del Rosario
reponame_str Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
collection Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803710518650732544