(Un)contested evidence: scientific literature, systematic reviews and the politics of evidence in the introduction of HPV vaccines in Colombia
This paper analyses the tensions between scientific literature and systematic reviews in the production of evidence in healthcare. Systematic reviews are devices developed – within evidence-based medicine – to navigate the complexities of scientific literature promising a clear and simple account of...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2019
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/23314
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12808
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/23314
- Palabra clave:
- Wart virus vaccine
Colombia
Economics
Evidence based medicine
Female
Health care delivery
Human
Organization
Organization and management
Papillomavirus infection
Politics
Publication
Uterine cervix tumor
Colombia
Delivery of Health Care
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18
Humans
Papillomavirus Infections
Papillomavirus Vaccines
Periodicals as Topic
Politics
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Evidence
HPV vaccine
Systematic reviews
Organizational
Decision Making
- Rights
- License
- Abierto (Texto Completo)