Associations between self-perceived voice disorders in teachers, perceptual assessment by speech-language pathologists, and instrumental analysis

Purpose: The three aims of this study were to assess agreement between self-perceived voice disorders, perceptual and instrumental assessment; to determine factors associated with perceptual voice assessment; and to determine which associated factors would serve as an initial screening tool for asce...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22153
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2016.1143969
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22153
Palabra clave:
Adult
Aged
Area under the curve
Colombia
Cross-sectional study
Female
Human
Male
Middle aged
Procedures
Receiver operating characteristic
School teacher
Self report
Speech analysis
Voice disorder
Young adult
Adult
Aged
Area under curve
Colombia
Cross-sectional studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle aged
Roc curve
School teachers
Self report
Speech production measurement
Voice disorders
Young adult
Instrumental voice analysis
Perceptual voice assessment
School teacher
Voice disorders
Rights
License
Abierto (Texto Completo)
Description
Summary:Purpose: The three aims of this study were to assess agreement between self-perceived voice disorders, perceptual and instrumental assessment; to determine factors associated with perceptual voice assessment; and to determine which associated factors would serve as an initial screening tool for ascertainment of the presence or absence of voice disorders among teachers. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 574 Colombian teachers. Participants filled in a questionnaire and recorded a voice sample. The voice samples were perceptually evaluated by a speech-language pathologist with the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain (GRBAS) scale and objectively with an automated voice analysis for fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer and maximum phonation time. Agreements between GRBAS scale, self-reported voice disorders and instrumental analysis were determined by unweighted Cohe?s Kappa coefficients and receiver operating characteristic curves. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with the perceptual assessment. Diagnostic performance of these variables was assessed by the area under the curve. Result: There was no agreement between self-reported voice disorders and GRBAS assessments. Maximum phonation time showed a slight agreement with perceptual assessment of voice disorders. Conclusion: Since these three methods offer different information, it is advisable to include all methods in ascertainment of voice disorders among teachers at work. © 2016 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited Published by Taylor and Francis.