Fink's integrated course design and taxonomy: The impact of their use in a “Basics of Dental Anatomy” course
Objective: This study aimed to assess whether the adjustment of Fink's Model of Integrated Course Design (ICD) with his Taxonomy of Significant Learning (hereinafter referred to as “ICD/SL”) affected the academic performance of students at Universidad El Bosque in the “Basics of Dental Anatomy”...
- Autores:
-
Uribe Cantalejo, Juan Carlos
Pardo M.I.
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2020
- Institución:
- Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio UCC
- Idioma:
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/41377
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1722-6
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13575279.2019.1612731?af=R&journalCode=cccp20
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/41377
- Palabra clave:
- course design
dental anatomy
dental education
Fink’s taxonomy
significant learning
teaching methodology
- Rights
- closedAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
Summary: | Objective: This study aimed to assess whether the adjustment of Fink's Model of Integrated Course Design (ICD) with his Taxonomy of Significant Learning (hereinafter referred to as “ICD/SL”) affected the academic performance of students at Universidad El Bosque in the “Basics of Dental Anatomy” course. Design: For this purpose, 3 academic groups were selected: 2018/1 (55 students), 2018/2 (79 students), and 2019/1 (57 students). The control group, 2018/1, was taught without ICD/SL; the 2 treatment groups, 2018/2 and 2019/1, was taught with ICD/SL, which applied revised learning goals based on Fink's Taxonomy and new teaching and evaluation activities. The assessment of academic performance was based on a Likert scale to position student results in each grade score report. Statistical analysis was performed through the Kruskal-Wallis test and P-value through the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test. Results: The results indicated that the treatment groups evidenced better academic performance in the summative assessment of the partial and final grades. In the treatment groups, 64% to 97% of students were in the High to Excellent segment; in comparison, this percentage in the control group was 44% to 65%. The course's rate of failure dropped from 10.9% in 2018/1 to only 1.7% in 2019/1. All the differences between the treatment and control groups were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The use of ICD/SL improved the academic performance of students. © 2020 American Dental Education Association |
---|