Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries

Our objective was to analyze the measurement invariance of the Academic Situations Specific Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (ASSPSES) among Peruvian, Mexican, Colombian, Argentinean, and Brazilian college students, and its relationship with academic emotional exhaustion (AEE). In addition to the ASSPS...

Full description

Autores:
Dominguez Lara, Sergio Alexis
Alarcón Parco, Danitsa
Campos Uscanga, Yolanda
Tamayo Agudelo, William
Merino Soto, César
Tumino, Marisa Cecilia
Quinde, Josué Mauricio
Barroca de Moura, Giovanna
De Almeida Baptista, Maria das Graças
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
Repositorio:
Repositorio UCC
Idioma:
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/52063
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.3051
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52063
Palabra clave:
Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución
id COOPER2_3a2568a7fb9fc17e94bc566b278ff77f
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/52063
network_acronym_str COOPER2
network_name_str Repositorio UCC
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
title Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
spellingShingle Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
title_short Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
title_full Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
title_fullStr Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
title_sort Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Dominguez Lara, Sergio Alexis
Alarcón Parco, Danitsa
Campos Uscanga, Yolanda
Tamayo Agudelo, William
Merino Soto, César
Tumino, Marisa Cecilia
Quinde, Josué Mauricio
Barroca de Moura, Giovanna
De Almeida Baptista, Maria das Graças
dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv Dominguez Lara, Sergio Alexis
Alarcón Parco, Danitsa
Campos Uscanga, Yolanda
Tamayo Agudelo, William
Merino Soto, César
Tumino, Marisa Cecilia
Quinde, Josué Mauricio
Barroca de Moura, Giovanna
De Almeida Baptista, Maria das Graças
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
topic Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv Academic self-efficacy
College students
Validity
Latin America
Psychometric properties
description Our objective was to analyze the measurement invariance of the Academic Situations Specific Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (ASSPSES) among Peruvian, Mexican, Colombian, Argentinean, and Brazilian college students, and its relationship with academic emotional exhaustion (AEE). In addition to the ASSPSES, the Emotional Exhaustion Scale (EES) was used. Two thousand one hundred forty-two college students (70.26% women) between the ages of 16 and 35 (M = 21.79 years) participated. The one-dimensional structure of ASSPSES was corroborated in each sample with a confirmatory factor analysis and the measurement invariance analysis was carried out with a multi-group factor analysis (MGFA) and with the differential item functioning. The relationship with the AEE was tested with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Regard the results, in all of the samples, the one-dimensional model presented adequate psychometric indicators with respect to both dimensionality and reliability. Similarly, regarding the analysis of measurement invariance, a strong variance was attained, and DIF is weak, which together with the MGFA results provides favorable evidence of measurement invariance. We conclude that ASSPSES is an invariant measure among the analyzed groups although replicating the study is necessary for the consolidation of the findings. These findings contribute to the understanding of the internal structure of the ASSPSES, something that had been awaiting evaluation, given how the scale is used in various contexts.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-18T14:08:50Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-18T14:08:50Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículos Científicos
dc.type.hasVersion.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversion.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driver.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1688-4221
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.3051
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52063
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation.none.fl_str_mv Dominguez-Lara, S., Alarcón-Parco, D., Campos-Uscanga, Y., Tamayo-Agudelo, W., Merino-Soto, C., Tumino, M.C., Quinde, J. M., De Moura, G.B., & Baptista, M. G. A.(2023). Psychometricproperties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries. Ciencias Psicológicas, 17(1), e-3051. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.3051
identifier_str_mv 1688-4221
Dominguez-Lara, S., Alarcón-Parco, D., Campos-Uscanga, Y., Tamayo-Agudelo, W., Merino-Soto, C., Tumino, M.C., Quinde, J. M., De Moura, G.B., & Baptista, M. G. A.(2023). Psychometricproperties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries. Ciencias Psicológicas, 17(1), e-3051. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.3051
url https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.3051
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52063
dc.relation.isversionof.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/3051
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Psicológicas
dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv Alegre, A. (2014). Academic self-efficacy, self-regulated learning and academic performance in first-year university students. Propósitos y Representaciones, 2(1), 79-120. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2014.v2n1.54
Ansong, D., Eisensmith, S. R., Okumu, M., & Chowa, G. A. (2019). The importance of self-efficacy and educational aspirations for academic achievement in resource-limited countries: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Adolescence, 70(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.003
Atalayin, C., Balkis, M., Tezel, H., Onal, B., & Kayrak, G. (2015). The prevalence and consequences of burnout on a group of preclinical dental students. European Journal of Dentistry, 9(3), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.163227
Ato, M., López, J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Ávalos, M. L., Oropeza, R., Ramírez, J. C., & Palos, M. U. (2018). Percepción de autoeficacia y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de bachillerato. Caleidoscopio - Revista Semestral de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 22(39), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.33064/39crscsh1323
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Reviews Psychologist. 52(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Barraza, A. (2010). Validación del inventario de expectativas de autoeficacia académica en tres muestras secuenciales e independientes. CPU-e, Revista de Investigación Educativa, 10(1), 1-30.
Blanco-Vega, H., Martínez-Marín, M., Zueck-Enríquez, M. C. & Gastélum-Cuadras, G. (2011). Análisis psicométrico de la escala autoeficacia en conductas académicas en universitarios de primer ingreso. Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 11(3), 1-27.
Borzone-Valdebenito, M. A. (2017). Autoeficacia y vivencias académicas en estudiantes universitarios. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 20(1), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.1.13
Bresó, E., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). In search of the “third dimension” of burnout: Efficacy or inefficacy? Applied Psychology, 56(3), 460-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00290.x
Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2019). A Social Cognitive View of Career Development and Guidance. In J. A. Athanasou & H. N. Perera (Eds.), International Handbook of Career Guidance (pp. 147-166). Springer.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Buadas, C. R., Lobo, P. E., & Díaz, N. Y. (2017). Aprendizaje autónomo y autoeficacia en alumnos universitarios de inglés como lengua extranjera. Aportes Científicos desde Humanidades, 12(2), 129-138.
Bueno-Pacheco, A., Lima-Castro, S., Peña-Contreras, E., Cedillo-Quizhpe, C., & Aguilar-Sizer, M. (2018). Adaptación al español de la Escala de Autoeficacia General para su uso en el contexto ecuatoriano. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación e Avaliação Psicológica, 48(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.01
Bulfone, G., Badolamenti, S., Biagioli, V., Maurici, M., Macale, L., Sili, A., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. (2021). Nursing students' academic self-efficacy: A longitudinal analysis of academic self-efficacy changes and predictive variables over time. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(5), 2353-2362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14771
Byrne, B. M. & van de Vijver, F. (2010). Testing for measurement and structuralequivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of none-quivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10(2), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305051003637306
Byrne, B. M., Oakland, T., Leong, F. T., van de Vijver, F. J., Hambleton, R. K., Cheung, F. M., & Bartram, D. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(2), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014516
Campos, J. A. D. B., & Maroco, J. (2012). Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey: Portugal – Brazil cross – cultural adaptation. Revista de Saúde Pública, 46(5), 816-824. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012000500008
Charkhabi, M., Azizi Abarghuei, M., & Hayati, D. (2013). The association of academic burnout with self-efficacy and quality of learning experience among Iranian students. SpringerPlus, 2, 677. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-677
Charry, C., Garzón, A., Pozo, C., & Bretones, B. (2018). Invarianza factorial del burnout académico para estudiantes hispanohablantes. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 23(79), 1195-1215.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Clayson, P. E. & Miller, G. A. (2017). Psychometric considerations in the measurement of event-related brain potentials: Guidelines for measurement and reporting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 111, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.005
Colegio de Psicólogos del Perú. (2017). Código de ética y deontología. https://www.cpsp.pe/documentos/marco_legal/codigo_de_etica_y_deontologia.pdf
Davis, J. A. (1967). A partial coefficient for Goodman and Kruskal’s Gamma. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482900
Del Valle, M., Díaz, A., Pérez, M., & Vergara, J. (2018). Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio Escala Autoeficacia Percibida en Situaciones Académicas (EAPESA) en Universitarios Chilenos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación e Avaliação Psicológica, 49(4), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP49.4.08
Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459
DiStefano, C., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, D. (2018). Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: Evidence for trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394
Dominguez-Lara, S. & Campos-Uscanga, Y. (2020). Análisis psicométrico de una medida de autoeficacia académica en estudiantes mexicanos de ciencias de la salud. Online Advance. Educación Médica. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.edumed.2020.09.021
Dominguez-Lara, S. & Merino-Soto, C. (2018). Análisis de las malas especificaciones en modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento,10(2), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.30882/1852.4206.v10.n2.19595
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2016). Valores normativos de una escala de autoeficacia académica en estudiantes universitarios de Lima. Interacciones, 2(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.24016/2016.v2n2.31
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2018a). Afrontamiento ante la ansiedad pre-examen y autoeficacia académica en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud. Educación Médica, 19(1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.07.007
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2018b). Proposal for cut-offs for factor loadings: A construct reliability perspective. Enfermería Clínica, 28(6), 401-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.06.002
Dominguez-Lara, S. (2018c). Reliability and ordinal alpha. Actas Urológicas Españolas, 42(2), 140-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.002
Dominguez-Lara, S., Alarcón-Parco, D., Fernández-Arata, M., Tamayo-Agudelo, W., Bernal-Vargas, L., & Campos-Uscanga, Y. (2021). Invarianza factorial de una medida de burnout académico entre estudiantes universitarios de Perú, México y Colombia. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 13(3), 70-86.
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
Escobar, A. & Pérez, C. (2017). Estructura factorial y confiabilidad de una escala de autoeficacia académica en estudiantes chilenos de Fonoaudiología. Educación Médica Superior, 31(3), 70-79.
Espinoza, C. & Barra, E. (2018). Autoeficacia, apoyo social y bienestar psicológico en estudiantes universitarios asmáticos. Revista de Psicología, 14(28), 141-147.
Ferguson, C.J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001580
Fernández, A., Pérez, E., Alderete, A. M., Richaud, M. C., & Liporace, M. F. (2010). ¿Construir o adaptar tests psicológicos? Diferentes respuestas a una cuestión controvertida. Revista Evaluar, 10(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v10.n1.459
Ferrel-Ortega, F. R., Ferrel-Ballestas, L. F., Cantillo-Aguirre, A. A., Jaramillo-Campo, J., & Jiménez-Suárez, S. M. (2017). Variables académicas y sociodemográficas relacionadas con el Síndrome de Burnout, en estudiantes de Ingenierías y Ciencias de la Salud de una universidad estatal de Colombia. Psicogente, 20(38), 336-352. https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.20.38.2555
Fidalgo A. M. (2011). A new approach for differential item functioning detection using Mantel-Haenszel methods. The GMHDIF program. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 1018-1022. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.47
Fidalgo, A. M. & Madeira, J. M. (2008) Generalized Mantel-Haenszel methods for DIF detection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 940-958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408315265
Fidalgo, A. M. & Scalon, J. D. (2009). Using Generalized Mantel-Haenszel statistics to assess DIF among multiple groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282909337302
Fidalgo, A. M. & Scalon, J. D. (2012). Uso dos métodos Mantel-Haenszel para a detecção do funcionamento diferencial dos itens e software relacionado. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000100008
Fidalgo, A. M. (2009). GMHDIF: A computer program for detecting DIF in dichotomous and polytomous items using generalized Mantel-Haenszel Statistics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 247-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621610375691
Finch, W. H. & French, B. F. (2008). Comparing factor loadings in exploratory Factor Analysis: A New Randomization Test. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 7(2), 376-384. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1225512120
Fontana, S. (2011). Estudio preliminar de las propiedades psicométricas de la escala de desgaste emocional para estudiantes universitarios. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 3(2), 44-48.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluationg structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Galán, F., Sanmartín, A., Polo, J., & Giner, L. (2011). Burnout risk in medical students in Spain using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(4), 453-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0623-x
Gignac, G. E., Bates, T. C., & Jang, K. (2007). Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability, and the Five Factor Model as measured by the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1051-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.024
Gomes, G. & Soares, A. B. (2013). Inteligência, habilidades sociais e expectativas acadêmicas no desempenho de estudantes universitários. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(4), 780-789. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000400019
Green, Z. A. (2022). Generalized self-efficacy shields on the negative effect of academic anxiety on academic self-efficacy during COVID-19 over time: A mixed-method study. Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 2(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.47602/josep.v2i1.17
Greenglass, E. R. (2007). Teaching and Stress. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Stress (2nd ed., pp. 713-717). Academic Press.
Gutiérrez-García, A. G. & Landeros-Velázquez, M.G. (2018). Autoeficacia académica y ansiedad, como incidente crítico, en mujeres y hombres universitarios. Revista Costarricense de Psicología, 37(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v37i01.01
Halsey, L. G. (2019). The reign of the p-value is over: what alternative analyses could we employ to fill the power vacuum? Biology letters, 15(5), 20190174. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0174
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999152x
Hernández-Jacquez, L. F. (2022). Evolución del nivel de autoeficacia académica percibida en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos del medio rural. Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo, 7, e13450. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e13450
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Sage
Hofstede, G. (1989). Un reexamen des cultures Nationales. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 2-3, 43-64.
Hu, Q. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey in China. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 394-408. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.2.394-408
Hunsley, J. & Marsh, E. J. (2008). Developing criteria for evidence-based assessment: An introduction to assessment that work. In J. Hunsley & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), A guide to assessments that work (pp. 3-14). Oxford University Press.
Khan, M. (2013). Academic self-efficacy, coping, and academic performance in college. International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities, 5(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7710/2168-0620.1006.
Kim, J. & Oshima, T. C. (2013). Effect of multiple testing adjustment in differential item functioning detection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 458-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412467033
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
Kong, L-N., Yang, L., Pan, Y-N., & Chen, S-Z. (2021). Proactive personality, professional self-efficacy and academic burnout in undergraduate nursing students in China. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(4), 690-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.04.003
Lai, K. & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2-3), 220-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
Landis, J. R., Heyman, E. R., & Koch, G. G., (1978). Average partial association in three-way contingency tables: A review and discussion of alternative tests. International Statistical Review, 46, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1402373
Ledesma, R. D., Ferrando, P. J., Trógolo, M. A., Poó, F. M., Tosi, J. D., & Castro, C. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis in transportation research: Current practices and recommendations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78, 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.021
León, A., González, S., González, N., & Barcelata, B. (2019). Estrés, autoeficacia, rendimiento académico y resiliencia en adultos emergentes. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 17(1), 129-148. http://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v17i47.2226
Li, C. (2016a). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
Li, C. (2016b). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavioral Research Methods, 48, 936-949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Llorca, A., Richaud, M. C., & Malonda, E. (2017). Parenting, peer relationships, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement: direct and mediating effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02120
Luo, Y., Gao, W., & Liu, X. (2022). Longitudinal relationship between self-esteem and academic self-efficacy among college students in China: Evidence from a cross-lagged model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877343
Mahler, C. (2016). The Influence of Model Components and Misspecification Type on the Performance of the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) in Structural Equation Modeling [Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary]. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/11023/3240/ucalgary_2016_mahler_claudia.pdf?sequence=1
Martin, A. J. & Marsh, H. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: a construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149
Martins, R. M. M. & Santos, A. A. A. (2019). Estratégias de aprendizagem e autoeficácia acadêmica em universitários ingressantes: estudo correlacional. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 23, e176346. http://doi.org/10.1590/2175-35392019016346
McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
Medrano, L. A., Flores-Kanter, E., Moretti, L., & Pereno, G. L. (2016). Los efectos de la inducción de estados emocionales positivos y negativos sobre las creencias de autoeficacia académica de estudiantes universitarios. Psicología Educativa: Revista de los Psicólogos de la Educación, 22(2), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2015.03.003
Medrano, L., Galleano, C., Galera, M., & Del Valle, R. (2010). Creencias Irracionales, rendimiento y deserción académica de ingresantes universitarios. Liberabit, 16(2), 183-192.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
Mesurado, B., Richaud, M. C., & Mateo, J. N. (2016). Engagement, flow, self-efficacy, and eustress of university students: a cross-national comparison between the Philippines and Argentina. The Journal of Psychology, 150(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595
Montes de Oca, C. I. & Moreta Herrera, R. (2019). La función predictora de la Autoeficiencia en la motivación escolar en los estudiantes de medicina del Ecuador. Uniandes EPISTEME, 6(4), 565-578.
Moran, V. E., Jaime, M. F. Z., & Cupani, M. (2019). Adaptación argentina de dos medidas de autoeficacia en el ámbito académico universitario. Contextos educativos: Revista de Educación, 24, 197-211. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3622
Moreta-Herrera, R., Lara-Salazar, M., Camacho-Bonilla, P., & Sánchez-Guevera, S. (2019). Análisis factorial, fiabilidad y validez de la escala de autoeficacia general (EAG) en estudiantes ecuatorianos. Psychology, Society, & Education, 11(2), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v10i1.2024
Moreta-Herrera, R., Montes de Oca, C., Navarro Cuellar, L. F., & Villegas Villacrés, N. (2021). Validez factorial con estimación robusta de la Escala de Autoeficacia Percibida Específica de Situaciones Académicas (Eapesa) en universitarios ecuatorianos. Ciencias Psicológicas, 15(1), e-2153. http://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i1.2153
Moreta-Herrera, R., Vaca-Quintana, D., Quistgaard-Álvarez, A., Merlyn-Sacoto, M.-F., & Dominguez-Lara, S. (2022). Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Cansancio Emocional en estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos durante el brote de COVID-19. Ciencias Psicológicas, 16(1), e-2755. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v16i1.2755
Morgan, B., De Bruin, G. P. & De Bruin, K. (2014). Operationalizing burnout in the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: personal efficacy versus personal inefficacy. South African Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 216-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246314528834
Mueller, M. (2020). iarm: Item Analysis in Rasch Models. R package version 0.4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=iarm
Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2015). Mplus User’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, Muthén & Muthén.
Navarro-Loli, J. S. & Dominguez-Lara, S. (2019). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia Percibida Específica de Situaciones Académicas en adolescentes peruanos. Psychology, Society, & Education, 11(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v10i1.1985
Palenzuela, D. L. (1983). Construcción y validación de una escala de autoeficacia percibida específica de situaciones académicas. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 9(21), 185-219.
Pendergast, L. L., von der Embse, N., Kilgus, S. P., & Eklund, K. R. (2017). Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 60(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002
Penfield, R. D. (2001). Assessing differential item functioning among multiple groups: A comparison of three Mantel-Haenszel procedures. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403_3
Pérez, E. R. & Delgado, M. (2006). Inventario de Autoeficacia para el Estudio: desarrollo y validación inicial. Avaliação Psicológica, 5(2), 135-143.
Potthoff, S., Garnefski, N., Miklósi, M., Ubbiali, A., Domínguez-Sánchez, F. J., Martins, E. C., Witthöft, M., & Kraaij, V. (2016). Cognitive emotion regulation and psychopathology across cultures: A comparison between six European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.022
Rodríguez, M. & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29(2), 205-227.
Rosario, P., Lourenço, A., Olímpia, M., Núñez, J., González-Pienda, J., & Valle, A. (2012). Autoeficacia y utilidad percibida como condiciones necesarias para el aprendizaje académico autorregulado. Anales de Psicología. 28(1), 37-44.
Roshangar, F., Azar, E. F., Sarbakhsh, P., & Azarmi, R. (2020). The effect of case-based learning with or without conceptual mapping method on critical thinking and academic self-efficacy of nursing students. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 11(1), 37-44.
Rutkowski, L. & Svetina, D. (2017). Measurement invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators & fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 30(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08957347.2016.1243540
Sánchez-Rosas, J. & Esquivel, S. (2016). Calidad instruccional docente, valor de la tarea, autoeficacia y aburrimiento: Un modelo de atención en clase. Revista de Psicología (Santiago), 25(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2017.44966
Saris, W. E, Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation modeling or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433
Sarmento, C. (2014). Interculturalism, multiculturalism, and intercultural studies: questioning definitions and repositioning strategies. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0026
Savalei, V. (2012). The relationship between root mean square error of approximation and model misspecification in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(6), 910-932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412452564
Schaufeli, W. B. & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: burnout and work engagement and their relationship with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701217878
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzàlez-Romà, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two simple confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schnohr, C. W., Kreiner, S., Due, E. P., Currie, C., Boyce, W., & Diderichsen, F. (2008). Differential item functioning of a Family Affluence Scale: validation study on data from HBSC 2001/02. Social Indicator Research, 89(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9221-4
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 101-123). American Psychological Association
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 34-54). Routledge.
Sohrabi, A., Mehdad, A., Sadeghi, A., & Aghaei. A. (2022). Investigating the impact of Lent and Brown social cognitive therapy on the components of academic self-efficacy perception of students at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 22, 305-313.
Thomas, R., Wheeler, L. A., Delgado, M. Y., Nair, R. L., & Coulter, K. M. (2022). Latinx adolescents’ academic self-efficacy: Explaining longitudinal links between ethnic–racial identity and educational adjustment. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 28(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000488
Tumino, M. C., Quinde, J. M., Casali, L. N., & Valega, M. R. (2020). Autoeficacia en estudiantes universitarios: El rol del empoderamiento académico. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 14, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4618
Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019a). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.001
Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019b). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1-14.
van de Vijver, F. J. (2009). Types of comparative studies in cross-cultural psychology. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 1-12. http://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1017
Ventura, A. C., Cattoni, M. S., & Borgobello, A. (2017). Aprendizaje autorregulado en el nivel universitario: Un estudio situado con estudiantes de psicopedagogía de diferentes ciclos académicos. Revista Electrónica Educare, 21(2), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-2.15
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 209-231). Guilford.
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
World Medical Association. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. Helsinki. http://www.conamed.gob.mx/prof_salud/pdf/helsinki.pdf
Yavuz, G. & Dogan, N. (2014). Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS): A validity study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2453-2457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.590
Yildirim, O. & Aybek, E.C. (2019). Testing measurement invariance of academic self-efficacy scale for Singapore, Spain and Turkey. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 5(2), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.585605
Yu, J. H., Chae, S. J., & Chang, K. H. (2016). The relationship among self-efficacy, perfectionism and academic burnout in medical school students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 28, 49-55. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2016.9
Zamora-Araya, J., Cruz-Quesada, J., & Amador-Montes, M. (2020). Autoeficacia y su relación con el rendimiento académico en estudiantes de enseñanza de la matemática. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 22(32), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v22i32.2818
Zander, L., Brouwer, J., Jansen, E., Crayen, C., & Hannover, B. (2018). Academic self-efficacy, growth mindsets, and university students' integration in academic and social support networks. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2018.01.012
Zhang, Y., Gan, Y., & Cham, H. (2007). Perfectionism, academic burnout and engagement among Chinese college students: a structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1529-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.010
Zimmerman, D. W. & Zumbo, B. D. (2015). Resolving the issue of how reliability is related to statistical power: adhering to mathematical definitions. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(2), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1446350640
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Atribución
dc.rights.accessrights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Atribución
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv 1-25
dc.coverage.temporal.none.fl_str_mv 17
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Medellín y Envigado
dc.publisher.program.none.fl_str_mv Psicología
dc.publisher.place.none.fl_str_mv Medellín
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Medellín y Envigado
institution Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/772ca946-d4b8-42f8-b43f-21825a4dd17d/download
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/224462ef-aedb-46c2-b26e-946fc7474ba5/download
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/b4b0ad22-2453-4884-95f1-a5a5e988e152/download
https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/954a161e-9d5f-4581-aa5c-b16bc5dbb078/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45
56fcf5316aef4e907833d5cdf10cf445
a0fa1f4054dc8804363acb0c624caf3a
d42c3ae5dbb3a497370df326d0ccf530
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_ 1811564890733674496
spelling Dominguez Lara, Sergio AlexisAlarcón Parco, Danitsa Campos Uscanga, YolandaTamayo Agudelo, WilliamMerino Soto, CésarTumino, Marisa CeciliaQuinde, Josué MauricioBarroca de Moura, GiovannaDe Almeida Baptista, Maria das Graças172023-07-18T14:08:50Z2023-07-18T14:08:50Z2023-02-271688-4221https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.3051https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12494/52063Dominguez-Lara, S., Alarcón-Parco, D., Campos-Uscanga, Y., Tamayo-Agudelo, W., Merino-Soto, C., Tumino, M.C., Quinde, J. M., De Moura, G.B., & Baptista, M. G. A.(2023). Psychometricproperties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countries. Ciencias Psicológicas, 17(1), e-3051. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v17i1.3051Our objective was to analyze the measurement invariance of the Academic Situations Specific Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (ASSPSES) among Peruvian, Mexican, Colombian, Argentinean, and Brazilian college students, and its relationship with academic emotional exhaustion (AEE). In addition to the ASSPSES, the Emotional Exhaustion Scale (EES) was used. Two thousand one hundred forty-two college students (70.26% women) between the ages of 16 and 35 (M = 21.79 years) participated. The one-dimensional structure of ASSPSES was corroborated in each sample with a confirmatory factor analysis and the measurement invariance analysis was carried out with a multi-group factor analysis (MGFA) and with the differential item functioning. The relationship with the AEE was tested with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Regard the results, in all of the samples, the one-dimensional model presented adequate psychometric indicators with respect to both dimensionality and reliability. Similarly, regarding the analysis of measurement invariance, a strong variance was attained, and DIF is weak, which together with the MGFA results provides favorable evidence of measurement invariance. We conclude that ASSPSES is an invariant measure among the analyzed groups although replicating the study is necessary for the consolidation of the findings. These findings contribute to the understanding of the internal structure of the ASSPSES, something that had been awaiting evaluation, given how the scale is used in various contexts.https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000168041https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5858-4964https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000004241william.tamayoa@campusucc.edu.cohttps://scholar.google.es/citations?user=RBbJI3sAAAAJ&hl=es1-25Universidad Católica del UruguayUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Medellín y EnvigadoPsicologíaMedellínhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/3051Ciencias PsicológicasAlegre, A. (2014). Academic self-efficacy, self-regulated learning and academic performance in first-year university students. Propósitos y Representaciones, 2(1), 79-120. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2014.v2n1.54Ansong, D., Eisensmith, S. R., Okumu, M., & Chowa, G. A. (2019). The importance of self-efficacy and educational aspirations for academic achievement in resource-limited countries: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Adolescence, 70(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.003Atalayin, C., Balkis, M., Tezel, H., Onal, B., & Kayrak, G. (2015). The prevalence and consequences of burnout on a group of preclinical dental students. European Journal of Dentistry, 9(3), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.163227Ato, M., López, J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511Ávalos, M. L., Oropeza, R., Ramírez, J. C., & Palos, M. U. (2018). Percepción de autoeficacia y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de bachillerato. Caleidoscopio - Revista Semestral de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 22(39), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.33064/39crscsh1323Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Reviews Psychologist. 52(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1Barraza, A. (2010). Validación del inventario de expectativas de autoeficacia académica en tres muestras secuenciales e independientes. CPU-e, Revista de Investigación Educativa, 10(1), 1-30.Blanco-Vega, H., Martínez-Marín, M., Zueck-Enríquez, M. C. & Gastélum-Cuadras, G. (2011). Análisis psicométrico de la escala autoeficacia en conductas académicas en universitarios de primer ingreso. Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 11(3), 1-27.Borzone-Valdebenito, M. A. (2017). Autoeficacia y vivencias académicas en estudiantes universitarios. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 20(1), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.1.13Bresó, E., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). In search of the “third dimension” of burnout: Efficacy or inefficacy? Applied Psychology, 56(3), 460-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00290.xBrown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2019). A Social Cognitive View of Career Development and Guidance. In J. A. Athanasou & H. N. Perera (Eds.), International Handbook of Career Guidance (pp. 147-166). Springer.Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.Buadas, C. R., Lobo, P. E., & Díaz, N. Y. (2017). Aprendizaje autónomo y autoeficacia en alumnos universitarios de inglés como lengua extranjera. Aportes Científicos desde Humanidades, 12(2), 129-138.Bueno-Pacheco, A., Lima-Castro, S., Peña-Contreras, E., Cedillo-Quizhpe, C., & Aguilar-Sizer, M. (2018). Adaptación al español de la Escala de Autoeficacia General para su uso en el contexto ecuatoriano. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación e Avaliação Psicológica, 48(3), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.01Bulfone, G., Badolamenti, S., Biagioli, V., Maurici, M., Macale, L., Sili, A., Vellone, E., & Alvaro, R. (2021). Nursing students' academic self-efficacy: A longitudinal analysis of academic self-efficacy changes and predictive variables over time. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(5), 2353-2362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14771Byrne, B. M. & van de Vijver, F. (2010). Testing for measurement and structuralequivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of none-quivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10(2), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305051003637306Byrne, B. M., Oakland, T., Leong, F. T., van de Vijver, F. J., Hambleton, R. K., Cheung, F. M., & Bartram, D. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training in psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(2), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014516Campos, J. A. D. B., & Maroco, J. (2012). Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey: Portugal – Brazil cross – cultural adaptation. Revista de Saúde Pública, 46(5), 816-824. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012000500008Charkhabi, M., Azizi Abarghuei, M., & Hayati, D. (2013). The association of academic burnout with self-efficacy and quality of learning experience among Iranian students. SpringerPlus, 2, 677. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-677Charry, C., Garzón, A., Pozo, C., & Bretones, B. (2018). Invarianza factorial del burnout académico para estudiantes hispanohablantes. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 23(79), 1195-1215.Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834Clayson, P. E. & Miller, G. A. (2017). Psychometric considerations in the measurement of event-related brain potentials: Guidelines for measurement and reporting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 111, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.005Colegio de Psicólogos del Perú. (2017). Código de ética y deontología. https://www.cpsp.pe/documentos/marco_legal/codigo_de_etica_y_deontologia.pdfDavis, J. A. (1967). A partial coefficient for Goodman and Kruskal’s Gamma. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482900Del Valle, M., Díaz, A., Pérez, M., & Vergara, J. (2018). Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio Escala Autoeficacia Percibida en Situaciones Académicas (EAPESA) en Universitarios Chilenos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación e Avaliação Psicológica, 49(4), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP49.4.08Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459DiStefano, C., Liu, J., Jiang, N., & Shi, D. (2018). Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: Evidence for trustworthiness? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394Dominguez-Lara, S. & Campos-Uscanga, Y. (2020). Análisis psicométrico de una medida de autoeficacia académica en estudiantes mexicanos de ciencias de la salud. Online Advance. Educación Médica. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.edumed.2020.09.021Dominguez-Lara, S. & Merino-Soto, C. (2018). Análisis de las malas especificaciones en modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento,10(2), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.30882/1852.4206.v10.n2.19595Dominguez-Lara, S. (2016). Valores normativos de una escala de autoeficacia académica en estudiantes universitarios de Lima. Interacciones, 2(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.24016/2016.v2n2.31Dominguez-Lara, S. (2018a). Afrontamiento ante la ansiedad pre-examen y autoeficacia académica en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud. Educación Médica, 19(1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.07.007Dominguez-Lara, S. (2018b). Proposal for cut-offs for factor loadings: A construct reliability perspective. Enfermería Clínica, 28(6), 401-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.06.002Dominguez-Lara, S. (2018c). Reliability and ordinal alpha. Actas Urológicas Españolas, 42(2), 140-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.002Dominguez-Lara, S., Alarcón-Parco, D., Fernández-Arata, M., Tamayo-Agudelo, W., Bernal-Vargas, L., & Campos-Uscanga, Y. (2021). Invarianza factorial de una medida de burnout académico entre estudiantes universitarios de Perú, México y Colombia. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 13(3), 70-86.Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046Escobar, A. & Pérez, C. (2017). Estructura factorial y confiabilidad de una escala de autoeficacia académica en estudiantes chilenos de Fonoaudiología. Educación Médica Superior, 31(3), 70-79.Espinoza, C. & Barra, E. (2018). Autoeficacia, apoyo social y bienestar psicológico en estudiantes universitarios asmáticos. Revista de Psicología, 14(28), 141-147.Ferguson, C.J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532-538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001580Fernández, A., Pérez, E., Alderete, A. M., Richaud, M. C., & Liporace, M. F. (2010). ¿Construir o adaptar tests psicológicos? Diferentes respuestas a una cuestión controvertida. Revista Evaluar, 10(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v10.n1.459Ferrel-Ortega, F. R., Ferrel-Ballestas, L. F., Cantillo-Aguirre, A. A., Jaramillo-Campo, J., & Jiménez-Suárez, S. M. (2017). Variables académicas y sociodemográficas relacionadas con el Síndrome de Burnout, en estudiantes de Ingenierías y Ciencias de la Salud de una universidad estatal de Colombia. Psicogente, 20(38), 336-352. https://doi.org/10.17081/psico.20.38.2555Fidalgo A. M. (2011). A new approach for differential item functioning detection using Mantel-Haenszel methods. The GMHDIF program. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 1018-1022. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.47Fidalgo, A. M. & Madeira, J. M. (2008) Generalized Mantel-Haenszel methods for DIF detection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 940-958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408315265Fidalgo, A. M. & Scalon, J. D. (2009). Using Generalized Mantel-Haenszel statistics to assess DIF among multiple groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282909337302Fidalgo, A. M. & Scalon, J. D. (2012). Uso dos métodos Mantel-Haenszel para a detecção do funcionamento diferencial dos itens e software relacionado. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000100008Fidalgo, A. M. (2009). GMHDIF: A computer program for detecting DIF in dichotomous and polytomous items using generalized Mantel-Haenszel Statistics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 247-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621610375691Finch, W. H. & French, B. F. (2008). Comparing factor loadings in exploratory Factor Analysis: A New Randomization Test. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 7(2), 376-384. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1225512120Fontana, S. (2011). Estudio preliminar de las propiedades psicométricas de la escala de desgaste emocional para estudiantes universitarios. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 3(2), 44-48.Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluationg structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104Galán, F., Sanmartín, A., Polo, J., & Giner, L. (2011). Burnout risk in medical students in Spain using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(4), 453-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0623-xGignac, G. E., Bates, T. C., & Jang, K. (2007). Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability, and the Five Factor Model as measured by the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1051-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.024Gomes, G. & Soares, A. B. (2013). Inteligência, habilidades sociais e expectativas acadêmicas no desempenho de estudantes universitários. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(4), 780-789. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000400019Green, Z. A. (2022). Generalized self-efficacy shields on the negative effect of academic anxiety on academic self-efficacy during COVID-19 over time: A mixed-method study. Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 2(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.47602/josep.v2i1.17Greenglass, E. R. (2007). Teaching and Stress. In G. Fink (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Stress (2nd ed., pp. 713-717). Academic Press.Gutiérrez-García, A. G. & Landeros-Velázquez, M.G. (2018). Autoeficacia académica y ansiedad, como incidente crítico, en mujeres y hombres universitarios. Revista Costarricense de Psicología, 37(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v37i01.01Halsey, L. G. (2019). The reign of the p-value is over: what alternative analyses could we employ to fill the power vacuum? Biology letters, 15(5), 20190174. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0174Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999152xHernández-Jacquez, L. F. (2022). Evolución del nivel de autoeficacia académica percibida en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos del medio rural. Revista Brasileira de Educação do Campo, 7, e13450. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e13450Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. SageHofstede, G. (1989). Un reexamen des cultures Nationales. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 2-3, 43-64.Hu, Q. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey in China. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 394-408. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.2.394-408Hunsley, J. & Marsh, E. J. (2008). Developing criteria for evidence-based assessment: An introduction to assessment that work. In J. Hunsley & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), A guide to assessments that work (pp. 3-14). Oxford University Press.Khan, M. (2013). Academic self-efficacy, coping, and academic performance in college. International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities, 5(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7710/2168-0620.1006.Kim, J. & Oshima, T. C. (2013). Effect of multiple testing adjustment in differential item functioning detection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 458-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412467033Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.Kong, L-N., Yang, L., Pan, Y-N., & Chen, S-Z. (2021). Proactive personality, professional self-efficacy and academic burnout in undergraduate nursing students in China. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(4), 690-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.04.003Lai, K. & Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2-3), 220-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306Landis, J. R., Heyman, E. R., & Koch, G. G., (1978). Average partial association in three-way contingency tables: A review and discussion of alternative tests. International Statistical Review, 46, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1402373Ledesma, R. D., Ferrando, P. J., Trógolo, M. A., Poó, F. M., Tosi, J. D., & Castro, C. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis in transportation research: Current practices and recommendations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78, 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.021León, A., González, S., González, N., & Barcelata, B. (2019). Estrés, autoeficacia, rendimiento académico y resiliencia en adultos emergentes. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 17(1), 129-148. http://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v17i47.2226Li, C. (2016a). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093Li, C. (2016b). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavioral Research Methods, 48, 936-949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7Llorca, A., Richaud, M. C., & Malonda, E. (2017). Parenting, peer relationships, academic self-efficacy, and academic achievement: direct and mediating effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02120Luo, Y., Gao, W., & Liu, X. (2022). Longitudinal relationship between self-esteem and academic self-efficacy among college students in China: Evidence from a cross-lagged model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877343Mahler, C. (2016). The Influence of Model Components and Misspecification Type on the Performance of the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) in Structural Equation Modeling [Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary]. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/11023/3240/ucalgary_2016_mahler_claudia.pdf?sequence=1Martin, A. J. & Marsh, H. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: a construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149Martins, R. M. M. & Santos, A. A. A. (2019). Estratégias de aprendizagem e autoeficácia acadêmica em universitários ingressantes: estudo correlacional. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 23, e176346. http://doi.org/10.1590/2175-35392019016346McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64Medrano, L. A., Flores-Kanter, E., Moretti, L., & Pereno, G. L. (2016). Los efectos de la inducción de estados emocionales positivos y negativos sobre las creencias de autoeficacia académica de estudiantes universitarios. Psicología Educativa: Revista de los Psicólogos de la Educación, 22(2), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2015.03.003Medrano, L., Galleano, C., Galera, M., & Del Valle, R. (2010). Creencias Irracionales, rendimiento y deserción académica de ingresantes universitarios. Liberabit, 16(2), 183-192.Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825Mesurado, B., Richaud, M. C., & Mateo, J. N. (2016). Engagement, flow, self-efficacy, and eustress of university students: a cross-national comparison between the Philippines and Argentina. The Journal of Psychology, 150(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595Montes de Oca, C. I. & Moreta Herrera, R. (2019). La función predictora de la Autoeficiencia en la motivación escolar en los estudiantes de medicina del Ecuador. Uniandes EPISTEME, 6(4), 565-578.Moran, V. E., Jaime, M. F. Z., & Cupani, M. (2019). Adaptación argentina de dos medidas de autoeficacia en el ámbito académico universitario. Contextos educativos: Revista de Educación, 24, 197-211. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3622Moreta-Herrera, R., Lara-Salazar, M., Camacho-Bonilla, P., & Sánchez-Guevera, S. (2019). Análisis factorial, fiabilidad y validez de la escala de autoeficacia general (EAG) en estudiantes ecuatorianos. Psychology, Society, & Education, 11(2), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v10i1.2024Moreta-Herrera, R., Montes de Oca, C., Navarro Cuellar, L. F., & Villegas Villacrés, N. (2021). Validez factorial con estimación robusta de la Escala de Autoeficacia Percibida Específica de Situaciones Académicas (Eapesa) en universitarios ecuatorianos. Ciencias Psicológicas, 15(1), e-2153. http://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i1.2153Moreta-Herrera, R., Vaca-Quintana, D., Quistgaard-Álvarez, A., Merlyn-Sacoto, M.-F., & Dominguez-Lara, S. (2022). Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Cansancio Emocional en estudiantes universitarios ecuatorianos durante el brote de COVID-19. Ciencias Psicológicas, 16(1), e-2755. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v16i1.2755Morgan, B., De Bruin, G. P. & De Bruin, K. (2014). Operationalizing burnout in the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey: personal efficacy versus personal inefficacy. South African Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 216-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246314528834Mueller, M. (2020). iarm: Item Analysis in Rasch Models. R package version 0.4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=iarmMuthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2015). Mplus User’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, Muthén & Muthén.Navarro-Loli, J. S. & Dominguez-Lara, S. (2019). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia Percibida Específica de Situaciones Académicas en adolescentes peruanos. Psychology, Society, & Education, 11(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v10i1.1985Palenzuela, D. L. (1983). Construcción y validación de una escala de autoeficacia percibida específica de situaciones académicas. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 9(21), 185-219.Pendergast, L. L., von der Embse, N., Kilgus, S. P., & Eklund, K. R. (2017). Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 60(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002Penfield, R. D. (2001). Assessing differential item functioning among multiple groups: A comparison of three Mantel-Haenszel procedures. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403_3Pérez, E. R. & Delgado, M. (2006). Inventario de Autoeficacia para el Estudio: desarrollo y validación inicial. Avaliação Psicológica, 5(2), 135-143.Potthoff, S., Garnefski, N., Miklósi, M., Ubbiali, A., Domínguez-Sánchez, F. J., Martins, E. C., Witthöft, M., & Kraaij, V. (2016). Cognitive emotion regulation and psychopathology across cultures: A comparison between six European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.022Rodríguez, M. & Ruiz, M. (2008). Atenuación de la asimetría y de la curtosis de las puntuaciones observadas mediante transformaciones de variables: Incidencia sobre la estructura factorial. Psicológica, 29(2), 205-227.Rosario, P., Lourenço, A., Olímpia, M., Núñez, J., González-Pienda, J., & Valle, A. (2012). Autoeficacia y utilidad percibida como condiciones necesarias para el aprendizaje académico autorregulado. Anales de Psicología. 28(1), 37-44.Roshangar, F., Azar, E. F., Sarbakhsh, P., & Azarmi, R. (2020). The effect of case-based learning with or without conceptual mapping method on critical thinking and academic self-efficacy of nursing students. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 11(1), 37-44.Rutkowski, L. & Svetina, D. (2017). Measurement invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators & fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 30(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08957347.2016.1243540Sánchez-Rosas, J. & Esquivel, S. (2016). Calidad instruccional docente, valor de la tarea, autoeficacia y aburrimiento: Un modelo de atención en clase. Revista de Psicología (Santiago), 25(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2017.44966Saris, W. E, Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation modeling or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433Sarmento, C. (2014). Interculturalism, multiculturalism, and intercultural studies: questioning definitions and repositioning strategies. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(4), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0026Savalei, V. (2012). The relationship between root mean square error of approximation and model misspecification in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(6), 910-932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412452564Schaufeli, W. B. & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: burnout and work engagement and their relationship with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701217878Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzàlez-Romà, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two simple confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326Schnohr, C. W., Kreiner, S., Due, E. P., Currie, C., Boyce, W., & Diderichsen, F. (2008). Differential item functioning of a Family Affluence Scale: validation study on data from HBSC 2001/02. Social Indicator Research, 89(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9221-4Schunk, D. H. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 101-123). American Psychological AssociationSchunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 34-54). Routledge.Sohrabi, A., Mehdad, A., Sadeghi, A., & Aghaei. A. (2022). Investigating the impact of Lent and Brown social cognitive therapy on the components of academic self-efficacy perception of students at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 22, 305-313.Thomas, R., Wheeler, L. A., Delgado, M. Y., Nair, R. L., & Coulter, K. M. (2022). Latinx adolescents’ academic self-efficacy: Explaining longitudinal links between ethnic–racial identity and educational adjustment. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 28(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000488Tumino, M. C., Quinde, J. M., Casali, L. N., & Valega, M. R. (2020). Autoeficacia en estudiantes universitarios: El rol del empoderamiento académico. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 14, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4618Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019a). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.001Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019b). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1-14.van de Vijver, F. J. (2009). Types of comparative studies in cross-cultural psychology. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 1-12. http://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1017Ventura, A. C., Cattoni, M. S., & Borgobello, A. (2017). Aprendizaje autorregulado en el nivel universitario: Un estudio situado con estudiantes de psicopedagogía de diferentes ciclos académicos. Revista Electrónica Educare, 21(2), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-2.15West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 209-231). Guilford.Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237World Medical Association. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. Helsinki. http://www.conamed.gob.mx/prof_salud/pdf/helsinki.pdfYavuz, G. & Dogan, N. (2014). Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS): A validity study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2453-2457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.590Yildirim, O. & Aybek, E.C. (2019). Testing measurement invariance of academic self-efficacy scale for Singapore, Spain and Turkey. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 5(2), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.585605Yu, J. H., Chae, S. J., & Chang, K. H. (2016). The relationship among self-efficacy, perfectionism and academic burnout in medical school students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 28, 49-55. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2016.9Zamora-Araya, J., Cruz-Quesada, J., & Amador-Montes, M. (2020). Autoeficacia y su relación con el rendimiento académico en estudiantes de enseñanza de la matemática. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 22(32), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v22i32.2818Zander, L., Brouwer, J., Jansen, E., Crayen, C., & Hannover, B. (2018). Academic self-efficacy, growth mindsets, and university students' integration in academic and social support networks. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2018.01.012Zhang, Y., Gan, Y., & Cham, H. (2007). Perfectionism, academic burnout and engagement among Chinese college students: a structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1529-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.010Zimmerman, D. W. & Zumbo, B. D. (2015). Resolving the issue of how reliability is related to statistical power: adhering to mathematical definitions. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(2), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1446350640Academic self-efficacyCollege studentsValidityLatin AmericaPsychometric propertiesAcademic self-efficacyCollege studentsValidityLatin AmericaPsychometric propertiesPsychometric properties and measurement invariance of an academic self-efficacy scale in college students from five Latin American countriesArtículos Científicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleAtribucióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2PublicationLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84334https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/772ca946-d4b8-42f8-b43f-21825a4dd17d/download3bce4f7ab09dfc588f126e1e36e98a45MD51ORIGINAL2023_Vista_Propiedades_psicometricas_invariancia.pdf2023_Vista_Propiedades_psicometricas_invariancia.pdfapplication/pdf8186706https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/224462ef-aedb-46c2-b26e-946fc7474ba5/download56fcf5316aef4e907833d5cdf10cf445MD52TEXT2023_Vista_Propiedades_psicometricas_invariancia.pdf.txt2023_Vista_Propiedades_psicometricas_invariancia.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain50https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/b4b0ad22-2453-4884-95f1-a5a5e988e152/downloada0fa1f4054dc8804363acb0c624caf3aMD53THUMBNAIL2023_Vista_Propiedades_psicometricas_invariancia.pdf.jpg2023_Vista_Propiedades_psicometricas_invariancia.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg13611https://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstreams/954a161e-9d5f-4581-aa5c-b16bc5dbb078/downloadd42c3ae5dbb3a497370df326d0ccf530MD5420.500.12494/52063oai:repository.ucc.edu.co:20.500.12494/520632024-08-10 09:36:56.453open.accesshttps://repository.ucc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional Universidad Cooperativa de Colombiabdigital@metabiblioteca.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