Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo

A partir de las nociones de libertad de proceso y de oportunidad de Amartya Sen, este artículo expone las condiciones necesarias para que el funcionamiento de los mercados tenga resultados compatibles con el concepto de la soberanía del consumidor formulado por Hutt. Estas condiciones están vinculad...

Full description

Autores:
Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/12176
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12176
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04
Palabra clave:
consumer sovereignty
consumer protection
freedom of choice
regulation
free competition
D18
L49
soberanía del consumidor
protección al consumidor
libertad de elección
regulación
libre competencia
D18
L49
soberania do consumidor
proteção do consumidor
liberdade de escolha
regulação
livre concorrência
D18
L49
Rights
openAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id uexternad2_ec8522199041debbb31ddbab4d013e05
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/12176
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Consumer sovereignty and freedom of choice in developing countries
title Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
spellingShingle Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
consumer sovereignty
consumer protection
freedom of choice
regulation
free competition
D18
L49
soberanía del consumidor
protección al consumidor
libertad de elección
regulación
libre competencia
D18
L49
soberania do consumidor
proteção do consumidor
liberdade de escolha
regulação
livre concorrência
D18
L49
title_short Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
title_full Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
title_fullStr Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
title_full_unstemmed Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
title_sort Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrollo
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv consumer sovereignty
consumer protection
freedom of choice
regulation
free competition
D18
L49
topic consumer sovereignty
consumer protection
freedom of choice
regulation
free competition
D18
L49
soberanía del consumidor
protección al consumidor
libertad de elección
regulación
libre competencia
D18
L49
soberania do consumidor
proteção do consumidor
liberdade de escolha
regulação
livre concorrência
D18
L49
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv soberanía del consumidor
protección al consumidor
libertad de elección
regulación
libre competencia
D18
L49
soberania do consumidor
proteção do consumidor
liberdade de escolha
regulação
livre concorrência
D18
L49
description A partir de las nociones de libertad de proceso y de oportunidad de Amartya Sen, este artículo expone las condiciones necesarias para que el funcionamiento de los mercados tenga resultados compatibles con el concepto de la soberanía del consumidor formulado por Hutt. Estas condiciones están vinculadas al desarrollo de capacidades básicas de los consumidores, la promoción de mercados con opciones plurales y el acceso a mecanismos de justicia de consumo. Examina, además, el papel del Estado en el cumplimiento de esas condiciones en países en desarrollo.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-04 00:00:00
2022-09-09T21:17:14Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-04 00:00:00
2022-09-09T21:17:14Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-04
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2450
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0124-5996
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12176
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04
2346-2450
0124-5996
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12176
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6395
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6765
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6951
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 38 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 95
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 38
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 71
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 20
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista de Economía Institucional
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
Cook, Ph. y Moore, M. (2002). The economics of alcohol abuse and alcohol-control policies. Health Affairs, 21(2), 120-133.
Cotter, Th. (2010). The essential facilities doctrine. Antitrust law and economics, vol. 4. K. Hylton (ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (pp. 157-182). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cseres, J. (2005). Competition policy and consumer protection. Ámsterdam: Kluwer.
Darby M. y Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67.
Engel, E. (1995). Consumer protection policy and rational behavior. Revista de Análisis Económico, 10(2), 183-202.
Feres, J. C. y Mancero, J. (2001). El método de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas y su aplicación en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Cepal.
Filho, S. (2015). Monopolies and underdevelopment: From colonial past to global reality. Series New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics. Londres: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Frey, B., Benz, M. y Stuzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also what matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377-401.
Godfrey, N. (2008). Why is competition important for growth and poverty reduction? Conference Document, OECD Global Forum on International Investment, [http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/40315399.pdf].
Gunning, P. (2009). Rothbard on consumer sovereignly and his implicit rejection of Mises’s economics. Smithfield: Bryant University, [http://www.sdaeonline.org/wp-content/uploads/doc/Gunning_Rothbard_on_Mises.pdf].
Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. Nueva York: Routledge Press.
Hayek, F. (1960). The Constitution of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hutt, W. (1940a). The economist and the public. A study of competition and opinion. Londres: Transaction Publishers.
Hutt, W. (1940b). The concept of consumers’ sovereignty. The Economic Journal, 50(197), 66-77.
Hutt, W. (1943). Plan for reconstruction. Londres: Kegan Paul & Co.
Islam, S. y Clarke, M. (2001). The relationship between well-being, utility and capacities: A new approach to social welfare measurement based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Melbourne: Victoria University, [http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/SAMATTHEW.pdf].
Kenrick, D., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S. et al. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292-314.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Nelson, Ph. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329.
Nelson, Ph. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729-754.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarquía, Estado y utopía. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
OECD et al. (2009). Financial literacy in developing countries: Promoting access to finance by empowering consumers, [https://www.globalbrigades.org/media/Financial_Literacy.pdf].
Persky, J. (1993). Retrospective: Consumer sovereignty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), 183-191.
Posner, R. (1974). The social cost of monopoly. NBER working paper 55. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Prabhat, J., Musgrove, Ph., Chaloupka, F. et al. (2000). The economic rationale for intervention in the tobacco market. En P. Jha y F. Chaloupka (eds.), Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). Una teoría de la justicia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993). El liberalismo político. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Roemer, J. y Tranoy, A. (2013). Equality of oportunity. En A. Atkinson y F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of income distribution, vol 2. Amsterdam: North Holland
Rothenberg, J. (1962). Consumers’ sovereignty and the hospitality of freedom of choice. The American Economic Review, 52(2), 269-283.
Saving, J. (2006). Consumer sovereignty in the modern global era. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(1): 107-119.
Sen, A. (1993). Markets and freedoms: Achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(4), 519-541.
Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2),151-166.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry about the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, [http://www.ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf].
Smith, A. y Todd, Z. (2014). Behavior, paternalism, and policy, evaluating consumer financial protection. Journal of Law and Liberty, Working paper, 14-06, March.
Thomas, M. y Buckmaster, L. (2010). Paternalism in social policy when is it justifiable? Research paper 8, Social Policy Section, Parliament of Australia.
Von Mises, L. (1949). Human action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, [https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Human%20Action_3.pdf].
Witzke von, H., Kirschke, D., Lotze-C., H. et al. (2005). The economics of consumer protection in developing countries’ food economy: The case of diarrhea prevention and treatment in Rwanda. Agrarwirtschaft, 54, 314-319.
Wahba, M. y Bridwell, L. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 212-240.
Waldfogel, J. (2005). Does consumer irrationality trump consumer sovereignty? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 691-696.
Wandel, J. (2012). Competition and antitrust policy: An Austrian economics perspective. En G. Leismuller y E. J. Schimpf (eds.), Economics of competition. Nueva York: Nova Science Publishers.
Williamson, O. (1968). Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare trade-offs. American Economic Review, 58(1), 18-36.
Yamey, B. (1988). Professor Hutt on monopoly policy (1934-1943). Mangerial and Decision Economics, 9(5), 27-31.
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/5273
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/70ccd46f-82cc-4db4-9c4b-2e93dea21941/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5b88260d8138245c6ac7fbdd1957e5b1
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1831928467644481536
spelling Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo587a1068-d153-4f18-98b4-328987c190a52018-04-04 00:00:002022-09-09T21:17:14Z2018-04-04 00:00:002022-09-09T21:17:14Z2018-04-04A partir de las nociones de libertad de proceso y de oportunidad de Amartya Sen, este artículo expone las condiciones necesarias para que el funcionamiento de los mercados tenga resultados compatibles con el concepto de la soberanía del consumidor formulado por Hutt. Estas condiciones están vinculadas al desarrollo de capacidades básicas de los consumidores, la promoción de mercados con opciones plurales y el acceso a mecanismos de justicia de consumo. Examina, además, el papel del Estado en el cumplimiento de esas condiciones en países en desarrollo.Based on Amartya Sen’s notions of freedom of process and opportunity, this article explain the necessary conditions for the operation of markets to have results compatible with the concept of consumer sovereignty formulated by Hutt. These conditions are linked to the development of the basic capacities of consumers, the promotion of markets with plural options and the access to consumer justice mechanisms. It also examines the role of the State in meeting these conditions in developing countries.application/pdfapplication/xmltext/html10.18601/01245996.v20n38.042346-24500124-5996https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12176https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v20n38.04spaUniversidad Externado de Colombiahttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6395https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6765https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/5273/6951Núm. 38 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio95387120Revista de Economía InstitucionalAkerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.Cook, Ph. y Moore, M. (2002). The economics of alcohol abuse and alcohol-control policies. Health Affairs, 21(2), 120-133.Cotter, Th. (2010). The essential facilities doctrine. Antitrust law and economics, vol. 4. K. Hylton (ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (pp. 157-182). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Cseres, J. (2005). Competition policy and consumer protection. Ámsterdam: Kluwer.Darby M. y Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67.Engel, E. (1995). Consumer protection policy and rational behavior. Revista de Análisis Económico, 10(2), 183-202.Feres, J. C. y Mancero, J. (2001). El método de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas y su aplicación en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Cepal.Filho, S. (2015). Monopolies and underdevelopment: From colonial past to global reality. Series New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics. Londres: Edward Elgar Publishing.Frey, B., Benz, M. y Stuzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also what matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377-401.Godfrey, N. (2008). Why is competition important for growth and poverty reduction? Conference Document, OECD Global Forum on International Investment, [http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/40315399.pdf].Gunning, P. (2009). Rothbard on consumer sovereignly and his implicit rejection of Mises’s economics. Smithfield: Bryant University, [http://www.sdaeonline.org/wp-content/uploads/doc/Gunning_Rothbard_on_Mises.pdf].Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. Nueva York: Routledge Press.Hayek, F. (1960). The Constitution of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Hutt, W. (1940a). The economist and the public. A study of competition and opinion. Londres: Transaction Publishers.Hutt, W. (1940b). The concept of consumers’ sovereignty. The Economic Journal, 50(197), 66-77.Hutt, W. (1943). Plan for reconstruction. Londres: Kegan Paul & Co.Islam, S. y Clarke, M. (2001). The relationship between well-being, utility and capacities: A new approach to social welfare measurement based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Melbourne: Victoria University, [http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/SAMATTHEW.pdf].Kenrick, D., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S. et al. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292-314.Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.Nelson, Ph. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329.Nelson, Ph. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729-754.Nozick, R. (1974). Anarquía, Estado y utopía. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica.OECD et al. (2009). Financial literacy in developing countries: Promoting access to finance by empowering consumers, [https://www.globalbrigades.org/media/Financial_Literacy.pdf].Persky, J. (1993). Retrospective: Consumer sovereignty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(1), 183-191.Posner, R. (1974). The social cost of monopoly. NBER working paper 55. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Prabhat, J., Musgrove, Ph., Chaloupka, F. et al. (2000). The economic rationale for intervention in the tobacco market. En P. Jha y F. Chaloupka (eds.), Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Rawls, J. (1971). Una teoría de la justicia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Rawls, J. (1993). El liberalismo político. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.Roemer, J. y Tranoy, A. (2013). Equality of oportunity. En A. Atkinson y F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of income distribution, vol 2. Amsterdam: North HollandRothenberg, J. (1962). Consumers’ sovereignty and the hospitality of freedom of choice. The American Economic Review, 52(2), 269-283.Saving, J. (2006). Consumer sovereignty in the modern global era. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(1): 107-119.Sen, A. (1993). Markets and freedoms: Achievements and limitations of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedoms. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(4), 519-541.Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2),151-166.Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry about the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, [http://www.ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_WealthNations_p.pdf].Smith, A. y Todd, Z. (2014). Behavior, paternalism, and policy, evaluating consumer financial protection. Journal of Law and Liberty, Working paper, 14-06, March.Thomas, M. y Buckmaster, L. (2010). Paternalism in social policy when is it justifiable? Research paper 8, Social Policy Section, Parliament of Australia.Von Mises, L. (1949). Human action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, [https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Human%20Action_3.pdf].Witzke von, H., Kirschke, D., Lotze-C., H. et al. (2005). The economics of consumer protection in developing countries’ food economy: The case of diarrhea prevention and treatment in Rwanda. Agrarwirtschaft, 54, 314-319.Wahba, M. y Bridwell, L. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 212-240.Waldfogel, J. (2005). Does consumer irrationality trump consumer sovereignty? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 691-696.Wandel, J. (2012). Competition and antitrust policy: An Austrian economics perspective. En G. Leismuller y E. J. Schimpf (eds.), Economics of competition. Nueva York: Nova Science Publishers.Williamson, O. (1968). Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare trade-offs. American Economic Review, 58(1), 18-36.Yamey, B. (1988). Professor Hutt on monopoly policy (1934-1943). Mangerial and Decision Economics, 9(5), 27-31.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/5273consumer sovereigntyconsumer protectionfreedom of choiceregulationfree competitionD18L49soberanía del consumidorprotección al consumidorlibertad de elecciónregulaciónlibre competenciaD18L49soberania do consumidorproteção do consumidorliberdade de escolharegulaçãolivre concorrênciaD18L49Soberanía del consumidor y libertad de elección en países en desarrolloConsumer sovereignty and freedom of choice in developing countriesArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2536https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/70ccd46f-82cc-4db4-9c4b-2e93dea21941/download5b88260d8138245c6ac7fbdd1957e5b1MD51001/12176oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/121762023-08-14 15:20:31.962https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org