Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista
Este artículo busca contribuir a la reflexión sobre el tema de los derechos reproductivos, asumiendo como perspectiva de análisis el debate feminista occidental contemporáneo. No obstante la variedad de enfoques y posiciones que caracterizan ese debate, se enfatizará el interés convergente de la dis...
- Autores:
-
Fanlo Cortés, Isabel
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad Externado de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/11569
- Acceso en línea:
- https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11569
https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n32.02
- Palabra clave:
- Reproductive rights
feminist theories
abortion
surrogacy
reproductive technologies
derechos reproductivos
teorías feministas
aborto
maternidad subrogada
tecnologías reproductivas
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
| id |
uexternad2_dfa28485f42e6c880fe790ea55b18ad2 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/11569 |
| network_acronym_str |
uexternad2 |
| network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
Reproductive Rights and Women’s Freedom. Remarks on the Feminist Debate |
| title |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista |
| spellingShingle |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista Reproductive rights feminist theories abortion surrogacy reproductive technologies derechos reproductivos teorías feministas aborto maternidad subrogada tecnologías reproductivas |
| title_short |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista |
| title_full |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista |
| title_fullStr |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista |
| title_sort |
Derechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feminista |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Fanlo Cortés, Isabel |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Fanlo Cortés, Isabel |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Reproductive rights feminist theories abortion surrogacy reproductive technologies |
| topic |
Reproductive rights feminist theories abortion surrogacy reproductive technologies derechos reproductivos teorías feministas aborto maternidad subrogada tecnologías reproductivas |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
derechos reproductivos teorías feministas aborto maternidad subrogada tecnologías reproductivas |
| description |
Este artículo busca contribuir a la reflexión sobre el tema de los derechos reproductivos, asumiendo como perspectiva de análisis el debate feminista occidental contemporáneo. No obstante la variedad de enfoques y posiciones que caracterizan ese debate, se enfatizará el interés convergente de la discusión bioética feminista más reciente en el tema de la regulación jurídica que los Estados prevén, tanto en relación con el uso de determinadas tecnologías reproductivas como respecto del ejercicio de otros derechos reproductivos, al igual que las premisas de valor que sostienen estas políticas del derecho y sus efectos en la vida de las mujeres. Finalmente, también a la luz de las transformaciones recientes de las modalidades de control público sobre las elecciones reproductivas, se individualizarán algunos retos que siguen interrogando a los feminismos contemporáneos. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-01 00:00:00 2022-09-09T21:08:57Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-01 00:00:00 2022-09-09T21:08:57Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-01 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.18601/01234366.n32.02 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2346-2442 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0123-4366 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11569 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n32.02 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.18601/01234366.n32.02 2346-2442 0123-4366 |
| url |
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11569 https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n32.02 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/download/5020/6008 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/download/5020/6079 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/download/5020/6846 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 32 , Año 2017 : Enero-Junio |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
52 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
32 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
29 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Derecho Privado |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Álvarez Medina, S., “Diferencia y teoría feminista”, en Beltrán, E. y Maquieira V. (eds.), Feminismos. Debates teóricos contemporáneos, 2.ª ed., Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 2005, 243-286. Álvarez Medina, S., “El umbral de autonomía. La concepción relacional y la construcción de las opciones”, en Hierro, L. L. (ed.), Autonomía individual frente a autonomía colectiva. Derechos en conflicto, Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2014, 53-79. Amorós, C., Tiempo de feminismo. Sobre feminismo, proyecto ilustrado y posmodernidad, Madrid, Cátedra, 2000. Andrews, L.B., “Surrogate motherhood: The challenge for feminists”, Law Medicine & Health Care, 16, 1988, 72-80. Andrews, L.B., “Alternative modes of reproduction”, en Cohen, S. y Taub, N. (eds.), Reproductive Laws of the 1990s, Clifton, Humana Press, 1989, 380-388. Arditti, R.; Duelli Klein, R. y Minden, S. (eds.), Test-tube Women: What Future for Motherhood?, Boston, Pandora Press, 1984. Baier, A., Postures of the Mind. Essays on Mind and Morals, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1985. Battaglia, L., “Il punto di vista delle donne nelle pratiche di procreazione artificiale”, en Romano, C. y Grassani, G. (eds.), Bioetica, Torino, Utet, 1995, 345-351. Battaglia, L., Bioetica senza dogmi, Soveria Mannelli, Rubettino, 2009. Bello, B. G. y Mancini, L. (eds.), “Intersezionalità tra diritto e società”, Sociologia del diritto, 2, 2016 (n.º monográfico). Benhabib, S., Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, New York, Routledge, 1992. Bergallo, P., “La liberalización del aborto: contextos, modelos regulatorios y argumentos para su debate”, en Id. (comp.), Aborto y justicia reproductiva, Buenos Aires, Del Puerto, 2011. Boccia, M. L., La differenza politica. Donne e cittadinanza, Milano, il Saggiatore, 2002. Borsellino, P., Bioetica tra “morali” e diritto, Milano, Raffaello Cortina, 2009. Botti, C., Prospettive femministe. Morale, bioetica e vita quotidiana, Torino, Espress, 2012. Butler, J., Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York- London, Routledge, 1990. Casalini, B., “Libere di scegliere? Patriarcato, libertà e autonomia in una prospettiva di genere”, Etica & Politica, xiii, 2, 2011, 329-364. Casalini, B., “Neoliberismo e femminismi”, Jura Gentium, xii, 1, 2015, 31-65. Chrodow, N., The Reproduction of Mothering. Psycoanalysis and Sociology of Gender, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978. Corea, G., The Mother Machine: Reprductive Technologies from Artificial Inseminarion to Artificial Wombs, New York, Harper and Row, 1985. Crenshaw, K., “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139-167. Crenshaw, K., “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color”, Stanford Law Review, 43, 1991, 1241-1299. Danna, D., Contract Children. Questioning Surrogacy, Stuttgart, Ibidem, 2015. D’Elia, C., L’aborto e la responsabilità, Roma, Ediesse, 2008. Del Bò, C., “L’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza”, en Poggi, F. (ed.), Diritto e bioetica. Questioni fondamentali, Roma, Carocci, 2013, 111-127. Dini, T. y Tarantino, S. (eds.), Femminismo e neoliberalismo. Libertà femminile versus imprenditoria di sé e precarietà, Natan Edizioni, 2014. Donchin, A., “Potere e procreazione: prospettive femministe nei confronti delle nuove tecnologie riproduttive”, Bioetica. Rivista interdisciplinare, 3, 1996, 401-424. Donchin, A., “Prospettive che convergono: le critiche femministe alla riproduzione assistita”, en Faralli, C. y Cortesi, C. (eds.), Nuove maternità. Riflessioni bioetiche al femminile, Reggio Emilia, Diabasis, 2005, 69-108. Dworkin, R., Life’s Dominion. An argument about abortion, euthanasia and individuale freedom, New York, Knopf, 1993. Fanlo Cortés, I. y Pozzolo, S., “We want sex (equality). Labour market reforms, economic crisis and the condition of women in Europe”, AG. About Gender. Rivista internazionale di studi di genere, ii, 4, 2013, i-xxiv. Fanlo Cortés, I., “Giudici, responsabilità medica e controllo sulle scelte riproduttive”, en Carusi, D. (ed.), Chiamati al mondo. Vite nascenti ed autodeterminazione procreativa, Torino, Giappichelli, 2014, 97-107. Flax, J., Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990. Forti, S. y Guaraldo, O., “Rinforzare la specie. Il corpo femminile tra biopolitica e religione materna”, Filosofia politica, 1, 2006, 57-78. Foucault, M., Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au College de France, 1978-1979, Paris, 2004. Fraser, N., “Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History”, New Left Review, 56, 2009, 97-117. Fraser, N., Fortunes of feminism. From State-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis, Verso, London-New York, 2013. Gibson, S., “The problem of abortion: Essentially contested concepts and moral autonomy”, Bioethics, xvii, 3, 2004, 221-233. Katz Rothman, B., “The legacy of patriarchy as context for surrogacy. Or why are we quibbling over this?”, The American Journal of Bioethics, xiv, 5, 2014. Lindemann Nelson, H., “Dethroning choices: Analogy, personhood and the new reproductive technologies”, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, xxiii, 1995, 129-135. Mackenzie, C., “Abortion and embodiment”, Australian Journal of Philosophy, 70, 1992, 136-155. Mackenzie, C. y Stoljar, N. (eds.), Relation Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000. MacRobbie, A., The aftermath of feminism. Gender, culture and social change, Los Angeles-London-New Delhi-Singapore-Washington, Sage, 2009. Marso, L., “Feminism’s quest for common desires”, Perspectives on Politics, viii, 1, 2010, 263-269. Morondo Taramundi, D., “Un caffè da Starbucks. Intersezionalità e disgregazione del soggetto nella sfida al diritto antidiscriminatorio”, Ragion pratica, 37, 2011, 365-384. Morondo Taramundi, D., “Una sonda en el post-patriarcado: el debate sobre emancipación y libertà femminile en el feminismo italo-español”, Gênero e Direito. Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito, 2, 2015, Nicholson, L. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, New York-London, Routledge, 1989. Pitch, T., Un diritto per due, Milano, il Saggiatore, 1998. Pozzolo, S., “Locatioventris”, Bioderecho, 3, 2016, 37-64. Pozzolo, S. (ed.), “Debating ‘surrogacy’ or pregnancy for others. A first round of opinions”, AG. About Gender. Rivista internazionale di studi di genere, v, 10, 2016, 331-357. Roberts, D., Killing the Black Body. Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty, New York, Vintage Books, 1999. Ripoli, M., “Madre natura. Considerazioni sulla maternità”, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, xxiv, 1, 1994, 231-248. Rodotà, S., “Prefazione”, en Valentini, C., La fecondazione proibita, Milano, Feltrinelli, 2004, 7-18. Rowland, R., Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technologies, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1992. Rose, N., The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty- First Century, pup, 2007. Ruddick, S., “Maternal thinking”, Feminist Studies, 6, 1980, 342-367. Saraceno, C., “Ma che razza di famiglia è?”, il Mulino, 2, 2004, 239-244. Saporiti, M., La coscienza disubbidiente. Ragioni, tutele e limiti dell’obiezione di coscienza, Milano, Giuffrè, 2014. Sherwin, S., No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1992. Spallone, P., Beyond Conception: The New Politics of Reproduction, London, Macmillan, 1989. Thomson, J. J., “A defense of abortion” (1971), en Feinberg, J. (ed.), The Problem of Abortion, Wandsworth, Wandsworth Publishing, 1984. Tong, R., “Feminist perspectives and gestational motherhood: The need for a unified legal focus”, en Callahan, J. (ed.), Reproduction, Ethics, and the Law: Feminist Perspectives, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1995, 55-79. Warren, M. A., “On moral and legal status of abortion”, en Feinberg, J. (ed.), The Problem of Abortion, Wandsworth, Wandsworth Publishing, 1984. Young, I. M., Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1990, trad. Silvina Álvarez, La justicia y la política de la diferencia, Madrid, Cátedra, 2000. Zanchetti, M., L’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza. Commentario sistematico alla legge 22 maggio 1978 n. 194, Padova, Cedam, 1992. |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/xml |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Derecho Civil |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/view/5020 |
| institution |
Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/bc4d2bb6-b06d-4e88-9f1b-dbff537bfaac/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4008ef5cae91e726819f615374ee7bff |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org |
| _version_ |
1814100497655660544 |
| spelling |
Fanlo Cortés, Isabel698af120-ce0f-4a5b-bfb3-00e62424b84f2017-07-01 00:00:002022-09-09T21:08:57Z2017-07-01 00:00:002022-09-09T21:08:57Z2017-07-01Este artículo busca contribuir a la reflexión sobre el tema de los derechos reproductivos, asumiendo como perspectiva de análisis el debate feminista occidental contemporáneo. No obstante la variedad de enfoques y posiciones que caracterizan ese debate, se enfatizará el interés convergente de la discusión bioética feminista más reciente en el tema de la regulación jurídica que los Estados prevén, tanto en relación con el uso de determinadas tecnologías reproductivas como respecto del ejercicio de otros derechos reproductivos, al igual que las premisas de valor que sostienen estas políticas del derecho y sus efectos en la vida de las mujeres. Finalmente, también a la luz de las transformaciones recientes de las modalidades de control público sobre las elecciones reproductivas, se individualizarán algunos retos que siguen interrogando a los feminismos contemporáneos.This article seeks to contribute to the issue of reproductive rights, assuming for the analysis the perspective of the contemporary Western feminist debate. Notwithstanding the variety of approaches and positions that find expression in the scope of such a debate, emphasis is given to the convergent interest of the most recent feminist bioethical discussion in the subject of legal regulation that the States predict, both in relation to the use of certain Reproductive technologies, and the exercise of other reproductive rights, as well as the value premises that underpin these policies and their effects on the lives of women. Finally, in the light of the recent transformations of the modalities of public control over reproductive choices, some challenges will be identified that fall on contemporary feminisms.application/pdftext/htmlapplication/xml10.18601/01234366.n32.022346-24420123-4366https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11569https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n32.02spaDepartamento de Derecho Civilhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/download/5020/6008https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/download/5020/6079https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/download/5020/6846Núm. 32 , Año 2017 : Enero-Junio523229Revista de Derecho PrivadoÁlvarez Medina, S., “Diferencia y teoría feminista”, en Beltrán, E. y Maquieira V. (eds.), Feminismos. Debates teóricos contemporáneos, 2.ª ed., Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 2005, 243-286.Álvarez Medina, S., “El umbral de autonomía. La concepción relacional y la construcción de las opciones”, en Hierro, L. L. (ed.), Autonomía individual frente a autonomía colectiva. Derechos en conflicto, Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2014, 53-79.Amorós, C., Tiempo de feminismo. Sobre feminismo, proyecto ilustrado y posmodernidad, Madrid, Cátedra, 2000.Andrews, L.B., “Surrogate motherhood: The challenge for feminists”, Law Medicine & Health Care, 16, 1988, 72-80.Andrews, L.B., “Alternative modes of reproduction”, en Cohen, S. y Taub, N. (eds.), Reproductive Laws of the 1990s, Clifton, Humana Press, 1989, 380-388.Arditti, R.; Duelli Klein, R. y Minden, S. (eds.), Test-tube Women: What Future for Motherhood?, Boston, Pandora Press, 1984.Baier, A., Postures of the Mind. Essays on Mind and Morals, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Battaglia, L., “Il punto di vista delle donne nelle pratiche di procreazione artificiale”, en Romano, C. y Grassani, G. (eds.), Bioetica, Torino, Utet, 1995, 345-351.Battaglia, L., Bioetica senza dogmi, Soveria Mannelli, Rubettino, 2009.Bello, B. G. y Mancini, L. (eds.), “Intersezionalità tra diritto e società”, Sociologia del diritto, 2, 2016 (n.º monográfico).Benhabib, S., Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, New York, Routledge, 1992.Bergallo, P., “La liberalización del aborto: contextos, modelos regulatorios y argumentos para su debate”, en Id. (comp.), Aborto y justicia reproductiva, Buenos Aires, Del Puerto, 2011.Boccia, M. L., La differenza politica. Donne e cittadinanza, Milano, il Saggiatore, 2002.Borsellino, P., Bioetica tra “morali” e diritto, Milano, Raffaello Cortina, 2009.Botti, C., Prospettive femministe. Morale, bioetica e vita quotidiana, Torino, Espress, 2012.Butler, J., Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York- London, Routledge, 1990.Casalini, B., “Libere di scegliere? Patriarcato, libertà e autonomia in una prospettiva di genere”, Etica & Politica, xiii, 2, 2011, 329-364.Casalini, B., “Neoliberismo e femminismi”, Jura Gentium, xii, 1, 2015, 31-65.Chrodow, N., The Reproduction of Mothering. Psycoanalysis and Sociology of Gender, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.Corea, G., The Mother Machine: Reprductive Technologies from Artificial Inseminarion to Artificial Wombs, New York, Harper and Row, 1985.Crenshaw, K., “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139-167.Crenshaw, K., “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color”, Stanford Law Review, 43, 1991, 1241-1299.Danna, D., Contract Children. Questioning Surrogacy, Stuttgart, Ibidem, 2015.D’Elia, C., L’aborto e la responsabilità, Roma, Ediesse, 2008.Del Bò, C., “L’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza”, en Poggi, F. (ed.), Diritto e bioetica. Questioni fondamentali, Roma, Carocci, 2013, 111-127.Dini, T. y Tarantino, S. (eds.), Femminismo e neoliberalismo. Libertà femminile versus imprenditoria di sé e precarietà, Natan Edizioni, 2014.Donchin, A., “Potere e procreazione: prospettive femministe nei confronti delle nuove tecnologie riproduttive”, Bioetica. Rivista interdisciplinare, 3, 1996, 401-424.Donchin, A., “Prospettive che convergono: le critiche femministe alla riproduzione assistita”, en Faralli, C. y Cortesi, C. (eds.), Nuove maternità. Riflessioni bioetiche al femminile, Reggio Emilia, Diabasis, 2005, 69-108.Dworkin, R., Life’s Dominion. An argument about abortion, euthanasia and individuale freedom, New York, Knopf, 1993.Fanlo Cortés, I. y Pozzolo, S., “We want sex (equality). Labour market reforms, economic crisis and the condition of women in Europe”, AG. About Gender. Rivista internazionale di studi di genere, ii, 4, 2013, i-xxiv.Fanlo Cortés, I., “Giudici, responsabilità medica e controllo sulle scelte riproduttive”, en Carusi, D. (ed.), Chiamati al mondo. Vite nascenti ed autodeterminazione procreativa, Torino, Giappichelli, 2014, 97-107.Flax, J., Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1990.Forti, S. y Guaraldo, O., “Rinforzare la specie. Il corpo femminile tra biopolitica e religione materna”, Filosofia politica, 1, 2006, 57-78.Foucault, M., Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au College de France, 1978-1979, Paris, 2004.Fraser, N., “Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History”, New Left Review, 56, 2009, 97-117.Fraser, N., Fortunes of feminism. From State-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis, Verso, London-New York, 2013.Gibson, S., “The problem of abortion: Essentially contested concepts and moral autonomy”, Bioethics, xvii, 3, 2004, 221-233.Katz Rothman, B., “The legacy of patriarchy as context for surrogacy. Or why are we quibbling over this?”, The American Journal of Bioethics, xiv, 5, 2014.Lindemann Nelson, H., “Dethroning choices: Analogy, personhood and the new reproductive technologies”, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, xxiii, 1995, 129-135.Mackenzie, C., “Abortion and embodiment”, Australian Journal of Philosophy, 70, 1992, 136-155.Mackenzie, C. y Stoljar, N. (eds.), Relation Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.MacRobbie, A., The aftermath of feminism. Gender, culture and social change, Los Angeles-London-New Delhi-Singapore-Washington, Sage, 2009.Marso, L., “Feminism’s quest for common desires”, Perspectives on Politics, viii, 1, 2010, 263-269.Morondo Taramundi, D., “Un caffè da Starbucks. Intersezionalità e disgregazione del soggetto nella sfida al diritto antidiscriminatorio”, Ragion pratica, 37, 2011, 365-384.Morondo Taramundi, D., “Una sonda en el post-patriarcado: el debate sobre emancipación y libertà femminile en el feminismo italo-español”, Gênero e Direito. Periódico do Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Gênero e Direito, 2, 2015,Nicholson, L. (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism, New York-London, Routledge, 1989.Pitch, T., Un diritto per due, Milano, il Saggiatore, 1998.Pozzolo, S., “Locatioventris”, Bioderecho, 3, 2016, 37-64.Pozzolo, S. (ed.), “Debating ‘surrogacy’ or pregnancy for others. A first round of opinions”, AG. About Gender. Rivista internazionale di studi di genere, v, 10, 2016, 331-357.Roberts, D., Killing the Black Body. Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty, New York, Vintage Books, 1999.Ripoli, M., “Madre natura. Considerazioni sulla maternità”, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, xxiv, 1, 1994, 231-248.Rodotà, S., “Prefazione”, en Valentini, C., La fecondazione proibita, Milano, Feltrinelli, 2004, 7-18.Rowland, R., Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technologies, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1992.Rose, N., The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty- First Century, pup, 2007.Ruddick, S., “Maternal thinking”, Feminist Studies, 6, 1980, 342-367.Saraceno, C., “Ma che razza di famiglia è?”, il Mulino, 2, 2004, 239-244.Saporiti, M., La coscienza disubbidiente. Ragioni, tutele e limiti dell’obiezione di coscienza, Milano, Giuffrè, 2014.Sherwin, S., No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1992.Spallone, P., Beyond Conception: The New Politics of Reproduction, London, Macmillan, 1989.Thomson, J. J., “A defense of abortion” (1971), en Feinberg, J. (ed.), The Problem of Abortion, Wandsworth, Wandsworth Publishing, 1984.Tong, R., “Feminist perspectives and gestational motherhood: The need for a unified legal focus”, en Callahan, J. (ed.), Reproduction, Ethics, and the Law: Feminist Perspectives, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1995, 55-79.Warren, M. A., “On moral and legal status of abortion”, en Feinberg, J. (ed.), The Problem of Abortion, Wandsworth, Wandsworth Publishing, 1984.Young, I. M., Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1990, trad. Silvina Álvarez, La justicia y la política de la diferencia, Madrid, Cátedra, 2000.Zanchetti, M., L’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza. Commentario sistematico alla legge 22 maggio 1978 n. 194, Padova, Cedam, 1992.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpri/article/view/5020Reproductive rightsfeminist theoriesabortionsurrogacyreproductive technologiesderechos reproductivosteorías feministasabortomaternidad subrogadatecnologías reproductivasDerechos reproductivos y libertad de las mujeres. Observaciones sobre el debate feministaReproductive Rights and Women’s Freedom. Remarks on the Feminist DebateArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2560https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/bc4d2bb6-b06d-4e88-9f1b-dbff537bfaac/download4008ef5cae91e726819f615374ee7bffMD51001/11569oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/115692023-08-14 15:27:11.148https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org |