Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach

Este artículo explora las complejidades del reclamo de derechos de autor para las obras de danza, lo cual no es tan sencillo como para otras formas artísticas. A pesar de estos desafíos, la proliferación de las redes sociales y las tecnologías de internet en las últimas décadas ha mejorado significa...

Full description

Autores:: Pérez Acevedo, Natalia

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2025

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_dce060f3cd61f0d77d283f75ef969c23
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/26289
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
title	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
spellingShingle	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach Copyright, Dance Works, Choreography, Economic Rights, Originality, Fixation, Legal Systems, Moral Rights derecho de autor, obras de danza, coreografía, derechos patrimoniales, originalidad, fijación, sistemas legales, derechos morales
title_short	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
title_full	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
title_fullStr	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
title_full_unstemmed	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
title_sort	Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Pérez Acevedo, Natalia
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Pérez Acevedo, Natalia
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Copyright, Dance Works, Choreography, Economic Rights, Originality, Fixation, Legal Systems, Moral Rights
topic	Copyright, Dance Works, Choreography, Economic Rights, Originality, Fixation, Legal Systems, Moral Rights derecho de autor, obras de danza, coreografía, derechos patrimoniales, originalidad, fijación, sistemas legales, derechos morales
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	derecho de autor, obras de danza, coreografía, derechos patrimoniales, originalidad, fijación, sistemas legales, derechos morales
description	Este artículo explora las complejidades del reclamo de derechos de autor para las obras de danza, lo cual no es tan sencillo como para otras formas artísticas. A pesar de estos desafíos, la proliferación de las redes sociales y las tecnologías de internet en las últimas décadas ha mejorado significativamente la capacidad de identificar a los creadores originales de obras de danza y hacer cumplir sus derechos, especialmente cuando estas obras se vuelven virales. El artículo examina las condiciones bajo las cuales los movimientos de danza y las obras coreográficas son consideradas susceptibles de protección por derechos de autor y evalúa el éxito de los esfuerzos de protección en diferentes sistemas legales. El análisis busca aclarar el panorama legal en torno a la protección de las obras de danza y las implicaciones para los creadores en la era digital.
publishDate	2025
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2025-02-05T14:08:21Z 2025-04-09T19:13:29Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2025-02-05T14:08:21Z 2025-04-09T19:13:29Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2025-02-05
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/16571959.n39.02
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2116
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	1657-1959
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26289
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n39.02
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/16571959.n39.02 2346-2116 1657-1959
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26289 https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n39.02
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/10201/17426
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 39 , Año 2025 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	80
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	39
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	43
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Abad Carles, Ana. Historia del ballet y de la danza moderna. Alianza Editorial, 2004. “Breve historia de la danza”. En Los bailes de salón [en línea]. (Consulta: 28 de agosto de 2022). Disponible en: https://moldes1.tripod.com/tecnica/historia.html Campaign. “History of advertising: No 148: Mehdi Norowzian’s Joy” [Photo]. In: Campaign, 24 September 2015. Available at: https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/history-advertising-no-148-mehdi-norowzians-joy/1365197 Carrière Laurent. Choreography and Copyright: Some Comments on Choreographic Works as Newly Defined in The Canadian Copyright Act. Montreal: Leger Robic Richard, Lawyers, 2003. Available at: https://www.robic.ca/en/publications/choreographyand-copyright-some-comments-on-choreographic-works-as-newly-defined-in-thecanadian-copyright-act/ (Accessed: 28 August 2022). “Choreography”. In Cambridge Dictionary [online], 24 August 2022. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/choreography (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Coyle, M. “The History of Copyright”. In: Lawdit Solicitors [online], 23 April 2003. Available at: https://lawdit.co.uk/readingroom/the-history-of-copyright (Accessed: 28 August 2022). Creutzenberg Jan. “Can Tradition be Copyrighted? A Symposium on #dancecopyright. In: Seoul Stages [Blog], 5 April 2019. Available at: https://seoulstages.wordpress.com/2019/04/05/can-tradition-be-copyrighted-a-symposium-on-dancecopyright/ (Accessed: 29 August 2022). “Dance”. In: Cambridge Dictionary [online], 18 December 2019. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dance (Accessed: 29 August 2022). “Dance Notation”. In Encyclopaedia Britannica [online]. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/art/dance-notation (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Derclaye, Estelle. Research Handbook on the future of EU Copyright. Edward Elgar Publishing, 200 9. Available at: https://books.google.de/books/about/Research_Handbook_on_the_Future_of_EU_Co.html?id=MIIOdtjZLCkC&redir_esc=y (Accessed:22 October 2022. Giles, Katherine. “Shall We Dance: Dancing and Copyright Law”. In: Arts Law Centre of Australia, 31 March 2005. Available at: https://www.artslaw.com.au/article/shall-wedance-dancing-and-copyright-law/ (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Ginsburg, Jane. “Overview of Copyright Law”. In Rochelle Dreyfuss and Justine Pila (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press, 2017; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-518, 2016. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1990 (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Gowling WLG. “So you think you can dance? Copyright protection of dance moves”. In: Gowling WLG [online], 12 de mazo de 2019. Available at: https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/articles/2019/copyright-protection-of-dance-moves/ (Accessed: 29 August 2022). “History of Copyright”. In Wikipedia, 12 November 2020. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_copyright (Accessed: 28 August 2022). Iriarte Ahón, Erick and Medina Plasencia, Ruddy. Guía de derecho de autor para coreógrafos. Instituto Nacional de la Defensa de la Competencia y la Propiedad Intelectual (Indecopi); United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 2013. Karjiker, Sadulla. “Justifications for Copyright: The Economic Justification”. South African Intellectual Property Law Journal, vol. 2 , 2014, pp. 13 -41. Available at: https://blogs.sun.ac.za/iplaw/files/2016/04/Sadulla-Karjiker-Justifications-for-copyright-the-economicjustification.pdf (Accessed: 23 October 2022). Kraut, Anthea. Choreographing Copyright: Race, Gender, and Intellectual Property Rights in American Dance. Oxford University Press, 2015. Kemp, Deborah. “Copyright on Steroids: In Search of an End to over Protection”, McGeorge Law Review, vol. 41 , Iss. 4 , 2017. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr/vol41/iss4/1 (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Lepage, Anne. “Overview of exceptions and limitations to copyright in the digital environment”. In: Unesco’s e-Copyright Bulletin, January-March 2003. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001396/139696E.pdf (Accessed: 22 October 2022). MasterClass. “History of Dance: Universal Elements and Types of Dance”. In: MasterClass, Articles [online], 19 November 2021. Available at: https://www.masterclass.com/articles/history-of-dance (Accessed: 28 August 2022). Pavis, Mathilde; Waelde, Charlotte, and Whatley, Sarah. “Who Can Profit from Dance? An Exploration of Copyright Ownership”, Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research, vol. 35 , n.° 1 , 2017, pp. 96-110. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90010869 (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Richard, Arnold; Dinwoodie, Graeme; Bently, Lionel, and Derclaye, Estelle. “IP Law Post-Brexit”. Judicature, vol. 101 , n.° 2 , 2017. Available at: https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/ip-law-post-brexit/ (Accessed: 2 January 2025). Royal Spanish Academy [Real Academia Española, RAE]. Dictionary of the Spanish Language [Diccionario de la lengua española], 2001. Senftleben, Martin. “Overprotection and Protection Overlaps in Intellectual Property Law - the Need for Horizontal Fair Use Defences”. In: Annette Kur and Vytautas Mizaras (Eds.), The Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Chapter 8). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1597123 (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Taber, Isaiah West. Loïe Fuller dansant avec son voile [Photo], 1897. In L’Historie par l’Image [online]. Available at: https://histoire-image.org/fr/etudes/loie-fuller-incarnation-symbolisme-scene Thakur, Nishant and Anil Varkey, Sandra. “Closed list approach versus open-ended approach in subject-matter copyright”. In SCC Times [online], 28 March 2021. Available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/03/28/copyright-2/ (Accessed: 9 October 2022). The Albany Law Journal. “The Serpentine Dance, by Marie Louise Fuller”. The Albany Law Journal, vol. 46 , 1892, pp. 165 -166. Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.35112100788530&view=1up&seq=180&skin=2021 (Accessed: 29 August 2022 ). The New York Times. “The Copyright Law and Dance”. In The New York Times [online], 11 January 1981. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/11/arts/the-copyrightlaw-and-dance.html (Accessed: 29 August 2022). The United States Copyright Office. Circular 52. Copyright Registration of Choreography and Pantomime. The United States Copyright Office, 2017. Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ52.pdf (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Tjia, Rick. “Copyright for Choreography: What you need to know”. In: Dance Informa Magazine [online], 4 May 2021. Available at: https://www.danceinforma.com/2021 /05 /04 /what-you-need-to-know-about-copyright-for-choreography/ (Accessed: 29 August2022). Traylor, Martha M. “Choreography, Pantomime and the Copyright Revision Act of 1976”. New England Law Review, vol. 16 , 1981, pp. 227 ss. United States Congress Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights. Copyright Law Revision: Studies Prepared for the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-Sixth Congress, 1st Session [Second Session]. US Government Printing Office, 1960. Available at: https://books.google.nl/books?id=a49nEUU-eZsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=nl&pli=1#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Van Camp, Julie. “Copyright of Choreographic Works”. In: Stephen F. Breimer, Robert Thorne, and John David Viera (Eds.), 1994-95 Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts Handbook (pp. 5 9-92). New York: Clark, Boardman, and Callaghan, 1994. Available at: https://home.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/copyrigh.html (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Waelde, Charlotte; Whatley, Sarah, and Pavis, Mathilde. “Let’s Dance! But who owns it?” European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 36 , 2004, pp. 217 -228. Yoo Joo-Hyun. “Copyright Battle Rocks Traditional Dance World: Debate Rages over Whether Certain Styles Belong to Artists or to the Culture”. In: Korea JoongAng Daily [online], 13 January 2019. Available at: https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2019/01/13/features/Copyright-battle-rocks-traditional-dance-world-Debate-rages-over-whethercertain-styles-belong-to-artists-or-to-the-culture/3058082.html (Accessed: 29 August 2022). Act No 121/2000 Coll. on Copyright and Rights Related to Copyright and on Amendment to Certain Acts, Article 2.1.(CZ). Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1979. Code de la Propiété Intellectuelle 1992, Article L 112-1.4 (FR). Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices (Third Edition), January 28, 2021. Constitution of India (Bhāratīya Samvidhāna), Article 21. Copyright Act 1957, Section 2(h) (IN). Copyright Act 1992, § 4 (3.8) (EE). Copyright Law, Article 10.1. (NL). Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (UK). Croatian Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA), Article 5.2.(HR). Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC, 2019, OJ L130/92. Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, 2001, OJ L167/10. Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights, 2006, OJ L372/12. Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs, 2009, OJ L111/16. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Legal Protection of Databases, 2004, OJ L77/20. Engraving Copyright Act 1734. Fine Arts Copyright Act 1862. Intellectual Property Code [FR]. Law 2121/1993, Article 2(1) (GR). Law No 633/1941, Article 2.3. (IT). Law on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights of 29 June 1993, Article 3.3. (BG). Law on Intellectual Property’ approved by means of the Royal Legislative Decree 1/1996, of 12 April 1996, Article 10.1.c (ES) The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, S 3(2) (UK). United States Code, Title 17, § 101; 106A. Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG), 1965, §2 Para. 2. (DE). Academy of General Education, Manipal and Others v B Malini Mallya, 2009 (Supreme Court of India). Bikram’s Yoga College v Evolation Yoga, Case No. 13-55763, 9th Cir., Oct. 8, 2015. Case 6 U 117/06, 2007 (Higher Regional Court of Cologne). CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 (Supreme Court of Canada). Cofemel - Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV, 2019, Case C‑683/17. Consorts Huston et autres c. Société Turner Entertainment Co.; Syndicat Français des Artistes Interprètes et autres c. Société Turner Entertainment Co. et autres, 1991 (Cour de Cassation Francaise). Eva-Marie Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, 2011 (Court of Justice of the European Union). Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company, 1991, 499 U.S. 340. Horgan v. MacMillan, Inc, 1986 (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit). Hyperion Records v. Sawkins, 2005 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal). Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening, 2009 (Court of Justice of the European Union). Institute for Inner Studies & Ors. v Charlotte Anderson & Ors, 2014 (Delhi High Court). Interlego v Tyco, 1989 (United Kingdom Judicial Committee of the Privy Council). Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Other’s, 2014 (Court of Justice of the European Union). Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV, 2018, Case C-310/17. Massine v. de Basil, 1938 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal). Merchandising v Harpbond, 1983 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal). Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd. and others v. Meltwater Holding BV and others, 2011, EWCA 890 Civ, 2012. Norowzian v Arks Limited, 2000 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal). Pastor v. Chen, 2002 (British Columbia Provincial Court). Tribunal Supremo [España], Sala de lo Civil. Sentencia núm. 82/2021, Casación e Infracción Procesal Núm. 1443/2018. Walter v Lane, 1900 (House of Lords of the United Kingdom).
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Natalia Pérez Acevedo - 2025
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv	Natalia Pérez Acevedo - 2025 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/10201
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/ffbfbaa0-dc71-4d56-ac54-31bc66c52af9/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	c79537c3539806ecac5e4961e3aa9341
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1831928424407498752
spelling	Pérez Acevedo, Natalia2025-02-05T14:08:21Z2025-04-09T19:13:29Z2025-02-05T14:08:21Z2025-04-09T19:13:29Z2025-02-05Este artículo explora las complejidades del reclamo de derechos de autor para las obras de danza, lo cual no es tan sencillo como para otras formas artísticas. A pesar de estos desafíos, la proliferación de las redes sociales y las tecnologías de internet en las últimas décadas ha mejorado significativamente la capacidad de identificar a los creadores originales de obras de danza y hacer cumplir sus derechos, especialmente cuando estas obras se vuelven virales. El artículo examina las condiciones bajo las cuales los movimientos de danza y las obras coreográficas son consideradas susceptibles de protección por derechos de autor y evalúa el éxito de los esfuerzos de protección en diferentes sistemas legales. El análisis busca aclarar el panorama legal en torno a la protección de las obras de danza y las implicaciones para los creadores en la era digital.This article explores the complexities of claiming copyright for dance works, which is not as straightforward as for other artistic forms. Despite these challenges, the proliferation of social media and internet technologies in recent decades has significantly enhanced the ability to identify the original creators of dance works and enforce their rights, especially when these works go viral. The article examines the conditions under which dance moves and choreographic works are considered copyrightable and assesses the success of enforcement efforts across different legal systems. The analysis aims to clarify the legal landscape surrounding the protection of dance works and the implications for creators in a digital age.application/pdf10.18601/16571959.n39.022346-21161657-1959https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26289https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n39.02spaCentro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectualhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/10201/17426Núm. 39 , Año 2025 : Enero-Junio803943Revista La Propiedad InmaterialAbad Carles, Ana. Historia del ballet y de la danza moderna. Alianza Editorial, 2004.“Breve historia de la danza”. En Los bailes de salón [en línea]. (Consulta: 28 de agosto de 2022). Disponible en: https://moldes1.tripod.com/tecnica/historia.htmlCampaign. “History of advertising: No 148: Mehdi Norowzian’s Joy” [Photo]. In: Campaign, 24 September 2015. Available at: https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/history-advertising-no-148-mehdi-norowzians-joy/1365197Carrière Laurent. Choreography and Copyright: Some Comments on Choreographic Works as Newly Defined in The Canadian Copyright Act. Montreal: Leger Robic Richard, Lawyers, 2003. Available at: https://www.robic.ca/en/publications/choreographyand-copyright-some-comments-on-choreographic-works-as-newly-defined-in-thecanadian-copyright-act/ (Accessed: 28 August 2022).“Choreography”. In Cambridge Dictionary [online], 24 August 2022. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/choreography (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Coyle, M. “The History of Copyright”. In: Lawdit Solicitors [online], 23 April 2003. Available at: https://lawdit.co.uk/readingroom/the-history-of-copyright (Accessed: 28 August 2022).Creutzenberg Jan. “Can Tradition be Copyrighted? A Symposium on #dancecopyright. In: Seoul Stages [Blog], 5 April 2019. Available at: https://seoulstages.wordpress.com/2019/04/05/can-tradition-be-copyrighted-a-symposium-on-dancecopyright/ (Accessed: 29 August 2022).“Dance”. In: Cambridge Dictionary [online], 18 December 2019. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dance (Accessed: 29 August 2022).“Dance Notation”. In Encyclopaedia Britannica [online]. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/art/dance-notation (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Derclaye, Estelle. Research Handbook on the future of EU Copyright. Edward Elgar Publishing, 200 9. Available at: https://books.google.de/books/about/Research_Handbook_on_the_Future_of_EU_Co.html?id=MIIOdtjZLCkC&redir_esc=y (Accessed:22 October 2022.Giles, Katherine. “Shall We Dance: Dancing and Copyright Law”. In: Arts Law Centre of Australia, 31 March 2005. Available at: https://www.artslaw.com.au/article/shall-wedance-dancing-and-copyright-law/ (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Ginsburg, Jane. “Overview of Copyright Law”. In Rochelle Dreyfuss and Justine Pila (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press, 2017; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-518, 2016. Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1990 (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Gowling WLG. “So you think you can dance? Copyright protection of dance moves”. In: Gowling WLG [online], 12 de mazo de 2019. Available at: https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/articles/2019/copyright-protection-of-dance-moves/ (Accessed: 29 August 2022).“History of Copyright”. In Wikipedia, 12 November 2020. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_copyright (Accessed: 28 August 2022).Iriarte Ahón, Erick and Medina Plasencia, Ruddy. Guía de derecho de autor para coreógrafos. Instituto Nacional de la Defensa de la Competencia y la Propiedad Intelectual (Indecopi); United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 2013.Karjiker, Sadulla. “Justifications for Copyright: The Economic Justification”. South African Intellectual Property Law Journal, vol. 2 , 2014, pp. 13 -41. Available at: https://blogs.sun.ac.za/iplaw/files/2016/04/Sadulla-Karjiker-Justifications-for-copyright-the-economicjustification.pdf (Accessed: 23 October 2022).Kraut, Anthea. Choreographing Copyright: Race, Gender, and Intellectual Property Rights in American Dance. Oxford University Press, 2015.Kemp, Deborah. “Copyright on Steroids: In Search of an End to over Protection”, McGeorge Law Review, vol. 41 , Iss. 4 , 2017. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr/vol41/iss4/1 (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Lepage, Anne. “Overview of exceptions and limitations to copyright in the digital environment”. In: Unesco’s e-Copyright Bulletin, January-March 2003. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001396/139696E.pdf (Accessed: 22 October 2022).MasterClass. “History of Dance: Universal Elements and Types of Dance”. In: MasterClass, Articles [online], 19 November 2021. Available at: https://www.masterclass.com/articles/history-of-dance (Accessed: 28 August 2022).Pavis, Mathilde; Waelde, Charlotte, and Whatley, Sarah. “Who Can Profit from Dance? An Exploration of Copyright Ownership”, Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research, vol. 35 , n.° 1 , 2017, pp. 96-110. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90010869 (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Richard, Arnold; Dinwoodie, Graeme; Bently, Lionel, and Derclaye, Estelle. “IP Law Post-Brexit”. Judicature, vol. 101 , n.° 2 , 2017. Available at: https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/ip-law-post-brexit/ (Accessed: 2 January 2025).Royal Spanish Academy [Real Academia Española, RAE]. Dictionary of the Spanish Language [Diccionario de la lengua española], 2001.Senftleben, Martin. “Overprotection and Protection Overlaps in Intellectual Property Law - the Need for Horizontal Fair Use Defences”. In: Annette Kur and Vytautas Mizaras (Eds.), The Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Chapter 8). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1597123 (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Taber, Isaiah West. Loïe Fuller dansant avec son voile [Photo], 1897. In L’Historie par l’Image [online]. Available at: https://histoire-image.org/fr/etudes/loie-fuller-incarnation-symbolisme-scene Thakur, Nishant and Anil Varkey, Sandra. “Closed list approach versus open-ended approach in subject-matter copyright”. In SCC Times [online], 28 March 2021. Available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/03/28/copyright-2/ (Accessed: 9 October 2022).The Albany Law Journal. “The Serpentine Dance, by Marie Louise Fuller”. The Albany Law Journal, vol. 46 , 1892, pp. 165 -166. Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.35112100788530&view=1up&seq=180&skin=2021 (Accessed: 29 August 2022 ).The New York Times. “The Copyright Law and Dance”. In The New York Times [online], 11 January 1981. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/11/arts/the-copyrightlaw-and-dance.html (Accessed: 29 August 2022).The United States Copyright Office. Circular 52. Copyright Registration of Choreography and Pantomime. The United States Copyright Office, 2017. Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ52.pdf (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Tjia, Rick. “Copyright for Choreography: What you need to know”. In: Dance Informa Magazine [online], 4 May 2021. Available at: https://www.danceinforma.com/2021 /05 /04 /what-you-need-to-know-about-copyright-for-choreography/ (Accessed: 29 August2022).Traylor, Martha M. “Choreography, Pantomime and the Copyright Revision Act of 1976”. New England Law Review, vol. 16 , 1981, pp. 227 ss.United States Congress Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights. Copyright Law Revision: Studies Prepared for the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-Sixth Congress, 1st Session [Second Session]. US Government Printing Office, 1960. Available at: https://books.google.nl/books?id=a49nEUU-eZsC&printsec=frontcover&hl=nl&pli=1#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Van Camp, Julie. “Copyright of Choreographic Works”. In: Stephen F. Breimer, Robert Thorne, and John David Viera (Eds.), 1994-95 Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts Handbook (pp. 5 9-92). New York: Clark, Boardman, and Callaghan, 1994. Available at: https://home.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/copyrigh.html (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Waelde, Charlotte; Whatley, Sarah, and Pavis, Mathilde. “Let’s Dance! But who owns it?” European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 36 , 2004, pp. 217 -228.Yoo Joo-Hyun. “Copyright Battle Rocks Traditional Dance World: Debate Rages over Whether Certain Styles Belong to Artists or to the Culture”. In: Korea JoongAng Daily [online], 13 January 2019. Available at: https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2019/01/13/features/Copyright-battle-rocks-traditional-dance-world-Debate-rages-over-whethercertain-styles-belong-to-artists-or-to-the-culture/3058082.html (Accessed: 29 August 2022).Act No 121/2000 Coll. on Copyright and Rights Related to Copyright and on Amendment to Certain Acts, Article 2.1.(CZ).Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1979.Code de la Propiété Intellectuelle 1992, Article L 112-1.4 (FR).Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices (Third Edition), January 28, 2021.Constitution of India (Bhāratīya Samvidhāna), Article 21.Copyright Act 1957, Section 2(h) (IN).Copyright Act 1992, § 4 (3.8) (EE).Copyright Law, Article 10.1. (NL).Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (UK).Croatian Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA), Article 5.2.(HR).Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC, 2019, OJ L130/92.Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, 2001, OJ L167/10.Directive 2006/116/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights, 2006, OJ L372/12.Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs, 2009, OJ L111/16.Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Legal Protection of Databases, 2004, OJ L77/20.Engraving Copyright Act 1734.Fine Arts Copyright Act 1862.Intellectual Property Code [FR].Law 2121/1993, Article 2(1) (GR).Law No 633/1941, Article 2.3. (IT).Law on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights of 29 June 1993, Article 3.3. (BG).Law on Intellectual Property’ approved by means of the Royal Legislative Decree 1/1996, of 12 April 1996, Article 10.1.c (ES)The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, S 3(2) (UK).United States Code, Title 17, § 101; 106A.Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG), 1965, §2 Para. 2. (DE).Academy of General Education, Manipal and Others v B Malini Mallya, 2009 (Supreme Court of India).Bikram’s Yoga College v Evolation Yoga, Case No. 13-55763, 9th Cir., Oct. 8, 2015.Case 6 U 117/06, 2007 (Higher Regional Court of Cologne).CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 (Supreme Court of Canada).Cofemel - Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV, 2019, Case C‑683/17.Consorts Huston et autres c. Société Turner Entertainment Co.; Syndicat Français des Artistes Interprètes et autres c. Société Turner Entertainment Co. et autres, 1991 (Cour de Cassation Francaise).Eva-Marie Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, 2011 (Court of Justice of the European Union). Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company, 1991, 499 U.S. 340.Horgan v. MacMillan, Inc, 1986 (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit).Hyperion Records v. Sawkins, 2005 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal).Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening, 2009 (Court of Justice of the European Union).Institute for Inner Studies & Ors. v Charlotte Anderson & Ors, 2014 (Delhi High Court).Interlego v Tyco, 1989 (United Kingdom Judicial Committee of the Privy Council).Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Other’s, 2014 (Court of Justice of the European Union).Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV, 2018, Case C-310/17.Massine v. de Basil, 1938 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal).Merchandising v Harpbond, 1983 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal).Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd. and others v. Meltwater Holding BV and others, 2011, EWCA 890 Civ, 2012.Norowzian v Arks Limited, 2000 (United Kingdom Court of Appeal).Pastor v. Chen, 2002 (British Columbia Provincial Court).Tribunal Supremo [España], Sala de lo Civil. Sentencia núm. 82/2021, Casación e Infracción Procesal Núm. 1443/2018.Walter v Lane, 1900 (House of Lords of the United Kingdom).Natalia Pérez Acevedo - 2025info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/10201Copyright,Dance Works,Choreography,Economic Rights,Originality,Fixation,Legal Systems,Moral Rightsderecho de autor,obras de danza,coreografía,derechos patrimoniales,originalidad,fijación,sistemas legales,derechos moralesProtection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative ApproachProtection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative ApproachArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2500https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/ffbfbaa0-dc71-4d56-ac54-31bc66c52af9/downloadc79537c3539806ecac5e4961e3aa9341MD51001/26289oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/262892025-04-09 14:13:29.284http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Natalia Pérez Acevedo - 2025https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Protection of Choreographic Works: A Comparative Approach

Publicaciones similares