Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review

Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas considera...

Full description

Autores:
Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/25522
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25522
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03
Palabra clave:
Judicial review,
republicanism,
democracy,
participation,
legitimacy
Control judicial,
republicanismo,
democracia,
participación,
legitimidad
Rights
openAccess
License
Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023
id uexternad2_cfef5235b257505b877f0e588fc7afc3
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/25522
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
title Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
spellingShingle Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
Judicial review,
republicanism,
democracy,
participation,
legitimacy
Control judicial,
republicanismo,
democracia,
participación,
legitimidad
title_short Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
title_full Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
title_fullStr Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
title_full_unstemmed Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
title_sort Judges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial Review
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Judicial review,
republicanism,
democracy,
participation,
legitimacy
topic Judicial review,
republicanism,
democracy,
participation,
legitimacy
Control judicial,
republicanismo,
democracia,
participación,
legitimidad
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Control judicial,
republicanismo,
democracia,
participación,
legitimidad
description Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliberativa que enfatiza el potencial de esta institución como un mecanismo que sirve para promover la participación política en igualdad de condiciones y que, por tanto, dota al control judicial de una legitimidad democrática participativa. La Sección IV argumenta que la legitimidad democrática participativa del control judicial debe ser vista como un fenómeno gradual cuya fuerza o debilidad relativa depende de las variaciones de las características específicas del contexto institucional donde opera el poder judicial. La Sección V presenta algunas conclusiones.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z
2025-04-09T17:55:29Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-30T11:54:52Z
2025-04-09T17:55:29Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-30
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/01229893.n57.03
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2051
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0122-9893
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25522
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/01229893.n57.03
2346-2051
0122-9893
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25522
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15332
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15333
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15334
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 83
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 57
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 41
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Derecho del Estado
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Alsina, Victòria, and José Luis Martí. “The Birth of the Crowdlaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking.” Analyse & Kritik 40 (2), 2018, 317–38.
Angel-Cabo, Natalia. “The Constitution and the City: Reflections on Judicial Experimentalism Through an Urban Lens.” In European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020, edited by E. Hirsch Ballin, G. van der Schyff, M. Stremler, and M. De Visser, Vol. 2. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law. The Hague: Asser Press, 2021.
Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, 1–32. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Bellamy, Richard. “The Republic of Reasons: Public Reasoning, Depolitization, and Non-Domination.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Bello Hutt, Donald. “Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System.” Theoria, 64 (3), 2017, 77–103. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2017.6415204.
Bello Hutt, Donald. “Measuring Popular and Judicial Deliberation: A Critical Comparison.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4), 2018, 1121–47.
Bello Hutt, Donald. “The Deliberative Constitutionalism Debate and a Republican Way Forward.” Jurisprudence. An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 12(1), 2020, 69–88.
Besson, Samantha, and José Luis Martí. “Law and Republicanism: Mapping the Issues.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
Chambers, Simone. “Citizens Without Robes: On the Deliberative Potential of Everyday Politics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2), 2020, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.388.
Comparative Constitutions Project. “Replication Data for the Research Paper: Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 2013-29.” Comparative Constitutions Project (blog), 2013.
Dryzek, John S. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 2009, 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129.
Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Harvard University Press, 2001.
Estlund, David, and Hélène Landemore. “The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Eylon, Yuval, and Aron Harel. “The Right to Judicial Review.” Virginia Law Review 92, 2006, 991–1022.
Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. “Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Toward an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutional justice, east and west, edited by Wojciech Sadurski. Kluwer Law International, 2002.
Ferreres, Víctor. Justicia Constitucional y Democracia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1997.
Gargarella, Roberto. “Why Do We Care about Dialogue? ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, ‘Meaningful Engagement’ and Public Hearings: A Sympathetic but Critical Analysis.” In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, edited by Katharine G. Young. Globalization and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Ginsburg, Tom, and Mila Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30(3), 2014.
Goodin, Robert. Innovating Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 1996.
Harel, Aron. Why Law Matters. Oxford University Press, 2014.
Hartmann-Cortés, Kevin, Juan Felipe Herrera, and Gabriel Hernando Angarita. “La ‘Privatización’ de la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 50, 2021, 203–59.
Hilbink, Lisa. “Assessing the New Constitutionalism.” Comparative Politics, 40(2), 2008), 227–45.
Honohan, Iseult. “Republicans, Rights, and Constitutions: Is Judicial Review Compatible with Republican Self-Government?” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Hübner Mendes, Conrado. Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford University Press, 2013.
Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor. “The Republican Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, edited by Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, 1–28. Oxford. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing, 2008.
Lafont, Cristina. Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Landau, David, and Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” University of California Davis Law Review, FSU College of Law, Public Law, 53(1313), 2020, 1313–87.
Linares, Sebastián. Democracia Participativa Epistémica. Filosofía y Derecho. Marcial Pons, 2017.
Linares, Sebastián. “Democracia sin atajos: cognitivamente exigente pero participativamente austera.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 55, 2023, 57–85.
Linares, Sebastián. La (i) legitimidad democrática del control judicial de las leyes. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008.
Lustig, Doreen, and J. H. H. Weiler. “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World—Retrospective and Prospective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(2), 2018, 315–72.
Mansbridge, Jane. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Stephen Macedo, 211–42. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark Warren. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by Jane Mansbridge and John Parkinson, 1–26. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Martí, José Luis. “Is Constitutional Rigidity the Problem? Democratic Legitimacy and the Last Word.” Ratio Juris 27(4), 2014.
Martí, José Luis. La República Deliberativa. Una Teoría de la Democracia. Madrid, Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2006.
Martí, José Luis. “The Role of New Technologies in Deliberative Democracy.” In Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy, edited by Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli. Bloomsbury, 2021.
Owen, David, and Graham Smith. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 23(2), 2015, 213–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12054.
Pettit, Philip. “Civic Republican Political Theory.” In A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain, by Philip Pettit and José Luis Martí. Princeton University Press, 2012.
Pettit, Philip. “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” Nomos 42, 2000, 105–44.
Pettit, Philip. “Depoliticizing Democracy.” Ratio Juris 17(1), 2004, 52–65.
Pettit, Philip. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple. On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30(3), 2002, 339–56.
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997.
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1996.
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Tomkins, Adam. “The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution.” University of Toronto Law Journal, 60, 2010, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.60.1.1.
Valentini, Chiara. “Deliberative Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Revus [Online] 47 (2022). http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8030.
Vandamme, Pierre-Étienne, and Donald Bello Hutt. “Selecting Constitutional Judges Randomly.” Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 2021, 107–27.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?” The Yale Law Journal 123, 2014, 1692–1730.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Judges as Moral Reasoners.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7(1), 2009, 2–24.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and Republican Government.” In That Eminent Tribunal. Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution, edited by Christopher Wolfe. New Forum Books, 2004.
Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” The Yale Law Journal, 2006.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/c119aecc-f5ad-478c-b606-0fda8ae3788b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e0b9d901f256951acc293aeac3862213
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1831928401261232128
spelling Cortés-Arbeláez, Alejandro2023-08-30T11:54:52Z2025-04-09T17:55:29Z2023-08-30T11:54:52Z2025-04-09T17:55:29Z2023-08-30Este artículo presenta un enfoque republicano del control judicial de constitucionalidad de las leyes que se basa en una interpretación deliberativa y participativa de este arreglo institucional. El documento se divide en cinco secciones, más una introducción. La Sección I presenta algunas consideraciones y aclaraciones sobre el concepto de control judicial y el tipo de teoría política republicana que subyace a los principales argumentos del trabajo. La Sección II reconstruye la crítica republicana al control judicial. La Sección III muestra que suscribir una perspectiva republicana no necesariamente lleva a respaldar esta crítica y presenta una defensa del control judicial que se apoya en una concepción republicana de la democracia deliberativa que enfatiza el potencial de esta institución como un mecanismo que sirve para promover la participación política en igualdad de condiciones y que, por tanto, dota al control judicial de una legitimidad democrática participativa. La Sección IV argumenta que la legitimidad democrática participativa del control judicial debe ser vista como un fenómeno gradual cuya fuerza o debilidad relativa depende de las variaciones de las características específicas del contexto institucional donde opera el poder judicial. La Sección V presenta algunas conclusiones.This paper presents a republican approach to judicial review that is based on a deliberative and participatory interpretation of this institutional arrangement. The paper is divided into five sections, plus an introduction. Section I presents some considerations and clarifications regarding the concept of judicial review and the type of republican political theory that underlies the main arguments. Section II reconstructs the republican critique of judicial review. Section III shows that subscribing to a republican perspective does not necessarily lead to the endorsement of this critique and presents a defense of judicial review that relies on a republican conception of deliberative democracy that stresses the potential of this institution as a mechanism that serves to promote political participation in equal terms and that, thus, imbues judicial review with a participatory democratic legitimacy. Section IV argues that the participatory democratic legitimacy of judicial review should be seen as a gradual phenomenon whose relative strength or weakness depends on the variations of specific characteristics of the institutional context where the judiciary operates. Section V presents some conclusions.application/pdftext/htmltext/xml10.18601/01229893.n57.032346-20510122-9893https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25522https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n57.03spaDepartamento de Derecho Constitucionalhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15332https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15333https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/8955/15334Núm. 57 , Año 2023 : Septiembre-Diciembre835741Revista Derecho del EstadoAlsina, Victòria, and José Luis Martí. “The Birth of the Crowdlaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking.” Analyse & Kritik 40 (2), 2018, 317–38.Angel-Cabo, Natalia. “The Constitution and the City: Reflections on Judicial Experimentalism Through an Urban Lens.” In European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2020, edited by E. Hirsch Ballin, G. van der Schyff, M. Stremler, and M. De Visser, Vol. 2. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law. The Hague: Asser Press, 2021.Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, 1–32. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press, 2018.Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Bellamy, Richard. “The Republic of Reasons: Public Reasoning, Depolitization, and Non-Domination.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009.Bello Hutt, Donald. “Deliberation and Courts: The Role of the Judiciary in a Deliberative System.” Theoria, 64 (3), 2017, 77–103. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2017.6415204.Bello Hutt, Donald. “Measuring Popular and Judicial Deliberation: A Critical Comparison.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(4), 2018, 1121–47.Bello Hutt, Donald. “The Deliberative Constitutionalism Debate and a Republican Way Forward.” Jurisprudence. An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 12(1), 2020, 69–88.Besson, Samantha, and José Luis Martí. “Law and Republicanism: Mapping the Issues.” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009.Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.Chambers, Simone. “Citizens Without Robes: On the Deliberative Potential of Everyday Politics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 16(2), 2020, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.388.Comparative Constitutions Project. “Replication Data for the Research Paper: Ginsburg, T., & Versteeg, M. Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” University of Virginia School of Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 2013-29.” Comparative Constitutions Project (blog), 2013.Dryzek, John S. “Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building.” Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 2009, 1379–1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332129.Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Harvard University Press, 2001.Estlund, David, and Hélène Landemore. “The Epistemic Value of Democratic Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. Oxford University Press, 2018.Eylon, Yuval, and Aron Harel. “The Right to Judicial Review.” Virginia Law Review 92, 2006, 991–1022.Ferejohn, John, and Pasquale Pasquino. “Constitutional Courts as Deliberative Institutions: Toward an Institutional Theory of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutional justice, east and west, edited by Wojciech Sadurski. Kluwer Law International, 2002.Ferreres, Víctor. Justicia Constitucional y Democracia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1997.Gargarella, Roberto. “Why Do We Care about Dialogue? ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, ‘Meaningful Engagement’ and Public Hearings: A Sympathetic but Critical Analysis.” In The Future of Economic and Social Rights, edited by Katharine G. Young. Globalization and Human Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Ginsburg, Tom, and Tamir Moustafa. “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Ginsburg, Tom, and Mila Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30(3), 2014.Goodin, Robert. Innovating Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2008.Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusets: The MIT Press, 1996.Harel, Aron. Why Law Matters. Oxford University Press, 2014.Hartmann-Cortés, Kevin, Juan Felipe Herrera, and Gabriel Hernando Angarita. “La ‘Privatización’ de la acción pública de inconstitucionalidad.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 50, 2021, 203–59.Hilbink, Lisa. “Assessing the New Constitutionalism.” Comparative Politics, 40(2), 2008), 227–45.Honohan, Iseult. “Republicans, Rights, and Constitutions: Is Judicial Review Compatible with Republican Self-Government?” In Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives, edited by Samantha Besson and José Luis Martí. Oxford University Press, 2009.Hübner Mendes, Conrado. Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford Constitutional Theory. Oxford University Press, 2013.Laborde, Cécile, and John Maynor. “The Republican Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory.” In Republicanism and Political Theory, edited by Cécile Laborde and John Maynor, 1–28. Oxford. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing, 2008.Lafont, Cristina. Democracy without Shortcuts. A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020.Landau, David, and Rosalind Dixon. “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy.” University of California Davis Law Review, FSU College of Law, Public Law, 53(1313), 2020, 1313–87.Linares, Sebastián. Democracia Participativa Epistémica. Filosofía y Derecho. Marcial Pons, 2017.Linares, Sebastián. “Democracia sin atajos: cognitivamente exigente pero participativamente austera.” Revista Derecho del Estado, 55, 2023, 57–85.Linares, Sebastián. La (i) legitimidad democrática del control judicial de las leyes. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008.Lustig, Doreen, and J. H. H. Weiler. “Judicial Review in the Contemporary World—Retrospective and Prospective.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16(2), 2018, 315–72.Mansbridge, Jane. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Stephen Macedo, 211–42. Oxford University Press, 1999.Mansbridge, Jane, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis Thompson, and Mark Warren. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by Jane Mansbridge and John Parkinson, 1–26. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Martí, José Luis. “Is Constitutional Rigidity the Problem? Democratic Legitimacy and the Last Word.” Ratio Juris 27(4), 2014.Martí, José Luis. La República Deliberativa. Una Teoría de la Democracia. Madrid, Barcelona: Marcial Pons, 2006.Martí, José Luis. “The Role of New Technologies in Deliberative Democracy.” In Rule of Law vs Majoritarian Democracy, edited by Giuliano Amato, Benedetta Barbisan, and Cesare Pinelli. Bloomsbury, 2021.Owen, David, and Graham Smith. “Survey Article: Deliberation, Democracy, and the Systemic Turn.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 23(2), 2015, 213–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12054.Pettit, Philip. “Civic Republican Political Theory.” In A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain, by Philip Pettit and José Luis Martí. Princeton University Press, 2012.Pettit, Philip. “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” Nomos 42, 2000, 105–44.Pettit, Philip. “Depoliticizing Democracy.” Ratio Juris 17(1), 2004, 52–65.Pettit, Philip. “Keeping Republican Freedom Simple. On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30(3), 2002, 339–56.Pettit, Philip. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997.Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1996.Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Tomkins, Adam. “The Role of the Courts in the Political Constitution.” University of Toronto Law Journal, 60, 2010, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.60.1.1.Valentini, Chiara. “Deliberative Constitutionalism and Judicial Review.” Revus [Online] 47 (2022). http://journals.openedition.org/revus/8030.Vandamme, Pierre-Étienne, and Donald Bello Hutt. “Selecting Constitutional Judges Randomly.” Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 2021, 107–27.Waldron, Jeremy. “Five to Four: Why Do Bare Majorities Rule on Courts?” The Yale Law Journal 123, 2014, 1692–1730.Waldron, Jeremy. “Judges as Moral Reasoners.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7(1), 2009, 2–24.Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and Republican Government.” In That Eminent Tribunal. Judicial Supremacy and the Constitution, edited by Christopher Wolfe. New Forum Books, 2004.Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, 1999.Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” The Yale Law Journal, 2006.Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/8955Judicial review,republicanism,democracy,participation,legitimacyControl judicial,republicanismo,democracia,participación,legitimidadJudges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial ReviewJudges without Robes: A Republican Approach to Participatory Judicial ReviewArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2551https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/c119aecc-f5ad-478c-b606-0fda8ae3788b/downloade0b9d901f256951acc293aeac3862213MD51001/25522oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/255222025-04-09 12:55:29.984http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Alejandro Cortés-Arbeláez - 2023https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Publicaciones similares