The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision

Teniendo en cuenta la importancia de la protección de datos personales, esta investigación se centrará en la identificación de los criterios utilizados por los tribunales colombianos respecto a los derechos de acceso, modificación y supresión de datos personales en el contexto de la información disp...

Full description

Autores:: Osma Peralta, Sarah

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2018

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_c487a1757fce8297a3edfb024bd82d1f
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/26160
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
title	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
spellingShingle	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision search engines; personal data; data protection; regulation; fundamental rights; right to be forgotten motores de búsqueda; datos personales; regulación; derechos fundamentales; derecho al olvido
title_short	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
title_full	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
title_fullStr	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
title_full_unstemmed	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
title_sort	The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Osma Peralta, Sarah
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Osma Peralta, Sarah
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	search engines; personal data; data protection; regulation; fundamental rights; right to be forgotten
topic	search engines; personal data; data protection; regulation; fundamental rights; right to be forgotten motores de búsqueda; datos personales; regulación; derechos fundamentales; derecho al olvido
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	motores de búsqueda; datos personales; regulación; derechos fundamentales; derecho al olvido
description	Teniendo en cuenta la importancia de la protección de datos personales, esta investigación se centrará en la identificación de los criterios utilizados por los tribunales colombianos respecto a los derechos de acceso, modificación y supresión de datos personales en el contexto de la información disponible al público a través de los motores de búsqueda. Este marco de referencia expondrá los diferentes casos puestos en conocimiento de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia y de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia, en tanto que intenta resaltar cuál fue el criterio utilizado por estas para determinar que los motores de búsqueda son simples intermediarios entre los creadores de contenido y los titulares de datos personales. Finalmente, este estudio intenta contribuir no solo a la literatura legal de protección de datos en Colombia, sino también a mejorar las posibilidades de implementar efectivamente los derechos de los usuarios de los motores de búsqueda en línea en Colombia.
publishDate	2018
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2018-12-06T00:00:00Z 2025-04-09T19:11:37Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2018-12-06T00:00:00Z 2025-04-09T19:11:37Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2018-12-06
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/16571959.n26.06
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2116
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	1657-1959
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26160
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n26.06
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/16571959.n26.06 2346-2116 1657-1959
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26160 https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n26.06
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5778/7249 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5778/7598
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 26 , Año 2018 : Julio-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	169
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	26
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	143
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista La Propiedad Inmaterial
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Alsenoy, B. V. & Koekkoek, M. http://ghum.kuleuven.be/. 2015. Retrieved from http://ghum.kuleuven.be/: http://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/publications/working_papers/new_series/wp151-160/wp152- alsenoy-koekkoek.pdf Ambrose, M. L. Speaking of forgetting: Analysis of possible non-eu responses to the right to be forgotten and speech exception. Communication, Culture & Technology, Georgetown University, 3520 Prospect St. NW, Suite 311, Washington, dc 20057, USA (2014). Andrade, N. N. Oblivion: The right to be different from oneself, Reproposing the Right to be Forgotten. In Ghezzi A., Pereira Â.G., Vesnic´-Alujevic´ L. (eds.), The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2008). Opinion 1/2008 on data protection issues related to search engines. Brussels. Retrieved September 23, 2018 http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2008/wp148_en.pdf Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, guidelines on the implementation of the Google Spain case. (2014, November 26). Retrieved September 23, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion- recommendation/files/2014/wp225_en.pdf Bernal, P. The eu, the us and Right to be forgotten. Reloading Data Protection: Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. ed. / Serge Gutwirth; Ronald Leenes; Paul De Hert. Springer, 2014. Brin, S., & Page, L. The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. (1997) Retrieved on October 5 2018, from http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/361/1/1998-8.pdf Case Bodil Lindqvist C-101/01. (2003, November 6). Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=48382&doclang= Case Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González C-131/12, C. 2014. Retrieved on October 10 of 2018, from Case C-131/12 [2014] Retrieved on October 10, 2018: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?doclang=EN&text&pageIndex=0&part=1&mode=DOC&docid=152065&occ=first&dir&cid=437838 Commission National de L’informatique et des libertes. 2009. www.cnil.fr. Retrieved September 6, 2018, from https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/typo/document/CNIL-30erapport_2009.pdf Commission to the European Parliament. (2010, November 4). http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0006/contributions/organisations/beuc_en.pdf. Retrieved September 2, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consultingpublic/0006/contributions/organisations/beu c_en.pdf [hereinafter Comprehensive Approach on Personal Data Protection]. Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data. Strasbourg, 1981. ECHR. (2010, June). http://www.echr.coe.int/. Retrieved on September 12, 2018, from http://www.echr.coe.int: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_eng.pdf European Parliament and Council. (1995, Octubre 24). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.Retrieved on September 20 of 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?uri=celex%3A32016R0679 Evans, M. Analysing Google rankings through search engine optimization data. Internet Research 17, (2007): 21-37. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240710730470 Gasser, U. Regulating Search Engines: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. Yale journal of Law and technology 8, (2006): 203. Article 7. EU GDPR, Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/ec (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with eea relevance). Retrieved on September 26 of 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?qid=1532348683434&uri=celex:02016R0679-20160504 Google www.Google.com. Retrieved September 9, 2018, from https://www.google.com/about/company/ Google Annual Meeting of Stockholders. (2014, October 16). Google Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Retrieved on October 12, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcFTklq2-lI Google’s response to Art 29 wp requests. (2014, july 31). www.google.fr. Retrieved from www.google.fr. Retrieved on October 12 of 2018 https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8syaai6SSfiT0EwRUFyOENqR3M/edit Graux, Ausloos and Valcke. 2012. The right to be forgotten in the internet era, working paper. Retrieved on October 12, 2018, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2174896 Handbook on European data protection law . 2014. http://www.echr.coe.int/.Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Handbook_data_protection_02ENG.pdf Italian Supreme Court Case no. 3679 of 1998. Retrieved from s.sica and v.zenozencovich, Legislazione, giurisprudenza e dottrina nel diritto dell’Internet , in Il diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica, 2010, p. 387 Karma Snack. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from Retrieved from http://karmasnack.com/about/search-engine-market-share/ Koops, B. J. Forgetting Footprints, Shunning Shadows: A Critical Analysis of the’Right to Be Forgotten’in Big Data Practice. 2011. scripted, p. 234. Korenhof, P. Stage ahoy! Deconstruction of the “Drunken Pirate” Case in the Light of impression management. Reloading Data Protection Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. Springer. 2014. Mayer-Schönberger, V. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2012, June 2). Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved from www.youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b-RT42uDYI Moerel, E.M.L. The long arm of eu data protection law: Does the Data Protection Directive apply to processing of personal data of eu citizens by websites worldwide? International Data Privacy Law, (2011): 28-46. Patrick Van Eecke, google advisory council. (2015). Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from https://www.google.com/advisorycouncil/ Pino, G. The Right to Personal Identity in Italian Private Law: Constitutional Interpretation and Judge-Made Rights. Conference; edited by Mark Van Hoecke and Francois Ost, European private law in context; The harmonization Posner, E. Slate.com. Retrieved Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from Slate.com: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2014/05/the_european_right_to_be_forgotten_is_just_what_the_internet_needs.html Reding V. The European data protection framework for the twenty-first century. International Data Privacy Law 2, (2012): 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ips015 Sartor, G. The Right to be forgotten in the Draft Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law. 2014. Retrieved on September 20 of 2018, from https://brusselsprivacyhub.eu/Resources/Sartor_Presentation_Right_To_Be_Forgotten_Bruxelles_28102014.pdf Simon Castellano, P. El reconocimiento del derecho al olvido digital en España y en la ue. Madrid: Efectos tras la sentencia del tjue de mayo de 2014. Barcelona: Wolters Kluwer, 2015. Zittrain, J. (2014, may 14). http://www.nytimes.com/. Retrieved On October 12 of 2018 from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/opinion/dontforce-google-to-forget.html 95/46/ec, d. (1995, October 24). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=celex:31995L0046:en:html
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Sarah Osma Peralta - 2018
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Sarah Osma Peralta - 2018 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Centro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectual
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/5778
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/0af72347-d1eb-4854-8428-2447fc4bc324/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	c49e3ed678f1a9255c76b680792f22f0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1831928430375993344
spelling	Osma Peralta, Sarah2018-12-06T00:00:00Z2025-04-09T19:11:37Z2018-12-06T00:00:00Z2025-04-09T19:11:37Z2018-12-06Teniendo en cuenta la importancia de la protección de datos personales, esta investigación se centrará en la identificación de los criterios utilizados por los tribunales colombianos respecto a los derechos de acceso, modificación y supresión de datos personales en el contexto de la información disponible al público a través de los motores de búsqueda. Este marco de referencia expondrá los diferentes casos puestos en conocimiento de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia y de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia, en tanto que intenta resaltar cuál fue el criterio utilizado por estas para determinar que los motores de búsqueda son simples intermediarios entre los creadores de contenido y los titulares de datos personales. Finalmente, este estudio intenta contribuir no solo a la literatura legal de protección de datos en Colombia, sino también a mejorar las posibilidades de implementar efectivamente los derechos de los usuarios de los motores de búsqueda en línea en Colombia.Considering the relevance of personal data protection, this research will focus on the identification of the criteria used by Colombian Courts regarding the rights to access, modification and erasure personal data within the context of information made available through search engines. This framework will expose the different cases ruled by both, the Colombian Constitutional court and the Colombian Supreme Court, as it attempts to highlight which was the criteria used to rule that search engines are mere intermediaries between the content makers and data subjects. Finally, this study attempts to contribute not only to the data protection legal literature in Colombia, but also, to improve the possibilities to effectively implement user’s rights of online search engines in Colombia. &nbsp;application/pdftext/html10.18601/16571959.n26.062346-21161657-1959https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26160https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n26.06spaCentro de Estudios de la Propiedad Intelectualhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5778/7249https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/download/5778/7598Núm. 26 , Año 2018 : Julio-Diciembre16926143Revista La Propiedad InmaterialAlsenoy, B. V. & Koekkoek, M. http://ghum.kuleuven.be/. 2015. Retrieved from http://ghum.kuleuven.be/: http://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/publications/working_papers/new_series/wp151-160/wp152- alsenoy-koekkoek.pdfAmbrose, M. L. Speaking of forgetting: Analysis of possible non-eu responses to the right to be forgotten and speech exception. Communication, Culture & Technology, Georgetown University, 3520 Prospect St. NW, Suite 311, Washington, dc 20057, USA (2014).Andrade, N. N. Oblivion: The right to be different from oneself, Reproposing the Right to be Forgotten. In Ghezzi A., Pereira Â.G., Vesnic´-Alujevic´ L. (eds.), The Ethics of Memory in a Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2008). Opinion 1/2008 on data protection issues related to search engines. Brussels. Retrieved September 23, 2018 http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2008/wp148_en.pdfArticle 29 Data Protection Working Party, guidelines on the implementation of the Google Spain case. (2014, November 26). Retrieved September 23, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion- recommendation/files/2014/wp225_en.pdfBernal, P. The eu, the us and Right to be forgotten. Reloading Data Protection: Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. ed. / Serge Gutwirth; Ronald Leenes; Paul De Hert. Springer, 2014.Brin, S., & Page, L. The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine. (1997) Retrieved on October 5 2018, from http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/361/1/1998-8.pdfCase Bodil Lindqvist C-101/01. (2003, November 6). Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=48382&doclang=Case Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González C-131/12, C. 2014. Retrieved on October 10 of 2018, from Case C-131/12 [2014] Retrieved on October 10, 2018: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf?doclang=EN&text&pageIndex=0&part=1&mode=DOC&docid=152065&occ=first&dir&cid=437838Commission National de L’informatique et des libertes. 2009. www.cnil.fr. Retrieved September 6, 2018, from https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/typo/document/CNIL-30erapport_2009.pdfCommission to the European Parliament. (2010, November 4). http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consulting_public/0006/contributions/organisations/beuc_en.pdf. Retrieved September 2, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/news/consultingpublic/0006/contributions/organisations/beu c_en.pdf [hereinafter Comprehensive Approach on Personal Data Protection].Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data. Strasbourg, 1981.ECHR. (2010, June). http://www.echr.coe.int/. Retrieved on September 12, 2018, from http://www.echr.coe.int: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_eng.pdfEuropean Parliament and Council. (1995, Octubre 24). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.Retrieved on September 20 of 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?uri=celex%3A32016R0679Evans, M. Analysing Google rankings through search engine optimization data. Internet Research 17, (2007): 21-37. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240710730470Gasser, U. Regulating Search Engines: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. Yale journal of Law and technology 8, (2006): 203. Article 7.EU GDPR, Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/ec (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with eea relevance). Retrieved on September 26 of 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?qid=1532348683434&uri=celex:02016R0679-20160504Google www.Google.com. Retrieved September 9, 2018, from https://www.google.com/about/company/Google Annual Meeting of Stockholders. (2014, October 16). Google Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Retrieved on October 12, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcFTklq2-lIGoogle’s response to Art 29 wp requests. (2014, july 31). www.google.fr. Retrieved from www.google.fr. Retrieved on October 12 of 2018 https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8syaai6SSfiT0EwRUFyOENqR3M/editGraux, Ausloos and Valcke. 2012. The right to be forgotten in the internet era, working paper. Retrieved on October 12, 2018, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2174896Handbook on European data protection law . 2014. http://www.echr.coe.int/.Retrieved October 12, 2018, from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Handbook_data_protection_02ENG.pdfItalian Supreme Court Case no. 3679 of 1998. Retrieved from s.sica and v.zenozencovich, Legislazione, giurisprudenza e dottrina nel diritto dell’Internet , in Il diritto dell’informazione e dell’informatica, 2010, p. 387Karma Snack. Retrieved October 12, 2018, from Retrieved from http://karmasnack.com/about/search-engine-market-share/Koops, B. J. Forgetting Footprints, Shunning Shadows: A Critical Analysis of the’Right to Be Forgotten’in Big Data Practice. 2011. scripted, p. 234.Korenhof, P. Stage ahoy! Deconstruction of the “Drunken Pirate” Case in the Light of impression management. Reloading Data Protection Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. Springer. 2014.Mayer-Schönberger, V. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2012, June 2). Oxford Internet Institute. Retrieved from www.youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b-RT42uDYIMoerel, E.M.L. The long arm of eu data protection law: Does the Data Protection Directive apply to processing of personal data of eu citizens by websites worldwide? International Data Privacy Law, (2011): 28-46.Patrick Van Eecke, google advisory council. (2015). Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from https://www.google.com/advisorycouncil/Pino, G. The Right to Personal Identity in Italian Private Law: Constitutional Interpretation and Judge-Made Rights. Conference; edited by Mark Van Hoecke and Francois Ost, European private law in context; The harmonizationPosner, E. Slate.com. Retrieved Retrieved on October 5 of 2018 from Slate.com: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2014/05/the_european_right_to_be_forgotten_is_just_what_the_internet_needs.htmlReding V. The European data protection framework for the twenty-first century. International Data Privacy Law 2, (2012): 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ips015Sartor, G. The Right to be forgotten in the Draft Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law. 2014. Retrieved on September 20 of 2018, from https://brusselsprivacyhub.eu/Resources/Sartor_Presentation_Right_To_Be_Forgotten_Bruxelles_28102014.pdfSimon Castellano, P. El reconocimiento del derecho al olvido digital en España y en la ue. Madrid: Efectos tras la sentencia del tjue de mayo de 2014. Barcelona: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.Zittrain, J. (2014, may 14). http://www.nytimes.com/. Retrieved On October 12 of 2018 from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/opinion/dontforce-google-to-forget.html 95/46/ec, d. (1995, October 24). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=celex:31995L0046:en:htmlSarah Osma Peralta - 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/propin/article/view/5778search engines;personal data;data protection;regulation;fundamental rights;right to be forgottenmotores de búsqueda;datos personales;regulación;derechos fundamentales;derecho al olvidoThe Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decisionThe Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decisionArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2561https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/0af72347-d1eb-4854-8428-2447fc4bc324/downloadc49e3ed678f1a9255c76b680792f22f0MD51001/26160oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/261602025-04-09 14:11:37.454https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Sarah Osma Peralta - 2018https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

The Role of search engines in Colombia after the Muebles Caqueta vs. Google Inc decision

Publicaciones similares