Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills

El artículo analiza el uso de simulaciones como una herramienta de aprendizaje activo y explora su idoneidad en los estudios de Relaciones Internacionales (RR. II.), que involucran a diferentes poblaciones de estudiantes. Las experiencias de negociación anteriores se utilizan para describir Game of...

Full description

Autores:
Irrera, Daniela
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/8543
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8543
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n33.03
Palabra clave:
simulation;
conflict;
peace;
negotiation;
skills
simulación;
conflicto;
paz;
negociación;
habilidades
Rights
openAccess
License
Daniela Irrera - 2020
id uexternad2_bfaafbf62fc59486708bdee5c2e6c154
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/8543
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
title Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
spellingShingle Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
simulation;
conflict;
peace;
negotiation;
skills
simulación;
conflicto;
paz;
negociación;
habilidades
title_short Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
title_full Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
title_fullStr Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
title_full_unstemmed Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
title_sort Simulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skills
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Irrera, Daniela
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Irrera, Daniela
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv simulation;
conflict;
peace;
negotiation;
skills
topic simulation;
conflict;
peace;
negotiation;
skills
simulación;
conflicto;
paz;
negociación;
habilidades
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv simulación;
conflicto;
paz;
negociación;
habilidades
description El artículo analiza el uso de simulaciones como una herramienta de aprendizaje activo y explora su idoneidad en los estudios de Relaciones Internacionales (RR. II.), que involucran a diferentes poblaciones de estudiantes. Las experiencias de negociación anteriores se utilizan para describir Game of Peace, un modelo de negociación, desarrollado por el autor, para abarcar a los estudiantes en el papel de varias facciones involucradas en una guerra civil. Al evaluar los comentarios de los estudiantes, aquí se sostiene que las simulaciones son extremadamente funcionales para los cursos de RR. II., para mejorar las habilidades de aprendizaje, fomentar las habilidades y capacidades relacionales, y para llevar las teorías y conceptos a la vida real. El artículo consta de tres partes. En primer lugar, se evalúa la literatura más reciente sobre simulaciones para reflexionar sobre la idoneidad de las simulaciones; en segundo lugar, la experiencia del Game of Peace se presenta en sus principales pasos, roles y características de interacción. Por último, sus principales resultados se utilizan para evaluar su impacto pedagógico y prever más investigaciones.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-23 17:16:24
2022-09-08T13:49:39Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-23 17:16:24
2022-09-08T13:49:39Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-23
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/16577558.n33.03
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2132
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1657-7558
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8543
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n33.03
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/16577558.n33.03
2346-2132
1657-7558
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8543
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n33.03
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/6861/11056
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/6861/11058
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/6861/11057
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 33 , Año 2021 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 28
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 33
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 13
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Oasis
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Ayhan, K. J. (2019). Transferring Knowledge to Narrative Worlds: Applying Power Taxonomy to Science Fiction Films. International Studies Perspectives.
Asal, V.; Miller, I. & Willis, C. N. (2020). System, State, or Individual: Gaming Levels of Analysis in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives, 21 (1), 97-107.
Asal V. (2005). ‘Playing Games with International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 6: 359–373.
Ben-Yehuda, H. and Zohar, G. (2018). Fanaticism Through the Looking Glass of Simulations, Journal of Political Science Education, 14(2): 1-25.
Ben-Yehuda, H.; Levin-Banchik, L. & Naveh, C. (2015). World politics simulations in a global information age, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Brynen, R. (2010). (Ending) civil war in the classroom: A peacebuilding simulation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43 (1), 145-149.
Blake E. L. and Starkey B. A. (2001), Simulation in international relations education, Simulation & Gaming, 32(4: 537-551.
Bridge, D., & Radford, S. (2014). Teaching diplomacy by other means: Using an outside-of-class simulation to teach international relations theory. International Studies Perspectives, 15 (4), 423-437.
Cusimano, M. (2000). Case Teaching Without Cases. In J. S. Lantis, L. M. Kuzma and J. Boehrer (edited), The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching, Active Learning, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Fowler, M. R. (2009). Culture and negotiation: The pedagogical dispute regarding cross-cultural simulations. International Studies Perspectives, 10(3), 341-359.
Klabbers, J. H. (2009). The magic circle: Principles of gaming & simulation. Brill Sense.
Giovanello, S. P.; Kirk, J. A. & Kromer, M. K. (2013). Student perceptions of a role-playing simulation in an introductory international relations course. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 197-208.
Irrera, D. (2016). The use of simulations as a teaching tool, www.e.ir-info, https://www.e-ir.info/2016/05/26/the-use-of-simulations-as-a-teaching-tool/
Lantis, J. S.; Kuzma, L. M. & Boehrer, J. (Eds.) (2000). The new international studies classroom: Active teaching, active learning. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Lantis, J. S. (1998). Simulations and experiential learning in the international relations classroom. International Negotiation, 3(1), 39-57.
McIntosh, D. (2001). The uses and limits of the model United Nations in an international relations classroom. International Studies Perspectives, 2(3), 269-280.
Newmann, W. W. & Twigg, J. L. (2000). Active engagement of the intro IR student: A simulation approach. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33(4), 835-842.
Pepinsky T.B. (2005). From Agents to Outcomes: Simulation in International Relations, in European Journal of International Relations, 11(3): 367-394.
Raines, S. (2003). ‘The Potential Perils of Slack (not Pack) Pedagogy: A Response to J. Martin Rochester’s Remarks about Active Learning Strategies. International Studies Perspectives 4: 432–435.
Raymond, C. and Sorensen, K. (2008). The use of a Middle East crisis simulation in an international relations course. PS: Political Science & Politics 41.1: 179-182.
Raymond, C. & Usherwood, S. (2013). Assessment in simulations. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 157-167.
Rothman, S. B. (2012). Developing and adapting simulations through six points of variance: An example of teaching applied game theory through international negotiations. International Studies Perspectives, 13(4), 437-457.
Shellman, S. and Turan, K. (2006). Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR Simulation, Journal of Political Science Education 2(1): 1-14.
Simpson A., W. and Kaussler, B. (2009). IR Teaching Reloaded: Using Films and Simulations in the Teaching of International Relations, International Studies Perspectives, 10, 413–427.
Stoll, R. J. (2011). Civil Engineering: Does a Realist World Influence the Onset of Civil Wars? Simulation & Gaming, 42(6), 748-771.
Stover, W. J. (2005). Teaching and learning empathy: An interactive, online diplomatic simulation of Middle East conflict. Journal of Political Science Education, 1(2), 207-219.
Strand, J. R. & Rapkin, D. P. (2011). Weighted Voting in the United Nations Security Council: A Simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 42(6), 772-802.
Taylor, K. (2013). Simulations inside and outside the IR classroom: A comparative analysis. International Studies Perspectives, 14(2), 134-149.
Tessman, B. F. (2007). International relations in action: A world politics simulation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Torney-Purta, J. (1998). Evaluating programs designed to teach international content and negotiation skills. International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 3(1), 77-97.
Weir, K. & Baranowski, M. (2011). Simulating history to understand international politics. Simulation & Gaming, 42(4), 441-461.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Daniela Irrera - 2020
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Daniela Irrera - 2020
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/6861
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/9f0c46a4-e224-4407-9607-66c14d83b31e/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a722f8ef9e365ded6f10cc0316bd7c96
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1808418140569206784
spelling Irrera, Danielaab0b232e-1620-4e04-8115-718400b131072020-10-23 17:16:242022-09-08T13:49:39Z2020-10-23 17:16:242022-09-08T13:49:39Z2020-10-23El artículo analiza el uso de simulaciones como una herramienta de aprendizaje activo y explora su idoneidad en los estudios de Relaciones Internacionales (RR. II.), que involucran a diferentes poblaciones de estudiantes. Las experiencias de negociación anteriores se utilizan para describir Game of Peace, un modelo de negociación, desarrollado por el autor, para abarcar a los estudiantes en el papel de varias facciones involucradas en una guerra civil. Al evaluar los comentarios de los estudiantes, aquí se sostiene que las simulaciones son extremadamente funcionales para los cursos de RR. II., para mejorar las habilidades de aprendizaje, fomentar las habilidades y capacidades relacionales, y para llevar las teorías y conceptos a la vida real. El artículo consta de tres partes. En primer lugar, se evalúa la literatura más reciente sobre simulaciones para reflexionar sobre la idoneidad de las simulaciones; en segundo lugar, la experiencia del Game of Peace se presenta en sus principales pasos, roles y características de interacción. Por último, sus principales resultados se utilizan para evaluar su impacto pedagógico y prever más investigaciones.The article discusses the use of simulations as an active learning tool and explores their suitability in International Relations (IR) studies, involving different student populations. Previous negotiation experiences are used to describe Game of Peace, a negotiation model, developed by the author, for encompassing students in taking on the role of several factions involved in a civil war. By assessing students’ feedbacks, it is here sustained that simulations are extremely functional to IR courses, in improving learning abilities, encouraging skills and relational capacities, and in bringing theories and concepts to real life. The article consists of three parts. Firstly, the most recent literature on simulations is assessed in order to reflect on the suitability of simulations; secondly, the Game of Peace experience is presented in its major steps, roles and interactional features. Lastly, its main outcomes are used for assessing its pedagogical impact and envisaging further research.application/pdftext/xmltext/html10.18601/16577558.n33.032346-21321657-7558https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8543https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n33.03spaFacultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionaleshttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/6861/11056https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/6861/11058https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/6861/11057Núm. 33 , Año 2021 : Enero-Junio283313OasisAyhan, K. J. (2019). Transferring Knowledge to Narrative Worlds: Applying Power Taxonomy to Science Fiction Films. International Studies Perspectives.Asal, V.; Miller, I. & Willis, C. N. (2020). System, State, or Individual: Gaming Levels of Analysis in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives, 21 (1), 97-107.Asal V. (2005). ‘Playing Games with International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 6: 359–373.Ben-Yehuda, H. and Zohar, G. (2018). Fanaticism Through the Looking Glass of Simulations, Journal of Political Science Education, 14(2): 1-25.Ben-Yehuda, H.; Levin-Banchik, L. & Naveh, C. (2015). World politics simulations in a global information age, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Brynen, R. (2010). (Ending) civil war in the classroom: A peacebuilding simulation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43 (1), 145-149.Blake E. L. and Starkey B. A. (2001), Simulation in international relations education, Simulation & Gaming, 32(4: 537-551.Bridge, D., & Radford, S. (2014). Teaching diplomacy by other means: Using an outside-of-class simulation to teach international relations theory. International Studies Perspectives, 15 (4), 423-437.Cusimano, M. (2000). Case Teaching Without Cases. In J. S. Lantis, L. M. Kuzma and J. Boehrer (edited), The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching, Active Learning, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Fowler, M. R. (2009). Culture and negotiation: The pedagogical dispute regarding cross-cultural simulations. International Studies Perspectives, 10(3), 341-359.Klabbers, J. H. (2009). The magic circle: Principles of gaming & simulation. Brill Sense.Giovanello, S. P.; Kirk, J. A. & Kromer, M. K. (2013). Student perceptions of a role-playing simulation in an introductory international relations course. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 197-208.Irrera, D. (2016). The use of simulations as a teaching tool, www.e.ir-info, https://www.e-ir.info/2016/05/26/the-use-of-simulations-as-a-teaching-tool/Lantis, J. S.; Kuzma, L. M. & Boehrer, J. (Eds.) (2000). The new international studies classroom: Active teaching, active learning. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Lantis, J. S. (1998). Simulations and experiential learning in the international relations classroom. International Negotiation, 3(1), 39-57.McIntosh, D. (2001). The uses and limits of the model United Nations in an international relations classroom. International Studies Perspectives, 2(3), 269-280.Newmann, W. W. & Twigg, J. L. (2000). Active engagement of the intro IR student: A simulation approach. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33(4), 835-842.Pepinsky T.B. (2005). From Agents to Outcomes: Simulation in International Relations, in European Journal of International Relations, 11(3): 367-394.Raines, S. (2003). ‘The Potential Perils of Slack (not Pack) Pedagogy: A Response to J. Martin Rochester’s Remarks about Active Learning Strategies. International Studies Perspectives 4: 432–435.Raymond, C. and Sorensen, K. (2008). The use of a Middle East crisis simulation in an international relations course. PS: Political Science & Politics 41.1: 179-182.Raymond, C. & Usherwood, S. (2013). Assessment in simulations. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2), 157-167.Rothman, S. B. (2012). Developing and adapting simulations through six points of variance: An example of teaching applied game theory through international negotiations. International Studies Perspectives, 13(4), 437-457.Shellman, S. and Turan, K. (2006). Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR Simulation, Journal of Political Science Education 2(1): 1-14.Simpson A., W. and Kaussler, B. (2009). IR Teaching Reloaded: Using Films and Simulations in the Teaching of International Relations, International Studies Perspectives, 10, 413–427.Stoll, R. J. (2011). Civil Engineering: Does a Realist World Influence the Onset of Civil Wars? Simulation & Gaming, 42(6), 748-771.Stover, W. J. (2005). Teaching and learning empathy: An interactive, online diplomatic simulation of Middle East conflict. Journal of Political Science Education, 1(2), 207-219.Strand, J. R. & Rapkin, D. P. (2011). Weighted Voting in the United Nations Security Council: A Simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 42(6), 772-802.Taylor, K. (2013). Simulations inside and outside the IR classroom: A comparative analysis. International Studies Perspectives, 14(2), 134-149.Tessman, B. F. (2007). International relations in action: A world politics simulation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Torney-Purta, J. (1998). Evaluating programs designed to teach international content and negotiation skills. International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice, 3(1), 77-97.Weir, K. & Baranowski, M. (2011). Simulating history to understand international politics. Simulation & Gaming, 42(4), 441-461.Daniela Irrera - 2020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/6861simulation;conflict;peace;negotiation;skillssimulación;conflicto;paz;negociación;habilidadesSimulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skillsSimulating conflict resolution dynamics and fostering negotiation skillsArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2549https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/9f0c46a4-e224-4407-9607-66c14d83b31e/downloada722f8ef9e365ded6f10cc0316bd7c96MD51001/8543oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/85432023-08-14 15:18:13.464http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Daniela Irrera - 2020https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org