New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic

El Derecho Internacional Económico (DIE) es una materia cuya fluidez le ha permitido cambiar significantemente a lo largo de los años. El DIE nunca ha sido un sistema rígido y fijo de reglas y, al igual que todas las áreas del Derecho, ha ido fluctuando conforme a las circunstancias socioeconómicas...

Full description

Autores:
Gonzalez , Pedro Lacasa
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/15243
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15243
https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n57.08
Palabra clave:
International Economic Law;
Pandemic;
Multilateralism;
Lex arbitrii;
Legal Remedy.
Derecho Internacional Económico;
Pandemia;
Multilateralismo;
Lex arbitrii;
Remedio legal.
Rights
openAccess
License
Pedro Lacasa Gonzalez - 2023
id uexternad2_bb72a6719db5953c067978edae0d464e
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/15243
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
title New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
spellingShingle New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
International Economic Law;
Pandemic;
Multilateralism;
Lex arbitrii;
Legal Remedy.
Derecho Internacional Económico;
Pandemia;
Multilateralismo;
Lex arbitrii;
Remedio legal.
title_short New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
title_full New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
title_fullStr New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
title_sort New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 Pandemic
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Gonzalez , Pedro Lacasa
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Gonzalez , Pedro Lacasa
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv International Economic Law;
Pandemic;
Multilateralism;
Lex arbitrii;
Legal Remedy.
topic International Economic Law;
Pandemic;
Multilateralism;
Lex arbitrii;
Legal Remedy.
Derecho Internacional Económico;
Pandemia;
Multilateralismo;
Lex arbitrii;
Remedio legal.
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Derecho Internacional Económico;
Pandemia;
Multilateralismo;
Lex arbitrii;
Remedio legal.
description El Derecho Internacional Económico (DIE) es una materia cuya fluidez le ha permitido cambiar significantemente a lo largo de los años. El DIE nunca ha sido un sistema rígido y fijo de reglas y, al igual que todas las áreas del Derecho, ha ido fluctuando conforme a las circunstancias socioeconómicas de una determinada época y este factor determinante del DIE le ha permitido adaptarse en el tiempo. Han sido siempre la acción, el pensamiento y la ideología humanas los que construyeron las bases sociales e internacionales para el desarrollo del DIE. La pandemia del 2020 ha sido indudablemente uno de esos eventos que cambiaron drásticamente las circunstancias de una determinada época. La pandemia ha establecido una “nueva normalidad”. Sin embargo, es sabido que lo “normal” es un concepto que también fluctúa a lo largo del tiempo y que resulta del consenso de una determinada época. Lo que es normal hoy tal vez no haya sido normal 30 años atrás. Lo que era normal 50 años atrás tal vez no sea normal hoy en día. No obstante, el DIE parece desconocer este hecho: la mayoría de las instituciones del Derecho Internacional Público han sido creadas dentro de un sistema de naciones-Estado organizado hace siglos con el Tratado de Westfalia y abrazando el Multilateralismo. Y aunque el DIE pretenda resolver los problemas internacionales que puedan surgir a través de una visión desfasada, el Multilateralismo no ha resultado ser tan eficiente como se pensaba, especialmente en los esfuerzos internacionales contra la pandemia del Covid-19. Quizás sea necesario algunos ajustes o actualizaciones. A pesar de la mutabilidad del DIE, la mayoría de los postulados y premisas del Derecho Internacional han sido puestos a prueba con la emergencia de la tecnología como medio de interacción humana a nivel internacional. Esto ha alterado tanto al Derecho Internacional Público como al Derecho Internacional Privado. Un ejemplo importante es el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, cuyo marco legal está basado en un Tratado Internacional de los años 50 y cuya Ley Modelo más popular data de los años 80. Tal vez algunas actualizaciones sean convenientes también en este respecto. La pandemia del año 2020 provocó una rotura sin precedentes en la cadena de contratos a nivel internacional, afectando directamente a la cadena de suministros. Las armas legales para hacer frente a este rompimiento contractual internacional masivo fueron los remedios legales diseñados precisamente para las situaciones de incumplimiento contractual cuando un factor externo ha ocasionado que la obligación contractual resultase demasiado onerosa o de cumplimiento imposible. Estos remedios legales provienen de dos fuentes: el Derecho positivo y el soft law. La ausencia de un Derecho positivo uniforme derivó en soluciones legales distintas a un mismo problema de derecho contractual internacional. Y aunque el DIE reconozca la diversidad cultural y sociológica de las diferentes jurisdicciones, aboga por la uniformidad y la previsibilidad. Esta obra no contiene soluciones mágicas para estos asuntos internacionales: prefiere exponer algunos de los problemas concernientes al porvenir del DIE de una manera objetiva en lugar de la indiferencia actual hacia los mismos.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-01T10:53:31Z
2024-06-07T06:32:25Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-01T10:53:31Z
2024-06-07T06:32:25Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023-02-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/01236458.n57.08
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2078
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0123-6458
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15243
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n57.08
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/01236458.n57.08
2346-2078
0123-6458
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15243
https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n57.08
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/download/8541/13101
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 57 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 190
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 57
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 157
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Con-texto
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Amon, J. J. (2020). COVID-19 and Detention: Respecting Human Rights. 22(1), 5.
Aksar, Y. (Ed.). (2011). Implementing international economic law: Through dispute settlement mechanisms. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Born, G. (2020). International Commercial Arbitration, 3d Edition. Kluwer Law International.
Collins, D. (2017). An Introduction to International Investment Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, T., & Garcia, A. (2010). Benefits and Limitations of International Arbitration for IP Disputes. En T. Cook, & A. Garcia, International Intellectual Property Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.
Fauvarque-Cosson, B. (2003). Principes du Droit Européen du Contrat. Paris, France: Société de législation comparée.
Gaillard, E. (2008). Aspects philosophiques du droit de l’arbitrage international. La Haye, Netherlands: The Hague Academy of International Law.
Gaillard, E. (2009). The Urgency of Not Revising the New York Convention. En I. &. International (Ed.), ICCA International Arbitration Conference (págs. 689-696). Kluwer Law International.
Gásperi, L. D. (1964). Anteproyecto de Código Civil. Asunción, Paraguay: El Gráfico.
Goode, R. (2001). The Role of the Lex Loci Arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration International, 17(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008973626914.
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law. OUP Oxford.
Marisa Herrera, G. C. (2015). Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación Comentado. Libro Tercero. Tomo IV. Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. Buenos Aires: Dirección Nacional del Sisema Argentino de Información Jurídica.
Herdegen, M. (2021). International Economic Law. 21.
International economic law: General course on public international law. (n.d.). [Data set]. Koninklijke Brill NV. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789024735556.009-264.
Jansen, N., & Zimmermann, R. (2018). Non-Performance and Remedies in General. In N. Jansen & R. Zimmermann, Commentaries on European Contract Laws. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790693.003.0009.
Joubin-Bret, A. (2019). Foreword: Celebration of the 60th Anniversary of the New York Convention. En K. F. Gomez, & A. M. Lopez-Rodriguez, 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges (págs. pp v–500). Kluwer Law International.
Káposznyák, A. (2019). The Expanding Role of the New York Convention in Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards. En K. F. Gómez, & A. M. (eds), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges. Kluwer Law International.
Kessedjian, C. (September de 2005). Competing Approaches to Force Majeure and Hardship. International Review of Law and Economics(25), 641–670.
Kirmser, R. T. (2008). Responsabilidad Civil: una materia en constante evolución. La responsabilidad sin culpa. En C. S. Justicia, Responsabilidad Civil. Daños y Perjuicios. Asunción, Paraguay: Intercontinental.
Lacasa, P. (2021). Infraestructura Municipal: Personería Jurídica, Contratos de Construcción y Arbitraje. (I. Editores, Ed.) Buenos Aires, Argentina: IJ Editores.
Latty, F. (2004). Le droit transnational économique. En P. Daillier, G. d. Pradelle, & H. Ghérari, Droit de l’économie internationale. Paris, France: Centre de droit international de l’Université Paris X.
Ongenae, K., & Piers, M. (2022). Procedural Formalities in Arbitration: Towards a Technologically Neutral Legal Framework. 24.
Paulsson, J. (2013). The Idea of Arbitration. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564163.001.0001.
Racine, J.-B. (2020). Le droit économique au XXI siècle. Notions et enjeux. Paris: lgdj.
Sanders, P. (1979). A Twenty Years’s Review of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. International Lawyer(269), 20.
Toth, O. (2019). The New York Convention and Investment Arbitration: Harmony or Tension? En K. F. Gómez, & A. M.-R. (eds), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges. Kluwer Law International.
Titi, C. (2021). The Function of Equity in International Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Smit, R. H. (2022). Chapter 24: The Future of Science and Technology in International Arbitration: The Next Thirty Years. 12.
Alland, D., Chetail, V., de Frouville, O., & Viñuales, J. E. (Eds.). (2014). 31. La lex arbitrii dans l’arbitrage commercial international: Mythe ou réalité? In Unité et diversité du droit international/Unity and Diversity of International Law (pp. 669–688). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004262393_032.
Arcuri, A. (2020). International Economic Law and Disintegration: Beware the Schmittean Moment. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa012.
Gaillard, E. (2011, January 20). Le nouveau droit français de l’arbitrage interne et international. Recueil Dalloz(3).
Bateson, D. (2020, July). Virtual Arbitration: The Impact of COVID-19. Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 9(1), 159-170.
Hirschmann, G. (2021). The Reassertion of National Sovereignty: A Challenge to International Organizations’ Survival? Security and Human Rights, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230- bja10003.
Harris, R. A. (2014). Corporativism. In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp. 743–745). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0210.
Ingrid Katz et all. (8 de April de 2021). From Vaccine Nationalism to Vaccine Equity–Finding a Path Forward. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1281-1283.
Ferrari, F. (2021). Plures leges faciunt arbitrum. Arbitration International, 37(3), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiab004.
Fach, K. (2015). Enforcing Global Law: international arbitration and informal regulatory instruments. The journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law(47), 112-139.
Kallel, S. (2008). Online Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 25(3), 345-353.
Kaufmann-Kohler, G. (2003). Globalization of Arbitral Procedure. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 36.
Lacasa, P. (2019). El Arbitraje como ventaja competitiva en el mundo empresarial: el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional y el Arbitraje de Inversiones. Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Católica “Nuestra Señora de la Asunción”(28), 37-60.
Lacasa, P. (October de 2021). Arbitraje de la construcción y un triángulo amoroso: donde el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional y el Arbitraje de Inversiones chocan (Parte I). Revista Arbitraje Alumni(2), 207 – 240.
Mance, J. (2016). Arbitration: A Law unto itself? Arbitration International, 32(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiv072.
Pejovic, Caslav—”Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal” [2001] VUWLawRw 42; (2001) 32 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 817. (n.d.). Retrieved October 29, 2021, from http://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2001/42.html.
Warusfel, B. (September-October de 2008). Le droit économique et ses juges. Revue de l’Association des Sciences-Po(152), 20-24.
Pinsolle, P. (2022). Arbitration and New Technologies. 7.
Scott, D. (2012). Norms of Self-Determination: Thinking Sovereignty Through. Middle East Law and Governance, 4(2–3), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/18763375-00403003.
Smit, R. H. (2022). Chapter 24: The Future of Science and Technology In International Arbitration: The Next Thirty Years. 12.
Sykes, A. O. (2005). Public vs. Private Enforcement of International Economic Law: Of Standing and Remedy. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.671801.
The principles and standards of international economic law. (n.d.). [Data set]. Koninklijke Brill NV. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789028615427.001-098.
Vargas, A., & Geuna, T. (2021, September). Arbitraje internacional en tiempos de pandemia COVID-19: un análisis del debido proceso y los retos que implican las audiencias remotas. Revista Arbitraje Alumni(2).
Vargas, D. M. B. (2021). Las nuevas fronteras del derecho económico internacional. Con-texto, 56, 7–8. https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n56.01.
Yu, H.-L., & Nasir, M. (2022). Can Online Arbitration Exist Within the Traditional Arbitration Framework? 15.
Agarwal, R., & Gopinath, G. (2021). A proposal to end the COVID-19 Pandemic. IMF Staff Discussion Note, International Monetary Fund.
Forneris, X., & Mocheva, N. (2018). How Countries Can Fully Implement the New York Convention. World Bank, Finance, Competitiveness and Innovation, Washington.
Fromont, M. (1973). Rapport sur le droit économique français. Commision des communautés européennes. Bruxelles: Collection Études.
UN. (24 de September de 2021). UN Web TV–Paraguay, President Addresses General Debate, 76th Session. Recuperado el February de 2022, de UN Web TV: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1s/k1sgfcyote.
Blogs and web sites
A Proposal to End the COVID-19 Pandemic. (n.d.). IMF. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2021/05/19/AProposal-to-End-the-COVID-19-Pandemic-460263.
About our Alliance. (n.d.). Retrieved October 5, 2021, from https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/about.
Chan, R. (n.d.). The Cambridge Analytica whistleblower explains how the firm used Facebook data to sway elections. Business Insider. Retrieved October 2, 2021, from https://www.businessinsider.com/cambridge-analytica-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-facebookdata-2019-10.
COVID-19 Response: 96% Of Global Destinations Impose Travel Restrictions, UNWTO Reports | UNWTO. (n.d.). Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://www.unwto.org/news/covid-19-response-travel-restrictions.
Facultad de Derecho Universidad Austral. (2021). Intervención judicial en el arbitraje: ¿Fuera de lugar en la Global Zoom Jurisdiction? | Masterclass. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT8PdniuYrM.
Imposing Virtual Arbitration Hearings in Times of COVID-19: The Swiss Perspective. (2021, January 14). Kluwer Arbitration Blog. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration. com/2021/01/14/imposing-virtual-arbitration-hearings-in-times-of-covid-19-the-swissperspective/.
Khanna, V. (2021, April 14). Economic damage from vaccine nationalism. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/economic-damage-from-vaccine-nationalism?_cldee=c3VzYW5hLm9yY2VyYUBpY2NzcGFpbi5vcmc%3d&recipientid=contact-35c7 980666eee911a812000d3aba7712-098bfdb216454e3ba0cd3860fa69847c&esid=bedd8c74-bb9e-eb11-b1ac-000d3ad8fbae.
The U.S. and China Are Battling for Influence in Latin America, and the Pandemic Has Raised the Stakes. (n.d.). Time. Retrieved October 17, 2021, from https://time.com/5936037/us-china-latin-america-influence/.
Unequal Vaccine Distribution Self-Defeating, World Health Organization Chief Tells Economic and Social Council’s Special Ministerial Meeting | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/ecosoc7039.doc.htm.
U.S. blocks WTO judge reappointment as dispute settlement crisis looms | Reuters. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-wtoidUSKCN1LC19O.
U.S. is about to cripple the WTO dispute-settling system—Los Angeles Times. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-12-09/us-to-cripple-world-trade-organizations-appeals-system.
‘Vaccine nationalism’ threatens global plan to distribute COVID-19 shots fairly. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.science.org/content/article/vaccine-nationalismthreatens-global-plan-distribute-covid-19-shots-fairly.
New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 10 June 1958.
OAS (2021). Resolution 1/2021. Organization of American States, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Organization of American States.
OAS (2021). The Equitable Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines. Organization of American States, Permanent Council. OAS.
Principles of European Contract Law, 2002.
UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 2016, available at https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-i.pdf. Argentinian Civil Code, 1869 (Código de Vélez).
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Pedro Lacasa Gonzalez - 2023
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Pedro Lacasa Gonzalez - 2023
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Departamento de Derecho Económico
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/view/8541
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/3f977608-ef8d-4fcd-ab9a-e950625b0fc3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f2c2a45cef375ec048f5828f68f31120
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1814100431853322240
spelling Gonzalez , Pedro Lacasa2023-02-01T10:53:31Z2024-06-07T06:32:25Z2023-02-01T10:53:31Z2024-06-07T06:32:25Z2023-02-01El Derecho Internacional Económico (DIE) es una materia cuya fluidez le ha permitido cambiar significantemente a lo largo de los años. El DIE nunca ha sido un sistema rígido y fijo de reglas y, al igual que todas las áreas del Derecho, ha ido fluctuando conforme a las circunstancias socioeconómicas de una determinada época y este factor determinante del DIE le ha permitido adaptarse en el tiempo. Han sido siempre la acción, el pensamiento y la ideología humanas los que construyeron las bases sociales e internacionales para el desarrollo del DIE. La pandemia del 2020 ha sido indudablemente uno de esos eventos que cambiaron drásticamente las circunstancias de una determinada época. La pandemia ha establecido una “nueva normalidad”. Sin embargo, es sabido que lo “normal” es un concepto que también fluctúa a lo largo del tiempo y que resulta del consenso de una determinada época. Lo que es normal hoy tal vez no haya sido normal 30 años atrás. Lo que era normal 50 años atrás tal vez no sea normal hoy en día. No obstante, el DIE parece desconocer este hecho: la mayoría de las instituciones del Derecho Internacional Público han sido creadas dentro de un sistema de naciones-Estado organizado hace siglos con el Tratado de Westfalia y abrazando el Multilateralismo. Y aunque el DIE pretenda resolver los problemas internacionales que puedan surgir a través de una visión desfasada, el Multilateralismo no ha resultado ser tan eficiente como se pensaba, especialmente en los esfuerzos internacionales contra la pandemia del Covid-19. Quizás sea necesario algunos ajustes o actualizaciones. A pesar de la mutabilidad del DIE, la mayoría de los postulados y premisas del Derecho Internacional han sido puestos a prueba con la emergencia de la tecnología como medio de interacción humana a nivel internacional. Esto ha alterado tanto al Derecho Internacional Público como al Derecho Internacional Privado. Un ejemplo importante es el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, cuyo marco legal está basado en un Tratado Internacional de los años 50 y cuya Ley Modelo más popular data de los años 80. Tal vez algunas actualizaciones sean convenientes también en este respecto. La pandemia del año 2020 provocó una rotura sin precedentes en la cadena de contratos a nivel internacional, afectando directamente a la cadena de suministros. Las armas legales para hacer frente a este rompimiento contractual internacional masivo fueron los remedios legales diseñados precisamente para las situaciones de incumplimiento contractual cuando un factor externo ha ocasionado que la obligación contractual resultase demasiado onerosa o de cumplimiento imposible. Estos remedios legales provienen de dos fuentes: el Derecho positivo y el soft law. La ausencia de un Derecho positivo uniforme derivó en soluciones legales distintas a un mismo problema de derecho contractual internacional. Y aunque el DIE reconozca la diversidad cultural y sociológica de las diferentes jurisdicciones, aboga por la uniformidad y la previsibilidad. Esta obra no contiene soluciones mágicas para estos asuntos internacionales: prefiere exponer algunos de los problemas concernientes al porvenir del DIE de una manera objetiva en lugar de la indiferencia actual hacia los mismos.International Economic Law (IEL) is a fluid topic, and it has changed significantly over the course of years. It has never been a steady system and just as in all fields of the Law, IEL has been fluctuating in response of the social and economic circumstances of a determined period, and this determinant feature has enabled IEL to adapt itself over time. It has always been human action, thoughts and ideology what built the social and international basis for the development of IEL. The 2020 pandemic was certainly one of those events that changed drastically the circumstances of a determined period. It established a “new normality”. Nevertheless, it is understood that what is “normal” is a concept that also fluctuates over time and result from the consensus of a of certain period. What is normal today has might not be so normal in 30 years. What was normal 50 years ago might not be normal today. However, IEL seem to disregard this fact: most of the Public International Law institutions have been created within a system of nation-States orchestrated centuries ago with the Westphalian Treaty and praising Multilateralism. And even though IEL pretends to solve the international issues that may arise through an outdated vision, Multilateralism proved not to be as efficient or as consistent as it supposed to be, especially in the transnational battle against COVID-19 pandemic. Adjustments or updates may be conceivable. Despite IEL mutable conditions, most of the core ideas, assumptions and postulates of International Law has been challenged since the emergence of technology as a medium for international human interaction. This fact altered Public International Law as Private International Law. One significant example is International Commercial Arbitration, whose legal framework is based on a Treaty from the 50’s and whose most popular Model Law of its field comes from the 80’s. Perhaps an update is required here too. The 2020 pandemic provoked an unprecedent break in the international contractual chain, cracking the supply chain worldwide. The legal munitions to face these massive international contractual breaches were the legal remedies designed precisely to deal with contractual underperforming or breach when an external factor rendered the contractual obligation too expensive or simply of impossible performing. These legal remedies came from two sources: from soft law and hard law. The lack of uniform hard law legal remedies resulted in different solutions to a same international contractual problem. And albeit IEL acknowledges the cultural and sociological differences that exist in the distinct domestic jurisdictions, it advocates for uniformity and predictability. This paper does not provide magical solutions for these problems; it prefers to expose some of these international issues concerning the future of IEL in an objective manner in lieu of the current indifference on them.application/pdf10.18601/01236458.n57.082346-20780123-6458https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15243https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n57.08spaDepartamento de Derecho Económicohttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/download/8541/13101Núm. 57 , Año 2022 : Enero-Junio19057157Con-textoAmon, J. J. (2020). COVID-19 and Detention: Respecting Human Rights. 22(1), 5.Aksar, Y. (Ed.). (2011). Implementing international economic law: Through dispute settlement mechanisms. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Born, G. (2020). International Commercial Arbitration, 3d Edition. Kluwer Law International.Collins, D. (2017). An Introduction to International Investment Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Cook, T., & Garcia, A. (2010). Benefits and Limitations of International Arbitration for IP Disputes. En T. Cook, & A. Garcia, International Intellectual Property Arbitration. Kluwer Law International.Fauvarque-Cosson, B. (2003). Principes du Droit Européen du Contrat. Paris, France: Société de législation comparée.Gaillard, E. (2008). Aspects philosophiques du droit de l’arbitrage international. La Haye, Netherlands: The Hague Academy of International Law.Gaillard, E. (2009). The Urgency of Not Revising the New York Convention. En I. &. International (Ed.), ICCA International Arbitration Conference (págs. 689-696). Kluwer Law International.Gásperi, L. D. (1964). Anteproyecto de Código Civil. Asunción, Paraguay: El Gráfico.Goode, R. (2001). The Role of the Lex Loci Arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration International, 17(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008973626914.Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law. OUP Oxford.Marisa Herrera, G. C. (2015). Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación Comentado. Libro Tercero. Tomo IV. Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. Buenos Aires: Dirección Nacional del Sisema Argentino de Información Jurídica.Herdegen, M. (2021). International Economic Law. 21.International economic law: General course on public international law. (n.d.). [Data set]. Koninklijke Brill NV. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789024735556.009-264.Jansen, N., & Zimmermann, R. (2018). Non-Performance and Remedies in General. In N. Jansen & R. Zimmermann, Commentaries on European Contract Laws. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790693.003.0009.Joubin-Bret, A. (2019). Foreword: Celebration of the 60th Anniversary of the New York Convention. En K. F. Gomez, & A. M. Lopez-Rodriguez, 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges (págs. pp v–500). Kluwer Law International.Káposznyák, A. (2019). The Expanding Role of the New York Convention in Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards. En K. F. Gómez, & A. M. (eds), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges. Kluwer Law International.Kessedjian, C. (September de 2005). Competing Approaches to Force Majeure and Hardship. International Review of Law and Economics(25), 641–670.Kirmser, R. T. (2008). Responsabilidad Civil: una materia en constante evolución. La responsabilidad sin culpa. En C. S. Justicia, Responsabilidad Civil. Daños y Perjuicios. Asunción, Paraguay: Intercontinental.Lacasa, P. (2021). Infraestructura Municipal: Personería Jurídica, Contratos de Construcción y Arbitraje. (I. Editores, Ed.) Buenos Aires, Argentina: IJ Editores.Latty, F. (2004). Le droit transnational économique. En P. Daillier, G. d. Pradelle, & H. Ghérari, Droit de l’économie internationale. Paris, France: Centre de droit international de l’Université Paris X.Ongenae, K., & Piers, M. (2022). Procedural Formalities in Arbitration: Towards a Technologically Neutral Legal Framework. 24.Paulsson, J. (2013). The Idea of Arbitration. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564163.001.0001.Racine, J.-B. (2020). Le droit économique au XXI siècle. Notions et enjeux. Paris: lgdj.Sanders, P. (1979). A Twenty Years’s Review of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. International Lawyer(269), 20.Toth, O. (2019). The New York Convention and Investment Arbitration: Harmony or Tension? En K. F. Gómez, & A. M.-R. (eds), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges. Kluwer Law International.Titi, C. (2021). The Function of Equity in International Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Smit, R. H. (2022). Chapter 24: The Future of Science and Technology in International Arbitration: The Next Thirty Years. 12.Alland, D., Chetail, V., de Frouville, O., & Viñuales, J. E. (Eds.). (2014). 31. La lex arbitrii dans l’arbitrage commercial international: Mythe ou réalité? In Unité et diversité du droit international/Unity and Diversity of International Law (pp. 669–688). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004262393_032.Arcuri, A. (2020). International Economic Law and Disintegration: Beware the Schmittean Moment. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa012.Gaillard, E. (2011, January 20). Le nouveau droit français de l’arbitrage interne et international. Recueil Dalloz(3).Bateson, D. (2020, July). Virtual Arbitration: The Impact of COVID-19. Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 9(1), 159-170.Hirschmann, G. (2021). The Reassertion of National Sovereignty: A Challenge to International Organizations’ Survival? Security and Human Rights, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230- bja10003.Harris, R. A. (2014). Corporativism. In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp. 743–745). American Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0210.Ingrid Katz et all. (8 de April de 2021). From Vaccine Nationalism to Vaccine Equity–Finding a Path Forward. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1281-1283.Ferrari, F. (2021). Plures leges faciunt arbitrum. Arbitration International, 37(3), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiab004.Fach, K. (2015). Enforcing Global Law: international arbitration and informal regulatory instruments. The journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law(47), 112-139.Kallel, S. (2008). Online Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 25(3), 345-353.Kaufmann-Kohler, G. (2003). Globalization of Arbitral Procedure. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 36.Lacasa, P. (2019). El Arbitraje como ventaja competitiva en el mundo empresarial: el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional y el Arbitraje de Inversiones. Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Católica “Nuestra Señora de la Asunción”(28), 37-60.Lacasa, P. (October de 2021). Arbitraje de la construcción y un triángulo amoroso: donde el Arbitraje Comercial Internacional y el Arbitraje de Inversiones chocan (Parte I). Revista Arbitraje Alumni(2), 207 – 240.Mance, J. (2016). Arbitration: A Law unto itself? Arbitration International, 32(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiv072.Pejovic, Caslav—”Civil Law and Common Law: Two Different Paths Leading to the Same Goal” [2001] VUWLawRw 42; (2001) 32 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 817. (n.d.). Retrieved October 29, 2021, from http://www.nzlii.org/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2001/42.html.Warusfel, B. (September-October de 2008). Le droit économique et ses juges. Revue de l’Association des Sciences-Po(152), 20-24.Pinsolle, P. (2022). Arbitration and New Technologies. 7.Scott, D. (2012). Norms of Self-Determination: Thinking Sovereignty Through. Middle East Law and Governance, 4(2–3), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/18763375-00403003.Smit, R. H. (2022). Chapter 24: The Future of Science and Technology In International Arbitration: The Next Thirty Years. 12.Sykes, A. O. (2005). Public vs. Private Enforcement of International Economic Law: Of Standing and Remedy. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.671801.The principles and standards of international economic law. (n.d.). [Data set]. Koninklijke Brill NV. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789028615427.001-098.Vargas, A., & Geuna, T. (2021, September). Arbitraje internacional en tiempos de pandemia COVID-19: un análisis del debido proceso y los retos que implican las audiencias remotas. Revista Arbitraje Alumni(2).Vargas, D. M. B. (2021). Las nuevas fronteras del derecho económico internacional. Con-texto, 56, 7–8. https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n56.01.Yu, H.-L., & Nasir, M. (2022). Can Online Arbitration Exist Within the Traditional Arbitration Framework? 15.Agarwal, R., & Gopinath, G. (2021). A proposal to end the COVID-19 Pandemic. IMF Staff Discussion Note, International Monetary Fund.Forneris, X., & Mocheva, N. (2018). How Countries Can Fully Implement the New York Convention. World Bank, Finance, Competitiveness and Innovation, Washington.Fromont, M. (1973). Rapport sur le droit économique français. Commision des communautés européennes. Bruxelles: Collection Études.UN. (24 de September de 2021). UN Web TV–Paraguay, President Addresses General Debate, 76th Session. Recuperado el February de 2022, de UN Web TV: https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1s/k1sgfcyote.Blogs and web sitesA Proposal to End the COVID-19 Pandemic. (n.d.). IMF. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2021/05/19/AProposal-to-End-the-COVID-19-Pandemic-460263.About our Alliance. (n.d.). Retrieved October 5, 2021, from https://www.gavi.org/our-alliance/about.Chan, R. (n.d.). The Cambridge Analytica whistleblower explains how the firm used Facebook data to sway elections. Business Insider. Retrieved October 2, 2021, from https://www.businessinsider.com/cambridge-analytica-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-facebookdata-2019-10.COVID-19 Response: 96% Of Global Destinations Impose Travel Restrictions, UNWTO Reports | UNWTO. (n.d.). Retrieved October 27, 2021, from https://www.unwto.org/news/covid-19-response-travel-restrictions.Facultad de Derecho Universidad Austral. (2021). Intervención judicial en el arbitraje: ¿Fuera de lugar en la Global Zoom Jurisdiction? | Masterclass. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT8PdniuYrM.Imposing Virtual Arbitration Hearings in Times of COVID-19: The Swiss Perspective. (2021, January 14). Kluwer Arbitration Blog. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration. com/2021/01/14/imposing-virtual-arbitration-hearings-in-times-of-covid-19-the-swissperspective/.Khanna, V. (2021, April 14). Economic damage from vaccine nationalism. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/economic-damage-from-vaccine-nationalism?_cldee=c3VzYW5hLm9yY2VyYUBpY2NzcGFpbi5vcmc%3d&recipientid=contact-35c7 980666eee911a812000d3aba7712-098bfdb216454e3ba0cd3860fa69847c&esid=bedd8c74-bb9e-eb11-b1ac-000d3ad8fbae.The U.S. and China Are Battling for Influence in Latin America, and the Pandemic Has Raised the Stakes. (n.d.). Time. Retrieved October 17, 2021, from https://time.com/5936037/us-china-latin-america-influence/.Unequal Vaccine Distribution Self-Defeating, World Health Organization Chief Tells Economic and Social Council’s Special Ministerial Meeting | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/ecosoc7039.doc.htm.U.S. blocks WTO judge reappointment as dispute settlement crisis looms | Reuters. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-wtoidUSKCN1LC19O.U.S. is about to cripple the WTO dispute-settling system—Los Angeles Times. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-12-09/us-to-cripple-world-trade-organizations-appeals-system.‘Vaccine nationalism’ threatens global plan to distribute COVID-19 shots fairly. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.science.org/content/article/vaccine-nationalismthreatens-global-plan-distribute-covid-19-shots-fairly.New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York, 10 June 1958.OAS (2021). Resolution 1/2021. Organization of American States, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Organization of American States.OAS (2021). The Equitable Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines. Organization of American States, Permanent Council. OAS.Principles of European Contract Law, 2002.UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, 2016, available at https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2016-English-i.pdf. Argentinian Civil Code, 1869 (Código de Vélez).Pedro Lacasa Gonzalez - 2023info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/view/8541International Economic Law;Pandemic;Multilateralism;Lex arbitrii;Legal Remedy.Derecho Internacional Económico;Pandemia;Multilateralismo;Lex arbitrii;Remedio legal.New (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 PandemicNew (and inevitable) Horizons for International Economic Law: The Aftermath of the 2020 PandemicArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2568https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/3f977608-ef8d-4fcd-ab9a-e950625b0fc3/downloadf2c2a45cef375ec048f5828f68f31120MD51001/15243oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/152432024-06-07 01:32:26.078http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Pedro Lacasa Gonzalez - 2023https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Publicaciones similares