A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?

The article revolves around the doctrine of precedent within the so-called European legal space, wondering whether and to what extent we can speak of a convergence towards a stare decisis model boosted by the harmonizing role of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The article argues that alt...

Full description

Autores:
Civitarese, Stefano
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/25681
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25681
https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n14.09
Palabra clave:
Stare Decisis
Precedent
European Union Law
Administrative Law
Judicial Liability
Rights
openAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id uexternad2_8b4e44df6c67c2d0a68b770863e8ef2e
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/25681
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
title A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
spellingShingle A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
Stare Decisis
Precedent
European Union Law
Administrative Law
Judicial Liability
title_short A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
title_full A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
title_fullStr A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
title_full_unstemmed A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
title_sort A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Civitarese, Stefano
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Civitarese, Stefano
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Stare Decisis
Precedent
European Union Law
Administrative Law
Judicial Liability
topic Stare Decisis
Precedent
European Union Law
Administrative Law
Judicial Liability
description The article revolves around the doctrine of precedent within the so-called European legal space, wondering whether and to what extent we can speak of a convergence towards a stare decisis model boosted by the harmonizing role of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The article argues that although there are still some differences between civil law and common law legal systems they regard more the style of reasoning and the deep understanding of the relationship between the present decision of a court and past judicial decisions than the very existence of the constraints of the latter upon the former. The article concludes that a sort of mechanism of stare decisis has in fact been created, even though, on the one hand, uncertainty remains as to the way in which the binding force of a precedent concretely operates in the system, and on the other hand, this mechanism relates exclusively to the relationships between past and future decisions of higher courts (horizontal effect). This change, far from being a shift towards a truly judge-made law system or a consequence of the final abandonment of the dictates of the rule of law, enhances legal certainty contributing to the fundamental requirement of stability of law as a feature of the ideal of the rule of law.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-11T00:00:00Z
2025-04-09T17:59:41Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-11T00:00:00Z
2025-04-09T17:59:41Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-11
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/21452946.n14.09
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2145-2946
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25681
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n14.09
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/21452946.n14.09
2145-2946
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25681
https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n14.09
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/download/4296/4880
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/download/4296/5029
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 14 , Año 2015 : Julio-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 194
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 14
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 173
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Amull, A. (1993). Owning up to fallibility: Precedent and the Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review 30, pp. 247-248.
Civitarese, S. & G. Gardini (2013). Il primato del diritto comunitario e l’autonomia processuale degli Stati membri: alla ricerca di un equilibrio sostenibile. Diritto Pubblico 1, 1.
Civitarese, S. (forthcoming). Obbligo di interpretazione conforme al diritto ue e principio di autonomia procedurale in relazione al diritto amministrativo nazionale. Riv. It. Dir. Pubblico Comunitario.
Conway, G. (2012). The limits of legal reasoning and the European Court of Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Cross, R. & J. W. Harris (1991). Precedent in English Law. Clarendon Press.
Deoorter, B. & F. Parisi (2004). Legal precedents and judicial discretion. In C. K.
Rowley & F. Schneider (eds.) (2004). The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Kluwer.
Follieri, E. (2012). L’introduzione del principio dello stare decisis nell’ordinamento italiano, con particolare riferimento alle sentenze dell’Adunanza Plenaria del Consiglio di Stato. Dir. Proc. Amm., p. 1255.
Garner, J.W. (1924). French Administrative Law. The Yale Journal, vol. 33, n.º 6, pp. 597-627.
Komarek, J. (2008-09). Judicial lawmaking and precedent in supreme courts: The European Court of Justice compared to the us Supreme Court and the French Cour de cassation. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 399.
Luiso, F. P. (2003). Il vincolo delle Sezioni semplici al precedente delle Sezioni unite. Giur. It., 820.
Lundmark, T. (2012). Charting the Divide between Common Law and Civil Law. Oxford University Press.
McAuliffe, K. (2013). Precedent at the Court of Justice of the European Union: The linguistic aspect. In M.
Freeman & F. Smith (eds.). Law and Language: Current Legal Issues, vol. 15, pp. 483-493.
Oggianu, S. (2011). Giurisdizione amministrativa e funzione nomofilattica. L’adunanza plenaria del Consiglio di Stato. Cedam.
Sassani, B. (2006). Il nuovo giudizio di Cassazione. Riv. Dir. Proc., 217.
Shauer, F. (2009). Thinking Like a Lawyer. Harvard University Press, pp. 44-54.
Speziale, V. (2011). Le sezioni unite della cassazione del 2010 sul termine di impugnazione del licenziamento e sul deposito del testo del contratto collettivo. Rivista It. Diritto del Lavoro 3, p. 1009.
Stone, J. (1959). The ratio of the ratio decidendi. Modern Law Review 22(6), pp. 597-620.
Stone, A. & M. McCowan (2003). Discretion and precedent in European Law. In O. Wiklund (ed.) (2003). Judicial Discretion in European Perspective. Kluwer.
Stone, A. (2004). The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford University Press
Tridimas, T. (2012). Precedent and the Court of Justice. A Jurisprudence of Doubt? In J. Dickinson & P. Eleftheriadis (eds.). Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.
Verde, G. (2012). Ius litigatoris e ius constitutionis. In G. Verde (ed.). Il difficile rapporto tra giudice e legge. Napoli.
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/view/4296
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/c32170a1-98d1-47b1-9fcc-7de0576a62b0/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a898d4831033bcd25b34f63ce88f59b8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1834110527009193984
spelling Civitarese, Stefano2015-12-11T00:00:00Z2025-04-09T17:59:41Z2015-12-11T00:00:00Z2025-04-09T17:59:41Z2015-12-11The article revolves around the doctrine of precedent within the so-called European legal space, wondering whether and to what extent we can speak of a convergence towards a stare decisis model boosted by the harmonizing role of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The article argues that although there are still some differences between civil law and common law legal systems they regard more the style of reasoning and the deep understanding of the relationship between the present decision of a court and past judicial decisions than the very existence of the constraints of the latter upon the former. The article concludes that a sort of mechanism of stare decisis has in fact been created, even though, on the one hand, uncertainty remains as to the way in which the binding force of a precedent concretely operates in the system, and on the other hand, this mechanism relates exclusively to the relationships between past and future decisions of higher courts (horizontal effect). This change, far from being a shift towards a truly judge-made law system or a consequence of the final abandonment of the dictates of the rule of law, enhances legal certainty contributing to the fundamental requirement of stability of law as a feature of the ideal of the rule of law.application/pdftext/html10.18601/21452946.n14.092145-2946https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25681https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n14.09spaUniversidad Externado de Colombiahttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/download/4296/4880https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/download/4296/5029Núm. 14 , Año 2015 : Julio-Diciembre19414173Revista Digital de Derecho AdministrativoAmull, A. (1993). Owning up to fallibility: Precedent and the Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review 30, pp. 247-248.Civitarese, S. & G. Gardini (2013). Il primato del diritto comunitario e l’autonomia processuale degli Stati membri: alla ricerca di un equilibrio sostenibile. Diritto Pubblico 1, 1.Civitarese, S. (forthcoming). Obbligo di interpretazione conforme al diritto ue e principio di autonomia procedurale in relazione al diritto amministrativo nazionale. Riv. It. Dir. Pubblico Comunitario.Conway, G. (2012). The limits of legal reasoning and the European Court of Justice. Cambridge University Press.Cross, R. & J. W. Harris (1991). Precedent in English Law. Clarendon Press.Deoorter, B. & F. Parisi (2004). Legal precedents and judicial discretion. In C. K.Rowley & F. Schneider (eds.) (2004). The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Kluwer.Follieri, E. (2012). L’introduzione del principio dello stare decisis nell’ordinamento italiano, con particolare riferimento alle sentenze dell’Adunanza Plenaria del Consiglio di Stato. Dir. Proc. Amm., p. 1255.Garner, J.W. (1924). French Administrative Law. The Yale Journal, vol. 33, n.º 6, pp. 597-627.Komarek, J. (2008-09). Judicial lawmaking and precedent in supreme courts: The European Court of Justice compared to the us Supreme Court and the French Cour de cassation. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 399.Luiso, F. P. (2003). Il vincolo delle Sezioni semplici al precedente delle Sezioni unite. Giur. It., 820.Lundmark, T. (2012). Charting the Divide between Common Law and Civil Law. Oxford University Press.McAuliffe, K. (2013). Precedent at the Court of Justice of the European Union: The linguistic aspect. In M.Freeman & F. Smith (eds.). Law and Language: Current Legal Issues, vol. 15, pp. 483-493.Oggianu, S. (2011). Giurisdizione amministrativa e funzione nomofilattica. L’adunanza plenaria del Consiglio di Stato. Cedam.Sassani, B. (2006). Il nuovo giudizio di Cassazione. Riv. Dir. Proc., 217.Shauer, F. (2009). Thinking Like a Lawyer. Harvard University Press, pp. 44-54.Speziale, V. (2011). Le sezioni unite della cassazione del 2010 sul termine di impugnazione del licenziamento e sul deposito del testo del contratto collettivo. Rivista It. Diritto del Lavoro 3, p. 1009.Stone, J. (1959). The ratio of the ratio decidendi. Modern Law Review 22(6), pp. 597-620.Stone, A. & M. McCowan (2003). Discretion and precedent in European Law. In O. Wiklund (ed.) (2003). Judicial Discretion in European Perspective. Kluwer.Stone, A. (2004). The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford University PressTridimas, T. (2012). Precedent and the Court of Justice. A Jurisprudence of Doubt? In J. Dickinson & P. Eleftheriadis (eds.). Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.Verde, G. (2012). Ius litigatoris e ius constitutionis. In G. Verde (ed.). Il difficile rapporto tra giudice e legge. Napoli.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/view/4296Stare DecisisPrecedentEuropean Union LawAdministrative LawJudicial LiabilityA European convergence towards a stare decisis model?A European convergence towards a stare decisis model?Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2477https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/c32170a1-98d1-47b1-9fcc-7de0576a62b0/downloada898d4831033bcd25b34f63ce88f59b8MD51001/25681oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/256812025-04-09 12:59:41.21https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org