Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo

Este ensayo muestra la influencia de Max Weber en el interés de Frank Knight por combinar la teoría económica y la historia económica comparada. En el periodo de entreguerras –cuando la enseñanza de la economía tenía un carácter pluralista– Knight se opuso al institucionalismo y defendió el estatus...

Full description

Autores:: Emmett, Ross

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_81ab1a2e9b51041332b49e772295606b
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/12266
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Frank Knight, Max Weber, Chicago economics, and institutionalism
title	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo
spellingShingle	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo institutionalism, neoclassical economics, ideal type, comparative history A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01 institucionalismo, economía neoclásica, tipo ideal, historia comparada A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01 institucionalismo, economia neoclássica, tipo ideal, história comparativa A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01
title_short	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo
title_full	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo
title_fullStr	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo
title_full_unstemmed	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo
title_sort	Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Emmett, Ross
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Emmett, Ross
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	institutionalism, neoclassical economics, ideal type, comparative history A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01
topic	institutionalism, neoclassical economics, ideal type, comparative history A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01 institucionalismo, economía neoclásica, tipo ideal, historia comparada A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01 institucionalismo, economia neoclássica, tipo ideal, história comparativa A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	institucionalismo, economía neoclásica, tipo ideal, historia comparada A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01 institucionalismo, economia neoclássica, tipo ideal, história comparativa A12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01
description	Este ensayo muestra la influencia de Max Weber en el interés de Frank Knight por combinar la teoría económica y la historia económica comparada. En el periodo de entreguerras –cuando la enseñanza de la economía tenía un carácter pluralista– Knight se opuso al institucionalismo y defendió el estatus científico de la teoría neoclásica, pero sus lecturas de Weber Knight lo llevaron a considerar que el&nbsp; equilibrio y la competencia perfecta eran “tipos ideales”, construcciones útiles para la teorización pero que nunca se observan en la realidad. Ayudan a identificar los elementos centrales, pero el estudio de cómo cambian no es objeto de la teoría. Se debe recurrir entonces a la historia, en la que los cambios no se asemejan a equilibrios. En la posguerra apareció un nuevo estándar científico, que redefinió la disciplina y relegó la obra de Knight al ámbito no científico de la “filosofía social”.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-01 07:01:15 2022-09-09T21:18:51Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-01 07:01:15 2022-09-09T21:18:51Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-01
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/01245996.v23n45.02
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2450
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0124-5996
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12266
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v23n45.02
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/01245996.v23n45.02 2346-2450 0124-5996
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12266 https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v23n45.02
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/7327/10054
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 45 , Año 2021 : Julio-diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	22
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	45
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	3
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	23
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista de Economía Institucional
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	<p>Boyd, R. (1996). Knight and Weber. E-mail al autor, 11 de septiembre.<br>Boyd, R. (1997). Frank H. Knight, Talcott Parsons, and Max Weber. Manuscrito sin publicar.<br>Brouwer, M.T. (2002). Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on entrepreneurship and economic development. En J. S. Metcalfe y U. Cantner (eds.), Change, transformation and development (pp. 145-168). Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.<br>Camic, C. (1991). Introduction: Talcott Parsons before The structure of social action. En C. Camic (ed.), Talcott Parsons: The early essays, (pp. ix-lxix). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.<br>Collins, R. (1980). Weber’s last theory of capitalism: A systematization. American Sociological Review, 45(6), 925-942.<br>Ebner, A. (2005). Knight and Weber. E-mail al autor, 25 de abril.<br>Emmett, R. B. (1997). “What is truth” in capital theory? Five stories relevant to the evaluation of Frank Knight’s contribution to the capital controversy. History of Political Economy, 29(sup. 1), 231-252.<br>Emmett, R. B. (1999a). Frank Hyneman Knight Papers 1910-1972: Finding guide. En W. Samuels (ed.), Research in the history of economic thought and methodology, Archival Supplement v. 9 (pp. 101-273). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.<br>Emmett, R. B. (1999b). The economist and the entrepreneur: Modernist impulses in Frank H. Knight’s Risk, uncertainty and profit. History of Political Economy, 31(1), 29-52. Reimpreso en Emmett, R. B. (2009, 48-62).<br>Emmett, R. B. (2009). Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American economics. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.<br>Hodgson, G. (2001). Frank Knight as Institutionalist economist. En J. E. Biddle, J. B. Davis y S. G. Medema (eds.), Economics broadly considered: Essays in honor of Warren J. Samuels (pp. 61-90). Londres: Routledge.<br>Gonce, R. A. (1996). F. H. Knight on social philosophy and economic theory: The beginnings. En W. Samuels y J. Biddle (eds.), Research in the history of economic thought and methodology, v. 14 (pp. 1-22). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.<br>Kloppenberg, J. T. (1986). Uncertain victory: Social democracy and progressivism in European and American thought, 1870-1920. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.<br>Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston y Nueva York: Houghton Mifflin.<br>Knight, F. (1924). The limitations of scientific method in economics. En R. G. Tugwell (ed.), The trend of economics (pp. 229-267). Nueva York: Knopf.<br>Knight, F. (1925). Carta a J. Viner, 9 de septiembre, Jacob Viner Papers, Public Policy Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library.<br>Knight, F. (1927). Translator’s Introduction. En M. Weber, General Economic History. Nueva York: Greenberg.<br>Knight, F. (1928). Historical and theoretical issues in the problem of modern capitalism. Journal of Economic and Business History, 1, 119-136.<br>Knight, F. (1930). Statik und Dynamik: zur Frage der Mechanischen Analogie in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften, A. Mahr, trad. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 2(1),-1-26. Reimpreso como Statics and dynamics en F. Knight. (1997). The ethics of competition (pp. 153-177). Londres-Nueva York: Routledge, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 1 (pp. 149-71). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1933). The economic organization, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reimpreso en The economic organization: With an article, “Notes on cost and utility” (1951). Nueva York: A. M. Kelley.<br>Knight, F. (1935). Economic theory and nationalism. En The ethics of competition. Nueva York: Harper.<br>Knight, F. (1936a). Carta a T. Parsons, 1 de mayo. Talcott Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG(FP) 42.8.2, Box 2, Pusey Library.<br>Knight, F. (1936b). Carta a Abram L. Harris, 27 de mayo de 1936, Frank H. Knight Papers, Box 60, Folder 6, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.<br>Knight, F. (1940a). “What is truth” in economics? Journal of Political Economy, 48(1), 1-32. Reimpreso en On the History and Method of Economics (1956). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999), Selected essays by Frank H Knight, v. 1 (pp. 372-399). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1940b). Socialism: The nature of the problem. Ethics, 50, 253-289. Reimpreso en Freedom and reform: Essays in economics and social philosophy (1947). Nueva York: Harper, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 77-106). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1941). Anthropology and economics. Journal of Political Economy, 49, 247-268. Reimpreso en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999) Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 107-125). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1944). Realism and relevance in the theory of demand. Journal of Political Economy, 52(4). 289-318. Reimpreso en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 243-283). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1946). The sickness of liberal society. Ethics, 56(2), 79-95. Reimpreso en F. Knight, (1992). Freedom and reform: Essays in economics and social philosophy [1947] (pp. 440-478). Indianapolis: Liberty Press.<br>Knight, F. (1947). Freedom and reform: Essays in economics and social philosophy. Nueva York: Harper.<br>Knight, F. (1951). Economics and ethics of the wage problem. En D. M. Wright (ed.) The impact of the union. Nueva York: Harcourt Brace, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 336-360), Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1960). Intelligence and democratic action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.<br>Knight, F. (1962). Philosophy and social institutions in the West. En C. A. Moore (ed.). Philosophy and culture: East and West. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press. Reimpreso en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 149-171). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1991). The case for Communism: From the standpoint of an ex-Liberal [1933]. En W. J. Samuels (ed.). Research in the history of economic thought and methodology, archival supplement 2 (pp. 57-108). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.<br>Knight, F. y Merriam, T. (1945). The economic order and religion, Nueva York: Harper.<br>May, H. F. (1949). Protestant churches and industrial America. Nueva York: Harper.<br>Morgan, M. S. y Rutherford, M. (1998). From interwar pluralism to postwar Neoclassicism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.<br>Neill, R. (1972). A new theory of value: The Canadian economics of H. A. Innis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.<br>Nopenney, C. (1997). Frank Knight and the Historical School. En P. Koslowski (ed.). Methodology of the social sciences, ethics and economics in the Newer Historical School: From Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker. Berlín: Springer.<br>Parsons, T. (1927). Carta a P. H. Douglas, 13 de noviembre. Talcott Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.2, Pusey Library.<br>Parsons, T. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.<br>Rodgers, D. T. (1982). In search of progressivism. Reviews in American History, 10(4), 113-131.<br>Rutherford, M. (1997). American Institutionalism and the history of economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(2), 178-195.<br>Shils, E. (1981). Some academics, mainly in Chicago. American Scholar 50(2), 179-196.<br>Schweitzer, A. (1975). Frank Knight’s social economics. History of Political Economy, 7(3), 279-292.<br>Stigler, G. (1987). Frank Hyneman Knight. En J. Eatwell, M. Milgate y P. Newman (eds.). The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, v. 3 (pp. 55-59). Nueva York: Stockton Press.<br>Tugwell, R. G. (ed.). (1924). The trend of economics. Nueva York: A. A. Knopf.<br>UCRC. (1952). Minutes of the Faculty Seminar on The Role of Ideologies in Economic Development, University of Chicago Research Center in Economic Development and Cultural Change, 11 de marzo, Frank H. Knight Papers, Box 24 Folder 24, Special Collections Research Collection, University of Chicago Library.<br>Yonay, Y. P. (1998). The struggle over the soul of economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical economists in America between the wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.<br>Young, A. A. (1927). Carta a F. H. Knight, 25 de febrero. Frank H. Knight Papers, Box 62, Folder 24, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.<br>Yu, T. F-L. (2002). The economics of Frank H. Knight: An Austrian interpretation. Forum for Social Economics, 31, 1-23.</p> <p> </p>
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Ross Emmett - 2021
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv	Ross Emmett - 2021 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/7327
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/3bec54ea-94e7-433d-9737-ef93bdc747ff/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	9b4dfaef30a1b66c2d541e64ae98b8d0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1814100512382910464
spelling	Emmett, Rossa91bf27d-9947-4002-852f-2a18e88f8e662021-07-01 07:01:152022-09-09T21:18:51Z2021-07-01 07:01:152022-09-09T21:18:51Z2021-07-01Este ensayo muestra la influencia de Max Weber en el interés de Frank Knight por combinar la teoría económica y la historia económica comparada. En el periodo de entreguerras –cuando la enseñanza de la economía tenía un carácter pluralista– Knight se opuso al institucionalismo y defendió el estatus científico de la teoría neoclásica, pero sus lecturas de Weber Knight lo llevaron a considerar que el&nbsp; equilibrio y la competencia perfecta eran “tipos ideales”, construcciones útiles para la teorización pero que nunca se observan en la realidad. Ayudan a identificar los elementos centrales, pero el estudio de cómo cambian no es objeto de la teoría. Se debe recurrir entonces a la historia, en la que los cambios no se asemejan a equilibrios. En la posguerra apareció un nuevo estándar científico, que redefinió la disciplina y relegó la obra de Knight al ámbito no científico de la “filosofía social”.This essay shows the influence of Max Weber on Frank Knight’s interest in combining economic theory and comparative economic history. In the interwar period –when the teaching of economics had a pluralistic character–Knight opposed institutionalism and defended the scientific status of neoclassical theory, but his readings of Weber Knight led him to regard equilibrium and perfect competition as “ideal types,” constructs useful for theorizing but never observed in reality. They help to identify the central elements, but the study of how they change is not the object of theory. One must then turn to history, in which changes do not resemble equilibria. In the postwar period a new scientific standard appeared, which redefined the discipline and relegated Knight’s work to the non-scientific realm of “social philosophy”application/pdf10.18601/01245996.v23n45.022346-24500124-5996https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12266https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v23n45.02spaUniversidad Externado de Colombiahttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/7327/10054Núm. 45 , Año 2021 : Julio-diciembre2245323Revista de Economía Institucional<p>Boyd, R. (1996). Knight and Weber. E-mail al autor, 11 de septiembre.<br>Boyd, R. (1997). Frank H. Knight, Talcott Parsons, and Max Weber. Manuscrito sin publicar.<br>Brouwer, M.T. (2002). Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on entrepreneurship and economic development. En J. S. Metcalfe y U. Cantner (eds.), Change, transformation and development (pp. 145-168). Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.<br>Camic, C. (1991). Introduction: Talcott Parsons before The structure of social action. En C. Camic (ed.), Talcott Parsons: The early essays, (pp. ix-lxix). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.<br>Collins, R. (1980). Weber’s last theory of capitalism: A systematization. American Sociological Review, 45(6), 925-942.<br>Ebner, A. (2005). Knight and Weber. E-mail al autor, 25 de abril.<br>Emmett, R. B. (1997). “What is truth” in capital theory? Five stories relevant to the evaluation of Frank Knight’s contribution to the capital controversy. History of Political Economy, 29(sup. 1), 231-252.<br>Emmett, R. B. (1999a). Frank Hyneman Knight Papers 1910-1972: Finding guide. En W. Samuels (ed.), Research in the history of economic thought and methodology, Archival Supplement v. 9 (pp. 101-273). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.<br>Emmett, R. B. (1999b). The economist and the entrepreneur: Modernist impulses in Frank H. Knight’s Risk, uncertainty and profit. History of Political Economy, 31(1), 29-52. Reimpreso en Emmett, R. B. (2009, 48-62).<br>Emmett, R. B. (2009). Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American economics. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.<br>Hodgson, G. (2001). Frank Knight as Institutionalist economist. En J. E. Biddle, J. B. Davis y S. G. Medema (eds.), Economics broadly considered: Essays in honor of Warren J. Samuels (pp. 61-90). Londres: Routledge.<br>Gonce, R. A. (1996). F. H. Knight on social philosophy and economic theory: The beginnings. En W. Samuels y J. Biddle (eds.), Research in the history of economic thought and methodology, v. 14 (pp. 1-22). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.<br>Kloppenberg, J. T. (1986). Uncertain victory: Social democracy and progressivism in European and American thought, 1870-1920. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.<br>Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston y Nueva York: Houghton Mifflin.<br>Knight, F. (1924). The limitations of scientific method in economics. En R. G. Tugwell (ed.), The trend of economics (pp. 229-267). Nueva York: Knopf.<br>Knight, F. (1925). Carta a J. Viner, 9 de septiembre, Jacob Viner Papers, Public Policy Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library.<br>Knight, F. (1927). Translator’s Introduction. En M. Weber, General Economic History. Nueva York: Greenberg.<br>Knight, F. (1928). Historical and theoretical issues in the problem of modern capitalism. Journal of Economic and Business History, 1, 119-136.<br>Knight, F. (1930). Statik und Dynamik: zur Frage der Mechanischen Analogie in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften, A. Mahr, trad. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 2(1),-1-26. Reimpreso como Statics and dynamics en F. Knight. (1997). The ethics of competition (pp. 153-177). Londres-Nueva York: Routledge, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 1 (pp. 149-71). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1933). The economic organization, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reimpreso en The economic organization: With an article, “Notes on cost and utility” (1951). Nueva York: A. M. Kelley.<br>Knight, F. (1935). Economic theory and nationalism. En The ethics of competition. Nueva York: Harper.<br>Knight, F. (1936a). Carta a T. Parsons, 1 de mayo. Talcott Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG(FP) 42.8.2, Box 2, Pusey Library.<br>Knight, F. (1936b). Carta a Abram L. Harris, 27 de mayo de 1936, Frank H. Knight Papers, Box 60, Folder 6, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.<br>Knight, F. (1940a). “What is truth” in economics? Journal of Political Economy, 48(1), 1-32. Reimpreso en On the History and Method of Economics (1956). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999), Selected essays by Frank H Knight, v. 1 (pp. 372-399). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1940b). Socialism: The nature of the problem. Ethics, 50, 253-289. Reimpreso en Freedom and reform: Essays in economics and social philosophy (1947). Nueva York: Harper, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 77-106). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1941). Anthropology and economics. Journal of Political Economy, 49, 247-268. Reimpreso en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999) Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 107-125). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1944). Realism and relevance in the theory of demand. Journal of Political Economy, 52(4). 289-318. Reimpreso en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 243-283). Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1946). The sickness of liberal society. Ethics, 56(2), 79-95. Reimpreso en F. Knight, (1992). Freedom and reform: Essays in economics and social philosophy [1947] (pp. 440-478). Indianapolis: Liberty Press.<br>Knight, F. (1947). Freedom and reform: Essays in economics and social philosophy. Nueva York: Harper.<br>Knight, F. (1951). Economics and ethics of the wage problem. En D. M. Wright (ed.) The impact of the union. Nueva York: Harcourt Brace, y en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 336-360), Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1960). Intelligence and democratic action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.<br>Knight, F. (1962). Philosophy and social institutions in the West. En C. A. Moore (ed.). Philosophy and culture: East and West. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press. Reimpreso en R. B. Emmett (ed.). (1999). Selected essays by Frank H. Knight, v. 2 (pp. 149-171). Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.<br>Knight, F. (1991). The case for Communism: From the standpoint of an ex-Liberal [1933]. En W. J. Samuels (ed.). Research in the history of economic thought and methodology, archival supplement 2 (pp. 57-108). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.<br>Knight, F. y Merriam, T. (1945). The economic order and religion, Nueva York: Harper.<br>May, H. F. (1949). Protestant churches and industrial America. Nueva York: Harper.<br>Morgan, M. S. y Rutherford, M. (1998). From interwar pluralism to postwar Neoclassicism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.<br>Neill, R. (1972). A new theory of value: The Canadian economics of H. A. Innis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.<br>Nopenney, C. (1997). Frank Knight and the Historical School. En P. Koslowski (ed.). Methodology of the social sciences, ethics and economics in the Newer Historical School: From Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker. Berlín: Springer.<br>Parsons, T. (1927). Carta a P. H. Douglas, 13 de noviembre. Talcott Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.2, Pusey Library.<br>Parsons, T. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.<br>Rodgers, D. T. (1982). In search of progressivism. Reviews in American History, 10(4), 113-131.<br>Rutherford, M. (1997). American Institutionalism and the history of economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(2), 178-195.<br>Shils, E. (1981). Some academics, mainly in Chicago. American Scholar 50(2), 179-196.<br>Schweitzer, A. (1975). Frank Knight’s social economics. History of Political Economy, 7(3), 279-292.<br>Stigler, G. (1987). Frank Hyneman Knight. En J. Eatwell, M. Milgate y P. Newman (eds.). The new Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, v. 3 (pp. 55-59). Nueva York: Stockton Press.<br>Tugwell, R. G. (ed.). (1924). The trend of economics. Nueva York: A. A. Knopf.<br>UCRC. (1952). Minutes of the Faculty Seminar on The Role of Ideologies in Economic Development, University of Chicago Research Center in Economic Development and Cultural Change, 11 de marzo, Frank H. Knight Papers, Box 24 Folder 24, Special Collections Research Collection, University of Chicago Library.<br>Yonay, Y. P. (1998). The struggle over the soul of economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical economists in America between the wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.<br>Young, A. A. (1927). Carta a F. H. Knight, 25 de febrero. Frank H. Knight Papers, Box 62, Folder 24, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.<br>Yu, T. F-L. (2002). The economics of Frank H. Knight: An Austrian interpretation. Forum for Social Economics, 31, 1-23.</p> <p> </p>Ross Emmett - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/7327institutionalism, neoclassical economics, ideal type, comparative historyA12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01institucionalismo, economía neoclásica, tipo ideal, historia comparadaA12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01institucionalismo, economia neoclássica, tipo ideal, história comparativaA12, B13, B2, D41, D5, N01Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismoFrank Knight, Max Weber, Chicago economics, and institutionalismArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2506https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/3bec54ea-94e7-433d-9737-ef93bdc747ff/download9b4dfaef30a1b66c2d541e64ae98b8d0MD51001/12266oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/122662023-08-14 15:29:43.661http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Ross Emmett - 2021https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Frank Knight, Max Weber, la economía de Chicago y el institucionalismo

Publicaciones similares