Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión

Este artículo revisa una rama reciente de investigación que subraya que las actuales instituciones de la economía del conocimiento ponen en peligro la promesa de crecimiento y prosperidad que se atribuye al mayor uso del conocimiento. La privatización excesiva del conocimiento genera círculos vicios...

Full description

Autores:: Pagano, Ugo
Rossi, Maria Alessandra

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2017

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_7c800d1e8f9ed38970052f0c1d156a8b
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/12135
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	The economy of knowledge, collapse and depression
title	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión
spellingShingle	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión institutions of the economy increase prosperity patenting global effects instituciones de la economía crecimiento prosperidad patentamiento efectos globales
title_short	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión
title_full	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión
title_fullStr	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión
title_full_unstemmed	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión
title_sort	Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Pagano, Ugo Rossi, Maria Alessandra
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Pagano, Ugo Rossi, Maria Alessandra
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	institutions of the economy increase prosperity patenting global effects
topic	institutions of the economy increase prosperity patenting global effects instituciones de la economía crecimiento prosperidad patentamiento efectos globales
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	instituciones de la economía crecimiento prosperidad patentamiento efectos globales
description	Este artículo revisa una rama reciente de investigación que subraya que las actuales instituciones de la economía del conocimiento ponen en peligro la promesa de crecimiento y prosperidad que se atribuye al mayor uso del conocimiento. La privatización excesiva del conocimiento genera círculos viciosos y virtuosos de acumulación de propiedad intelectual e inversión en capital humano que se auto refuerzan y aumentan la desigualdad global. Las actuales instituciones de la economía global también reducen las oportunidades de inversión globales, una de las causas de la actual depresión global. Sin antídotos espontáneos contra esos fenómenos, la política económica y la científica deberían intentar corregir, en forma coordinada y global, el balance entre conocimiento público y privado.
publishDate	2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2017-05-22 00:00:00 2022-09-09T21:16:33Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2017-05-22 00:00:00 2022-09-09T21:16:33Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2017-05-22
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/01245996.v19n36.03
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2450
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0124-5996
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12135
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v19n36.03
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/01245996.v19n36.03 2346-2450 0124-5996
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12135 https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v19n36.03
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4886/5812 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4886/5885 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4886/6884
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 36 , Año 2017 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	74
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	36
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	57
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	19
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista de Economía Institucional
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Abramovitz, M. “The welfare interpretation of secular trends in national income and product”, M. Abramovitz et al., eds., The allocation of economic resources: Essays in honor of Bernard Francis Haley, Stanford, Ca., Stanford University Press, 1959. Arrow, K. J. “Technical information and industrial structure”, Industrial and Corporate Change 5, 2, 1996, pp. 645-652. Azoulay, P.; W. Ding y T. Stuart. “The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output”, Journal of Industrial Economics 57, 4, 2009, pp. 637-676. Belloc, F. y U. Pagano. “Knowledge enclosures, forced specialization and investment crisis”, European Journal of Comparative Economics 9, 3, 2012, pp. 445-483. Benkler, Y. “Intellectual property and the organization of information production”, International Review of Law and Economics 22, 2002, pp. 81-107. Bessen, J. E. y M. J. Meurer. Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2008. Boldrin, M. y D. K. Levine. Against intellectual monopoly, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008. Campbell, E. G. et al. “Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey”, jama 287, 4, 2002, pp. 473-480. Cockburn, I.; M. MacGarvie y E. Mueller. “Patent thickets, licensing and innovative performance”, Industrial and Corporate Change 19, 3, 2010, pp. 899-925. Cohen W.; R. Nelson y J. Walsh. “Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not)”, nber working paper 7552, 2000. Cohendet, P. y F. Meyer-K. “The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification”, Research Policy 30, 9, 2001, pp. 1563-1591. Dosi, G. “Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation”, Journal of Economic Literature 26, 3, 1988, pp. 1120-1171. Duguet, E. e I. Kabla. “Appropriation strategy and the motivations to use the patent system: An econometric analysis at the firm level in French manufacturing” 1998, Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 49-50, 1998, pp. 289-327. Franzoni, C. y G. Scellato. “The grace period in international patent law and its effect on the timing of disclosure”, Research Policy 39, 2, 2010, pp. 200-2013. Franzoni, C. y G. Scellato. “Academic patenting and the consequences for scientific research”, The Australian Economic Review 44, 1, 2011, pp. 95-101. Freeman, C. “The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, 1, 1995, pp. 5-24. Geuna, A. y F. Rossi. The university and the economy. Pathways to growth and economic development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2015. Geuna, A. y L. Nesta. “University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence”, Research Policy 35, 6, 2006, pp. 790-807. Hall, B. H. y R. H. Ziedonis. “The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry 1979-1995”, rand Journal of Economics 32, 1, 2001, pp. 101-128. Hart, O. Firms, contracts and f inancial structure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995. Heller, M. y R. Eisenberg. “Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research”, Science 280, 5364, 1998, pp. 698-701. Jaffe A. B. y J. Lerner. Innovation and its discontents: How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004. Lanjouw, J. O. y I. M. Cockburn. “New pills for poor people? Evidence after gatt”, World Development 29, 2, 2001, pp. 265-249. Lemley, M. A. “Property, intellectual property, and free riding”, Texas Law Review 83, 2005, pp. 1031-1069. Lerner, J. “Patenting in the shadow of competitors”, Journal of Law and Economics 38, 2, 1995, pp. 463-490. Levin, R. et al. “Appropriating the returns from industrial r&d”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 1987. Lissoni, F. et al. “Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the keins database”, Research Evaluation 17, 2, 2008, pp. 87-102. Lundvall, B.-Å. “National innovation systems – Analytical concept and development tool”, Industry and innovation 14, 1, 2007, pp. 95-119. Mansfield E. “Patents and innovation: An empirical study”, Management Science 32, 2, 1986, pp. 173-181. Maskus, K. “The new globalization of intellectual property rights: What’s new this time?”, Australian Economic History Review 54, 3, 2014, pp. 262-284. Mazzucato, M. The entrepreneurial State: Debunking public vs. private sector myths, Londres, Anthem Press, 2013. Merges R. y R. Nelson. “On the complex economics of patent scope”, Columbia Law Review 90, 4, 1990, pp. 839-916. Murray, F. et al. “Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation”, nber working paper 14819, 2009. Noel, M. y M. Schankerman. “Strategic patenting and software innovation”, Journal of Industrial Economics 61, 3, 2013, pp. 481-520. Pagano U. “The crisis of intellectual monopoly capitalism”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 38, 6, 2014, pp. 1409-1429. Pagano U. y M. A. Rossi. “Incomplete contracts, intellectual property and institutional complementarities”, European Journal of Law and Economics 18, 1, 2004, pp. 55-76. Pagano U. y M. A. Rossi. “The crash of the knowledge economy”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, 4, 2009, pp. 665-683. Pagano U. y M. A. Rossi. “Property rights in the knowledge economy: An explanation of the crisis”, E. Brancaccio y G. Fontana, eds., The global economic crisis, Londres, Routledge, 2011, pp. 284-297. Partha, D. y P. A. David. “Toward a new economics of science”, Research Policy 23, 5, 1994, pp. 487-521. Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2014. Reitzig, M.; J. Henkel y F. Schneider. “Collateral damage for r&d manufacturers: How patent sharks operate in markets for technology”, Industrial and Corporate Change 19, 3, 2010, pp. 947-967. Rowthorn, R. “A note on Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 38, 5, 2014, pp. 1275-1284. Samuelson, P. “Enriching discourse on public domains”, Duke Law Journal 55, 2006, pp. 783-834. Schumpeter, J. A. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle [1934], New Brunswick, nj, Transaction Publishers, 1983. Schumpeter, J. A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, Nueva York, Harper and Brothers, 1942. Scotchmer, S. “Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 1, 1991, pp. 29-41. Scotchmer, S. “The political economy of intellectual property treaties”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 20, 2, 2004, pp. 415-437. Shapiro, C. “Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting”, A. Jaffe, J. Lerner y S. Stern, eds., Innovation policy and the economy, vol. 1, Cambridge, Mass., mit Press, 2001, pp. 119-150. Solow, R. M. “Investment and technical progress”, K. Arrow, S. Karlin y P. Suppes, eds., Mathematical methods in the social sciences [1959], Stanford, Ca., Stanford University Press, 1960, pp. 89-104. Stiglitz J. E. “New theoretical perspectives on the distribution of income and wealth among individuals”, nber working paper 21189, 2015. Stiglitz, J. E. “Knowledge as a global public good”, 1999, Stokes, D. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation, Washington, Brookings Institution Press, 1997. Thursby, J. y M. Thursby. “University licensing”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23, 4, 2007, pp. 620-639. Walsh, J. P.; W. M. Cohen y C. Cho. “Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research”, Research Policy 36, 8, 2007, pp. 1184-1203.
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html application/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4886
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/96e4b1c3-2308-489f-a440-0ccfe3329118/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	625efd6c914fe2f5e437f31d8faf44a5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1828229800684158976
spelling	Pagano, Ugofd56e1d7-1848-4bbd-8b62-a1f5d1a3762d300Rossi, Maria Alessandra84578066-34e0-4be8-8758-ab84630dd7772017-05-22 00:00:002022-09-09T21:16:33Z2017-05-22 00:00:002022-09-09T21:16:33Z2017-05-22Este artículo revisa una rama reciente de investigación que subraya que las actuales instituciones de la economía del conocimiento ponen en peligro la promesa de crecimiento y prosperidad que se atribuye al mayor uso del conocimiento. La privatización excesiva del conocimiento genera círculos viciosos y virtuosos de acumulación de propiedad intelectual e inversión en capital humano que se auto refuerzan y aumentan la desigualdad global. Las actuales instituciones de la economía global también reducen las oportunidades de inversión globales, una de las causas de la actual depresión global. Sin antídotos espontáneos contra esos fenómenos, la política económica y la científica deberían intentar corregir, en forma coordinada y global, el balance entre conocimiento público y privado.This paper reviews a recent strand of research emphasizing how the present institutions of the knowledge economy may be jeopardizing the very promise of growth and prosperity that the increased use of knowledge is generally reported to bring about. The excessive privatization of knowledge generates self-reinforcing vicious and virtuous circles of accumulation of intellectual property and investment in human capital, which increase global inequality. The present institutions of the global economy entail also a reduction of global investment opportunities that is one of the causes of the present global depression. Absent spontaneous antidotes to these phenomena, economic and science policies should aim at redressing the balance between public and private knowledge. Because of the distortion of incentives, stemming from uncompensated knowledge externalities at the international level, these policies should necessarily be coordinated at global level.application/pdftext/htmlapplication/xml10.18601/01245996.v19n36.032346-24500124-5996https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/12135https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v19n36.03spaUniversidad Externado de Colombiahttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4886/5812https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4886/5885https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/4886/6884Núm. 36 , Año 2017 : Enero-Junio74365719Revista de Economía InstitucionalAbramovitz, M. “The welfare interpretation of secular trends in national income and product”, M. Abramovitz et al., eds., The allocation of economic resources: Essays in honor of Bernard Francis Haley, Stanford, Ca., Stanford University Press, 1959.Arrow, K. J. “Technical information and industrial structure”, Industrial and Corporate Change 5, 2, 1996, pp. 645-652.Azoulay, P.; W. Ding y T. Stuart. “The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output”, Journal of Industrial Economics 57, 4, 2009, pp. 637-676.Belloc, F. y U. Pagano. “Knowledge enclosures, forced specialization and investment crisis”, European Journal of Comparative Economics 9, 3, 2012, pp. 445-483.Benkler, Y. “Intellectual property and the organization of information production”, International Review of Law and Economics 22, 2002, pp. 81-107.Bessen, J. E. y M. J. Meurer. Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2008.Boldrin, M. y D. K. Levine. Against intellectual monopoly, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008.Campbell, E. G. et al. “Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey”, jama 287, 4, 2002, pp. 473-480.Cockburn, I.; M. MacGarvie y E. Mueller. “Patent thickets, licensing and innovative performance”, Industrial and Corporate Change 19, 3, 2010, pp. 899-925.Cohen W.; R. Nelson y J. Walsh. “Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not)”, nber working paper 7552, 2000.Cohendet, P. y F. Meyer-K. “The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification”, Research Policy 30, 9, 2001, pp. 1563-1591.Dosi, G. “Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation”, Journal of Economic Literature 26, 3, 1988, pp. 1120-1171.Duguet, E. e I. Kabla. “Appropriation strategy and the motivations to use the patent system: An econometric analysis at the firm level in French manufacturing” 1998, Annales d’Économie et de Statistique 49-50, 1998, pp. 289-327.Franzoni, C. y G. Scellato. “The grace period in international patent law and its effect on the timing of disclosure”, Research Policy 39, 2, 2010, pp. 200-2013.Franzoni, C. y G. Scellato. “Academic patenting and the consequences for scientific research”, The Australian Economic Review 44, 1, 2011, pp. 95-101.Freeman, C. “The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19, 1, 1995, pp. 5-24.Geuna, A. y F. Rossi. The university and the economy. Pathways to growth and economic development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2015.Geuna, A. y L. Nesta. “University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence”, Research Policy 35, 6, 2006, pp. 790-807.Hall, B. H. y R. H. Ziedonis. “The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry 1979-1995”, rand Journal of Economics 32, 1, 2001, pp. 101-128.Hart, O. Firms, contracts and f inancial structure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.Heller, M. y R. Eisenberg. “Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research”, Science 280, 5364, 1998, pp. 698-701.Jaffe A. B. y J. Lerner. Innovation and its discontents: How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.Lanjouw, J. O. y I. M. Cockburn. “New pills for poor people? Evidence after gatt”, World Development 29, 2, 2001, pp. 265-249.Lemley, M. A. “Property, intellectual property, and free riding”, Texas Law Review 83, 2005, pp. 1031-1069.Lerner, J. “Patenting in the shadow of competitors”, Journal of Law and Economics 38, 2, 1995, pp. 463-490.Levin, R. et al. “Appropriating the returns from industrial r&d”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 1987.Lissoni, F. et al. “Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the keins database”, Research Evaluation 17, 2, 2008, pp. 87-102.Lundvall, B.-Å. “National innovation systems – Analytical concept and development tool”, Industry and innovation 14, 1, 2007, pp. 95-119.Mansfield E. “Patents and innovation: An empirical study”, Management Science 32, 2, 1986, pp. 173-181.Maskus, K. “The new globalization of intellectual property rights: What’s new this time?”, Australian Economic History Review 54, 3, 2014, pp. 262-284.Mazzucato, M. The entrepreneurial State: Debunking public vs. private sector myths, Londres, Anthem Press, 2013.Merges R. y R. Nelson. “On the complex economics of patent scope”, Columbia Law Review 90, 4, 1990, pp. 839-916.Murray, F. et al. “Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation”, nber working paper 14819, 2009.Noel, M. y M. Schankerman. “Strategic patenting and software innovation”, Journal of Industrial Economics 61, 3, 2013, pp. 481-520.Pagano U. “The crisis of intellectual monopoly capitalism”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 38, 6, 2014, pp. 1409-1429.Pagano U. y M. A. Rossi. “Incomplete contracts, intellectual property and institutional complementarities”, European Journal of Law and Economics 18, 1, 2004, pp. 55-76.Pagano U. y M. A. Rossi. “The crash of the knowledge economy”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, 4, 2009, pp. 665-683.Pagano U. y M. A. Rossi. “Property rights in the knowledge economy: An explanation of the crisis”, E. Brancaccio y G. Fontana, eds., The global economic crisis, Londres, Routledge, 2011, pp. 284-297.Partha, D. y P. A. David. “Toward a new economics of science”, Research Policy 23, 5, 1994, pp. 487-521.Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2014.Reitzig, M.; J. Henkel y F. Schneider. “Collateral damage for r&d manufacturers: How patent sharks operate in markets for technology”, Industrial and Corporate Change 19, 3, 2010, pp. 947-967.Rowthorn, R. “A note on Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 38, 5, 2014, pp. 1275-1284.Samuelson, P. “Enriching discourse on public domains”, Duke Law Journal 55, 2006, pp. 783-834.Schumpeter, J. A. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle [1934], New Brunswick, nj, Transaction Publishers, 1983.Schumpeter, J. A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy, Nueva York, Harper and Brothers, 1942.Scotchmer, S. “Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 1, 1991, pp. 29-41.Scotchmer, S. “The political economy of intellectual property treaties”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 20, 2, 2004, pp. 415-437.Shapiro, C. “Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting”, A. Jaffe, J. Lerner y S. Stern, eds., Innovation policy and the economy, vol. 1, Cambridge, Mass., mit Press, 2001, pp. 119-150.Solow, R. M. “Investment and technical progress”, K. Arrow, S. Karlin y P. Suppes, eds., Mathematical methods in the social sciences [1959], Stanford, Ca., Stanford University Press, 1960, pp. 89-104.Stiglitz J. E. “New theoretical perspectives on the distribution of income and wealth among individuals”, nber working paper 21189, 2015.Stiglitz, J. E. “Knowledge as a global public good”, 1999,Stokes, D. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation, Washington, Brookings Institution Press, 1997.Thursby, J. y M. Thursby. “University licensing”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23, 4, 2007, pp. 620-639.Walsh, J. P.; W. M. Cohen y C. Cho. “Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research”, Research Policy 36, 8, 2007, pp. 1184-1203.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/4886institutions of the economyincreaseprosperitypatentingglobal effectsinstituciones de la economíacrecimientoprosperidadpatentamientoefectos globalesEconomía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresiónThe economy of knowledge, collapse and depressionArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2551https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/96e4b1c3-2308-489f-a440-0ccfe3329118/download625efd6c914fe2f5e437f31d8faf44a5MD51001/12135oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/121352023-08-14 15:22:01.449https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Economía del conocimiento, crisis financiera y depresión

Publicaciones similares