Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review

Roberto Gargarella has infused into constitutional theory a deliberative approach to constitutional review and rights adjudication. By this, he has enriched our understanding of deliberative democracy as a political system in which the judiciary can play a central role, especially through the instit...

Full description

Autores:
Valentini, Chiara
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2021
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/11342
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11342
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n49.10
Palabra clave:
Deliberative democracy;
social rights;
justiciability;
adjudication;
Gargarella
Democracia deliberativa;
derechos sociales;
justiciabilidad;
adjudicación;
Gargarella
Rights
openAccess
License
Chiara Valentini - 2021
id uexternad2_79e917556a9af29981a818d1ff491ad4
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/11342
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
title Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
spellingShingle Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
Deliberative democracy;
social rights;
justiciability;
adjudication;
Gargarella
Democracia deliberativa;
derechos sociales;
justiciabilidad;
adjudicación;
Gargarella
title_short Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
title_full Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
title_fullStr Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
title_full_unstemmed Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
title_sort Deliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial Review
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Valentini, Chiara
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Valentini, Chiara
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Deliberative democracy;
social rights;
justiciability;
adjudication;
Gargarella
topic Deliberative democracy;
social rights;
justiciability;
adjudication;
Gargarella
Democracia deliberativa;
derechos sociales;
justiciabilidad;
adjudicación;
Gargarella
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Democracia deliberativa;
derechos sociales;
justiciabilidad;
adjudicación;
Gargarella
description Roberto Gargarella has infused into constitutional theory a deliberative approach to constitutional review and rights adjudication. By this, he has enriched our understanding of deliberative democracy as a political system in which the judiciary can play a central role, especially through the institution of constitutional review. Furthermore, he has provided us with crucial insights into the deliberative potential of this institution, shedding light on the different ways in which it may serve to secure the essential conditions of democratic deliberation. The article centers on this twofold, crucial contribution of Gargarella – to constitutional theory and to deliberative democratic theory – with a focus on the relationship between social rights and constitutional review. First, it presents the main controversial issues raised by this relationship, concerning both social rights justiciability and adjudication. Second it highlights the resources provided by Gargarella to understand and address both orders of issues, based on his account of deliberative democracy and constitutional review. Third, the article addresses the resulting view of the action of courts on social rights. In particular, it inquires into the idea of a “third way” for judicial action, requiring to modulate judicial review so as to mediate between judicial inertia and activism.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-21 16:50:25
2022-09-09T21:06:42Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-21 16:50:25
2022-09-09T21:06:42Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-21
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/01229893.n49.10
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2051
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0122-9893
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11342
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n49.10
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/01229893.n49.10
2346-2051
0122-9893
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11342
https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n49.10
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7149/10746
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7149/10747
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7149/10748
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 49 , Año 2021 : Mayo – Agosto
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 197
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 49
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 179
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista Derecho del Estado
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Chiara Valentini - 2021
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Chiara Valentini - 2021
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7149
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/3ae00f2b-c7a4-4968-a649-dae13d6637f2/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f782e1b93d714e3e536822cadec0bdce
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1814100399746973696
spelling Valentini, Chiarac5c781e5-170a-4c29-bd90-23de0d4958bc3002021-04-21 16:50:252022-09-09T21:06:42Z2021-04-21 16:50:252022-09-09T21:06:42Z2021-04-21Roberto Gargarella has infused into constitutional theory a deliberative approach to constitutional review and rights adjudication. By this, he has enriched our understanding of deliberative democracy as a political system in which the judiciary can play a central role, especially through the institution of constitutional review. Furthermore, he has provided us with crucial insights into the deliberative potential of this institution, shedding light on the different ways in which it may serve to secure the essential conditions of democratic deliberation. The article centers on this twofold, crucial contribution of Gargarella – to constitutional theory and to deliberative democratic theory – with a focus on the relationship between social rights and constitutional review. First, it presents the main controversial issues raised by this relationship, concerning both social rights justiciability and adjudication. Second it highlights the resources provided by Gargarella to understand and address both orders of issues, based on his account of deliberative democracy and constitutional review. Third, the article addresses the resulting view of the action of courts on social rights. In particular, it inquires into the idea of a “third way” for judicial action, requiring to modulate judicial review so as to mediate between judicial inertia and activism.Roberto Gargarella has infused into constitutional theory a deliberative approach to constitutional review and rights adjudication. By this, he has enriched our understanding of deliberative democracy as a political system in which the judiciary can play a central role, especially through the institution of constitutional review. Furthermore, he has provided us with crucial insights into the deliberative potential of this institution, shedding light on the different ways in which it may serve to secure the essential conditions of democratic deliberation. The article centers on this twofold, crucial contribution of Gargarella – to constitutional theory and to deliberative democratic theory – with a focus on the relationship between social rights and constitutional review. First, it presents the main controversial issues raised by this relationship, concerning both social rights justiciability and adjudication. Second it highlights the resources provided by Gargarella to understand and address both orders of issues, based on his account of deliberative democracy and constitutional review. Third, the article addresses the resulting view of the action of courts on social rights. In particular, it inquires into the idea of a “third way” for judicial action, requiring to modulate judicial review so as to mediate between judicial inertia and activism.application/pdftext/xmltext/html10.18601/01229893.n49.102346-20510122-9893https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11342https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n49.10spaDepartamento de Derecho Constitucionalhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7149/10746https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7149/10747https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/7149/10748Núm. 49 , Año 2021 : Mayo – Agosto19749179Revista Derecho del EstadoChiara Valentini - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/7149Deliberative democracy;social rights;justiciability;adjudication;GargarellaDemocracia deliberativa;derechos sociales;justiciabilidad;adjudicación;GargarellaDeliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial ReviewDeliberative Democracy, Social Rights and the Modulation of Judicial ReviewArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2539https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/3ae00f2b-c7a4-4968-a649-dae13d6637f2/downloadf782e1b93d714e3e536822cadec0bdceMD51001/11342oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/113422023-08-14 15:10:31.388http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Chiara Valentini - 2021https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Publicaciones similares