Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados

Este artículo analiza la relación entre el contexto geográfico como un espacio físico y la narrativa histórica como un espacio imaginado en la conformación de la identidad nacional taiwanesa. Basado en la propuesta teórica del constructivismo, que enfatiza la importancia de la identidad en la confor...

Full description

Autores:
Lemus-Delgado, Daniel
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/15155
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15155
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n37.06
Palabra clave:
China;
Taiwan;
constructivism;
national identity
China;
Taiwán;
constructivismo;
identidad nacional
Rights
openAccess
License
Daniel Lemus-Delgado - 2022
id uexternad2_7439bad499feccc3de72ef8f2af3a758
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/15155
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv The Relationship between Real and Imagined Spaces: Reflections on Taiwan’s Foreign Policy
title Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
spellingShingle Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
China;
Taiwan;
constructivism;
national identity
China;
Taiwán;
constructivismo;
identidad nacional
title_short Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
title_full Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
title_fullStr Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
title_full_unstemmed Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
title_sort Reflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginados
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Lemus-Delgado, Daniel
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Lemus-Delgado, Daniel
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv China;
Taiwan;
constructivism;
national identity
topic China;
Taiwan;
constructivism;
national identity
China;
Taiwán;
constructivismo;
identidad nacional
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv China;
Taiwán;
constructivismo;
identidad nacional
description Este artículo analiza la relación entre el contexto geográfico como un espacio físico y la narrativa histórica como un espacio imaginado en la conformación de la identidad nacional taiwanesa. Basado en la propuesta teórica del constructivismo, que enfatiza la importancia de la identidad en la conformación de los intereses de los Estados, se propone que las condiciones geográficas e históricas de Taiwán han desarrollado una identidad nacional distinta y diferenciada de la identidad china. Para ello, se asume una visión que sugiere que el contexto geográfico no solo genera condiciones materiales, sino también posibilita una serie de interacciones sociales que convierten al territorio también en un espacio “imaginado”, el cual es el resultado de narrativas históricas. Así, los elementos que conforman la identidad taiwanesa inciden en la política exterior de este Estado, particularmente en el caso de la búsqueda el reconocimiento internacional. Como conclusión, se destaca la manera en que el caso de Taiwán evidencia la forma como la identidad influye en la política exterior.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
2024-06-05T20:04:41Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05T00:00:00Z
2024-06-05T20:04:41Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-05
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/16577558.n37.06
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2132
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1657-7558
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15155
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n37.06
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/16577558.n37.06
2346-2132
1657-7558
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15155
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n37.06
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8419/13595
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8419/13596
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8419/13597
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 37 , Año 2023 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 91
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 37
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 71
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Oasis
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Addler, E. (2002). Constructivism and international relations. En W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse y B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations, pp. 95-118. Sage Publications.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflection of Origen and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.
Benner, E. (2013). The origins of Nationalism. En J. Breuilly (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism (pp. 36-54). Oxford University Press.
Berenskoetter, F. (2010). Identity in International Relations. En R. A. Denemark y R. Marlin-Bennett (Eds.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, vol. 6. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.218
Bloom, W. (1990). Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, C. y Kirsten, A. (2005). Understanding International Relations. Palgrave McMillan.
Brown, M. J. (2004). Is Taiwan Chinese?: The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. University of California Press.
Caspersen, N. (2012). Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. Polity Press.
Chen, J. (2014). Building a new society on the base of locality: transformation of social forces in Taiwan during the 1990s. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 15 (2): 291-305. DOI:10.1080/14649373.2014.924644
Chen, Q. (2010). The Taiwan straits situation since ma came to office and conditions for cross-straits political negotiations: A view from Shanghai. Journal of Contemporary China, 20 (68): 153-160. DOI:10.1080/10670564.2011.520853
Cheng, J. y Paladini. S. (2014). China’s ocean development strategy and its handling of the territorial conflicts in the South China Sea. Philippine Political Science Journal, 35 (2): 185-202. DOI:10.1080/01154451.2014.965476
Chernoff, F. (2007). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: concepts and contending accounts. Palgrave MacMillan.
Chu, Y. y Lin, C. (2003). Consolidating Taiwan’s new democracy amid competing national identities. En L. Fernández-Stembridge y T. Fisac (Eds.), China Today: Economic Reforms, Social Cohesion and Collective Identities (pp. 240-267). Routledge Curzon.
Chu, Y. y Lin, J. (2001). Political development in 20th- Century Taiwan: State-building, regime transformation and the construction of national identity. The China Quarterly, 165: 102129.
Connelly, M. (2014). Historia de Taiwán. El Colegio de México.
Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2): 126-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
Damm, J. (2011). From ‘overseas chinese’ to ‘overseas taiwanese’: Questions of identity and belonging.
Domestic, regional and global perspectives. En G. Schubert y J. Damm (Eds.), Taiwanese Identity in the 21st Century (pp. 51-71). Routledge.
Deans, P. (2005). Isolation, identity and Taiwanese stamps as vehicles for regime legitimation. East Asia, 22 (2): 8-30.
Dittmer, L. (2006). Taiwan as a factor in China’s quest for national identity. Journal of Contemporary China, 15 (49): 671-686. DOI:10.1080/10670560600836721
Eskildse, R. (2005). Taiwan: A periphery in search of a narrative. The Journal of Asian Studies, 64 (2): 281-294.
Genest, M. A. (2004). Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. Wadsworth.
George Wei, C. X. (2012). U.S.-China relations and its impact on the reconstruction of national identity in Taiwan. En B. Guo y C. Teng (Eds.), Taiwan and the Rise of China (pp. 51-72). Lexington Books.
Gold, T. (2008). Taiwan’s Quest for Identity in the Shadow of China. En D. Fell (ed.), The Politics of Modern Taiwan (pp.83-103). Routledge.
Griffiths, M., O’Callaghan, T. y Roach, S. (2008). International Relations: The Key Concepts. Routledge.
Harvey, J. y Stansfield, G. (2009). Theorizing unrecognized states: Sovereignty, secessionism, and political economy: James Harvey and Gareth Stansfield. En N. Caspersen y N. Stansfield, G. (Eds.), Unrecognized States in the International System (pp. 1-26). Routledge.
Hobson, J. (2000). The State and the International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
Holtug, N. (2017). Identity, causality and social cohesion. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43 (7): 1084-1100. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2016.1227697
Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23 (1): 171-200.
Hopf, T. (2002). Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies. Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Cornell University Press.
Hsü, I. C. Y. (2000). The Rise of Modern China. Oxford University Press.
Hughes, C. R. (2011). Negotiating National Identity in Taiwan: Between nativization and des-sicnization. En R. Ash, J. W. Garver y P. B. Prime (Eds.), Taiwan Democracy: Economic and Politics Challenges (pp. 51-74). Routledge.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94 (1): 7-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
Jackson, R. (2005). Classical and Modern Thought on International Relations: From Anarchy to Cosmopolis. Palgrave McMillan.
Jackson, R. y Sorensen, G. (2003). Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
Joint Communique between the United States and China (1972). History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/121325
Jung, H. (2019). The evolution of social constructivism in political science: Past to present. SAGE Open, 2 (1): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832703
Kang, J., Kim, J. y Wang, Y. (2015). Salvaging national pride: The 2010 taekwondo controversy and Taiwan’s quest for global recognition. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50 (1): 98-114.
Kaufman, J. K. (2013). Introduction to International Relations: Theory and Practice. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Keith, R. C. (2017). Deng Xiaoping and China’s Foreign Policy. Routledge.
Kim, S. (2018). Chinese foreign policy in theory and practice. En S. Kim (Ed.), China and The World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium (pp. 3-33). Routledge.
Kowert, P. (1998). Agent versus structure in the construction of national identity. En V. Kublákova, N. Onuf y P. Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World (pp. 101-122). M. E. Sharpe.
Krasner, S. D. (2009). Power, the State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations. Routledge.
Laio, N. (2019). Identity, Role Conception, and Status Dilemma: A socio-psychological account of China-U.S. relations. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 5 (3): 343-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500180
Lamley, H. (2007). Taiwan under japanese rule, 1895- 1945. The vicissitudes of colonialism. En M. A. Rubinstein (Ed.), Taiwan. A New History (pp.201-260). M. E. Sharpe.
Lemus, D. y Cerda, C. (2021). China or Taiwan? The tricky dilemma of diplomatic recognition: The salvadorean experience. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations, 7 (1): 45-78.
Lemus-Delgado, D. (2021). International sports events and national identity: The opening ceremony of the Taipei Universiade. Sport in Society, 24 (7): 1093- 1109. DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2020.1732929
Makeham, J. (2005). Introduction. En J. Makeham y A. Hsiau (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan (pp. 1-14). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980618_1
Mantorphe, J. (2009). Forbidden Nation: A History of Taiwan. Palgrave MacMillan.
McAllister, I. (2016). Democratic consolidation in Taiwan in comparative perspective. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1 (1): 44-61.
Menzies, G. (2013). 1421: el año en que China descubrió al mundo. Debolsillo.
Min Kuo, C. H. (2004). Taiwan. En Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations (vol. 4, pp. 645-659). Gale.
Neumann, I. B. y Gstöhl, S. (2006). Introduction: Lilliputians in Gulliver’s world? En C. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann y S. Gstöhl (Eds.). Small States in International Relations (pp. 3-36). University of Washington Press.
Nien-chung, C. (2016). China’s new foreign policy under Xi Jinping. Asian Security, 12 (2): 82-91. DOI:10.1080/14799855.2016.1183195
Özlük, E. y Murat, C. (2010). Burying sovereignty in its birth place: Back to the middle age. En S. F. Krishna-Hense (Ed.), Order and Disorder in the International System (pp. 171-182). Routledge.
Parker, G. (1998). Geopolitics: Past, present and Future. Routledge.
Pelosi, N. (2022, 2 de agosto). Nancy Pelosi: Por esto estoy liderando una delegación del Congreso estadounidense a Taiwán. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/es/post-opinion/2022/08/03/nancy-pelosi-taiwan-visitachina-razones-articulo/
Pew Research Center (2020). En Taiwan, Views of Mainland China Mostly Negative. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/05/PG_2020.05.12_Taiwan_final.pdf
Price, R. M. y Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous liaisons? Constructivism and critical international theory. European Journal of International Relations, 4, 259-294.
República de Taiwán (2022). National Statistics: Population and Housing. https://eng.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=41871&ctNode=2815&mp=5
Restad, H. E. (2020). What makes America great? Donald Trump, national identity, and U.S. foreign policy. Global Affairs, 6 (1): 21-36. DOI:10.1080/23340460.2020.1734955
Reus-Smith, C. (2005). Constructivism. En S. Burchill, A. Linklater y R. Devetak (Eds.), Theories of International Relations (pp. 188-210). Palgrave MacMillan.
Rigger, S (2011). Why Taiwan Matters: Small Island, Global Power. Rowman and Littlefield.
Rupert, M. (2013). Marxism. En T. Dunne, M. Kurki, y S. Smith (Eds.), International Relations Theories Discipline and Diversity (pp. 153-170). Oxford University Press.
Saurin, J. (2006). International relations as imperial illusion; or, the need of decolonize IR. En B. G. Jones (Ed.), Decolonizing International Relations (pp. 23-42). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Skoggard, I. (2001). Taiwan. En C. R. Ember y M. Ember (Eds.), Countries and Their Cultures (Vol. 4, pp. 2161-2176). Macmillan Publishers.
Slomp, G. (2008). On Sovereignty. En T. C. Salmon y M. F. Imber (eds.), Issues in International Relations (pp. 33-46). Routledge.
Stevens, P. (2016). Democracy and national destinies on Taiwan. Nations and Nationalism, 22 (4): 666-685.
Sutch, P. y Elias, J. (2007). International Relations: The Basics. Routledge.
The Taiwan Affairs Office and The Information Office of the State Council (2000, 17 de mayo). White Paper—The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/ceno/eng/ztxw/twwt/t110655.htm
Vasu, N., Chin, Y. y Law, K. (2013). Introduction: Un/ settled narrations. En N. Vasu, Y. Chin y K. Law (Eds.), Nationalism in the Asia Pacific. Nation, national narratives and Communities in Asia Pacific (pp. 12-17). Routledge.
Wachman, A. (1994) Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. M. E. Sharpe.
Wang, T. Y. (2000). One China, one Taiwan: An analysis of the democratic progressive party’s China policy. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 35 (1): 159-182. Wang, A., Wu, C., Yeh, Y. y Chen, F. (2018, 10 de noviembre). What does the 1992 Consensus mean to citizens in Taiwan? The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/11/what-doesthe-1992-consensus-mean-to-citizens-in-taiwan/ Wei, C. y Lai, C. J. (2017). Identities, rationality and Taiwan’s China policy: The dynamics of cross-strait exchanges. Asian Studies Review, 41 (1): 136-154. DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2016.1263276
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46 (2): 391-425.
Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review, 88 (2): 384-396.
Wilkinson, P. (2007). International Relations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Wills, J. E. (2007). The seventeenth-century transformations: Taiwan under the Dutch and the Cheng regime. En M. A. Rubinstein (Ed.), Taiwan, A New History (pp. 84-106). M. E. Sharpe.
Wong, T. K. (2001). From ethnic to civic nationalism: The formation and changing nature of Taiwanese identity. Asian Perspective, 25 (3): 175-206.
Ying, W. (2014). ¿Qué significa ser taiwanés? Prespectiva Global, 2 (2): 89-96.
Zhong, Y. (2016). Explaining national identity shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25 (99): 336- 352. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Daniel Lemus-Delgado - 2022
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Daniel Lemus-Delgado - 2022
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/8419
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/426294c1-af6c-4b10-bd78-55d5a923b776/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv adc3c76a2d04192553bc943585629589
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1814100462474887168
spelling Lemus-Delgado, Daniel2022-12-05T00:00:00Z2024-06-05T20:04:41Z2022-12-05T00:00:00Z2024-06-05T20:04:41Z2022-12-05Este artículo analiza la relación entre el contexto geográfico como un espacio físico y la narrativa histórica como un espacio imaginado en la conformación de la identidad nacional taiwanesa. Basado en la propuesta teórica del constructivismo, que enfatiza la importancia de la identidad en la conformación de los intereses de los Estados, se propone que las condiciones geográficas e históricas de Taiwán han desarrollado una identidad nacional distinta y diferenciada de la identidad china. Para ello, se asume una visión que sugiere que el contexto geográfico no solo genera condiciones materiales, sino también posibilita una serie de interacciones sociales que convierten al territorio también en un espacio “imaginado”, el cual es el resultado de narrativas históricas. Así, los elementos que conforman la identidad taiwanesa inciden en la política exterior de este Estado, particularmente en el caso de la búsqueda el reconocimiento internacional. Como conclusión, se destaca la manera en que el caso de Taiwán evidencia la forma como la identidad influye en la política exterior.This article analyses the relationship between the geographical context as a physical space and the historical narrative as an imagined space in the formation of Taiwanese national identity. Based on the theoretical proposal of constructivism, that emphasises the importance of identity in shaping the interests of the States, the article suggests that the geographical and historical conditions have enabled Taiwan to develop a different national identity from that of the Chinese. For this, the assumption is that the geographical context generates material conditions and social interactions, turning the territory into an “imagined” space. This immaterial space is, above all, the result of historical narratives. Thus, the elements that configure the Taiwanese identity affect the foreign policy of this State, particularly in the search for international recognition. The conclusion highlights how the case of Taiwan evidences the manner in which identity influences foreign policy.application/pdftext/htmltext/xml10.18601/16577558.n37.062346-21321657-7558https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15155https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n37.06spaFacultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionaleshttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8419/13595https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8419/13596https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/8419/13597Núm. 37 , Año 2023 : Enero-Junio913771OasisAddler, E. (2002). Constructivism and international relations. En W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse y B. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of International Relations, pp. 95-118. Sage Publications.Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflection of Origen and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.Benner, E. (2013). The origins of Nationalism. En J. Breuilly (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism (pp. 36-54). Oxford University Press.Berenskoetter, F. (2010). Identity in International Relations. En R. A. Denemark y R. Marlin-Bennett (Eds.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, vol. 6. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.218Bloom, W. (1990). Personal Identity, National Identity and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Brown, C. y Kirsten, A. (2005). Understanding International Relations. Palgrave McMillan.Brown, M. J. (2004). Is Taiwan Chinese?: The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. University of California Press.Caspersen, N. (2012). Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. Polity Press.Chen, J. (2014). Building a new society on the base of locality: transformation of social forces in Taiwan during the 1990s. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 15 (2): 291-305. DOI:10.1080/14649373.2014.924644Chen, Q. (2010). The Taiwan straits situation since ma came to office and conditions for cross-straits political negotiations: A view from Shanghai. Journal of Contemporary China, 20 (68): 153-160. DOI:10.1080/10670564.2011.520853Cheng, J. y Paladini. S. (2014). China’s ocean development strategy and its handling of the territorial conflicts in the South China Sea. Philippine Political Science Journal, 35 (2): 185-202. DOI:10.1080/01154451.2014.965476Chernoff, F. (2007). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: concepts and contending accounts. Palgrave MacMillan.Chu, Y. y Lin, C. (2003). Consolidating Taiwan’s new democracy amid competing national identities. En L. Fernández-Stembridge y T. Fisac (Eds.), China Today: Economic Reforms, Social Cohesion and Collective Identities (pp. 240-267). Routledge Curzon.Chu, Y. y Lin, J. (2001). Political development in 20th- Century Taiwan: State-building, regime transformation and the construction of national identity. The China Quarterly, 165: 102129.Connelly, M. (2014). Historia de Taiwán. El Colegio de México.Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2): 126-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501Damm, J. (2011). From ‘overseas chinese’ to ‘overseas taiwanese’: Questions of identity and belonging.Domestic, regional and global perspectives. En G. Schubert y J. Damm (Eds.), Taiwanese Identity in the 21st Century (pp. 51-71). Routledge.Deans, P. (2005). Isolation, identity and Taiwanese stamps as vehicles for regime legitimation. East Asia, 22 (2): 8-30.Dittmer, L. (2006). Taiwan as a factor in China’s quest for national identity. Journal of Contemporary China, 15 (49): 671-686. DOI:10.1080/10670560600836721Eskildse, R. (2005). Taiwan: A periphery in search of a narrative. The Journal of Asian Studies, 64 (2): 281-294.Genest, M. A. (2004). Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. Wadsworth.George Wei, C. X. (2012). U.S.-China relations and its impact on the reconstruction of national identity in Taiwan. En B. Guo y C. Teng (Eds.), Taiwan and the Rise of China (pp. 51-72). Lexington Books.Gold, T. (2008). Taiwan’s Quest for Identity in the Shadow of China. En D. Fell (ed.), The Politics of Modern Taiwan (pp.83-103). Routledge.Griffiths, M., O’Callaghan, T. y Roach, S. (2008). International Relations: The Key Concepts. Routledge.Harvey, J. y Stansfield, G. (2009). Theorizing unrecognized states: Sovereignty, secessionism, and political economy: James Harvey and Gareth Stansfield. En N. Caspersen y N. Stansfield, G. (Eds.), Unrecognized States in the International System (pp. 1-26). Routledge.Hobson, J. (2000). The State and the International Relations. Cambridge University Press.Holtug, N. (2017). Identity, causality and social cohesion. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43 (7): 1084-1100. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2016.1227697Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23 (1): 171-200.Hopf, T. (2002). Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies. Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Cornell University Press.Hsü, I. C. Y. (2000). The Rise of Modern China. Oxford University Press.Hughes, C. R. (2011). Negotiating National Identity in Taiwan: Between nativization and des-sicnization. En R. Ash, J. W. Garver y P. B. Prime (Eds.), Taiwan Democracy: Economic and Politics Challenges (pp. 51-74). Routledge.Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94 (1): 7-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241Jackson, R. (2005). Classical and Modern Thought on International Relations: From Anarchy to Cosmopolis. Palgrave McMillan.Jackson, R. y Sorensen, G. (2003). Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford University Press.Joint Communique between the United States and China (1972). History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/121325Jung, H. (2019). The evolution of social constructivism in political science: Past to present. SAGE Open, 2 (1): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832703Kang, J., Kim, J. y Wang, Y. (2015). Salvaging national pride: The 2010 taekwondo controversy and Taiwan’s quest for global recognition. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50 (1): 98-114.Kaufman, J. K. (2013). Introduction to International Relations: Theory and Practice. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Keith, R. C. (2017). Deng Xiaoping and China’s Foreign Policy. Routledge.Kim, S. (2018). Chinese foreign policy in theory and practice. En S. Kim (Ed.), China and The World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium (pp. 3-33). Routledge.Kowert, P. (1998). Agent versus structure in the construction of national identity. En V. Kublákova, N. Onuf y P. Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a Constructed World (pp. 101-122). M. E. Sharpe.Krasner, S. D. (2009). Power, the State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations. Routledge.Laio, N. (2019). Identity, Role Conception, and Status Dilemma: A socio-psychological account of China-U.S. relations. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 5 (3): 343-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500180Lamley, H. (2007). Taiwan under japanese rule, 1895- 1945. The vicissitudes of colonialism. En M. A. Rubinstein (Ed.), Taiwan. A New History (pp.201-260). M. E. Sharpe.Lemus, D. y Cerda, C. (2021). China or Taiwan? The tricky dilemma of diplomatic recognition: The salvadorean experience. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations, 7 (1): 45-78.Lemus-Delgado, D. (2021). International sports events and national identity: The opening ceremony of the Taipei Universiade. Sport in Society, 24 (7): 1093- 1109. DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2020.1732929Makeham, J. (2005). Introduction. En J. Makeham y A. Hsiau (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan (pp. 1-14). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980618_1Mantorphe, J. (2009). Forbidden Nation: A History of Taiwan. Palgrave MacMillan.McAllister, I. (2016). Democratic consolidation in Taiwan in comparative perspective. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1 (1): 44-61.Menzies, G. (2013). 1421: el año en que China descubrió al mundo. Debolsillo.Min Kuo, C. H. (2004). Taiwan. En Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations (vol. 4, pp. 645-659). Gale.Neumann, I. B. y Gstöhl, S. (2006). Introduction: Lilliputians in Gulliver’s world? En C. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann y S. Gstöhl (Eds.). Small States in International Relations (pp. 3-36). University of Washington Press.Nien-chung, C. (2016). China’s new foreign policy under Xi Jinping. Asian Security, 12 (2): 82-91. DOI:10.1080/14799855.2016.1183195Özlük, E. y Murat, C. (2010). Burying sovereignty in its birth place: Back to the middle age. En S. F. Krishna-Hense (Ed.), Order and Disorder in the International System (pp. 171-182). Routledge.Parker, G. (1998). Geopolitics: Past, present and Future. Routledge.Pelosi, N. (2022, 2 de agosto). Nancy Pelosi: Por esto estoy liderando una delegación del Congreso estadounidense a Taiwán. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/es/post-opinion/2022/08/03/nancy-pelosi-taiwan-visitachina-razones-articulo/Pew Research Center (2020). En Taiwan, Views of Mainland China Mostly Negative. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/05/PG_2020.05.12_Taiwan_final.pdfPrice, R. M. y Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous liaisons? Constructivism and critical international theory. European Journal of International Relations, 4, 259-294.República de Taiwán (2022). National Statistics: Population and Housing. https://eng.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=41871&ctNode=2815&mp=5Restad, H. E. (2020). What makes America great? Donald Trump, national identity, and U.S. foreign policy. Global Affairs, 6 (1): 21-36. DOI:10.1080/23340460.2020.1734955Reus-Smith, C. (2005). Constructivism. En S. Burchill, A. Linklater y R. Devetak (Eds.), Theories of International Relations (pp. 188-210). Palgrave MacMillan.Rigger, S (2011). Why Taiwan Matters: Small Island, Global Power. Rowman and Littlefield.Rupert, M. (2013). Marxism. En T. Dunne, M. Kurki, y S. Smith (Eds.), International Relations Theories Discipline and Diversity (pp. 153-170). Oxford University Press.Saurin, J. (2006). International relations as imperial illusion; or, the need of decolonize IR. En B. G. Jones (Ed.), Decolonizing International Relations (pp. 23-42). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Skoggard, I. (2001). Taiwan. En C. R. Ember y M. Ember (Eds.), Countries and Their Cultures (Vol. 4, pp. 2161-2176). Macmillan Publishers.Slomp, G. (2008). On Sovereignty. En T. C. Salmon y M. F. Imber (eds.), Issues in International Relations (pp. 33-46). Routledge.Stevens, P. (2016). Democracy and national destinies on Taiwan. Nations and Nationalism, 22 (4): 666-685.Sutch, P. y Elias, J. (2007). International Relations: The Basics. Routledge.The Taiwan Affairs Office and The Information Office of the State Council (2000, 17 de mayo). White Paper—The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/ceno/eng/ztxw/twwt/t110655.htmVasu, N., Chin, Y. y Law, K. (2013). Introduction: Un/ settled narrations. En N. Vasu, Y. Chin y K. Law (Eds.), Nationalism in the Asia Pacific. Nation, national narratives and Communities in Asia Pacific (pp. 12-17). Routledge.Wachman, A. (1994) Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. M. E. Sharpe.Wang, T. Y. (2000). One China, one Taiwan: An analysis of the democratic progressive party’s China policy. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 35 (1): 159-182. Wang, A., Wu, C., Yeh, Y. y Chen, F. (2018, 10 de noviembre). What does the 1992 Consensus mean to citizens in Taiwan? The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/11/what-doesthe-1992-consensus-mean-to-citizens-in-taiwan/ Wei, C. y Lai, C. J. (2017). Identities, rationality and Taiwan’s China policy: The dynamics of cross-strait exchanges. Asian Studies Review, 41 (1): 136-154. DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2016.1263276Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46 (2): 391-425.Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review, 88 (2): 384-396.Wilkinson, P. (2007). International Relations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Wills, J. E. (2007). The seventeenth-century transformations: Taiwan under the Dutch and the Cheng regime. En M. A. Rubinstein (Ed.), Taiwan, A New History (pp. 84-106). M. E. Sharpe.Wong, T. K. (2001). From ethnic to civic nationalism: The formation and changing nature of Taiwanese identity. Asian Perspective, 25 (3): 175-206.Ying, W. (2014). ¿Qué significa ser taiwanés? Prespectiva Global, 2 (2): 89-96.Zhong, Y. (2016). Explaining national identity shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25 (99): 336- 352. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866Daniel Lemus-Delgado - 2022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/8419China;Taiwan;constructivism;national identityChina;Taiwán;constructivismo;identidad nacionalReflexiones sobre la política exterior de Taiwán: entre espacios reales e imaginadosThe Relationship between Real and Imagined Spaces: Reflections on Taiwan’s Foreign PolicyArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2582https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/426294c1-af6c-4b10-bd78-55d5a923b776/downloadadc3c76a2d04192553bc943585629589MD51001/15155oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/151552024-06-05 15:04:41.882http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Daniel Lemus-Delgado - 2022https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Publicaciones similares