La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum

Desde 1945, la mayoría de los conflictos armados tuvieron lugar entre Estados y rebeldes o entre grupos armados no estatales al interior de Estados frágiles o fallidos. En la actualidad, los dramas en Irak, Siria y en Ucrania nos muestran que la guerra civil es uno de los males más importantes de nu...

Full description

Autores:: Kress, Klaus

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2017

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_73611e4b59db0a7c1950ae4094ca02a9
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/8030
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	The Head of Jano in the Evolution of Internal ius in bello and the Question of the New Internal ius contra bellum internum
title	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum
spellingShingle	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum Historical development of the law of non-international armed conflict Assimilation of the law of non-international armed conflict the right of non-international armed conflict Customary law of armed conflict Desarrollo histórico del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional Asimilación del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional al Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional Derecho consuetudinario del conflicto armado
title_short	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum
title_full	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum
title_fullStr	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum
title_full_unstemmed	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum
title_sort	La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Kress, Klaus
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Kress, Klaus
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Historical development of the law of non-international armed conflict Assimilation of the law of non-international armed conflict the right of non-international armed conflict Customary law of armed conflict
topic	Historical development of the law of non-international armed conflict Assimilation of the law of non-international armed conflict the right of non-international armed conflict Customary law of armed conflict Desarrollo histórico del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional Asimilación del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional al Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional Derecho consuetudinario del conflicto armado
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Desarrollo histórico del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional Asimilación del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional al Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional Derecho consuetudinario del conflicto armado
description	Desde 1945, la mayoría de los conflictos armados tuvieron lugar entre Estados y rebeldes o entre grupos armados no estatales al interior de Estados frágiles o fallidos. En la actualidad, los dramas en Irak, Siria y en Ucrania nos muestran que la guerra civil es uno de los males más importantes de nuestro tiempo. Reconociendo este hecho, el Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional, en particular desde la primera mitad de los años 90, ha experimentado un desarrollo bastante tormentoso. Este desarrollo legal tiene dos caras como la cabeza de Jano: por un lado, está caracterizado por la humanización del Derecho de los conflictos armados no internacionales. Sin embargo, por otro lado, las reglas que gobiernan las conductas en hostilidades se han cristalizado, y su denominación como ‘humanitaria’ no deja de ser eufemística. Vale la pena preguntar si el desarrollo de la ley de conflictos armados no internacionales debe complementarse con un Derecho contra el conflicto armado no internacional. La controversia presente sobre una política legal acerca del privilegio del combatiente para guerreros no estatales debe desenvolverse bajo esta nueva luz.
publishDate	2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2017-12-12 00:00:00 2022-09-08T13:43:43Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2017-12-12 00:00:00 2022-09-08T13:43:43Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2017-12-12
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/01210483.v38n104.06
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2108
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0121-0483
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8030
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v38n104.06
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/01210483.v38n104.06 2346-2108 0121-0483
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8030 https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v38n104.06
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/download/5212/6279
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 104 , Año 2017
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	202
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	104
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	179
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv	38
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Derecho Penal y Criminología
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Andreas Paulus/Mindia Vashakmadze. “Asymmetrical War and the Notion of Armed Conflict: A Tentative Conceptualization”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, 2009. Anthony Cullen. The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010. Antonio Cassese (ed.). Current Problems of International Law. Essays on U.N. Law and on the Law of Armed Conflict, Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, Milan, 1975. Antonio Cassese (ed.). The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, Editoriale Scientifica S.r.l., Naples, 1979. Antonio Cassese. “Should Rebels be Treated as Criminals? Some Modest roposals for Rendering Internal Armed Conflicts Less Inhumane”, en Antonio Cassese (ed.). Realizing Utopia. The Future of International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012. Auswärtiges Amt/Deutsches Rotes Kreuz/Bundesministerium der Verteidigung (eds), Dokumente zum Humanitären Völkerrecht, 2nd ed., Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, 2012. Ben Saul. ‘Legislating from A Radical The Hague: The UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon Invents an International Crime of Terrorism’, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, 2011. Christophe Swinarski (ed.). Études et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, icrc/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984. Claus Kress, “Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force”, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, Vol. 1, 2014. Claus Kress. “Review of Books”, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 83, 2012 Claus Kress. “Some Reflections on the International Legal Framework Governing Transnational Armed Conflict”, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 15, 2010. Claus Kress. “Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, 2009. Claus Kress. “War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflict and the Emerging System of International Criminal Justice”, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 30, 2000. Claus Kress/Leonie von Holtzendorff . “The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, 2010. Emily Crawford. The Treatment of Combatants and Insurgents under the Law of Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010. Frédéric Mégret. “Civil Disobedience” and International Law: Sketch for a Theoretical Argument”, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 46, 2010. Frédéric Mégret. “Should Rebels be Amnestied?”, en C. Stahn, J. Easterday and J. Iverson (eds.), Jus Post Bellum. Mapping the Normative Foundations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014. Jean d’Asprémont y Jérôme de Hemptinne. Droit international humanitaire, Editions A. Pedone, Paris, 2012. Jean S. Pictet. The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Commentary: iv Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Geneva, 1958. Jean-Henry Dunant. Un souvenir de Solférino, Cassel, London, 1947. Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck (eds.). Customary International Humanitarian Law, Vol. I: Rules. Vol. II: Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. Jeff McMahan. Killing in War, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009. Kenneth Watkin. “Opportunity Lost: Organized Armed Groups and the icrc ‘Direct Participation in Hostilities’ Interpretive Guidance”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 42, 2010. Lindsay Moir. The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2002 Mary Ellen O’Connell. “Combatants and Combat Zone”, University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 43, 2008-2009. Mary Ellen O’Connell. “Historical Development and Legal Basis”, en Dieter Fleck (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013. Niaz A. Shah. “The Use of Force under Islamic Law”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, 2013. Nigel Biggar. In Defence of War, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013. Nils Melzer. “Keeping the Balance Between Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the icrc’s Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 42, 2010. Noam Lubell y Nathan Derejko. “A Global Battlefied. Drones and the Geographical Scope of Armed Conflict”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 11, 2013. Noam Lub ell. Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010. Reinhard Merkel. “Die ‘kollaterale’ Tötung von Zivilisten im Krieg. Rechtsethische Grundlagen und Grenzen einer prekären Erlaubnis des humanitären Völkerrechts“, Juristen Zeitung, Vol. 67, 2012. Robin Geiss. “Military Necessity: A Fundamental ‘Principle’ Fallen Into Oblivion”, en Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Jana Gogolin (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2008. Sandesh Sivakuraman. The Law of International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012. Stefan Barriga/Claus Kress (eds.). The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War”, British Year Book of International Law, Vol. 29, 1952. Theodor Meron. “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, 2000. Thomas Buergenthal. “Human Rights”, en Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Vol. iv, Oxford University Press, 2012. W. Hays Parks. “Part ix of the icrc ‘Direct Participation Study’: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 42, 2010. Yoram Dinstein. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 2a ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Instituto de Ciencias Penales y Criminológicas
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/view/5212
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/a5eedacc-c7f1-4e10-814b-b44a4257c3c8/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	ad756b93c090a4e91e97fae6137451f4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1828229800829911040
spelling	Kress, Klaus66d943c9-0c6b-457f-a773-9a75980be3543002017-12-12 00:00:002022-09-08T13:43:43Z2017-12-12 00:00:002022-09-08T13:43:43Z2017-12-12Desde 1945, la mayoría de los conflictos armados tuvieron lugar entre Estados y rebeldes o entre grupos armados no estatales al interior de Estados frágiles o fallidos. En la actualidad, los dramas en Irak, Siria y en Ucrania nos muestran que la guerra civil es uno de los males más importantes de nuestro tiempo. Reconociendo este hecho, el Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional, en particular desde la primera mitad de los años 90, ha experimentado un desarrollo bastante tormentoso. Este desarrollo legal tiene dos caras como la cabeza de Jano: por un lado, está caracterizado por la humanización del Derecho de los conflictos armados no internacionales. Sin embargo, por otro lado, las reglas que gobiernan las conductas en hostilidades se han cristalizado, y su denominación como ‘humanitaria’ no deja de ser eufemística. Vale la pena preguntar si el desarrollo de la ley de conflictos armados no internacionales debe complementarse con un Derecho contra el conflicto armado no internacional. La controversia presente sobre una política legal acerca del privilegio del combatiente para guerreros no estatales debe desenvolverse bajo esta nueva luz.Since 1945, most armed conflicts took place between states and rebels or between non-state armed groups within fragile or failed states. Currently, the dramas in Iraq, Syria and Ukraine show us that the civil war is one of the major evils of our time. Recognizing this fact, the right of non-international armed conflict, particularly since the first half of the 90s, has experienced a rather stormy development. This legal development has two faces like Janus head: one is characterized by the humanization of the law of non-international armed conflicts. However, on the other hand, the rules governing conduct in hostilities have crystallized, where his name as ‘humanitarian’ continues to be euphemistic. It is worth asking whether the development of the law of non-international armed conflict must be complemented by a right against non-international armed conflict. The present controversy over legal policy about the privilege to non-state Fighter warriors must operate in this new light.application/pdf10.18601/01210483.v38n104.062346-21080121-0483https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8030https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v38n104.06spaInstituto de Ciencias Penales y Criminológicashttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/download/5212/6279Núm. 104 , Año 201720210417938Derecho Penal y CriminologíaAndreas Paulus/Mindia Vashakmadze. “Asymmetrical War and the Notion of Armed Conflict: A Tentative Conceptualization”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, 2009.Anthony Cullen. The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.Antonio Cassese (ed.). Current Problems of International Law. Essays on U.N. Law and on the Law of Armed Conflict, Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore, Milan, 1975.Antonio Cassese (ed.). The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, Editoriale Scientifica S.r.l., Naples, 1979.Antonio Cassese. “Should Rebels be Treated as Criminals? Some Modest roposals for Rendering Internal Armed Conflicts Less Inhumane”, en Antonio Cassese (ed.). Realizing Utopia. The Future of International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.Auswärtiges Amt/Deutsches Rotes Kreuz/Bundesministerium der Verteidigung (eds), Dokumente zum Humanitären Völkerrecht, 2nd ed., Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, 2012.Ben Saul. ‘Legislating from A Radical The Hague: The UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon Invents an International Crime of Terrorism’, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, 2011.Christophe Swinarski (ed.). Études et essais sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet, icrc/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Geneva/The Hague, 1984.Claus Kress, “Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force”, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, Vol. 1, 2014.Claus Kress. “Review of Books”, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 83, 2012Claus Kress. “Some Reflections on the International Legal Framework Governing Transnational Armed Conflict”, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 15, 2010.Claus Kress. “Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, 2009.Claus Kress. “War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflict and the Emerging System of International Criminal Justice”, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 30, 2000.Claus Kress/Leonie von Holtzendorff . “The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, 2010.Emily Crawford. The Treatment of Combatants and Insurgents under the Law of Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.Frédéric Mégret. “Civil Disobedience” and International Law: Sketch for a Theoretical Argument”, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 46, 2010.Frédéric Mégret. “Should Rebels be Amnestied?”, en C. Stahn, J. Easterday and J. Iverson (eds.), Jus Post Bellum. Mapping the Normative Foundations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.Jean d’Asprémont y Jérôme de Hemptinne. Droit international humanitaire, Editions A. Pedone, Paris, 2012.Jean S. Pictet. The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Commentary: iv Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Geneva, 1958.Jean-Henry Dunant. Un souvenir de Solférino, Cassel, London, 1947.Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck (eds.). Customary International Humanitarian Law, Vol. I: Rules. Vol. II: Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.Jeff McMahan. Killing in War, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.Kenneth Watkin. “Opportunity Lost: Organized Armed Groups and the icrc ‘Direct Participation in Hostilities’ Interpretive Guidance”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 42, 2010.Lindsay Moir. The Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Cambridge University Press, 2002Mary Ellen O’Connell. “Combatants and Combat Zone”, University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 43, 2008-2009.Mary Ellen O’Connell. “Historical Development and Legal Basis”, en Dieter Fleck (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.Niaz A. Shah. “The Use of Force under Islamic Law”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, 2013.Nigel Biggar. In Defence of War, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.Nils Melzer. “Keeping the Balance Between Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the icrc’s Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 42, 2010.Noam Lubell y Nathan Derejko. “A Global Battlefied. Drones and the Geographical Scope of Armed Conflict”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 11, 2013.Noam Lub ell. Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.Reinhard Merkel. “Die ‘kollaterale’ Tötung von Zivilisten im Krieg. Rechtsethische Grundlagen und Grenzen einer prekären Erlaubnis des humanitären Völkerrechts“, Juristen Zeitung, Vol. 67, 2012.Robin Geiss. “Military Necessity: A Fundamental ‘Principle’ Fallen Into Oblivion”, en Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Rüdiger Wolfrum, Jana Gogolin (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2008.Sandesh Sivakuraman. The Law of International Armed Conflict, Oxford University Press, 2012.Stefan Barriga/Claus Kress (eds.). The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War”, British Year Book of International Law, Vol. 29, 1952.Theodor Meron. “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94, 2000.Thomas Buergenthal. “Human Rights”, en Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Vol. iv, Oxford University Press, 2012.W. Hays Parks. “Part ix of the icrc ‘Direct Participation Study’: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 42, 2010.Yoram Dinstein. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 2a ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/view/5212Historical development of the law of non-international armed conflictAssimilation of the law of non-international armed conflict the right of non-international armed conflictCustomary law of armed conflictDesarrollo histórico del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacionalAsimilación del Derecho del conflicto armado no internacional al Derecho del conflicto armado no internacionalDerecho consuetudinario del conflicto armadoLa cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internumThe Head of Jano in the Evolution of Internal ius in bello and the Question of the New Internal ius contra bellum internumArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2599https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/a5eedacc-c7f1-4e10-814b-b44a4257c3c8/downloadad756b93c090a4e91e97fae6137451f4MD51001/8030oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/80302023-08-14 15:22:05.075https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

La cabeza de Jano en la evolución del ius in bello interno y la cuestión del nuevo ius contra bellum internum

Publicaciones similares