Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030

Este artículo es una crítica el Marco de Sendai para la Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres 2015-2030 (MSRRD), que la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas adoptó como el actual marco internacional de referencia no vinculante sobre este tema. Esta crítica de construye el enfoque tecnocrático que el...

Full description

Autores:: Osorio Piñeros, Julián David

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2020

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_5c8eb09d3313863b8563359c174d3aa8
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/11194
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
title	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
spellingShingle	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030 Sendai Framework; Technocracy; Epistemology; Vulnerability; Natural hazards; Poverty; Development Marco de Sendai; tecnocracia; epistemología; vulnerabilidad; eventos de la naturaleza; pobreza; desarrollo
title_short	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
title_full	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
title_fullStr	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
title_full_unstemmed	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
title_sort	Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Osorio Piñeros, Julián David
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Osorio Piñeros, Julián David
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Sendai Framework; Technocracy; Epistemology; Vulnerability; Natural hazards; Poverty; Development
topic	Sendai Framework; Technocracy; Epistemology; Vulnerability; Natural hazards; Poverty; Development Marco de Sendai; tecnocracia; epistemología; vulnerabilidad; eventos de la naturaleza; pobreza; desarrollo
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Marco de Sendai; tecnocracia; epistemología; vulnerabilidad; eventos de la naturaleza; pobreza; desarrollo
description	Este artículo es una crítica el Marco de Sendai para la Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres 2015-2030 (MSRRD), que la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas adoptó como el actual marco internacional de referencia no vinculante sobre este tema. Esta crítica de construye el enfoque tecnocrático que el MSRRD utiliza para comprender qué es el riesgo de desastres por eventos de la naturaleza, porque paradójicamente este enfoque promueve la adopción de políticas que aumentan la vulnerabilidad de las personas a este fenómeno. Hablando en términos epistemológicos, el MSRRD presenta una aproximación racionalista al riesgo de desastres. La señalada paradoja ocurre porque el enfoque tecnocrático no está diseñado para establecer cómo la conducta humana que se refleja en la estructura social, económica y política de la sociedad es un factor causal de vulnerabilidad al riesgo de desastres. Con la deconstrucción que el artículo desarrolla, se demuestra que el MSRRD se fundamenta en los siguientes paradigmas: 1) la idea de descargar en la ciencia y la tecnología la responsabilidad de resolver los problemas creados por el hombre, como por ejemplo la vulnerabilidad al riesgo de desastre, y 2) la modernización como teoría del desarrollo. Estos paradigmas no reconocen a la conducta humana como factor causal de vulnerabilidad.
publishDate	2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2020-08-20 15:51:45 2022-09-09T21:05:35Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2020-08-20 15:51:45 2022-09-09T21:05:35Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2020-08-20
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/01229893.n47.10
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2051
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0122-9893
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11194
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n47.10
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/01229893.n47.10 2346-2051 0122-9893
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11194 https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n47.10
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6769/9188 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6769/9678 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6769/9786
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 47 , Año 2020 : Septiembre-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	342
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	47
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	319
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Derecho del Estado
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Arbour, M. et al. Lessons from the Chilean earthquake: How a human rights framework facilitates disaster response. In Health and Human Rights Journal. Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2011. Available on: https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2469/2013/06/Arbour-final2.pdf (accessed 23 May 2020). Aronsson-Storrier, M. & da Costa, K. Regulating disasters? The role of International Law in disaster prevention and management. In Disaster Prevention and Management. Vol. 26, Issue 5, 2017. Aronsson-Storrier, M. Sendai five years on: Reflections on the role of International Law in the creation and reduction of disaster risk. In International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2020. Carlin, R. et al. Trust shaken: Earthquake damage, State capacity, and interpersonal trust in comparative perspective. In Comparative Politics. Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2014. Concannon, B. & Lindstrom, B. Cheaper, better, longer-lasting: A rights-based approach to disaster response in Haiti. In Emory International Law Review. Vol. 25, Issue 3, 2011. Charlt on, B. & Andras, P. The Modernization Imperative. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2003. Domonkos, S. Critical theory and political socialization. In Belvedere Meridionale. Vol. xxvi, 4, 2014. Available on: http://www.belvedere-meridionale.hu/lapszamok/2014-4/04_sik _Belvedere_2014_4_56-63pp.pdf (accessed 21 May 2020). Etkin, D. Disaster Theory. Amsterdam and Boston: Butterworth and Heinemann, 2016. Feldman, S. M. How to be critical. In Chicago-Kent Law Review. Vol. 76, Issue 2, 2000. Fitzpatrick, D. & Compton, C. Disaster risk reduction and the State: The failure of no- build zones after Typhoon Haiyan. In Samuel, K. L., Aronsson-Storrier, M. & Bookmill er, K. N. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction and International Law. Cambridge: cup, 2019. Giddens, A. The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990. Glantz, M. H. et al. Working with a Changing Climate, not Against it. Boulder: Consortium for Capacity Building/Instaar, University of Colorado, 2014. Available on: http://sparetimeuniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ShortExSum_01-16c-14_mhgfinal2.pdf (accessed 19 July 2019). Hovden, J. Risk and Uncertainty Management Strategies. 6th International crn Expert Workshop: Societal Security and Crisis Management in the 21st Century. Stockholm. 22-24 April 2004. Available on: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/13607/Report_crn _Stockholm.pdf (accessed 5 June 2019). Interview to M. Heidegger. Only a God can save us: The Spiegel interview (1966). In Sheehan, T. (ed.), Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker. New Jersey: Transaction, 2010. Kelm an, I.; Mercer, J. & Gaill ard, J. C. Indigenous knowledge and disaster risk reduction. In Geography. Vol. 97, Issue 1, 2012. Latour, B. Love your monsters. In Breakthrough Journal. 2, 2011. Available on: https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-2/love-your-monsters#body6 (accessed 21 July 2019). Linton, M. D. Modernization. In Paul, J. (ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2017. Lupton, D. Risk. 2nd. ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. Misa, T. J. The compelling tangle of modernity and technology. In Misa, T. J., Brey, P. & Feenberg, A. (eds.), Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press, 2003. Mol, A. P. The environmental transformation of the modern order. In Misa, T. J., Brey, P. & Feenberg, A. (eds.), Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press, 2003. Ogborn, M. Modernity and modernization. In Cloke, P., Crang, P. & Goodwin, M. (eds.), Introducing Human Geographies. 3rd. ed. Hoboken; Taylor and Francis, 2013. O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K. & Wisner, B. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. In Nature. Vol. 260, 1976. Presidencia de la República de Colombia. Decreto n.º 308 del 24 de febrero de 2016, “Por medio del cual se adopta el Plan Nacional de Gestión de Riesgo de Desastres”. Available on: https://dapre.presidencia.gov.co/normativa/normativa/decreto%20308%20del%2024%20de%20febrero%20de%202016.pdf and http://portal.gestiondelriesgo.gov.co/Paginas/Plan-Nacional-Gestion-Riesgo-de-Desastres.aspx (accessed 23 June 2020). Przeworski, A. & Limongi, F. Modernization: Theories and facts. In World Politics. Vol. 49, Issue 2, 1997. Sheppard, E. et al. A World of Difference: Encountering and Contesting Development. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2009. UNISDR. un Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction. Proposed Elements for Consideration in the Pos-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. 17 December 2013. United Nations General Assembly. International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Res 42/169. 11 December 1987. United Nations General Assembly. International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Report of the Secretary General. Res A/44/322. 20 June 1989. United Nations General Assembly. International Framework of Action for the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Res 44/236. 22 December 1989. United Nations General Assembly. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. A/ res/66/199. 22 December 2011. United Nations General Assembly. Preparatory Committee of the Third un World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction. First Session. Suggested Elements for the Pos-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. A/conf.224/pc(I)/6. 14-15 July 2014. United Nations General Assembly. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Res 69/283. 23 June 2015. United Nations General Assembly. Report of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Expert Working Group on Indicators and Terminology Relating to Disaster Risk Reduction. Res 71/644. 1 December 2016. United Nations Economic and Social Council. Report of the Secretary-General. Final Report of the Scientific and Technical Committee of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Addendum. A/54/132/Add.1-E/1999/80/Add.1. 18 June 1999. United Nations Off ice for Disaster Risk Reduction. Report of the unisdr Scientific and Technical Advisory Group 2013. Available on: https://www.unisdr.org/files/32609_ stagreport2013assembled.pdf (accessed 19 July 2019). United Nations Off ice for Disaster Risk Reduction. The Science and Technology Roadmap to Support the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. 2016. Available on: (https://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrscienceandtechnologyroadmap.pdf) (accessed 20 July 2019). United Nations Off ice for Disaster Risk Reduction. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2019. Available on: https://gar.unisdr.org/sites/default/files/reports/2019-05/full_gar_report.pdf (accessed 19 July 2019). Venn, C. & Featherstone, M. Modernity. In Theory, Culture & Society. 2006. Vol. 23, Issue 2-3, 2006. Available on: https://www.reading.ac.uk/library/ (accessed 8 May 2019). Weinberg, A. M. Can Technology Replace Social Engineering? In Teich, A. H. (ed.), Technology and Man’s Future. 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981. Will is, K. Theories and Practices of Development. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2011. Wisner, B. et al. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2003. Wisner, B. Five years beyond Sendai. Can we get beyond frameworks? In International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2020. World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction. Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action for Safer World / Guidelines for Natural Disaster Prevention, Preparedness and Mitigation. Yokohama, Japan. 23-27 May 1994. Endorsed by the un Doc. A/ conf.172/9. 27 September 1994. World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. 18-22 January 2005. Endorsed by the un Doc A/conf.206/6. 16 March 2005.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Julián David Osorio Piñeros - 2020
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Julián David Osorio Piñeros - 2020 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf application/xml text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/6769
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/4be6bf25-f31c-4a51-996b-5376754dc6d7/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	ac2d194406d08a3c0da9c1af02b0614d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1814100381401088000
spelling	Osorio Piñeros, Julián David4ab99130-59bf-4388-bec8-b3a8ec8d88112020-08-20 15:51:452022-09-09T21:05:35Z2020-08-20 15:51:452022-09-09T21:05:35Z2020-08-20Este artículo es una crítica el Marco de Sendai para la Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres 2015-2030 (MSRRD), que la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas adoptó como el actual marco internacional de referencia no vinculante sobre este tema. Esta crítica de construye el enfoque tecnocrático que el MSRRD utiliza para comprender qué es el riesgo de desastres por eventos de la naturaleza, porque paradójicamente este enfoque promueve la adopción de políticas que aumentan la vulnerabilidad de las personas a este fenómeno. Hablando en términos epistemológicos, el MSRRD presenta una aproximación racionalista al riesgo de desastres. La señalada paradoja ocurre porque el enfoque tecnocrático no está diseñado para establecer cómo la conducta humana que se refleja en la estructura social, económica y política de la sociedad es un factor causal de vulnerabilidad al riesgo de desastres. Con la deconstrucción que el artículo desarrolla, se demuestra que el MSRRD se fundamenta en los siguientes paradigmas: 1) la idea de descargar en la ciencia y la tecnología la responsabilidad de resolver los problemas creados por el hombre, como por ejemplo la vulnerabilidad al riesgo de desastre, y 2) la modernización como teoría del desarrollo. Estos paradigmas no reconocen a la conducta humana como factor causal de vulnerabilidad.This article is a criticism of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 (SFDRR), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and currently the non-binding international policy on this topic. It deconstructs the SFDRR’S technocratic approach to disaster risk reduction, due to natural hazards, given the fact that it invites, paradoxically, to the adoption of policies that increase people´s vulnerability. Epistemologically speaking, the SFDRR holds a rationalist understanding of disaster risk, whose origin is in the modernisation theory of development. The undesired outcome of the technocratic understanding of disaster risk is because this approach is not able to trace the grounds of this phenomenon which are the human decisions represented in the social, economic and political structures of society which cause poverty, a vulnerability to disaster risk. In deconstructing the SFDRR’S rationalist understanding of disaster risk, I found this approach is grounded on two paradigms: 1) the idea of discharging on science and technology the responsibility to solve man-made problems such as vulnerability to disaster risk, and 2) the modernization theory of development. These paradigms do not recognize the role of human decisions in creating vulnerability.application/pdfapplication/xmltext/html10.18601/01229893.n47.102346-20510122-9893https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/11194https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n47.10spaDepartamento de Derecho Constitucionalhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6769/9188https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6769/9678https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/6769/9786Núm. 47 , Año 2020 : Septiembre-Diciembre34247319Revista Derecho del EstadoArbour, M. et al. Lessons from the Chilean earthquake: How a human rights framework facilitates disaster response. In Health and Human Rights Journal. Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2011. Available on: https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2469/2013/06/Arbour-final2.pdf (accessed 23 May 2020).Aronsson-Storrier, M. & da Costa, K. Regulating disasters? The role of International Law in disaster prevention and management. In Disaster Prevention and Management. Vol. 26, Issue 5, 2017.Aronsson-Storrier, M. Sendai five years on: Reflections on the role of International Law in the creation and reduction of disaster risk. In International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2020.Carlin, R. et al. Trust shaken: Earthquake damage, State capacity, and interpersonal trust in comparative perspective. In Comparative Politics. Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2014.Concannon, B. & Lindstrom, B. Cheaper, better, longer-lasting: A rights-based approach to disaster response in Haiti. In Emory International Law Review. Vol. 25, Issue 3, 2011.Charlt on, B. & Andras, P. The Modernization Imperative. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2003.Domonkos, S. Critical theory and political socialization. In Belvedere Meridionale. Vol. xxvi, 4, 2014. Available on: http://www.belvedere-meridionale.hu/lapszamok/2014-4/04_sik _Belvedere_2014_4_56-63pp.pdf (accessed 21 May 2020).Etkin, D. Disaster Theory. Amsterdam and Boston: Butterworth and Heinemann, 2016.Feldman, S. M. How to be critical. In Chicago-Kent Law Review. Vol. 76, Issue 2, 2000.Fitzpatrick, D. & Compton, C. Disaster risk reduction and the State: The failure of no- build zones after Typhoon Haiyan. In Samuel, K. L., Aronsson-Storrier, M. & Bookmill er, K. N. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction and International Law. Cambridge: cup, 2019.Giddens, A. The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.Glantz, M. H. et al. Working with a Changing Climate, not Against it. Boulder: Consortium for Capacity Building/Instaar, University of Colorado, 2014. Available on: http://sparetimeuniversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/ShortExSum_01-16c-14_mhgfinal2.pdf (accessed 19 July 2019).Hovden, J. Risk and Uncertainty Management Strategies. 6th International crn Expert Workshop: Societal Security and Crisis Management in the 21st Century. Stockholm. 22-24 April 2004. Available on: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/13607/Report_crn _Stockholm.pdf (accessed 5 June 2019).Interview to M. Heidegger. Only a God can save us: The Spiegel interview (1966). In Sheehan, T. (ed.), Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker. New Jersey: Transaction, 2010.Kelm an, I.; Mercer, J. & Gaill ard, J. C. Indigenous knowledge and disaster risk reduction. In Geography. Vol. 97, Issue 1, 2012.Latour, B. Love your monsters. In Breakthrough Journal. 2, 2011. Available on: https://thebreakthrough.org/journal/issue-2/love-your-monsters#body6 (accessed 21 July 2019).Linton, M. D. Modernization. In Paul, J. (ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2017.Lupton, D. Risk. 2nd. ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Misa, T. J. The compelling tangle of modernity and technology. In Misa, T. J., Brey, P. & Feenberg, A. (eds.), Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press, 2003.Mol, A. P. The environmental transformation of the modern order. In Misa, T. J., Brey, P. & Feenberg, A. (eds.), Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press, 2003.Ogborn, M. Modernity and modernization. In Cloke, P., Crang, P. & Goodwin, M. (eds.), Introducing Human Geographies. 3rd. ed. Hoboken; Taylor and Francis, 2013.O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K. & Wisner, B. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. In Nature. Vol. 260, 1976.Presidencia de la República de Colombia. Decreto n.º 308 del 24 de febrero de 2016, “Por medio del cual se adopta el Plan Nacional de Gestión de Riesgo de Desastres”. Available on: https://dapre.presidencia.gov.co/normativa/normativa/decreto%20308%20del%2024%20de%20febrero%20de%202016.pdf and http://portal.gestiondelriesgo.gov.co/Paginas/Plan-Nacional-Gestion-Riesgo-de-Desastres.aspx (accessed 23 June 2020).Przeworski, A. & Limongi, F. Modernization: Theories and facts. In World Politics. Vol. 49, Issue 2, 1997.Sheppard, E. et al. A World of Difference: Encountering and Contesting Development. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2009.UNISDR. un Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Disaster Risk Reduction. Proposed Elements for Consideration in the Pos-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. 17 December 2013.United Nations General Assembly. International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Res 42/169. 11 December 1987.United Nations General Assembly. International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Report of the Secretary General. Res A/44/322. 20 June 1989.United Nations General Assembly. International Framework of Action for the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Res 44/236. 22 December 1989.United Nations General Assembly. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. A/ res/66/199. 22 December 2011.United Nations General Assembly. Preparatory Committee of the Third un World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction. First Session. Suggested Elements for the Pos-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. A/conf.224/pc(I)/6. 14-15 July 2014.United Nations General Assembly. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Res 69/283. 23 June 2015.United Nations General Assembly. Report of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Expert Working Group on Indicators and Terminology Relating to Disaster Risk Reduction. Res 71/644. 1 December 2016.United Nations Economic and Social Council. Report of the Secretary-General. Final Report of the Scientific and Technical Committee of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. Addendum. A/54/132/Add.1-E/1999/80/Add.1. 18 June 1999.United Nations Off ice for Disaster Risk Reduction. Report of the unisdr Scientific and Technical Advisory Group 2013. Available on: https://www.unisdr.org/files/32609_ stagreport2013assembled.pdf (accessed 19 July 2019).United Nations Off ice for Disaster Risk Reduction. The Science and Technology Roadmap to Support the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. 2016. Available on: (https://www.preventionweb.net/files/45270_unisdrscienceandtechnologyroadmap.pdf) (accessed 20 July 2019).United Nations Off ice for Disaster Risk Reduction. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2019. Available on: https://gar.unisdr.org/sites/default/files/reports/2019-05/full_gar_report.pdf (accessed 19 July 2019).Venn, C. & Featherstone, M. Modernity. In Theory, Culture & Society. 2006. Vol. 23, Issue 2-3, 2006. Available on: https://www.reading.ac.uk/library/ (accessed 8 May 2019).Weinberg, A. M. Can Technology Replace Social Engineering? In Teich, A. H. (ed.), Technology and Man’s Future. 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981.Will is, K. Theories and Practices of Development. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2011.Wisner, B. et al. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2003.Wisner, B. Five years beyond Sendai. Can we get beyond frameworks? In International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2020.World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction. Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action for Safer World / Guidelines for Natural Disaster Prevention, Preparedness and Mitigation. Yokohama, Japan. 23-27 May 1994. Endorsed by the un Doc. A/ conf.172/9. 27 September 1994.World Conference on Disaster Reduction. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. 18-22 January 2005. Endorsed by the un Doc A/conf.206/6. 16 March 2005.Julián David Osorio Piñeros - 2020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/6769Sendai Framework;Technocracy;Epistemology;Vulnerability;Natural hazards;Poverty;DevelopmentMarco de Sendai;tecnocracia;epistemología;vulnerabilidad;eventos de la naturaleza;pobreza;desarrolloTechnocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2596https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/4be6bf25-f31c-4a51-996b-5376754dc6d7/downloadac2d194406d08a3c0da9c1af02b0614dMD51001/11194oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/111942023-08-14 15:07:27.179https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Julián David Osorio Piñeros - 2020https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Technocracy, disaster risk reduction and development: A critique of the Sendai Framework 2015-2030

Publicaciones similares