Ambush marketing vs. official sponsorship: is the international I.P. an unfair competition regime a good referee?

Ambush marketing is a practice that will usually occurs in large-scale events, is not a sponsor seeks to gain benefits of brand exposure and awareness in a context that it would otherwise be available only to official sponsors. This paper addresses why and to what extend ambush marketing be contrast...

Full description

Autores:
Pardo Amézquita, Diego
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2016
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/26097
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/26097
https://doi.org/10.18601/16571959.n21.01
Palabra clave:
Intellectual Property
Trademarks
Copyright
Unfair Competition
Parasitic Marketing
Ambush Marketing
Business of Sports
Mass Events
Sponsorships
Rights
openAccess
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Description
Summary:Ambush marketing is a practice that will usually occurs in large-scale events, is not a sponsor seeks to gain benefits of brand exposure and awareness in a context that it would otherwise be available only to official sponsors. This paper addresses why and to what extend ambush marketing be contrasted, provided that it is a practice that current intellectual property and competition law has been unable to deter as well as an alternative measures are difficult to adopt at an international level. This difficulty jeopardizes official sponsoring’s interest on major events and the events themselves. As a result, this paper will (i) briefly examine the intersection between intellectual property rights and sport business in order to (ii) encase ambush marketing as a controversial –yet not necessarily illegal- business practice that exploits another’s commercial effort and deflects attention from official sponsorship of major events. It will then present (iii) the traditional and extraordinary legal responses to these practices, and the issues that they raise, to finally conclude that (iv) there is an urgent need to harmonize, at an international level, the legality –or not- of the matter, regardless of (v) the inherent ambush marketing paradoxes.