El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas
Este texto muestra la función y el desarrollo del principio de proporcionalidad en el establecimiento o autorización de las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio en la cpi. Para alcanzar este objetivo se estudia el concepto y fundamento normativo de estas figuras en el alto tribunal. Posterio...
- Autores:
-
Moratto, Simón
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Externado de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/8247
- Acceso en línea:
- https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8247
https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v41n111.06
- Palabra clave:
- principle;
proportionality;
restrictions;
disclosure;
icc.
principio;
proporcionalidad;
restricciones;
descubrimiento probatorio;
CPI
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Simón Moratto - 2021
| id |
uexternad2_2c86946aff3377d2b271e1cc4fe6f6e6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/8247 |
| network_acronym_str |
uexternad2 |
| network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas |
| dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv |
The Principle of Proportionality in the Disclosure Restrictions. At The Icc. State Of The Art, Criticism and Alternatives |
| title |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas |
| spellingShingle |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas principle; proportionality; restrictions; disclosure; icc. principio; proporcionalidad; restricciones; descubrimiento probatorio; CPI |
| title_short |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas |
| title_full |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas |
| title_fullStr |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas |
| title_full_unstemmed |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas |
| title_sort |
El principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativas |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Moratto, Simón |
| dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv |
Moratto, Simón |
| dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
principle; proportionality; restrictions; disclosure; icc. |
| topic |
principle; proportionality; restrictions; disclosure; icc. principio; proporcionalidad; restricciones; descubrimiento probatorio; CPI |
| dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
principio; proporcionalidad; restricciones; descubrimiento probatorio; CPI |
| description |
Este texto muestra la función y el desarrollo del principio de proporcionalidad en el establecimiento o autorización de las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio en la cpi. Para alcanzar este objetivo se estudia el concepto y fundamento normativo de estas figuras en el alto tribunal. Posteriormente, se analizan los puntos de contacto entre las instituciones que aquí convergen con la finalidad de lograr un entendimiento más completo de ellas, de manera que sea posible un análisis crítico del discurso de la Corte. Acto seguido se procede a señalar el estado del arte de este particular uso del principio de proporcionalidad en la jurisprudencia de este tribunal. Finalmente, se presentan algunas problemáticas de las que adolece este desarrollo y se propone una serie de soluciones a ellas. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-03 14:47:44 2022-09-08T13:45:48Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-03 14:47:44 2022-09-08T13:45:48Z |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-03 |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv |
Journal article |
| dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF |
| dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.18601/01210483.v41n111.06 |
| dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv |
2346-2108 |
| dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0121-0483 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8247 |
| dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v41n111.06 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.18601/01210483.v41n111.06 2346-2108 0121-0483 |
| url |
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8247 https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v41n111.06 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/download/7220/9905 |
| dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv |
Núm. 111 , Año 2020 : Julio-Diciembre |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
205 |
| dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv |
111 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
159 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv |
41 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derecho Penal y Criminología |
| dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv |
Alexy, Robert. “Sobre los derechos constitucionales a protección”, en Robert Alexy, José Bastida Freijedo, Juan Antonio García Amado, Alfonso Jaime García Figueroa, Luis Hierro Sánchez-Pescador, Josep Joan Moreso, C. Pardo, Gregorio Peces-Barba y Ernesto Valdés Garzón. Derechos sociales y ponderación, Madrid, Fundación Coloquio Jurídico Europeo, 2009. Alexy, Robert. Teoría de los derechos fundamentales, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2007. Ambos, Kai. “Confidential investigations (article 54 (3)(E) icc Statute) vs. Disclosure obligations: The Lubanga Case and National Law”, en New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, Berkeley, University of California Press, Fall 2009, vol. 12, n.º 4, pp. 543-568, disponible en [https://www.legal-tools. org/doc/c76c63/pdf/] (consulta: 7 de julio de 2019). Ambos, Kai. “The First judgement of the International Criminal Court (Prosecutor v. Lubanga): A comprehensive analysis of the legal issues”, en International Criminal Law Review, Leiden, Brill, 2012, vol. 12, pp. 115-153, disponible en [https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2030751] (consulta: 7 de julio de 2019). Ambos, Kai. Treatise on International Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Barak, Aharon. Proporcionalidad: los derechos fundamentales y sus restricciones, Lima, Palestra Editores, 2017. Bernal Cuéllar, Jaime y Eduardo Montealegre Lynett. El proceso penal, tomo i: Fundamentos constitucionales y teoría general, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2013. Bernal Cuéllar, Jaime y Eduardo Montealegre Lynett. El proceso penal, tomo ii: Estructura y garantías procesales, 6.ª edición, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2013. Bernal Pulido, Carlos. El principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2007. Brady, Helen. “Disclosure of Evidence”, en Roy S. Lee. The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Ardsley, Trans-national Publishers, 2001. Campbell Black, Henry. Black’s Law Dictionary. Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern, 4.ª ed., Minnesota, West Publishing Company, 1968. Chang-Jung Yang, Alice. The Prosecution’s Duty of Disclosure before Internatio-nal Criminal Tribunals (doctoral thesis), London, Brunel University-Brunel Law School, 2016. Cianello, Michele. “Disclosure before the icc: The emergence of a new form of po-licies implementation system in International Criminal Justice?”, en International Criminal Law Review, Leiden, Brill, 2010, col. 10, pp. 23-42. Fedorova, Masha. The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal Pro-ceedings, Cambridge, Intersentia, 2013. Fiori, Brando. Disclosure of Information in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Analysis of national and international criminal procedural systems and human rights law, Oisterwijk, Wolf Legal Publishers, 2015. Guerrero Peralta, Oscar Julián. El control de garantías como construcción de una función jurisdiccional, Bogotá, Escuela Judicial “Rodrigo Lara Bonilla”, 2006. Heinze, Alexander. International Criminal Procedure and Disclosure: an attempt to better understand and regulate disclosure and communication at the icc on the basis of a comprehensive and comparative theory of criminal procedure, Berlin, Duncker and Humblot GmbH, 2014. Jakobs, Günther. “Derecho Penal del Ciudadano y Derecho Penal del Enemigo”, en Manuel Cancio Meliá y Günther Jakobs. Derecho Penal del Enemigo, Madrid, Civitas Ediciones, S. L. 2003. Londoño Ayala, César Augusto. Principio de proporcionalidad en el Derecho pro-cesal penal, Bogotá, Ediciones Nueva Jurídica, 2009. Meester, Karel de; Kelly Pitcher; Rod Rastan y Goran Sluiter. “Investigation, Coer-cive Measures, Arrest and Surrender”, en Hakan Friman, Goran Sluiter, Suzannah Linton, Sergey Vasiliev y Salvatore Zappala (eds.). International Criminal Procedure. Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Moratto, Simón. “El lenguaje en el procedimiento penal: ¿motiva la adopción de un derecho procesal penal del enemigo?”, en Memorias del Tercer Encuentro Interna¬cional de Estudios Críticos de las Transiciones Políticas, Bogotá, Universidad de los Andes, 2019. Muñoz Conde, Francisco. De las prohibiciones probatorias al derecho procesal penal del enemigo, Buenos Aires, Hammurabi, 2008. Safferling, Cristoph. International Criminal Procedure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. Schuon, Christine. International Criminal Procedure: A Clash of Legal Cultures, The Hague, T. M. C. Asser Press, 2010. Silva Sánchez, Jesús-María. La expansión del Derecho Penal, 3.ª ed., Madrid, Mon¬tevideo, Edisofer, B de F, 2011. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus logico-philosophicus e investigaciones filosóficas, Madrid, Gredos, D. L. 2009. Corte Penal Internacional. Asamblea de los Estados Partes. Resolución icc-asp/4/ Res.1, por la que se aprueba el Código de Conducta Profesional de los Abogados, 2 de diciembre de 2005. Corte Penal Internacional. Magistrados de la Corte, Quinta sesión plenaria, La Haya, 17-28 de mayo de 2004. Documentos oficiales de la Corte Penal Internacional. icc-bd/01-01-04. Reglamento de la Corte, 26 de mayo de 2004. Corte Penal Internacional. Magistrados de la Corte, Quinta sesión plenaria, La Haya, 17-28 de mayo de 2004. Documentos oficiales de la Corte Penal Internacional. icc-bd/01-01-04. Reglamento de la Corte, 26 de mayo de 2004. Corte Penal Internacional. Presidencia de la Corte Penal Internacional. Documen¬tos oficiales de la Corte Penal Internacional. icc-bd/03-01-06. Reglamento de la Secretaría, 6 de marzo de 2006. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-1194 de 2005, MP: Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-210 de 2007, MP: Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-591 de 2005, MP: Clara Inés Vargas Hernández. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-873 de 2003, MP: Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa. International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (Trial Chamber) Prose-cutor v. Milomir Stakic. Order to the Registry of the Tribunal to provide documents. 5 July 2002. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision on the Final System of Disclosure and the Establishment of a Timetable”, icc-01/04-01/06. 15 May 2006. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision Esta¬blishing General Principles Governing Applications to Restrict Disclosure pursuant to Rule 81 (2) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence”, icc-01/04-01/06. 19 May 2006. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber i entitled ‘First Decision on the Prosecution Requests and Amended Requests for Redactions under Rule 81’”, icc-01/04-01/06 (oa 5). 14 December 2006. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber i entitled ‘First Decision on the Prosecution Requests and Amended Requests for Redactions under Rule 81’”, icc-01/04-01/06-773. 14 December 2006. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision on Legal Representation, Appointment of Counsel for the Defence, Protective Measures and Time-limit for Submission of Observations on Applications a/0010/06, a/0064/06, to a/0070/06, a/0081/06 to a/0104/06 and a/0111/06 to a/0127/06”, icc-02/04-01/05. 1 February 2007. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision on the Disclosure by the Defence”, icc-01/04-01/06. 20 March 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui. “Sixth Decision on the Prosecution Request for Authorisation to Redact the Interviews Transcripts of Witness 238”, icc-01/04-01/07. 21 April 2008. International Criminal Court Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga. “Judgment on the Appeal of the Prosecutor Against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber i entitled ‘First Decision on the Prosecution Request for Authorisation to Redact Witness Statements’”, icc-01/04-01/07 (oa). 13 May 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision on the consequences of non-disclosure of exculpatory materials covered by article 54 (3) (e) agreements and the application to stay the prosecution of the accused, together with certain other issues raised at the status conference on 10 June 2008”, icc-01/04- 01/06. 13 June 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgment on the appeals of The prosecutor and The defence against Trial Chamber i’s Decision on Victims’ participation of 18 January 2008”, icc-01/04-01/06-1432. 11 July 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Public re-dacted version of icc-01/05-01/08-48-US-Exp Decision Concerning the Prosecutor’s Proposals for Redactions”, icc-01/05-01/08. 23 July 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Decision on the evidence disclosure system and setting a Timetable for disclosure between the parties”, icc-01/05-01/08. 31 July 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Public redacted version of icc-01/05-01/08-135-Conf Second Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Redactions”, icc-01/05-01/08. 1 October 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgement on the appeal of the prosecutor against the decision of Trial Chamber i entitled ‘Decision on the consequences of non-disclosure of exculpatory materials covered by article 54 (3) (e) agreements and the application to stay the prosecution of the accused, together with other issues raised at the status conference on 10 June 2008’”, icc-01/04-01/06. 21 October 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre-Bemba Gombo. “Public redacted version of icc-01/05-01/08-215-Conf Third Decision on the Prosecutor’s Requests for Redactions and Related Request for the Regulation of Contacts of Jean- Pierre Bemba Gombo, icc-01/05-01/08. 6 November 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Bemba. “Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber iii entitled ‘Decision on Application for Interim Release’”, icc-01/05-01/08-323. 16 Decem¬ber 2008. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Bahar Idriss Abu Garda. “Public Re-dacted Version of the ‘First Decision on the prosecution’s Request for Redactions’ issued on 14 August 2009”, icc-02/05-02/09. 20 August 2009. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Prosecutor v. Karemera et al., Trial Chamber iii. “Decision on motion for Disclosure of Medical Information and Ex-tension of Time”, ictr-98-44-T. 28 August 2009. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “First Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Redactions”, icc-02/05-03/09. 29 July 2010. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui. “Decision on the ‘prosecution’s application concerning disclosure by the defence pursuant to rules 78 and 79 (4)’”, icc-01/04-01/07. 14 September 2010. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Corrigendum on the “Decision on the confirmation of Charges”, icc-02/05-03/09. 7 March 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on Matters Raised at the Status Conference of 14 February 2011”, icc-01/04-01/10. 21 March 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on Issues Relating to Disclosure”, icc-01/04-01/10. 30 March 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision Setting the Regime for Evidence Disclosure and Other Related Matters”, icc-01/09-01/11. 6 April 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for Redactions pursuant to Rule 81 (2) and Rule 81 (4)”, icc-01/04-01/10. 20 May 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on the Review of Potentially Privileged Material”, icc-01/04-01/10. 15 June 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Mui¬gai Kenyatta and Mohammed Hussein Ali. “Decision on the Confidential Redacted Version of the Article 58 Application”, icc-01/09-02/11. 22 July 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on Prosecution’s Application for Authorisation to Disclose a Document received pur-suant Article 54 (3) (e) in redacted form”, icc-01/04-01/10. 4 August 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Decision on Article 54 (3) (e) documents”, icc- 02/05-03/09. 23 November 2011. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Decision on the Defence Disclosure and Related Issues”, icc-01/05-01/08. 24 February 2012. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on the Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime”, icc-01/09-02/11. 27 September 2012. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Decision on the Defence Request for a Temporary Stay of Proceedings”, icc-02/05-03/09. 26 October 2012. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision on Prosecution Application to Redact Investigator’s Identifying In-formation and to Vary the Redaction Protocol”, icc-01/09-01/11. 21 December 2012. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Confidential Redacted Version of ‘Decision on First Prosecution Application for Delayed Disclosure of Witness Identities’”, icc-01/09-01/11. 4 January 2013. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Decision on the Defence’s Request for Disclosure of Documents in the Possession of the Office of the Prosecutor”, icc-02/05-03/09. 23 January 2013. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for Authorisation to Maintain Certain Redactions”, icc-01/09-01/11. 23 April 2013. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Confidential Redacted Version of the ‘Decision on the Prosecution’s Re-newed Request for Delayed Disclosure of Identity of Witness 534’”, icc-01/09-011. 2 May 2013. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al- Senussi. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Request for Redactions pursuant to Rule 81 (2)”, icc-01/11-01/11. 16 August 2013. Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Judgment on the appeal of Mr. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus against the decision of Trial Chamber iv of 23 January 2013 entitled ‘Decision on the Defense’s request for Disclosure of Documents in the Possession of the Office of the Prosecutor’”, icc- 02/05-03/09 OA 4. 28 August 2013. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision on Disclosure of Information related to Prosecution Intermediaries”, icc-01/09-01/11. 4 September 2013. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Fidelé Babala Wandu and Narcisse Arido. “Decision on the ‘Prosecution’s Application for Redactions pursuant to Ru¬les 81 (2) and 81 (4) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’. Dated 6 June 2014”, icc-01/05-01/13. 17 June 2014. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision Setting the Regime for Evidence Disclosure and Other Related Matters”, icc-02/04-01/15. 27 February 2015. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision Concerning the Redaction and Transmission of Documents to the Defence”, icc-02/04-01/15. 15 April 2015. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi. “Decision on Issues Related to Disclosure and Exceptions thereto”, icc-01/12-01/15. 30 Septem-ber 2015. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi. “Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Redactions”, icc-01/12-01/15. 8 December 2015. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision on the Pro-secutor’s Request for Authorisation of non-standard Redactions”, icc-02/04-01/15. 23 December 2015. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision on the Pro-secution’s Application under Article 53 (3) (f) to Apply Redactions to Documents Obtained under Article 54 (3) (e)”, icc-02/04-01/15. 2 March 2016. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kimiri Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on the Prosecution’s First Request for the Authorisation of Redactions, 13 December 2012, icc-01/09-02/11-569-Conf”, icc-01/09-02/11. 3 February 2017. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kimiri Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on Second Prosecution Application for Delayed Dis-closure of Witness Identities, 8 January 2013, icc-01/09-02/11-593-Conf-Exp”, icc-01/09-02/11. 3 February 2017. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for Relief Pursuant to Decision 451, Rule 81 (2) and Regulation 35, 9 January 2013, icc-01/09-02/11- 595-Conf”, icc-01/09-02/11. 3 February 2017. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Moham-med Ag Mahmoud. “Decision on the Evidence Disclosure Protocol and Other Related Matters”, icc-01/12-01/18. 16 May 2018. International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Moham-med Ag Mahmoud. “Decision on the Prosecution Motion for Authorization to File an Anonymous Summary Concerning Witness mli-otp-p-p0113”, icc-01/12-01/18. 27 September 2018. |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Simón Moratto - 2021 |
| dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Simón Moratto - 2021 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciencias Penales y Criminológicas |
| dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/view/7220 |
| institution |
Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/e69edb1f-75fa-471e-9cba-07a31d1afe57/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7c4856ceefc4e48126d51142cfb6a968 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Externado de Colombia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org |
| _version_ |
1814100360376090624 |
| spelling |
Moratto, Simónf01b4b32-9817-457e-8607-f00420855cdb2021-06-03 14:47:442022-09-08T13:45:48Z2021-06-03 14:47:442022-09-08T13:45:48Z2021-06-03Este texto muestra la función y el desarrollo del principio de proporcionalidad en el establecimiento o autorización de las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio en la cpi. Para alcanzar este objetivo se estudia el concepto y fundamento normativo de estas figuras en el alto tribunal. Posteriormente, se analizan los puntos de contacto entre las instituciones que aquí convergen con la finalidad de lograr un entendimiento más completo de ellas, de manera que sea posible un análisis crítico del discurso de la Corte. Acto seguido se procede a señalar el estado del arte de este particular uso del principio de proporcionalidad en la jurisprudencia de este tribunal. Finalmente, se presentan algunas problemáticas de las que adolece este desarrollo y se propone una serie de soluciones a ellas.This paper shows the role and development of the principle of proportionality in authorizing disclosure restrictions at the icc. The concept and normative basis of these figures in this High Court is studied with the aim to achieve this objective. Subsequently, the contact points between these institutions are analyzed in order to get a more complete understanding of them, so that a critical analysis of the Court’s discourse is possible. After that, the state of the art about this particular use of the principle of proportionality in the Court’s jurisprudence will be indicated. Finally, some issues of this development are presented, and a series of solutions are proposed.application/pdf10.18601/01210483.v41n111.062346-21080121-0483https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8247https://doi.org/10.18601/01210483.v41n111.06spaInstituto de Ciencias Penales y Criminológicashttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/download/7220/9905Núm. 111 , Año 2020 : Julio-Diciembre20511115941Derecho Penal y CriminologíaAlexy, Robert. “Sobre los derechos constitucionales a protección”, en Robert Alexy, José Bastida Freijedo, Juan Antonio García Amado, Alfonso Jaime García Figueroa, Luis Hierro Sánchez-Pescador, Josep Joan Moreso, C. Pardo, Gregorio Peces-Barba y Ernesto Valdés Garzón. Derechos sociales y ponderación, Madrid, Fundación Coloquio Jurídico Europeo, 2009.Alexy, Robert. Teoría de los derechos fundamentales, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2007.Ambos, Kai. “Confidential investigations (article 54 (3)(E) icc Statute) vs. Disclosure obligations: The Lubanga Case and National Law”, en New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, Berkeley, University of California Press, Fall 2009, vol. 12, n.º 4, pp. 543-568, disponible en [https://www.legal-tools. org/doc/c76c63/pdf/] (consulta: 7 de julio de 2019).Ambos, Kai. “The First judgement of the International Criminal Court (Prosecutor v. Lubanga): A comprehensive analysis of the legal issues”, en International Criminal Law Review, Leiden, Brill, 2012, vol. 12, pp. 115-153, disponible en [https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2030751] (consulta: 7 de julio de 2019). Ambos, Kai. Treatise on International Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.Barak, Aharon. Proporcionalidad: los derechos fundamentales y sus restricciones, Lima, Palestra Editores, 2017.Bernal Cuéllar, Jaime y Eduardo Montealegre Lynett. El proceso penal, tomo i: Fundamentos constitucionales y teoría general, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2013.Bernal Cuéllar, Jaime y Eduardo Montealegre Lynett. El proceso penal, tomo ii: Estructura y garantías procesales, 6.ª edición, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2013.Bernal Pulido, Carlos. El principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2007.Brady, Helen. “Disclosure of Evidence”, en Roy S. Lee. The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Ardsley, Trans-national Publishers, 2001.Campbell Black, Henry. Black’s Law Dictionary. Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern, 4.ª ed., Minnesota, West Publishing Company, 1968.Chang-Jung Yang, Alice. The Prosecution’s Duty of Disclosure before Internatio-nal Criminal Tribunals (doctoral thesis), London, Brunel University-Brunel Law School, 2016.Cianello, Michele. “Disclosure before the icc: The emergence of a new form of po-licies implementation system in International Criminal Justice?”, en International Criminal Law Review, Leiden, Brill, 2010, col. 10, pp. 23-42.Fedorova, Masha. The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal Pro-ceedings, Cambridge, Intersentia, 2013.Fiori, Brando. Disclosure of Information in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Analysis of national and international criminal procedural systems and human rights law, Oisterwijk, Wolf Legal Publishers, 2015.Guerrero Peralta, Oscar Julián. El control de garantías como construcción de una función jurisdiccional, Bogotá, Escuela Judicial “Rodrigo Lara Bonilla”, 2006.Heinze, Alexander. International Criminal Procedure and Disclosure: an attempt to better understand and regulate disclosure and communication at the icc on the basis of a comprehensive and comparative theory of criminal procedure, Berlin, Duncker and Humblot GmbH, 2014.Jakobs, Günther. “Derecho Penal del Ciudadano y Derecho Penal del Enemigo”, en Manuel Cancio Meliá y Günther Jakobs. Derecho Penal del Enemigo, Madrid, Civitas Ediciones, S. L. 2003.Londoño Ayala, César Augusto. Principio de proporcionalidad en el Derecho pro-cesal penal, Bogotá, Ediciones Nueva Jurídica, 2009.Meester, Karel de; Kelly Pitcher; Rod Rastan y Goran Sluiter. “Investigation, Coer-cive Measures, Arrest and Surrender”, en Hakan Friman, Goran Sluiter, Suzannah Linton, Sergey Vasiliev y Salvatore Zappala (eds.). International Criminal Procedure. Principles and Rules, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.Moratto, Simón. “El lenguaje en el procedimiento penal: ¿motiva la adopción de un derecho procesal penal del enemigo?”, en Memorias del Tercer Encuentro Interna¬cional de Estudios Críticos de las Transiciones Políticas, Bogotá, Universidad de los Andes, 2019.Muñoz Conde, Francisco. De las prohibiciones probatorias al derecho procesal penal del enemigo, Buenos Aires, Hammurabi, 2008. Safferling, Cristoph. International Criminal Procedure, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.Schuon, Christine. International Criminal Procedure: A Clash of Legal Cultures, The Hague, T. M. C. Asser Press, 2010.Silva Sánchez, Jesús-María. La expansión del Derecho Penal, 3.ª ed., Madrid, Mon¬tevideo, Edisofer, B de F, 2011.Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus logico-philosophicus e investigaciones filosóficas, Madrid, Gredos, D. L. 2009.Corte Penal Internacional. Asamblea de los Estados Partes. Resolución icc-asp/4/ Res.1, por la que se aprueba el Código de Conducta Profesional de los Abogados, 2 de diciembre de 2005.Corte Penal Internacional. Magistrados de la Corte, Quinta sesión plenaria, La Haya, 17-28 de mayo de 2004. Documentos oficiales de la Corte Penal Internacional. icc-bd/01-01-04. Reglamento de la Corte, 26 de mayo de 2004.Corte Penal Internacional. Magistrados de la Corte, Quinta sesión plenaria, La Haya, 17-28 de mayo de 2004. Documentos oficiales de la Corte Penal Internacional. icc-bd/01-01-04. Reglamento de la Corte, 26 de mayo de 2004.Corte Penal Internacional. Presidencia de la Corte Penal Internacional. Documen¬tos oficiales de la Corte Penal Internacional. icc-bd/03-01-06. Reglamento de la Secretaría, 6 de marzo de 2006.Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-1194 de 2005, MP: Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra.Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-210 de 2007, MP: Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra.Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-591 de 2005, MP: Clara Inés Vargas Hernández.Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Sentencia C-873 de 2003, MP: Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa.International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (Trial Chamber) Prose-cutor v. Milomir Stakic. Order to the Registry of the Tribunal to provide documents. 5 July 2002.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision on the Final System of Disclosure and the Establishment of a Timetable”, icc-01/04-01/06. 15 May 2006.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision Esta¬blishing General Principles Governing Applications to Restrict Disclosure pursuant to Rule 81 (2) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence”, icc-01/04-01/06. 19 May 2006.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber i entitled ‘First Decision on the Prosecution Requests and Amended Requests for Redactions under Rule 81’”, icc-01/04-01/06 (oa 5). 14 December 2006.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber i entitled ‘First Decision on the Prosecution Requests and Amended Requests for Redactions under Rule 81’”, icc-01/04-01/06-773. 14 December 2006.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision on Legal Representation, Appointment of Counsel for the Defence, Protective Measures and Time-limit for Submission of Observations on Applications a/0010/06, a/0064/06, to a/0070/06, a/0081/06 to a/0104/06 and a/0111/06 to a/0127/06”, icc-02/04-01/05. 1 February 2007.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision on the Disclosure by the Defence”, icc-01/04-01/06. 20 March 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui. “Sixth Decision on the Prosecution Request for Authorisation to Redact the Interviews Transcripts of Witness 238”, icc-01/04-01/07. 21 April 2008. International Criminal Court Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga. “Judgment on the Appeal of the Prosecutor Against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber i entitled ‘First Decision on the Prosecution Request for Authorisation to Redact Witness Statements’”, icc-01/04-01/07 (oa). 13 May 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Decision on the consequences of non-disclosure of exculpatory materials covered by article 54 (3) (e) agreements and the application to stay the prosecution of the accused, together with certain other issues raised at the status conference on 10 June 2008”, icc-01/04- 01/06. 13 June 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgment on the appeals of The prosecutor and The defence against Trial Chamber i’s Decision on Victims’ participation of 18 January 2008”, icc-01/04-01/06-1432. 11 July 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Public re-dacted version of icc-01/05-01/08-48-US-Exp Decision Concerning the Prosecutor’s Proposals for Redactions”, icc-01/05-01/08. 23 July 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Decision on the evidence disclosure system and setting a Timetable for disclosure between the parties”, icc-01/05-01/08. 31 July 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Public redacted version of icc-01/05-01/08-135-Conf Second Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Redactions”, icc-01/05-01/08. 1 October 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. “Judgement on the appeal of the prosecutor against the decision of Trial Chamber i entitled ‘Decision on the consequences of non-disclosure of exculpatory materials covered by article 54 (3) (e) agreements and the application to stay the prosecution of the accused, together with other issues raised at the status conference on 10 June 2008’”, icc-01/04-01/06. 21 October 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre-Bemba Gombo. “Public redacted version of icc-01/05-01/08-215-Conf Third Decision on the Prosecutor’s Requests for Redactions and Related Request for the Regulation of Contacts of Jean- Pierre Bemba Gombo, icc-01/05-01/08. 6 November 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Bemba. “Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber iii entitled ‘Decision on Application for Interim Release’”, icc-01/05-01/08-323. 16 Decem¬ber 2008.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Bahar Idriss Abu Garda. “Public Re-dacted Version of the ‘First Decision on the prosecution’s Request for Redactions’ issued on 14 August 2009”, icc-02/05-02/09. 20 August 2009. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Prosecutor v. Karemera et al., Trial Chamber iii. “Decision on motion for Disclosure of Medical Information and Ex-tension of Time”, ictr-98-44-T. 28 August 2009.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “First Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Redactions”, icc-02/05-03/09. 29 July 2010.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui. “Decision on the ‘prosecution’s application concerning disclosure by the defence pursuant to rules 78 and 79 (4)’”, icc-01/04-01/07. 14 September 2010.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Corrigendum on the “Decision on the confirmation of Charges”, icc-02/05-03/09. 7 March 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on Matters Raised at the Status Conference of 14 February 2011”, icc-01/04-01/10. 21 March 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on Issues Relating to Disclosure”, icc-01/04-01/10. 30 March 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision Setting the Regime for Evidence Disclosure and Other Related Matters”, icc-01/09-01/11. 6 April 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for Redactions pursuant to Rule 81 (2) and Rule 81 (4)”, icc-01/04-01/10. 20 May 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on the Review of Potentially Privileged Material”, icc-01/04-01/10. 15 June 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Mui¬gai Kenyatta and Mohammed Hussein Ali. “Decision on the Confidential Redacted Version of the Article 58 Application”, icc-01/09-02/11. 22 July 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana. “Decision on Prosecution’s Application for Authorisation to Disclose a Document received pur-suant Article 54 (3) (e) in redacted form”, icc-01/04-01/10. 4 August 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Decision on Article 54 (3) (e) documents”, icc- 02/05-03/09. 23 November 2011.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. “Decision on the Defence Disclosure and Related Issues”, icc-01/05-01/08. 24 February 2012.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on the Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime”, icc-01/09-02/11. 27 September 2012.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Decision on the Defence Request for a Temporary Stay of Proceedings”, icc-02/05-03/09. 26 October 2012.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision on Prosecution Application to Redact Investigator’s Identifying In-formation and to Vary the Redaction Protocol”, icc-01/09-01/11. 21 December 2012.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Confidential Redacted Version of ‘Decision on First Prosecution Application for Delayed Disclosure of Witness Identities’”, icc-01/09-01/11. 4 January 2013.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Decision on the Defence’s Request for Disclosure of Documents in the Possession of the Office of the Prosecutor”, icc-02/05-03/09. 23 January 2013.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for Authorisation to Maintain Certain Redactions”, icc-01/09-01/11. 23 April 2013.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Confidential Redacted Version of the ‘Decision on the Prosecution’s Re-newed Request for Delayed Disclosure of Identity of Witness 534’”, icc-01/09-011. 2 May 2013.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al- Senussi. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Request for Redactions pursuant to Rule 81 (2)”, icc-01/11-01/11. 16 August 2013.Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus. “Judgment on the appeal of Mr. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus against the decision of Trial Chamber iv of 23 January 2013 entitled ‘Decision on the Defense’s request for Disclosure of Documents in the Possession of the Office of the Prosecutor’”, icc- 02/05-03/09 OA 4. 28 August 2013.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang. “Decision on Disclosure of Information related to Prosecution Intermediaries”, icc-01/09-01/11. 4 September 2013.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Fidelé Babala Wandu and Narcisse Arido. “Decision on the ‘Prosecution’s Application for Redactions pursuant to Ru¬les 81 (2) and 81 (4) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’. Dated 6 June 2014”, icc-01/05-01/13. 17 June 2014.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision Setting the Regime for Evidence Disclosure and Other Related Matters”, icc-02/04-01/15. 27 February 2015.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision Concerning the Redaction and Transmission of Documents to the Defence”, icc-02/04-01/15. 15 April 2015.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi. “Decision on Issues Related to Disclosure and Exceptions thereto”, icc-01/12-01/15. 30 Septem-ber 2015.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi. “Decision on the Prosecutor’s Request for Redactions”, icc-01/12-01/15. 8 December 2015.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision on the Pro-secutor’s Request for Authorisation of non-standard Redactions”, icc-02/04-01/15. 23 December 2015.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen. “Decision on the Pro-secution’s Application under Article 53 (3) (f) to Apply Redactions to Documents Obtained under Article 54 (3) (e)”, icc-02/04-01/15. 2 March 2016.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kimiri Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on the Prosecution’s First Request for the Authorisation of Redactions, 13 December 2012, icc-01/09-02/11-569-Conf”, icc-01/09-02/11. 3 February 2017.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kimiri Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on Second Prosecution Application for Delayed Dis-closure of Witness Identities, 8 January 2013, icc-01/09-02/11-593-Conf-Exp”, icc-01/09-02/11. 3 February 2017.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta. “Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for Relief Pursuant to Decision 451, Rule 81 (2) and Regulation 35, 9 January 2013, icc-01/09-02/11- 595-Conf”, icc-01/09-02/11. 3 February 2017.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Moham-med Ag Mahmoud. “Decision on the Evidence Disclosure Protocol and Other Related Matters”, icc-01/12-01/18. 16 May 2018.International Criminal Court. Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Moham-med Ag Mahmoud. “Decision on the Prosecution Motion for Authorization to File an Anonymous Summary Concerning Witness mli-otp-p-p0113”, icc-01/12-01/18. 27 September 2018.Simón Moratto - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derpen/article/view/7220principle;proportionality;restrictions;disclosure;icc.principio;proporcionalidad;restricciones;descubrimiento probatorio;CPIEl principio de proporcionalidad en las restricciones al descubrimiento probatorio ante la CPI. Estado del arte, críticas y alternativasThe Principle of Proportionality in the Disclosure Restrictions. At The Icc. State Of The Art, Criticism and AlternativesArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2654https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/e69edb1f-75fa-471e-9cba-07a31d1afe57/download7c4856ceefc4e48126d51142cfb6a968MD51001/8247oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/82472023-08-14 15:03:40.115https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Simón Moratto - 2021https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org |