Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad

En una economía de mercado, los precios de los bienes no necesariamente reflejan los derechos de propiedad de los factores productivos que agregan valor. Si la captura de la renta de la tierra agrícola fue ilegítima desde la economía clásica, la renta de la tierra urbana lo es aún más. Si la fertili...

Full description

Autores:
Araque Solano, Alex Smith
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/25370
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25370
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11
Palabra clave:
Urban land prices,
Property rights,
Value Capture
Precios del suelo urbano,
Derechos de propiedad,
Captura de valor
Preços do solo urbano,
Direitos de propriedade,
Captura de valor
Rights
openAccess
License
Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024
id uexternad2_264f6d61dce2306658874f29ba80cfed
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/25370
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv Urban Land Prices, Value Aggregation, and Property Rights
title Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
spellingShingle Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
Urban land prices,
Property rights,
Value Capture
Precios del suelo urbano,
Derechos de propiedad,
Captura de valor
Preços do solo urbano,
Direitos de propriedade,
Captura de valor
title_short Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
title_full Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
title_fullStr Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
title_full_unstemmed Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
title_sort Los precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedad
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Araque Solano, Alex Smith
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Araque Solano, Alex Smith
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Urban land prices,
Property rights,
Value Capture
topic Urban land prices,
Property rights,
Value Capture
Precios del suelo urbano,
Derechos de propiedad,
Captura de valor
Preços do solo urbano,
Direitos de propriedade,
Captura de valor
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Precios del suelo urbano,
Derechos de propiedad,
Captura de valor
Preços do solo urbano,
Direitos de propriedade,
Captura de valor
description En una economía de mercado, los precios de los bienes no necesariamente reflejan los derechos de propiedad de los factores productivos que agregan valor. Si la captura de la renta de la tierra agrícola fue ilegítima desde la economía clásica, la renta de la tierra urbana lo es aún más. Si la fertilidad era una cualidad natural del suelo, el propietario no aportaba nada adicional; en una economía urbana moderna, la “fertilidad” del suelo de un predio urbano proviene de la aglomeración. Los derechos de propiedad y de edificabilidad están inmersos, pero es evidente que este último es exógeno: la colectividad lo asigna o redefine, puesto que el interés individual no puede sobreponerse al interés de la sociedad. Entonces, ¿de dónde proviene el derecho a apropiarse del excedente colectivo implícito en el derecho a construir? La captación de rentas por parte de la comunidad permite financiar el desarrollo urbano, y su legitimidad deriva tanto de la fertilidad de la aglomeración como de la posibilidad de capitalizar cambios regulatorios en las ciudades. En este sentido, es necesario redefinir los acuerdos sociales para promover el avance del desarrollo.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-04T15:17:53Z
2025-04-09T17:48:00Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-04T15:17:53Z
2025-04-09T17:48:00Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-04
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2450
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0124-5996
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25370
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11
2346-2450
0124-5996
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25370
https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/10061/17695
https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/10061/17696
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 52 , Año 2025 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 340
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 52
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 319
dc.relation.citationvolume.spa.fl_str_mv 27
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Revista de Economía Institucional
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117138
Alterman, R. (2012). Land-use regulations and property values: The “Windfalls capture” idea revisited. En N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, & G. J. Knaap (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban economics and planning (pp. 755-786). Oxford University Press.
Araque, A., Cantor, L., & Moreno, P. (2022). Norma y precio del suelo urbano en la ciudad de Bogotá. Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 48(143). https://doi.org/10.7764/EURE.48.143.13
Arnott, R. (1979). Optimal city size in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 6(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(79)90017-2
Arnott, R., & Stiglitz, J. (1979). Aggregate land rent, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(4), 471-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884466
Arnott, R. (2004). Does the Henry George theorem provide a practical guide to optimal city size? The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(5), 1057-1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00334.x
Asabere, P. K., & Colwell, P. F. (1984). Zoning and the value of urban land. Real Estate Issues, 9(1), 22–27.
Azcurra, F. H. (2014). Marx y Sraffa: Dos modalidades de hacer teoría económica científica. RED Sociales, 1, 19–28. Recuperado de http://fliphtml5.com/xqkd/jvyo
Bejarano, J. A. (1999). Los nuevos dominios de la ciencia económica. Cuadernos de Economía, 18(31), 78-91.
Benabou, R. (1993). Workings of a city: Location, education, and production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 619-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118403
Birch, K. (2020). Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values, 45(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919829567
Borner, S., Bodmer, F., & Kobler, M. (2004). Institutional efficiency and its determinants: The role of political factors in economic growth. OECD.
Brueckner, J., Thisse, J. F., & Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review, 43(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00019-1
Che, S., Kumar, R. R., & Stauvermann, P. J. (2021). Taxation of land and economic growth. Economies, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020061
Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2003). Financial development, property rights and growth. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2401–2436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00610.x
Coase, R. (1991, diciembre). Prize lecture: The institutional structure of production. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel. Recuperado de https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1991/coase/lecture/
Cordes, M. W. (1999). Property rights and land use controls: Balancing private and public interest. North Illinois University Law Review, 19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2803580
Coriat, B., & Orsi, F. (2002). Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00078-1
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016). Sentencia C-192/16, Bogotá, D.C.: 20 de abril de 2016. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2016/C-192-16.htm
Cuevas, H. (1996). El capital humano en el sistema de precios. Cuadernos de Economía, 15(24), 7–25.
Davis, O. A. (1963). Economic elements in municipal zoning decisions. Land Economics, 39(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/3144842
Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359.
Demsetz, H. (1964). The exchange and enforcement of property rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11-26.
Demsetz, H. (2008). Frischmann’s view of “Toward a theory of property rights”. Review of Law and Economics, 4(1), 127-132.
Diwan, I., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade. Journal of International Economics, 30(1–2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-O
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Microfoundations of urban agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2063-2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1
Ferguson, C. E., & Gould, J. P. (1975). Microeconomic theory (4ta ed.). R.D. Irwin.
Fischel, W. (2000). Zoning and land use regulation. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 403–442. Recuperado de http://www.dartmouth.edu/~wfischel/Papers/WAF-zoningELEpdf.pdf
Flatters, F., Henderson, V., & Mieszkowsky, P. (1974). Public goods, efficiency, and regional fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90028-0
Fujita, M. (1989). Urban economic theory: Land use and city size. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625862
Fujita, M. (2012). Thünen and the new economic geography. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(6), 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.12.002
Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press.
Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2013). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth (2da ed.). Cambridge University Press.
George, H. (1879). Progress and poverty. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2ilXYg9
Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003
Glaeser, E., & Gottlieb, J. (2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 983-1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.983
Glaeser, E. (2012). Urban public finance (NBER Working Paper No. 18244). National Bureau of Economic Research. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w18244.pdf
Grether, D. M., & Mieszkowski, P. (1980). The effects of nonresidential land uses on the prices of adjacent housing: Some estimates of proximity effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(80)90052-2
Grieson, R. E., & White, J. R. (1981). The effects of zoning on structure and land markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(81)90001-2
Henderson, V., & Becker, R. (2000). Political economy of city sizes and formation. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2176
Hortas-Rico, M., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2010). Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1513–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353620
Hortas-Rico, M. (2014). Urban sprawl and municipal budgets in Spain: A dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of the Regional Science Association International, 93(4), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12022
Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2010). Municipal revenues and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Value capture and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Kang, H. Y. (2023). Patents as capitalist aesthetic forms. Law and Critique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09349-2
Klimovsky, E. A. (2006). Tasas de ganancia, acumulación, producción y circulación: Los conceptos básicos de la teoría clásica del valor. Cuadernos de Economía, 25(44), 33–55.
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
Marshall, A. (1961). Principles of economics (9ª ed.). Macmillan. Marx, K. (1975). El capital. Tomo 1. El proceso de producción del capital (1ª ed., Vol. 2). Siglo XXI Editores.
Mill, J. S. (2009 [1848]). The principles of political economy: With some of their applications to social philosophy. D. Appleton and Company.
Molotch, H. L. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881096
Nelson, R. H. (1979). A private property right theory of zoning. The Urban Lawyer, 11(4), 713–732. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27890908
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Ricardo, D. (1973). Principios de economía política y tributación. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Rymanov, A. (2017). Differential land rent and agricultural taxation. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 63(9), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.17221/127/2016-AGRICECON
Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. C. (2004a). The micro-empirics of agglomeration economies. En R. Arnott & D. McMillen (Eds.), A companion to urban economics (pp. 7-53). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996225.ch1
Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2004b). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4, 2119-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3
Savini, F. (2016). Don’t blame public law: The legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Planning Review, 87(4), 459-479.
Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Fleurbaey, M. (2022). Equity and efficiency effects of land value taxation. IMF Working Papers, WP/22/263. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/12/17/Equity-and-Efficiency-Effects-of-Land-Value-Taxation-527079
Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Editorial Planeta.
Senior, N. W. (1836). An outline of the science of political economy. W. Clowes and Sons.
Serkin, C. (2020). A case for zoning. Notre Dame Law Review, 96(2), 749–798. Recuperado de https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss2/6
Smith, A. (2011). La riqueza de las naciones (Trad. C. Braun). Alianza Editorial. (Trabajo original publicado en 1776)
Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge University Press.
Starrett, D. (1978). Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 17(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90120-5
Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). The theory of local public goods. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 274–333). Palgrave Macmillan.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1981). Public goods in open economies with heterogeneous individuals. NBER Working Paper No. 802. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w0802.pdf
Stiglitz, J. E. (1983). The theory of local public goods twenty–five years after Tiebout: A perspective. En G. Zodrow (Ed.), Local provision of public services (pp. 17–53). Academic Press.
Thisse, J. F. (2014). The new science of cities by Michael Batty: The opinion of an economist. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(3), 805-819.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
Vickrey, W. (1977). The city as a firm. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 334–343). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wheaton, W. (1993). Land capitalization, Tiebout mobility, and the role of zoning regulations. Journal of Urban Economics, 34(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1993.1029
Zouboulakis, M. (2016). Fundamentación de los derechos de propiedad: Clásicos y modernos. Revista de Economía Institucional, 18(34), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v18n34.02
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/10061
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/406baff3-ac19-4b2e-9856-2444f72b4da5/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c948a8496b5dbd8d062746303afdbc01
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1831928527241347072
spelling Araque Solano, Alex Smith2024-12-04T15:17:53Z2025-04-09T17:48:00Z2024-12-04T15:17:53Z2025-04-09T17:48:00Z2024-12-04En una economía de mercado, los precios de los bienes no necesariamente reflejan los derechos de propiedad de los factores productivos que agregan valor. Si la captura de la renta de la tierra agrícola fue ilegítima desde la economía clásica, la renta de la tierra urbana lo es aún más. Si la fertilidad era una cualidad natural del suelo, el propietario no aportaba nada adicional; en una economía urbana moderna, la “fertilidad” del suelo de un predio urbano proviene de la aglomeración. Los derechos de propiedad y de edificabilidad están inmersos, pero es evidente que este último es exógeno: la colectividad lo asigna o redefine, puesto que el interés individual no puede sobreponerse al interés de la sociedad. Entonces, ¿de dónde proviene el derecho a apropiarse del excedente colectivo implícito en el derecho a construir? La captación de rentas por parte de la comunidad permite financiar el desarrollo urbano, y su legitimidad deriva tanto de la fertilidad de la aglomeración como de la posibilidad de capitalizar cambios regulatorios en las ciudades. En este sentido, es necesario redefinir los acuerdos sociales para promover el avance del desarrollo.In a market economy, the prices of goods do not necessarily reflect the property rights of the productive factors that add value. If the capture of agricultural land rent was illegitimate from the perspective of classical economics, urban land rent is even more so. While the fertility of agricultural land was a natural quality, the owner contributed nothing additional; in a modern urban economy, the “fertility” of an urban plot of land comes from agglomeration. Property and building rights are embedded, but it is evident that the latter is exogenous: the community assigns or redefines it, as individual interest cannot prevail over the interest of society. Thus, where does the right to appropriate the collective surplus implicit in the right to build come from? The community’s capture of rents allows the financing of urban development, and its legitimacy derives from both the fertility of agglomeration and the ability to capitalize on regulatory changes in cities. In this sense, it is necessary to redefine social agreements to promote development progress.application/pdftext/html10.18601/01245996.v27n52.112346-24500124-5996https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/25370https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v27n52.11spaUniversidad Externado de Colombiahttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/10061/17695https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/download/10061/17696Núm. 52 , Año 2025 : Enero-Junio3405231927Revista de Economía InstitucionalAlchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 16–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117138Alterman, R. (2012). Land-use regulations and property values: The “Windfalls capture” idea revisited. En N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, & G. J. Knaap (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban economics and planning (pp. 755-786). Oxford University Press.Araque, A., Cantor, L., & Moreno, P. (2022). Norma y precio del suelo urbano en la ciudad de Bogotá. Revista EURE - Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 48(143). https://doi.org/10.7764/EURE.48.143.13Arnott, R. (1979). Optimal city size in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 6(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(79)90017-2Arnott, R., & Stiglitz, J. (1979). Aggregate land rent, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(4), 471-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884466Arnott, R. (2004). Does the Henry George theorem provide a practical guide to optimal city size? The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(5), 1057-1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00334.xAsabere, P. K., & Colwell, P. F. (1984). Zoning and the value of urban land. Real Estate Issues, 9(1), 22–27.Azcurra, F. H. (2014). Marx y Sraffa: Dos modalidades de hacer teoría económica científica. RED Sociales, 1, 19–28. Recuperado de http://fliphtml5.com/xqkd/jvyoBejarano, J. A. (1999). Los nuevos dominios de la ciencia económica. Cuadernos de Economía, 18(31), 78-91.Benabou, R. (1993). Workings of a city: Location, education, and production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 619-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118403Birch, K. (2020). Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, Technology & Human Values, 45(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919829567Borner, S., Bodmer, F., & Kobler, M. (2004). Institutional efficiency and its determinants: The role of political factors in economic growth. OECD.Brueckner, J., Thisse, J. F., & Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review, 43(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00019-1Che, S., Kumar, R. R., & Stauvermann, P. J. (2021). Taxation of land and economic growth. Economies, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020061Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2003). Financial development, property rights and growth. The Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2401–2436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6261.2003.00610.xCoase, R. (1991, diciembre). Prize lecture: The institutional structure of production. Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel. Recuperado de https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1991/coase/lecture/Cordes, M. W. (1999). Property rights and land use controls: Balancing private and public interest. North Illinois University Law Review, 19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2803580Coriat, B., & Orsi, F. (2002). Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00078-1Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016). Sentencia C-192/16, Bogotá, D.C.: 20 de abril de 2016. Recuperado de https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2016/C-192-16.htmCuevas, H. (1996). El capital humano en el sistema de precios. Cuadernos de Economía, 15(24), 7–25.Davis, O. A. (1963). Economic elements in municipal zoning decisions. Land Economics, 39(4), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/3144842Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359.Demsetz, H. (1964). The exchange and enforcement of property rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11-26.Demsetz, H. (2008). Frischmann’s view of “Toward a theory of property rights”. Review of Law and Economics, 4(1), 127-132.Diwan, I., & Rodrik, D. (1991). Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade. Journal of International Economics, 30(1–2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-ODuranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Microfoundations of urban agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2063-2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1Ferguson, C. E., & Gould, J. P. (1975). Microeconomic theory (4ta ed.). R.D. Irwin.Fischel, W. (2000). Zoning and land use regulation. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 403–442. Recuperado de http://www.dartmouth.edu/~wfischel/Papers/WAF-zoningELEpdf.pdfFlatters, F., Henderson, V., & Mieszkowsky, P. (1974). Public goods, efficiency, and regional fiscal equalization. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90028-0Fujita, M. (1989). Urban economic theory: Land use and city size. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625862Fujita, M. (2012). Thünen and the new economic geography. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(6), 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.12.002Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press.Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2013). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth (2da ed.). Cambridge University Press.George, H. (1879). Progress and poverty. Recuperado de http://bit.ly/2ilXYg9Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.06.003Glaeser, E., & Gottlieb, J. (2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 983-1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.983Glaeser, E. (2012). Urban public finance (NBER Working Paper No. 18244). National Bureau of Economic Research. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w18244.pdfGrether, D. M., & Mieszkowski, P. (1980). The effects of nonresidential land uses on the prices of adjacent housing: Some estimates of proximity effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(80)90052-2Grieson, R. E., & White, J. R. (1981). The effects of zoning on structure and land markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(81)90001-2Henderson, V., & Becker, R. (2000). Political economy of city sizes and formation. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2176Hortas-Rico, M., & Solé-Ollé, A. (2010). Does urban sprawl increase the costs of providing local public services? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1513–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353620Hortas-Rico, M. (2014). Urban sprawl and municipal budgets in Spain: A dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of the Regional Science Association International, 93(4), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12022Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2010). Municipal revenues and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Ingram, G., & Hong, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Value capture and land policies. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Kang, H. Y. (2023). Patents as capitalist aesthetic forms. Law and Critique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09349-2Klimovsky, E. A. (2006). Tasas de ganancia, acumulación, producción y circulación: Los conceptos básicos de la teoría clásica del valor. Cuadernos de Economía, 25(44), 33–55.Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763Marshall, A. (1961). Principles of economics (9ª ed.). Macmillan. Marx, K. (1975). El capital. Tomo 1. El proceso de producción del capital (1ª ed., Vol. 2). Siglo XXI Editores.Mill, J. S. (2009 [1848]). The principles of political economy: With some of their applications to social philosophy. D. Appleton and Company.Molotch, H. L. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315881096Nelson, R. H. (1979). A private property right theory of zoning. The Urban Lawyer, 11(4), 713–732. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27890908North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.Ricardo, D. (1973). Principios de economía política y tributación. Fondo de Cultura Económica.Rymanov, A. (2017). Differential land rent and agricultural taxation. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 63(9), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.17221/127/2016-AGRICECONRosenthal, S., & Strange, W. C. (2004a). The micro-empirics of agglomeration economies. En R. Arnott & D. McMillen (Eds.), A companion to urban economics (pp. 7-53). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996225.ch1Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2004b). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. En J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4, 2119-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3Savini, F. (2016). Don’t blame public law: The legal articulation of certainty in Amsterdam land-use planning. Town Planning Review, 87(4), 459-479.Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Fleurbaey, M. (2022). Equity and efficiency effects of land value taxation. IMF Working Papers, WP/22/263. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/12/17/Equity-and-Efficiency-Effects-of-Land-Value-Taxation-527079Sen, A. (2000). Desarrollo y libertad. Editorial Planeta.Senior, N. W. (1836). An outline of the science of political economy. W. Clowes and Sons.Serkin, C. (2020). A case for zoning. Notre Dame Law Review, 96(2), 749–798. Recuperado de https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss2/6Smith, A. (2011). La riqueza de las naciones (Trad. C. Braun). Alianza Editorial. (Trabajo original publicado en 1776)Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge University Press.Starrett, D. (1978). Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 17(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90120-5Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). The theory of local public goods. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 274–333). Palgrave Macmillan.Stiglitz, J. E. (1981). Public goods in open economies with heterogeneous individuals. NBER Working Paper No. 802. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w0802.pdfStiglitz, J. E. (1983). The theory of local public goods twenty–five years after Tiebout: A perspective. En G. Zodrow (Ed.), Local provision of public services (pp. 17–53). Academic Press.Thisse, J. F. (2014). The new science of cities by Michael Batty: The opinion of an economist. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(3), 805-819.Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.Vickrey, W. (1977). The city as a firm. En M. S. Feldstein & R. P. Inman (Eds.), The economics of public services (pp. 334–343). Palgrave Macmillan.Wheaton, W. (1993). Land capitalization, Tiebout mobility, and the role of zoning regulations. Journal of Urban Economics, 34(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1993.1029Zouboulakis, M. (2016). Fundamentación de los derechos de propiedad: Clásicos y modernos. Revista de Economía Institucional, 18(34), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.18601/01245996.v18n34.02Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/10061Urban land prices,Property rights,Value CapturePrecios del suelo urbano,Derechos de propiedad,Captura de valorPreços do solo urbano,Direitos de propriedade,Captura de valorLos precios del suelo urbano, agregación de valor y derechos de propiedadUrban Land Prices, Value Aggregation, and Property RightsArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2537https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/406baff3-ac19-4b2e-9856-2444f72b4da5/downloadc948a8496b5dbd8d062746303afdbc01MD51001/25370oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/253702025-04-09 12:48:01.069http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Alex Smith Araque Solano - 2024https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org