La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico

Este artículo analiza la relación entre los factores geopolíticos y la importancia estra­tégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional. El estudio examina esta relación a través de la influencia de los factores geopolíticos en la configuración de la estrategia n...

Full description

Autores:
Vidal Pérez , Esteban
Tipo de recurso:
Article of journal
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad Externado de Colombia
Repositorio:
Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/15729
Acceso en línea:
https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15729
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n40.09
Palabra clave:
UNCLOS;
national strategy;
perception;
state power;
geopolitics
Unclos;
estrategia nacional;
percepción;
poder del Estado;
geopolítica
Rights
openAccess
License
Esteban Vidal Pérez - 2024
id uexternad2_2094ecc9261807e8c10bbdbb6a3943fd
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/15729
network_acronym_str uexternad2
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv The Strategic Importance of the Territorial Disputes of the Chinese State in the South China Sea: A Geopolitical Approach from Nneoclassical Realism
title La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
spellingShingle La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
UNCLOS;
national strategy;
perception;
state power;
geopolitics
Unclos;
estrategia nacional;
percepción;
poder del Estado;
geopolítica
title_short La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
title_full La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
title_fullStr La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
title_full_unstemmed La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
title_sort La importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásico
dc.creator.fl_str_mv Vidal Pérez , Esteban
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv Vidal Pérez , Esteban
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv UNCLOS;
national strategy;
perception;
state power;
geopolitics
topic UNCLOS;
national strategy;
perception;
state power;
geopolitics
Unclos;
estrategia nacional;
percepción;
poder del Estado;
geopolítica
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Unclos;
estrategia nacional;
percepción;
poder del Estado;
geopolítica
description Este artículo analiza la relación entre los factores geopolíticos y la importancia estra­tégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional. El estudio examina esta relación a través de la influencia de los factores geopolíticos en la configuración de la estrategia nacional china. Para hacerlo recurre al realismo neo­clásico abordando las interacciones entre las presiones externas y las variables intervi­nientes del nivel de la unidad. De esta ma­nera analiza cómo los factores geopolíticos moldearon la percepción de la realidad de los líderes chinos y su impacto en la inter­pretación de ciertos eventos, como la crisis del estrecho de Taiwán de 1995 y la entrada en vigor de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar. El estudio sostiene que estos eventos fueron considera­dos una amenaza para China y contribuye­ron a configurar la estrategia nacional en un sentido marítimo. En consecuencia, China desarrolló su poder naval para controlar el mar de China meridional y establecer su esfera de influencia con el fin de convertir­se en potencia regional hegemónica. Todo esto significó el aumento de su presencia y asertividad en la región, lo que demuestra la importancia de sus disputas territoriales en esta área.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-26T16:23:50Z
2024-06-27T07:15:22Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-26T16:23:50Z
2024-06-27T07:15:22Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-26
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv Journal article
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18601/16577558.n40.09
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv 2346-2132
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1657-7558
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15729
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n40.09
identifier_str_mv 10.18601/16577558.n40.09
2346-2132
1657-7558
url https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15729
https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n40.09
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/9622/16063
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv Núm. 40 , Año 2024 : Julio-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv 209
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv 40
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv 179
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv Oasis
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv Acheson, D. (1951). Remarks by the secretary of state (Acheson) before the National Press Club, Washington, January 12, 1950. En R. Dennett y R. Turner (Eds.), Documents on American Foreign Relations (vol. 12, pp. 426- 433). Princeton University Press.
Ban, W. (Ed.) (2017). Chinese Visions of World Order: Tianxia, Culture, and World Politics. Duke University Press.
Cairo, H. (1993). Elementos para una geopolítica crítica de la guerra y la paz: la construcción social del conflicto territorial argentino-británico [Tesis doctoral inédita]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Chan, E. S. Y. (2020). Growing as a Sea Power: Development of China’s Maritime Security Strategy from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping (1978-2018) [Tesis doctoral inédita]. University of Sydney.
Chin-Kuei, T. (12 de diciembre de 2022). China’s Gray Zone Activities and Taiwan’s Responses. Stimson. https://www.stimson.org/2022/ chinas-gray-zone-activities-and-taiwans-responses/
Chubb, A. (2021). PRC Assertiveness in the South China Sea: Measuring continuity and change, 1970–2015. International Security, 45(3), 79- 121. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00400
Chun-shu, C. (2010). The Rise of the Chinese Empire: Nation, State, and Imperialism in Early China, ca. 1600 B.C.-A.D. 8. The University of Michigan Press.
Cole, B. D. (2003). The PLA Navy and “Active Defense”. En S. J. Flanagan y M. E. Marti (Eds.), The People’s Liberation Army and China in Transition (pp. 129-138). National Defense University Press.
Cole, B. D. (2010). The Great Wall at Sea: China’s Navy in the Twenty-First Century. Naval Institute Press.
Cole, B. D. (2016). China’s Quest for Great Power: Ships, Oil, and Foreign Policy. Naval Institute Press.
Criekemans, D. (2022). Geopolitical schools of thought: A concise overview from 1890 till 2020, and beyond. En D. Criekemans (Ed.), Geopolitics and International Relations: Grounding World Politics Anew (pp. 97-155). Brill Nijhoff.
Dalby, S. (2004). Geopolitics, the revolution in military affairs and the Bush Doctrine. International Politics, 46(2), 234-252. https:// doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.40
Danner, L. K. (2018). China’s Grand Strategy: Contradictory Foreign Policy? Palgrave.
Department of Defense (2017). Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2017. Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Dodds, K. (2005). Global Geopolitics: A Critical Introduction. Pearson.
Dodds, K. y Atkinson, D. (Eds.) (2003). Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of Geopolitical Thought. Routledge.
East, W. G. y Moodie, A. E. (1956). Introduction: The world background. En W. G. East y A. E. Moodie (Eds.), The Changing World: Studies in Political Geography (pp. 1-36). George G. Harrap.
Ekman, A. (2022). China and the Battle of Coalitions: The “circle of friends” versus the Indo-Pacific strategy. EUISS.
Erickson, A. S. (2023). China’s Coast Guard: Organization, Forces, and Yellow Sea Applications. En A. S. Erickson (Ed.), Maritime Gray Zone Operations: Challenges and Countermeasures in the Indo-Pacific (pp. 54-76). Routledge.
Erickson, A. y Goldstein, L. (2009). Gunboats for China’s New “Grand Canals”? Probing the Intersection of Beijing’s Naval and Oil Security Policies. Naval War College Review, 62 (2), 43-76.
Erickson, A. S. y Wuthnow, J. (2016). Barriers, Springboards and Benchmarks: China Conceptualizes the Pacific “Island Chains”. The China Quarterly, 225, 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0305741016000011
FAO (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/cc0461en/ online/sofia/2022/fishing-fleet.html
Fels, E. y Truong-Minh Vu (Eds.) (2016). Power Politics in Asia’s Contested Waters: Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea. Springer.
Feng, L. y Zhang, X. (2001). Lun Heping Shiqi Haijun de Zhanlue Yunyong. Zhongguo Junshi Kexue, (3), 77-84.
Flint, C. (2022). Introduction to Geopolitics. Routledge.
Flint, C. y Taylor, P. J. (2018). Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality. Routledge.
Foucher, M. (1986). L’ invention des frontiers. F.E.D.N.
Fravel, M. T. (2008). Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China’s Territorial Disputes. Princeton University Press.
Fravel, M. T. (2019). Active Defense: China’s Military Strategy since 1949. Princeton University Press.
Friedberg, A. L. (1988). The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895-1905. Princeton University Press.
Gaddis, J. L. (2005). Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War. Oxford University Press.
Garcia, Z. (2019). China’s Military Modernization, Japan’s Normalization and the South China Sea Territorial Disputes. Palgrave.
Ghiselli, A. (2021). Protecting China’s Interests Overseas: Securitization and Foreign Policy. Oxford University Press.
Giblin, B. (1985). Hérodote, une géographie géopolitique. Cahiers de Géographie du Quebec, 29(77), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.7202/021724ar
Goldstein, L. J. (2010). Five Dragons Stirring Up the Sea: Challenge and Opportunity in China’s Improving Maritime Enforcement Capabilities. Naval War College.
Götz, E. (2021). Neoclassical Realist Theories, Intervening Variables, and Paradigmatic Boundaries. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa026
Graham, E. (18 de agosto de 2016). The Hague Tribunal’s South China Sea Ruling: Empty provocation or slow-burning influence? Council of Councils. https://www.cfr.org/ councilofcouncils/global-memos/hague-tribunals-south-china-sea-ruling-empty-provocation-or-slow-burning-influence
Gu, Z. (2004). Weihu Haishang Shiyou Anquan Xuyou Qiangda Haishang Biandui. Dangdai Haijun, 49(8).
Honghua, M. (2020). China’s Grand Strategy: A Framework Analysis. Springer.
Hyun-Soo, K. (1994). The 1992 chinese territorial sea law in the light of the UN Convention. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(4), 894-904. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/43.4.894
Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.
Jorrín, J. (12 de diciembre de 2021). ¿Fue una buena idea aceptar a China en la OMC? Así ha afectado a las economías avanzadas. El Confidencial. https://www.elconfidencial.com/economia/2021-12-12/china-omc-afecto-economias-avanzadas_3339456/
Kaplan, R. D. (2017). La venganza de la geografía. RBA.
Kennedy, C. M. y Erickson, A. S. (2017). China’s third sea force, the people’s armed forces maritime militia: Tethered to the PLA. China Maritime Report (1). https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcon-tent.cgi?article=1000&context=cmsi-maritime-reports
Khan, S. W. (2018). Haunted by Chaos: China’s Grand Strategy from Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping. Harvard University Press.
Kristof, L. K. D. (1960). The origins and evolution of geopolitics. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4(1), 15-51. https://doi. org/10.1177/002200276000400103
Lacoste, Y. (1979). La geografía: un arma para la guerra. Gedisa.
Lacoste, Y. (1985). Géographie, géopolitique et relations internationales. Relations Internationales (41), 39-58.
Lanteigne, M. (2008). China’s Maritime Security and the “Malacca Dilemma”. Asian Security, 4(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799850802006555
Layton, P. (2021). China’s Enduring Grey Zone Challenge. Air and Space Power Centre.
Lefebvre, H. (2013). La producción del espacio. Capitán Swing.
Liang, F. (2011). Hai shang zhan lüe tong dao lun. Shishi chuban she.
Lieser, E. K. (22 de febrero de 2021). How Much Oil and Gas Is Contained in the South China Sea? The National Interest. https://nationalin-terest.org/blog/buzz/how-much-oil-and-gas-contained-south-china-sea-178587
Liu, H. (2004). Liu Huaqing Huiyilu. Jiefangjun chuban she.
Liu, Y. (1999). Zhongguo Weilai de Haijun Jianshe yu Haijun Zhanlue. Zhanlue yu Guanli (5), 96-100.
López, M. (2021). Pasado, presente y futuro de la geopolítica en el mar de China Meridional. Revista del Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos (17), 165-208.
Lu, R. (1998). Zhongguo zouxiang haiyang. Haichao chuban she.
Luo, X. (1994). Haiyang Yishi: yi ge bu Neng Huibi de Huati. Dangdai Haijun (5), 14.
Mamadouh, V. D. (1998). Geopolitics in the Nineties: One Flag, Many Meanings. GeoJournal, 46(4), 237-253. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1006950931650
Martinson, R. D. (2020). The China coast guard: A uniformed armed service. En M. McDevitt, China as a Twenty First Century Naval Power: Theory, Practice, and Implications (pp. 187- 206). Naval Institute Press.
Mastanduno, M., Lake, D. y Ikenberry, J. (1989). Toward a realist theory of state action. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600522
McDermott, R. (2004). Politial Psychology in International Relations. The University of Michigan Press.
McDevitt, M. A. (2020). China as a Twenty First Century Naval Power: Theory, Practice, and Implications. Naval Institute Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton.
Meibauer, G., Desmaele, L., Onea, T., Kitchen, N., Foulon, M., Reichwein, A. y Sterling- Folker, J. (2021). Forum: Rethinking neoclassical realism at theory’s end. International Studies Review, 23(1), 268-295. https://doi. org/10.1093/isr/viaa018
Minmin, L., You, L., Biao, M., Yu, C., Yong, F. y Renzhong, G. (2018). Study on population distribution pattern at the county level of China. Sustainability, 10(10). https://doi. org/10.3390/su10103598
Morgenthau, H. J. (1963). La lucha por el poder y por la paz. Editorial Sudamericana.
Nan, L. (2009). The evolution of China’s naval strategy and capabilities: From “near coast” and “near seas” to “far seas”. Asian Secur it y, 5(2), 144-169. ht tps://doi.org/10.1080/14799850902886567
Nan, L. (2014). China’s evolving naval strategy and capabilities in the Hu Jintao Era. En R. Kamphausen, D. Lai y T. Tranner (Eds.), Assessing the People’s Liberation Army in the Hu Jintao Era (pp. 257-299). The United States War College Press.
Nong, H. (2020). China and the South China Sea: Continuities and adaptations. En L. Buszynski y Do Thanh Hai (Eds.), The South China Sea: From a Regional Maritime Dispute to Geo-Strategic Competition (pp. 77-92). Routledge.
Office of the Secretary of Defense (2020). Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2020: Annual Report To Congress. Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2020/ Sep/01/2002488689/-1/-1/1/2020-dod-china-military-power-report-final.pdf
Office of the Secretary of Defense (2023). Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2023. Department of Defense. https://media. defense.gov/2023/Oct/19/2003323409/-1/- 1/1/2023-military-and-security-developments-involving-the-peoples-republic-of-china.pdf
Raditio, K. H. (2019). Understanding China’s Behaviour in the South China Sea. Palgrave.
Rae, N. (2007). Reinventing Geopolitical Codes in the Post-Cold War World With Special Reference to International Terrorism [Tesis doctoral inédita]. University of Glasgow.
Ripsman, N. M., Taliaferro, J. W. y Lobell, S. (2016). Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford University Press.
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814
Roth, A. (2023). A Hierarchical Vision of Order: Understanding Chinese Foreign Policy. Bristol University Press.
Rowan, J. P. (2005). The US-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute. Asian Survey, 45(3), 414-436. https://doi. org/10.1525/as.2005.45.3.414
Saunders, P. C. (2020). China’s Global Military-Security Interactions. En D. Shambaugh (Ed.), China and the World (pp. 181-207). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, B. C. (2005). Competing realist conceptions of power. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 523-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031401
Schweller, R. L. (2004a). Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of underbalancing. International Security, 29(2), 159-201. https:// doi.org/10.1162/0162288042879913
Schweller, R. L. (2004b). The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. En C. Elman y M. F. Elman (Eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (pp. 311- 347). MIT Press.
Scobell, A., Burke, E. J., Cooper III, C. A., Lilly, S., Ohlandt, C. J. R., Warner, E. y Williams, J. D. (2020). China’s Grand Strategy: Trends, Trayectories, and Long-Term Competition. RAND Corporation.
Shinji, Y., Masaaki, Y. y Rira, M. (2022). China’s Quest for Control of the Cognitive Domain and Gray Zone Situations. National Institute for Defense Studies.
Soja, E. W. (2022). La organización política del espacio. Geopolitica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder, 13(2), 385-447. https://doi.org/10.5209/geop.85021
Stavridis, J. (21 de febrero de 2019). China’s military seeks new islands to conquer. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2019-02-21/china-military-threatseeking-new-islands-to-conquer
Taliaferro, J. W. (2004). Balancing Risks: Great Power Intervention in the Periphery. Cornell University Press.
Taliaferro, J. W. (2009). Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war. En S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman y J. W. Taliaferro (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy (pp. 194-226). Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, P. J. (1988). Geopolitics Revived. University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Taylor, P. J. (1990). Britain and the Cold War: 1945 as Geopolitical Transition. Pinter.
Textor, C. (27 de julio de 2022). Gross domestic product (GDP) at current prices in China from 1985 to 2021 with forecasts until 2027. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263770/gross-domestic-productgdp-of-china/
The International Institute for Strategic Studies (2023). The Military Balance 2023. Routledge.
The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China (2019). China’s National Defense in the New Era. Foreign Languages Press.
Tønnesson, S. (2005). Locating the South China Sea. En P. H. Kratoska, R. Raben y H. S. Nordholt (Eds.), Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space (pp. 203-233). KITLV Press.
Turcsányi, R. Q. (2018). Chinese Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Springer.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (3 de abril de 2013). Contested areas of South China Sea likely have few conventional oil and gas resources. EIA. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=10651
U.S. Energy Information Administration (27 de agosto de 2018). More than 30% of global maritime crude oil trade moves through the South China Sea. eia. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36952
VornDick, W. (22 de octubre de 2018). China’s reach has grown; So should the island chains. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. https://amti.csis.org/chinas-reach-grown-islandchains/
Waltz, K. N. (1959). Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishers.
Wohlforth, W. C. (1993). The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War. Cornell University Press.
Yatsuzuka, Masaaki (16 de enero de 2023). How China’s maritime militia takes advantage of the grey zone. The Strategist. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/how-chinas-maritime-militia-takes-advantage-of-the-grey-zone/
Yin, D. (1994). Shuli Xiandai Haiyang Guotu Yishi. Zhenggong Xuekan (2), 10.
Yoshihara, T. y Holmes, J. R. (2018). Red Star Over the Pacific: China’s Rise and the Challenge to U.S. Maritime Strategy. Naval Institute Press.
Zakaria, F. (2000). De la riqueza al poder. Los orígenes del liderazgo mundial de Estados Unidos. Gedisa.
Zhibin, X. y Anjiao, O. (2018). The factors influencing China’s population distribution and spatial heterogeneity: A prefectural-level analysis using geographically weighted regression. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 11(2), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061- 017-9224-8
Zhou, H. (14 de enero de 2013). A new engine for economic growth. China Daily. http://www. chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-01/14/content_16112232.htm
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Esteban Vidal Pérez - 2024
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Esteban Vidal Pérez - 2024
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/9622
institution Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/e1cc8bbd-e5a2-4c79-8e39-61b2f624571b/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2c00f6e5e11d52a71cf0926e89730980
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_ 1814100508742254592
spelling Vidal Pérez , Esteban2024-06-26T16:23:50Z2024-06-27T07:15:22Z2024-06-26T16:23:50Z2024-06-27T07:15:22Z2024-06-26Este artículo analiza la relación entre los factores geopolíticos y la importancia estra­tégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional. El estudio examina esta relación a través de la influencia de los factores geopolíticos en la configuración de la estrategia nacional china. Para hacerlo recurre al realismo neo­clásico abordando las interacciones entre las presiones externas y las variables intervi­nientes del nivel de la unidad. De esta ma­nera analiza cómo los factores geopolíticos moldearon la percepción de la realidad de los líderes chinos y su impacto en la inter­pretación de ciertos eventos, como la crisis del estrecho de Taiwán de 1995 y la entrada en vigor de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar. El estudio sostiene que estos eventos fueron considera­dos una amenaza para China y contribuye­ron a configurar la estrategia nacional en un sentido marítimo. En consecuencia, China desarrolló su poder naval para controlar el mar de China meridional y establecer su esfera de influencia con el fin de convertir­se en potencia regional hegemónica. Todo esto significó el aumento de su presencia y asertividad en la región, lo que demuestra la importancia de sus disputas territoriales en esta área.This article analyzes the relationship be­tween geopolitical factors and the strategic significance of the Chinese state´s territo­rial disputes in the South China Sea. The study examines this relationship through the influence of geopolitical factors on the configuration of Chinese national strategy. To do so, it turns to neoclassical realism, addressing the interactions between exter­nal pressures and intervening variables at the unit level. In doing so, it analyzes how geopolitical factors shaped Chinese leaders’ perceptions of reality and their impact on their interpretation of certain events, such as the 1995 Taiwan Strait Crisis and the entry into force of the UNCLOS. The study argues that these events were perceived as threats to China and helped shape national strategy in maritime terms. As a result, China developed its naval power to control the South China Sea and establish its sphere of influence in order to become the hege­monic regional power. All of this meant the increase of its presence and assertiveness in the region, which proves the importance of its territorial disputes in this area.application/pdf10.18601/16577558.n40.092346-21321657-7558https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/15729https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n40.09spaFacultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionaleshttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/download/9622/16063Núm. 40 , Año 2024 : Julio-Diciembre20940179OasisAcheson, D. (1951). Remarks by the secretary of state (Acheson) before the National Press Club, Washington, January 12, 1950. En R. Dennett y R. Turner (Eds.), Documents on American Foreign Relations (vol. 12, pp. 426- 433). Princeton University Press.Ban, W. (Ed.) (2017). Chinese Visions of World Order: Tianxia, Culture, and World Politics. Duke University Press.Cairo, H. (1993). Elementos para una geopolítica crítica de la guerra y la paz: la construcción social del conflicto territorial argentino-británico [Tesis doctoral inédita]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Chan, E. S. Y. (2020). Growing as a Sea Power: Development of China’s Maritime Security Strategy from Deng Xiaoping to Xi Jinping (1978-2018) [Tesis doctoral inédita]. University of Sydney.Chin-Kuei, T. (12 de diciembre de 2022). China’s Gray Zone Activities and Taiwan’s Responses. Stimson. https://www.stimson.org/2022/ chinas-gray-zone-activities-and-taiwans-responses/Chubb, A. (2021). PRC Assertiveness in the South China Sea: Measuring continuity and change, 1970–2015. International Security, 45(3), 79- 121. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00400Chun-shu, C. (2010). The Rise of the Chinese Empire: Nation, State, and Imperialism in Early China, ca. 1600 B.C.-A.D. 8. The University of Michigan Press.Cole, B. D. (2003). The PLA Navy and “Active Defense”. En S. J. Flanagan y M. E. Marti (Eds.), The People’s Liberation Army and China in Transition (pp. 129-138). National Defense University Press.Cole, B. D. (2010). The Great Wall at Sea: China’s Navy in the Twenty-First Century. Naval Institute Press.Cole, B. D. (2016). China’s Quest for Great Power: Ships, Oil, and Foreign Policy. Naval Institute Press.Criekemans, D. (2022). Geopolitical schools of thought: A concise overview from 1890 till 2020, and beyond. En D. Criekemans (Ed.), Geopolitics and International Relations: Grounding World Politics Anew (pp. 97-155). Brill Nijhoff.Dalby, S. (2004). Geopolitics, the revolution in military affairs and the Bush Doctrine. International Politics, 46(2), 234-252. https:// doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.40Danner, L. K. (2018). China’s Grand Strategy: Contradictory Foreign Policy? Palgrave.Department of Defense (2017). Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2017. Office of the Secretary of Defense.Dodds, K. (2005). Global Geopolitics: A Critical Introduction. Pearson.Dodds, K. y Atkinson, D. (Eds.) (2003). Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of Geopolitical Thought. Routledge.East, W. G. y Moodie, A. E. (1956). Introduction: The world background. En W. G. East y A. E. Moodie (Eds.), The Changing World: Studies in Political Geography (pp. 1-36). George G. Harrap.Ekman, A. (2022). China and the Battle of Coalitions: The “circle of friends” versus the Indo-Pacific strategy. EUISS.Erickson, A. S. (2023). China’s Coast Guard: Organization, Forces, and Yellow Sea Applications. En A. S. Erickson (Ed.), Maritime Gray Zone Operations: Challenges and Countermeasures in the Indo-Pacific (pp. 54-76). Routledge.Erickson, A. y Goldstein, L. (2009). Gunboats for China’s New “Grand Canals”? Probing the Intersection of Beijing’s Naval and Oil Security Policies. Naval War College Review, 62 (2), 43-76.Erickson, A. S. y Wuthnow, J. (2016). Barriers, Springboards and Benchmarks: China Conceptualizes the Pacific “Island Chains”. The China Quarterly, 225, 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0305741016000011FAO (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/cc0461en/ online/sofia/2022/fishing-fleet.htmlFels, E. y Truong-Minh Vu (Eds.) (2016). Power Politics in Asia’s Contested Waters: Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea. Springer.Feng, L. y Zhang, X. (2001). Lun Heping Shiqi Haijun de Zhanlue Yunyong. Zhongguo Junshi Kexue, (3), 77-84.Flint, C. (2022). Introduction to Geopolitics. Routledge.Flint, C. y Taylor, P. J. (2018). Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality. Routledge.Foucher, M. (1986). L’ invention des frontiers. F.E.D.N.Fravel, M. T. (2008). Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China’s Territorial Disputes. Princeton University Press.Fravel, M. T. (2019). Active Defense: China’s Military Strategy since 1949. Princeton University Press.Friedberg, A. L. (1988). The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895-1905. Princeton University Press.Gaddis, J. L. (2005). Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War. Oxford University Press.Garcia, Z. (2019). China’s Military Modernization, Japan’s Normalization and the South China Sea Territorial Disputes. Palgrave.Ghiselli, A. (2021). Protecting China’s Interests Overseas: Securitization and Foreign Policy. Oxford University Press.Giblin, B. (1985). Hérodote, une géographie géopolitique. Cahiers de Géographie du Quebec, 29(77), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.7202/021724arGoldstein, L. J. (2010). Five Dragons Stirring Up the Sea: Challenge and Opportunity in China’s Improving Maritime Enforcement Capabilities. Naval War College.Götz, E. (2021). Neoclassical Realist Theories, Intervening Variables, and Paradigmatic Boundaries. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa026Graham, E. (18 de agosto de 2016). The Hague Tribunal’s South China Sea Ruling: Empty provocation or slow-burning influence? Council of Councils. https://www.cfr.org/ councilofcouncils/global-memos/hague-tribunals-south-china-sea-ruling-empty-provocation-or-slow-burning-influenceGu, Z. (2004). Weihu Haishang Shiyou Anquan Xuyou Qiangda Haishang Biandui. Dangdai Haijun, 49(8).Honghua, M. (2020). China’s Grand Strategy: A Framework Analysis. Springer.Hyun-Soo, K. (1994). The 1992 chinese territorial sea law in the light of the UN Convention. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(4), 894-904. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/43.4.894Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton University Press.Jorrín, J. (12 de diciembre de 2021). ¿Fue una buena idea aceptar a China en la OMC? Así ha afectado a las economías avanzadas. El Confidencial. https://www.elconfidencial.com/economia/2021-12-12/china-omc-afecto-economias-avanzadas_3339456/Kaplan, R. D. (2017). La venganza de la geografía. RBA.Kennedy, C. M. y Erickson, A. S. (2017). China’s third sea force, the people’s armed forces maritime militia: Tethered to the PLA. China Maritime Report (1). https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcon-tent.cgi?article=1000&context=cmsi-maritime-reportsKhan, S. W. (2018). Haunted by Chaos: China’s Grand Strategy from Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping. Harvard University Press.Kristof, L. K. D. (1960). The origins and evolution of geopolitics. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4(1), 15-51. https://doi. org/10.1177/002200276000400103Lacoste, Y. (1979). La geografía: un arma para la guerra. Gedisa.Lacoste, Y. (1985). Géographie, géopolitique et relations internationales. Relations Internationales (41), 39-58.Lanteigne, M. (2008). China’s Maritime Security and the “Malacca Dilemma”. Asian Security, 4(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799850802006555Layton, P. (2021). China’s Enduring Grey Zone Challenge. Air and Space Power Centre.Lefebvre, H. (2013). La producción del espacio. Capitán Swing.Liang, F. (2011). Hai shang zhan lüe tong dao lun. Shishi chuban she.Lieser, E. K. (22 de febrero de 2021). How Much Oil and Gas Is Contained in the South China Sea? The National Interest. https://nationalin-terest.org/blog/buzz/how-much-oil-and-gas-contained-south-china-sea-178587Liu, H. (2004). Liu Huaqing Huiyilu. Jiefangjun chuban she.Liu, Y. (1999). Zhongguo Weilai de Haijun Jianshe yu Haijun Zhanlue. Zhanlue yu Guanli (5), 96-100.López, M. (2021). Pasado, presente y futuro de la geopolítica en el mar de China Meridional. Revista del Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos (17), 165-208.Lu, R. (1998). Zhongguo zouxiang haiyang. Haichao chuban she.Luo, X. (1994). Haiyang Yishi: yi ge bu Neng Huibi de Huati. Dangdai Haijun (5), 14.Mamadouh, V. D. (1998). Geopolitics in the Nineties: One Flag, Many Meanings. GeoJournal, 46(4), 237-253. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1006950931650Martinson, R. D. (2020). The China coast guard: A uniformed armed service. En M. McDevitt, China as a Twenty First Century Naval Power: Theory, Practice, and Implications (pp. 187- 206). Naval Institute Press.Mastanduno, M., Lake, D. y Ikenberry, J. (1989). Toward a realist theory of state action. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600522McDermott, R. (2004). Politial Psychology in International Relations. The University of Michigan Press.McDevitt, M. A. (2020). China as a Twenty First Century Naval Power: Theory, Practice, and Implications. Naval Institute Press.Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton.Meibauer, G., Desmaele, L., Onea, T., Kitchen, N., Foulon, M., Reichwein, A. y Sterling- Folker, J. (2021). Forum: Rethinking neoclassical realism at theory’s end. International Studies Review, 23(1), 268-295. https://doi. org/10.1093/isr/viaa018Minmin, L., You, L., Biao, M., Yu, C., Yong, F. y Renzhong, G. (2018). Study on population distribution pattern at the county level of China. Sustainability, 10(10). https://doi. org/10.3390/su10103598Morgenthau, H. J. (1963). La lucha por el poder y por la paz. Editorial Sudamericana.Nan, L. (2009). The evolution of China’s naval strategy and capabilities: From “near coast” and “near seas” to “far seas”. Asian Secur it y, 5(2), 144-169. ht tps://doi.org/10.1080/14799850902886567Nan, L. (2014). China’s evolving naval strategy and capabilities in the Hu Jintao Era. En R. Kamphausen, D. Lai y T. Tranner (Eds.), Assessing the People’s Liberation Army in the Hu Jintao Era (pp. 257-299). The United States War College Press.Nong, H. (2020). China and the South China Sea: Continuities and adaptations. En L. Buszynski y Do Thanh Hai (Eds.), The South China Sea: From a Regional Maritime Dispute to Geo-Strategic Competition (pp. 77-92). Routledge.Office of the Secretary of Defense (2020). Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2020: Annual Report To Congress. Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2020/ Sep/01/2002488689/-1/-1/1/2020-dod-china-military-power-report-final.pdfOffice of the Secretary of Defense (2023). Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2023. Department of Defense. https://media. defense.gov/2023/Oct/19/2003323409/-1/- 1/1/2023-military-and-security-developments-involving-the-peoples-republic-of-china.pdfRaditio, K. H. (2019). Understanding China’s Behaviour in the South China Sea. Palgrave.Rae, N. (2007). Reinventing Geopolitical Codes in the Post-Cold War World With Special Reference to International Terrorism [Tesis doctoral inédita]. University of Glasgow.Ripsman, N. M., Taliaferro, J. W. y Lobell, S. (2016). Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford University Press.Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814Roth, A. (2023). A Hierarchical Vision of Order: Understanding Chinese Foreign Policy. Bristol University Press.Rowan, J. P. (2005). The US-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute. Asian Survey, 45(3), 414-436. https://doi. org/10.1525/as.2005.45.3.414Saunders, P. C. (2020). China’s Global Military-Security Interactions. En D. Shambaugh (Ed.), China and the World (pp. 181-207). Oxford University Press.Schmidt, B. C. (2005). Competing realist conceptions of power. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 523-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031401Schweller, R. L. (2004a). Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of underbalancing. International Security, 29(2), 159-201. https:// doi.org/10.1162/0162288042879913Schweller, R. L. (2004b). The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. En C. Elman y M. F. Elman (Eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (pp. 311- 347). MIT Press.Scobell, A., Burke, E. J., Cooper III, C. A., Lilly, S., Ohlandt, C. J. R., Warner, E. y Williams, J. D. (2020). China’s Grand Strategy: Trends, Trayectories, and Long-Term Competition. RAND Corporation.Shinji, Y., Masaaki, Y. y Rira, M. (2022). China’s Quest for Control of the Cognitive Domain and Gray Zone Situations. National Institute for Defense Studies.Soja, E. W. (2022). La organización política del espacio. Geopolitica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder, 13(2), 385-447. https://doi.org/10.5209/geop.85021Stavridis, J. (21 de febrero de 2019). China’s military seeks new islands to conquer. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2019-02-21/china-military-threatseeking-new-islands-to-conquerTaliaferro, J. W. (2004). Balancing Risks: Great Power Intervention in the Periphery. Cornell University Press.Taliaferro, J. W. (2009). Neoclassical realism and resource extraction: State building for future war. En S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman y J. W. Taliaferro (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy (pp. 194-226). Cambridge University Press.Taylor, P. J. (1988). Geopolitics Revived. University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Taylor, P. J. (1990). Britain and the Cold War: 1945 as Geopolitical Transition. Pinter.Textor, C. (27 de julio de 2022). Gross domestic product (GDP) at current prices in China from 1985 to 2021 with forecasts until 2027. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263770/gross-domestic-productgdp-of-china/The International Institute for Strategic Studies (2023). The Military Balance 2023. Routledge.The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China (2019). China’s National Defense in the New Era. Foreign Languages Press.Tønnesson, S. (2005). Locating the South China Sea. En P. H. Kratoska, R. Raben y H. S. Nordholt (Eds.), Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space (pp. 203-233). KITLV Press.Turcsányi, R. Q. (2018). Chinese Assertiveness in the South China Sea. Springer.U.S. Energy Information Administration (3 de abril de 2013). Contested areas of South China Sea likely have few conventional oil and gas resources. EIA. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=10651U.S. Energy Information Administration (27 de agosto de 2018). More than 30% of global maritime crude oil trade moves through the South China Sea. eia. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36952VornDick, W. (22 de octubre de 2018). China’s reach has grown; So should the island chains. Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. https://amti.csis.org/chinas-reach-grown-islandchains/Waltz, K. N. (1959). Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishers.Wohlforth, W. C. (1993). The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War. Cornell University Press.Yatsuzuka, Masaaki (16 de enero de 2023). How China’s maritime militia takes advantage of the grey zone. The Strategist. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/how-chinas-maritime-militia-takes-advantage-of-the-grey-zone/Yin, D. (1994). Shuli Xiandai Haiyang Guotu Yishi. Zhenggong Xuekan (2), 10.Yoshihara, T. y Holmes, J. R. (2018). Red Star Over the Pacific: China’s Rise and the Challenge to U.S. Maritime Strategy. Naval Institute Press.Zakaria, F. (2000). De la riqueza al poder. Los orígenes del liderazgo mundial de Estados Unidos. Gedisa.Zhibin, X. y Anjiao, O. (2018). The factors influencing China’s population distribution and spatial heterogeneity: A prefectural-level analysis using geographically weighted regression. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 11(2), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061- 017-9224-8Zhou, H. (14 de enero de 2013). A new engine for economic growth. China Daily. http://www. chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-01/14/content_16112232.htmEsteban Vidal Pérez - 2024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/9622UNCLOS;national strategy;perception;state power;geopoliticsUnclos;estrategia nacional;percepción;poder del Estado;geopolíticaLa importancia estratégica de las disputas territoriales del Estado chino en el mar de China Meridional: un enfoque geopolítico desde el realismo neoclásicoThe Strategic Importance of the Territorial Disputes of the Chinese State in the South China Sea: A Geopolitical Approach from Nneoclassical RealismArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2710https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/e1cc8bbd-e5a2-4c79-8e39-61b2f624571b/download2c00f6e5e11d52a71cf0926e89730980MD51001/15729oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/157292024-06-27 02:15:23.014http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0Esteban Vidal Pérez - 2024https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Publicaciones similares