Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?

El modelo clásico de organización política atraviesa un proceso de crisis profunda. Inexorablemente, las “fronteras” políticas, económicas, jurídicas, sociales y culturales de los Estados se tornan cada vez más porosas (para no decir sin sentido). Esta situación hace que las diferenciaciones entre d...

Full description

Autores:: Caballero Lois, Cecilia
Magno Pinto Bastos Júnior, Luiz Magno

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2017

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_134968a3e4b7962cc467fd7d8bd24f1b
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/10699
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Constitutional pluralism and trasnational spaces: The end or a new beginning of the National Constitution?
title	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?
spellingShingle	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo? Espacios transnacionales pluralismo constitucional transición de modelos de ordenación constitucional. Transnational spaces constitutional pluralism transition on models of constitutional ordering.
title_short	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?
title_full	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?
title_fullStr	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?
title_full_unstemmed	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?
title_sort	Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Caballero Lois, Cecilia Magno Pinto Bastos Júnior, Luiz Magno
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Caballero Lois, Cecilia Magno Pinto Bastos Júnior, Luiz Magno
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	Espacios transnacionales pluralismo constitucional transición de modelos de ordenación constitucional.
topic	Espacios transnacionales pluralismo constitucional transición de modelos de ordenación constitucional. Transnational spaces constitutional pluralism transition on models of constitutional ordering.
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	Transnational spaces constitutional pluralism transition on models of constitutional ordering.
description	El modelo clásico de organización política atraviesa un proceso de crisis profunda. Inexorablemente, las “fronteras” políticas, económicas, jurídicas, sociales y culturales de los Estados se tornan cada vez más porosas (para no decir sin sentido). Esta situación hace que las diferenciaciones entre derecho y política modernamente operadas por la constitución se diluyan, hasta el punto de que los elementos conceptuales clásicamente formulados por la teoría constitucional se muestran ahora incapaces de resolver los problemas relativos a la normativa social y las pretensiones de ordenación social. Este artículo pretende discutir en qué medida es posible mantener las funciones tradicionales asignadas a la constitución en vista de la ampliación de las áreas de regulación transnacional. Trata, en otras palabras, de entender las consecuencias y las posibilidades de (re)organización del proceso de ordenación que afectan al diseño estructural de la soberanía constitucional en su forma más fundamental, es decir, en su capacidad soberana para decidir en un determinado territorio. Se hace énfasis en la dimensión institucional de estas transformaciones, con vistas a formular, al final de este artículo, las bases para la identificación de un modelo de pluralismo constitucional apoyado sobre las máximas de pluralidad, ordenación heterárquica y conflictividad.
publishDate	2017
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2017-12-13 00:00:00 2022-09-09T21:01:43Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2017-12-13 00:00:00 2022-09-09T21:01:43Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2017-12-13
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/01229893.n40.06
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2051
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0122-9893
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/10699
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n40.06
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/01229893.n40.06 2346-2051 0122-9893
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/10699 https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n40.06
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6287 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6373 https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6591
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 40 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	151
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	40
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	127
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Derecho del Estado
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Ahdieh, R. B. (2004). Between dialogue and decree: International review of national courts. New York University Law Review. Vol. 79, n.º 6, 101-228. Augsberg, I. (2009). The relevance of network models within the juridic discourse. Empirical, sociological, and epistemological perspectives. German Law Journal. Vol. 10, n.º 4, 383-394. Avbelj, M. (2006). The EU and the many faces of legal pluralism toward a coherent or uniform EU legal order? Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, University of Zagreb. Vol. 2, 377-391. Bastos Jr., L. M. P. (2000). Possui a União Européia uma autêntica constituição? Um breve esboço sobre a natureza jurídica dos tratados de integração e o problema da legitimidade democrática. Revista de Informação Legislativa, Brasília. Vol. 37, n.º 147, 145-160. Bastos Jr., L. M. P. (2011). Constituição, quo vadis? Por um constitucionalismo da diferença como resposta aos desafios contemporâneos à teoria constitucional. Tese em Direito. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis. Berman, P. S. (2002). The globalization of jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 151, n.º 2, 311-529. Berman, P. S. (2005). Towards a cosmopolitan vision of conflict of laws: Redefining governmental interests in a global era. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 153, n.º 6, 1819-1882. Berman, P. S. (2007). Global legal pluralism. Southern California Law Review. Vol. 80, n.º 6, 1155-1237. Calliess, Ch. (2009). Europe as Transnational Law – The Transnationalization of Values by European Law. German Law Journal. Vol. 10, n.º 10. Caporaso, J. (2000). Changes in the Westphalian order: territory, public authority, and sovereignity. En: Capo raso, J. (org.). Continuity and change in the Westphalian order. Malden, usa; Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1-28. Castells, M. (2003). A sociedade em rede. 7.ª ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra. Cottier, Th. (2009). Multilayered governance, pluralism, and moral conflict. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 647-679. De Sousa Santos, B. (2000). Para um novo senso comum: a ciência, o direito e a política na transição paradigmática. São Paulo: Cortez. Vol. 1: “A crítica da razão indolente: contra o desperdício da experiência”. Dupret, B. (2007). Legal pluralism, plurality of laws, and legal practices: Theories, critiques, and praxiological re-specification. European Journal of Legal Studies, European University Institute. Vol. 1, n.º 2. Fraser, N. (2009). Reenquadrando a justiça em um mundo globalizado. Lua Nova: revista de cultura e política. cedec, n.º 77, 11-39. Gomes Canotilho, J. J. (2008). “Brancosos” e interconstitucionalidade: itinerários dos discursos sobre a historicidade constitucional. 2.ª ed. Coimbra: Almedina. Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, University of Birmingham. Vol. 24, 1-55. Gunther, K. (2008). Legal pluralism or uniform concept of law? Globalisation as a problema of legal theory. No Foundations: Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism, Helsinki, n.º 5, 5-21. Häberle, P. (1998). Libertad, igualdad, fraternidad: 1789 como historia, actualidad y futuro del Estado constitucional. Madrid: Trotta. Häberle, P. (2007). Estado constitucional cooperativo. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar. Joerges, Ch. (2005). Rethinking European Law’s Supremacy: A Plea for a Supranational Conflict of Laws. eui Working Paper Law, European University Institute, Florence, Paper n.º 2005/12. Joerges, Ch. (2006). Constitutionalism in Postnational constellations: Contrasting social regulation in the EU and in the wto. En: Joerges, C. y Petersmann, E-U. (eds.). Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 491-527. Petersmann, E.-U. (2007). Conflict of laws as constitutional form: Reflections on the International Trade Law and the Biotech Panel Report. reco n Online Working Paper Series, Working Paper n.º 2007/03. Petersmann, E.-U. (2010). The idea of three-dimensional conflicts law as constitutional form. reco n Online Working Paper Series, Working Paper n.º 2010/05, 2010. Komárek, J. (2010). Institutional Dimension of Constitutional Pluralism. Eric Stein Working Paper, Czech Society for European and Comparative Law, Paper n.º 3. Kontopo ulos, K. M. (1993). The logics of social structure. Cambridge: Cambridge. Koskenniemi, M. (2006). Fragmentation of internacional Law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Geneva, 1 May-9 June and 3 July-11 August. Identificação: A/CN.4/L.682 Kovziridz, T. (2009). Hierarchy and Interdependence in Multi-level Structures: Foreign and European Relations of Belgian, German and Austrian Federated Entities. Brussels: vub Press. Krisch, N. (2009). The case for pluralism in postnational law. lse Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, London School of Economics and Political Science, n.º 12. Kumm, M. (1999). Who is the final arbiter of constitutionality in Europe?: Three conceptions of the relationship between the German constitutional court and the European Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review. Vol. 36, n.º 2, 351-386. Kumm, M. (2006). Democratic constitutionalism encounters international law: terms of engagement. En: Choudhry, S. The migration of constitutional ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge, 256-293. Kumm, M. (2009). The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 258-325. Lachmayer, K. (2007). The international Constitutional Law approach: An introduction to a new perspective on constitutional challenges in a globalizing world. The Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law. Vol. 1, n.º 2, 91-99. Litfin, K. T. (1997). Sovereignty in world ecopolitics. Mershon International Studies Review, The International Studies Association. Vol. 41, n.º 2, 167-204. MacCormick, N. (1993). Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review. Vol. 56, n.º 1, 1-18. MacCormick, N. (1995). The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty now. European Law Journal. Vol. 1, n.º 3, 259-266. MacCormick, N. (1999). Questioning sovereignty: Law, State, and practical reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Maduro, M. P. (2003). Contrapunctual law: Europe’s constitutional pluralism in action. En: Walker, N. (ed.). Sovereignty in transition. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 501-537. Maduro, M. P. (2006). A constituição plural: constitucionalismo e União Européia. Cascais: Principia. Maduro, M. P. (2008). Interpreting european law - Judicial adjudication in a context of constitutional pluralism. Working Paper IE Law School, European University Institute, WPLS08-02. Disponible en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1134503 Maduro, M. P. (2009). Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds.). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 356-379. Mayer, F. (2006). The European Constitution and the Courts. En: Von Bogdandy, A. y Bast, J. (eds.). Principles of European Constitutional Law. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 281-333. Neves, M. (1994). A constitucionalização simbólica. São Paulo: Acadêmica. Neves, M. (1995). Constitucionalização simbólica e desconstitucionalização fática: mudança simbólica da constituição e permanência das estruturas reais de poder. Revista Trimestral de Direito Público, São Paulo, n.º 12, 156-167. Neves, M. (2009). Transconstitucionalismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. Pauwelyn, Joost (2004). Bridging fragmentation and unity: International Law as a universe of inter-connected islands. Michigan Journal of International Law. Vol. 25, n.º 4, 903-916. Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory constitutionalism: The function and potential of fundamental international norms and structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19, n.º 3, 579-610. Peters, A. (2007). The globalization of State constitutions. En: Nollkaemper, A. y Nijma, J. (eds.). New perspectives on the divide between national and international law. Oxford: Oxford, 251-308. Peters, A. (2009). The Merits of Global Constitutionalism. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 397-411. Rittberger, V. (2008). Global Governance: From ‘exclusive’ executive multilateralism to inclusive, multipartite institutions. Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, Institut für Politikwissenschaft Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Paper n.º 52. Rosenfeld, M. (2010). The identity of the constitutional subject: Selfhood, citizenship, culture, and community. London-New York: Routledge. Sweet, A. S. (2000). Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford. Sweet, A. S. y Mathews, J. (2008). Proportionality, balancing and global constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 47, n.º 1, 73-165. Tamanaha, B. (1995). An analytical map of social scientific approaches to the concept of law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 15, n.º 4, 501-535. Tamanaha, B. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global. Legal Studies Research Paper Series, St. John’s University School of Law, Paper n.º 07-0080. Van Aaken, A. (2009). Defragmentation of Public International Law Through Interpretation: A Methodological Proposal. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 483-512. Von Bernstorff, J. (2004). The Structural Limitations of Network Governance: icann as a Case in Point. En: Joerges, C.; Sand, I.-J. y Teubner, G. (eds.). Transnational Governance and constitutionalism. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 257-282. Von Bogdandy, A. (2008). Pluralism, direct effect, and the ultimate say: On the relationship between international and domestic constitutional law. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 397-413. Von Bogdandy, A.; Wolfrum, R.; Von Bernstorff, J.; Dann, P. y Goldmann, M. (eds.). (2009). The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law. Heildeberg: Springer. Walker, N. (2008a). Beyond boundaries disputes and basic grids: Mapping the global disorder of normative orders. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 373-396. Walker, N. (2008b). Taking constitutionalism beyond the State. Political Studies. Vol. 56, n.º 3, 519-543. Walker, N. (2009). Reframing the EU Constitutionalism. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds.). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 149-176. Wolkmer, A. C. (1997). Pluralismo jurídico: fundamentos de uma nova cultura no direito. São Paulo: Alfa e Ômega. Zacher, M. W. (2000). Os pilares em ruína do templo de Vestfália. En: Rosenau, J.; Czempiel, E-O. (orgs.). Governança sem governo: ordem e transformação na política mundial. Brasília: UnB; Imprensa Oficial, 83-141. Zagrebelsky, G. (1995). El derecho dúctil: ley, derechos y justicia. Madrid: Trotta. Zagrebelsky, G. (2008). El juez en el siglo xxi. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal Constitucional, n.º 10, 249-268.
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf text/html application/xml
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Departamento de Derecho Constitucional
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/5220
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/24d3a91f-4cf5-4a7a-b01c-5365ca68126a/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	b2498be54cae1e640d89db181da0530b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1814100442546700288
spelling	Caballero Lois, Cecilia532b237a-ea6d-4e57-9e14-266a9958aad5Magno Pinto Bastos Júnior, Luiz Magno02384b81-eb2f-46d8-86d8-e5e7111e68b72017-12-13 00:00:002022-09-09T21:01:43Z2017-12-13 00:00:002022-09-09T21:01:43Z2017-12-13El modelo clásico de organización política atraviesa un proceso de crisis profunda. Inexorablemente, las “fronteras” políticas, económicas, jurídicas, sociales y culturales de los Estados se tornan cada vez más porosas (para no decir sin sentido). Esta situación hace que las diferenciaciones entre derecho y política modernamente operadas por la constitución se diluyan, hasta el punto de que los elementos conceptuales clásicamente formulados por la teoría constitucional se muestran ahora incapaces de resolver los problemas relativos a la normativa social y las pretensiones de ordenación social. Este artículo pretende discutir en qué medida es posible mantener las funciones tradicionales asignadas a la constitución en vista de la ampliación de las áreas de regulación transnacional. Trata, en otras palabras, de entender las consecuencias y las posibilidades de (re)organización del proceso de ordenación que afectan al diseño estructural de la soberanía constitucional en su forma más fundamental, es decir, en su capacidad soberana para decidir en un determinado territorio. Se hace énfasis en la dimensión institucional de estas transformaciones, con vistas a formular, al final de este artículo, las bases para la identificación de un modelo de pluralismo constitucional apoyado sobre las máximas de pluralidad, ordenación heterárquica y conflictividad.This article aims to discuss to what extent it is possible to maintain the traditional function assigned to the constitution when it is confronted with the expanding the areas of transnational regulation. In other words, it to understand the consequences and possibilities of (re)organization of the ordering process that affects the structural design of constitutional sovereignty in its most fundamental feature, that is, its sovereign capacity to decide in a given territory.application/pdftext/htmlapplication/xml10.18601/01229893.n40.062346-20510122-9893https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/10699https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n40.06spaDepartamento de Derecho Constitucionalhttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6287https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6373https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/download/5220/6591Núm. 40 , Año 2018 : Enero-Junio15140127Revista Derecho del EstadoAhdieh, R. B. (2004). Between dialogue and decree: International review of national courts. New York University Law Review. Vol. 79, n.º 6, 101-228.Augsberg, I. (2009). The relevance of network models within the juridic discourse. Empirical, sociological, and epistemological perspectives. German Law Journal. Vol. 10, n.º 4, 383-394.Avbelj, M. (2006). The EU and the many faces of legal pluralism toward a coherent or uniform EU legal order? Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, University of Zagreb. Vol. 2, 377-391.Bastos Jr., L. M. P. (2000). Possui a União Européia uma autêntica constituição? Um breve esboço sobre a natureza jurídica dos tratados de integração e o problema da legitimidade democrática. Revista de Informação Legislativa, Brasília. Vol. 37, n.º 147, 145-160.Bastos Jr., L. M. P. (2011). Constituição, quo vadis? Por um constitucionalismo da diferença como resposta aos desafios contemporâneos à teoria constitucional. Tese em Direito. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.Berman, P. S. (2002). The globalization of jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 151, n.º 2, 311-529.Berman, P. S. (2005). Towards a cosmopolitan vision of conflict of laws: Redefining governmental interests in a global era. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 153, n.º 6, 1819-1882.Berman, P. S. (2007). Global legal pluralism. Southern California Law Review. Vol. 80, n.º 6, 1155-1237.Calliess, Ch. (2009). Europe as Transnational Law – The Transnationalization of Values by European Law. German Law Journal. Vol. 10, n.º 10.Caporaso, J. (2000). Changes in the Westphalian order: territory, public authority, and sovereignity. En: Capo raso, J. (org.). Continuity and change in the Westphalian order. Malden, usa; Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1-28. Castells, M. (2003). A sociedade em rede. 7.ª ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Cottier, Th. (2009). Multilayered governance, pluralism, and moral conflict. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 647-679.De Sousa Santos, B. (2000). Para um novo senso comum: a ciência, o direito e a política na transição paradigmática. São Paulo: Cortez. Vol. 1: “A crítica da razão indolente: contra o desperdício da experiência”.Dupret, B. (2007). Legal pluralism, plurality of laws, and legal practices: Theories, critiques, and praxiological re-specification. European Journal of Legal Studies, European University Institute. Vol. 1, n.º 2.Fraser, N. (2009). Reenquadrando a justiça em um mundo globalizado. Lua Nova: revista de cultura e política. cedec, n.º 77, 11-39.Gomes Canotilho, J. J. (2008). “Brancosos” e interconstitucionalidade: itinerários dos discursos sobre a historicidade constitucional. 2.ª ed. Coimbra: Almedina.Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, University of Birmingham. Vol. 24, 1-55.Gunther, K. (2008). Legal pluralism or uniform concept of law? Globalisation as a problema of legal theory. No Foundations: Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism, Helsinki, n.º 5, 5-21.Häberle, P. (1998). Libertad, igualdad, fraternidad: 1789 como historia, actualidad y futuro del Estado constitucional. Madrid: Trotta.Häberle, P. (2007). Estado constitucional cooperativo. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar.Joerges, Ch. (2005). Rethinking European Law’s Supremacy: A Plea for a Supranational Conflict of Laws. eui Working Paper Law, European University Institute, Florence, Paper n.º 2005/12.Joerges, Ch. (2006). Constitutionalism in Postnational constellations: Contrasting social regulation in the EU and in the wto. En: Joerges, C. y Petersmann, E-U. (eds.). Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 491-527.Petersmann, E.-U. (2007). Conflict of laws as constitutional form: Reflections on the International Trade Law and the Biotech Panel Report. reco n Online Working Paper Series, Working Paper n.º 2007/03.Petersmann, E.-U. (2010). The idea of three-dimensional conflicts law as constitutional form. reco n Online Working Paper Series, Working Paper n.º 2010/05, 2010.Komárek, J. (2010). Institutional Dimension of Constitutional Pluralism. Eric Stein Working Paper, Czech Society for European and Comparative Law, Paper n.º 3.Kontopo ulos, K. M. (1993). The logics of social structure. Cambridge: Cambridge.Koskenniemi, M. (2006). Fragmentation of internacional Law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Geneva, 1 May-9 June and 3 July-11 August. Identificação: A/CN.4/L.682Kovziridz, T. (2009). Hierarchy and Interdependence in Multi-level Structures: Foreign and European Relations of Belgian, German and Austrian Federated Entities. Brussels: vub Press.Krisch, N. (2009). The case for pluralism in postnational law. lse Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, London School of Economics and Political Science, n.º 12.Kumm, M. (1999). Who is the final arbiter of constitutionality in Europe?: Three conceptions of the relationship between the German constitutional court and the European Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review. Vol. 36, n.º 2, 351-386.Kumm, M. (2006). Democratic constitutionalism encounters international law: terms of engagement. En: Choudhry, S. The migration of constitutional ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge, 256-293.Kumm, M. (2009). The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 258-325.Lachmayer, K. (2007). The international Constitutional Law approach: An introduction to a new perspective on constitutional challenges in a globalizing world. The Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law. Vol. 1, n.º 2, 91-99.Litfin, K. T. (1997). Sovereignty in world ecopolitics. Mershon International Studies Review, The International Studies Association. Vol. 41, n.º 2, 167-204.MacCormick, N. (1993). Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review. Vol. 56, n.º 1, 1-18.MacCormick, N. (1995). The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty now. European Law Journal. Vol. 1, n.º 3, 259-266.MacCormick, N. (1999). Questioning sovereignty: Law, State, and practical reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Maduro, M. P. (2003). Contrapunctual law: Europe’s constitutional pluralism in action. En: Walker, N. (ed.). Sovereignty in transition. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 501-537.Maduro, M. P. (2006). A constituição plural: constitucionalismo e União Européia. Cascais: Principia.Maduro, M. P. (2008). Interpreting european law - Judicial adjudication in a context of constitutional pluralism. Working Paper IE Law School, European University Institute, WPLS08-02. Disponible en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1134503Maduro, M. P. (2009). Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds.). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 356-379.Mayer, F. (2006). The European Constitution and the Courts. En: Von Bogdandy, A. y Bast, J. (eds.). Principles of European Constitutional Law. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 281-333.Neves, M. (1994). A constitucionalização simbólica. São Paulo: Acadêmica.Neves, M. (1995). Constitucionalização simbólica e desconstitucionalização fática: mudança simbólica da constituição e permanência das estruturas reais de poder. Revista Trimestral de Direito Público, São Paulo, n.º 12, 156-167.Neves, M. (2009). Transconstitucionalismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.Pauwelyn, Joost (2004). Bridging fragmentation and unity: International Law as a universe of inter-connected islands. Michigan Journal of International Law. Vol. 25, n.º 4, 903-916.Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory constitutionalism: The function and potential of fundamental international norms and structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19, n.º 3, 579-610.Peters, A. (2007). The globalization of State constitutions. En: Nollkaemper, A. y Nijma, J. (eds.). New perspectives on the divide between national and international law. Oxford: Oxford, 251-308.Peters, A. (2009). The Merits of Global Constitutionalism. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 397-411.Rittberger, V. (2008). Global Governance: From ‘exclusive’ executive multilateralism to inclusive, multipartite institutions. Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, Institut für Politikwissenschaft Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Paper n.º 52.Rosenfeld, M. (2010). The identity of the constitutional subject: Selfhood, citizenship, culture, and community. London-New York: Routledge.Sweet, A. S. (2000). Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford.Sweet, A. S. y Mathews, J. (2008). Proportionality, balancing and global constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 47, n.º 1, 73-165.Tamanaha, B. (1995). An analytical map of social scientific approaches to the concept of law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 15, n.º 4, 501-535.Tamanaha, B. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global. Legal Studies Research Paper Series, St. John’s University School of Law, Paper n.º 07-0080.Van Aaken, A. (2009). Defragmentation of Public International Law Through Interpretation: A Methodological Proposal. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Vol. 16, n.º 2, 483-512.Von Bernstorff, J. (2004). The Structural Limitations of Network Governance: icann as a Case in Point. En: Joerges, C.; Sand, I.-J. y Teubner, G. (eds.). Transnational Governance and constitutionalism. Oxford, Portland: Hart, 257-282.Von Bogdandy, A. (2008). Pluralism, direct effect, and the ultimate say: On the relationship between international and domestic constitutional law. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 397-413.Von Bogdandy, A.; Wolfrum, R.; Von Bernstorff, J.; Dann, P. y Goldmann, M. (eds.). (2009). The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law. Heildeberg: Springer.Walker, N. (2008a). Beyond boundaries disputes and basic grids: Mapping the global disorder of normative orders. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, n.º 3-4, 373-396.Walker, N. (2008b). Taking constitutionalism beyond the State. Political Studies. Vol. 56, n.º 3, 519-543.Walker, N. (2009). Reframing the EU Constitutionalism. En: Dunoff, J. y Trachtman, J. (eds.). Ruling the world? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge, 149-176.Wolkmer, A. C. (1997). Pluralismo jurídico: fundamentos de uma nova cultura no direito. São Paulo: Alfa e Ômega.Zacher, M. W. (2000). Os pilares em ruína do templo de Vestfália. En: Rosenau, J.; Czempiel, E-O. (orgs.). Governança sem governo: ordem e transformação na política mundial. Brasília: UnB; Imprensa Oficial, 83-141.Zagrebelsky, G. (1995). El derecho dúctil: ley, derechos y justicia. Madrid: Trotta.Zagrebelsky, G. (2008). El juez en el siglo xxi. Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal Constitucional, n.º 10, 249-268.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/derest/article/view/5220Espacios transnacionalespluralismo constitucionaltransición de modelos de ordenación constitucional.Transnational spacesconstitutional pluralismtransition on models of constitutional ordering.Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?Constitutional pluralism and trasnational spaces: The end or a new beginning of the National Constitution?Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2687https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/24d3a91f-4cf5-4a7a-b01c-5365ca68126a/downloadb2498be54cae1e640d89db181da0530bMD51001/10699oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/106992023-08-14 15:18:10.87https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

Pluralismo constitucional y espacios transnacionales: ¿el fin de la constitución nacional o su nuevo comienzo?

Publicaciones similares