The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19

La prominencia de Argentina en la historia del arreglo de diferencias relativas a inversiones internacionales (ISDS) permite un estudio de caso fundamental sobre la tensión entre las medidas estatales y la inversión extranjera directa (IED). Argentina, al igual que otros países latinoamericanos, ha...

Full description

Autores:: Harti Alonso, Munia El
Herbst, Sophia

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2021

Institución:: Universidad Externado de Colombia

Repositorio:: Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia

Idioma:: spa

id	uexternad2_1024a81c30b81aaa9167089660a2b043
oai_identifier_str	oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/8422
network_acronym_str	uexternad2
network_name_str	Biblioteca Digital Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
title	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
spellingShingle	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19 covid-19; NAFTA; Argentina; Latin America; Foreign Direct Investment/FDI; Arbitration; Public Health; Dispute Resolution; Emergency; Investment Disputes covid-19, nafta, Argentina, Inversión Extranjera Directa/IED, arbitraje, salud pública, resolución de conflictos emergencia, diferencias relativas a inversiones
title_short	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
title_full	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
title_fullStr	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
title_full_unstemmed	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
title_sort	The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Harti Alonso, Munia El Herbst, Sophia
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Harti Alonso, Munia El Herbst, Sophia
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv	covid-19; NAFTA; Argentina; Latin America; Foreign Direct Investment/FDI; Arbitration; Public Health; Dispute Resolution; Emergency; Investment Disputes
topic	covid-19; NAFTA; Argentina; Latin America; Foreign Direct Investment/FDI; Arbitration; Public Health; Dispute Resolution; Emergency; Investment Disputes covid-19, nafta, Argentina, Inversión Extranjera Directa/IED, arbitraje, salud pública, resolución de conflictos emergencia, diferencias relativas a inversiones
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv	covid-19, nafta, Argentina, Inversión Extranjera Directa/IED, arbitraje, salud pública, resolución de conflictos emergencia, diferencias relativas a inversiones
description	La prominencia de Argentina en la historia del arreglo de diferencias relativas a inversiones internacionales (ISDS) permite un estudio de caso fundamental sobre la tensión entre las medidas estatales y la inversión extranjera directa (IED). Argentina, al igual que otros países latinoamericanos, ha adoptado un enfoque proactivo para mitigar la pandemia actual. En particular, estas decisiones de salud pública de emergencia pueden obstaculizar la IED, lo que conlleva a un aumento de las disputas de inversiones. Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar comparativamente la crisis argentina pasada, y los casos del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) relacionados con la salud publica, capitalizando sobre las lecciones aprendidas para proporcionar una guía en anticipación de las disputas de la covid-19. Para explorar este tema, una discusión sobre cuestiones jurisdiccionales y de procedimiento permite una aplicación moderna de cuestiones pasadas.
publishDate	2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-27 16:56:44 2022-09-08T13:47:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-27 16:56:44 2022-09-08T13:47:38Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2021-07-27
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversion.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.content.spa.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.driver.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.redcol.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
dc.type.version.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.18601/01236458.n56.05
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2346-2078
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	0123-6458
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8422
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n56.05
identifier_str_mv	10.18601/01236458.n56.05 2346-2078 0123-6458
url	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8422 https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n56.05
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/download/7399/10097
dc.relation.citationedition.spa.fl_str_mv	Núm. 56 , Año 2021 : Julio-Diciembre
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	100
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	56
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	83
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Con-texto
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Sheargold, M., & Mitchell, A. (2019). Public Health in International Investment Law and Arbitration. Titi, C. and Fach, K. (2019). Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes, OUP. Titi, C. (2014). The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law. Alcolea, L. C. (2020). The covid-19 Crisis: Core Investment Law Issues Revisited. Transnational Dispute Management. Alvarez, J. (2012). The Paradoxical Argentina Cases. World Arbitration and Mediation Review 6(3). Bakry, A. (2020). After 48 Years at icsid (1972-2020): An Overview of the Status of Egypt in icsid Arbitrations. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Banifatemi, Y. (2015). The Long March Towards a Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment. Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of icsid, Kluwer. Benedettelli, M. (2020). Could covid-19 emergency measures give rise to investment claims? First reflections from Italy. Global Arbitration Review. Benítez, M., Velásco C., et al. (2020) Responses to covid-19 in five Latin American countries. Health Policy and Technology 9(4). Berg, N., Ward, D., Gregor, K. & Gilley, E. (2020). covid-19 Measures: Leveraging Investment Agreements to Protect Foreign Investments. Ropes & Gray Coronavirus Information and Updates. Bnamericas (2020). Coronavirus to worsen fallout from Chile’s power price freeze. Bnamericas. Brower, II C. (2006). Why the ftc Notes of Interpretation Constitute a Partial Amendment of nafta Article 1105. Virginia Journal of International Law. Burke-White, W. (2008). The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability Under bits and the Legitimacy of the icsid System. Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos (2020). Chile: New legal regulations related to working remotely. L&E Global. Chaisse, J. (2020). Both Possible and Improbable—Could covid-19 Measures Give Rise to Investor-State Disputes? Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13(1). ciar Global Editorial Staff (2020). Nuevos inversores de renovables abandonan arbitrajes contra España. ciar Global. Diamond, Nicholas, J. (2020). Pandemics, Emergency Measures, and isds. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Echandi, R., & Kher, P. (2014). Can International Investor-State Disputes be Prevented? Empirical Evidence from Settlements in icsid Arbitration. icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 29(1). European Commission (November 2020). Building a European Health Union: Stronger crisis preparedness and response for Europe. Press Release. Gantz, D. (2019). The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Settlement of Disputes. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy Report. Gillaume, G. (2011). The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1). Gillespie, P. (2020). Argentina Freezes tv, Internet and Mobile Prices Until Year-End. Bloomberg News. Hodgson, M. (2020). The usmca/cusma/t-mec’s Entry into Force: usmca and U.S. Investors – A Reversal of Fortune? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Hodgson, M. (2020). La pandemia del covid-19 y el impacto de las medidas de protección sobre las obligaciones internacionales de los Estados en materia de inversion. Jenner & Block: Arbitraje Internacional. Joshi, R. (2020). Force Majeure under the ilc Draft Articles on State Responsibility: Assessing its Viability Against covid-19 Claims. American Society of International Law Insights, 24(24). Katel, P. (2001). Argentina’s Crisis Explained. Time Magazine. Kaufmann-Kohler, G. (2011). Interpretive Powers of the Free Trade Commission and the Rule of Law. iia Series n.º 7. Kessedjian, C. et al. (2020). Mediation in Future Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Academic Forum on isds Concept Paper 2020/16. Korzun. V. (2017). The Right to Regulate in Investor State Arbitration: Slicing and Dicing Regulatory Carve-Outs. flash: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History 50. Lee, J. (2020). The Coronavirus Pandemic and International Investment Arbitration–Application of “Security Exceptions” Clauses in Investment Agreements. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13(1). Love, B. (Spring, 2020). Consideration of State responsibility for investment treaty violations during the covid-19 pandemic. Reed Smith International Arbitration Focus: Investor State Arbitration. Mann, H., & Readhead, A. (May 2020), Force Majeure and covid-19: Legal risks of a double edged-sword. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Mao-Wei, L. (2020). Legitimate Expectations in a Time of Pandemic: The Host State’s covid- 19 Measures, Its Obligations and Possible Defenses Under International Investment Agreements. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13(1). Milan, L. (2020). covid-19 and the risk of foreign investor challenges. The Canadian Bar Association National Magazine. Moberg, A., & Hindelang, S. (2020). The art of casting political dissent in law: The eu’s framework for the screening of foreign direct investment. Common Market Law Review 57(5). Nitschke, F. (2020). icsid’s Role in Advancing Investor-State Mediation. Global Arbitration Review. Perez-Salido, P. (2019). Royal Decree-Law 17/2019: An Opportunity for Spain to Leave Behind the Renewable Energy Arbitrations? Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Rabson, M. (2017). nafta lawsuits target Canada most while U.S. hasn’t lost yet. The Canadian Press Financial Post. Reinisch, A. (2006). Necessity in International Investment Arbitration – An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent icsid Cases? Comments on cms v. Argentina and lg&e v. Argentina. Transnational Dispute Management. Riaño, M., Paz, I., Claviño I., & Ramón, J. (2019). Spain Approves Royal Decree-Law 17/2019, of 22 November, which establishes the new rate of reasonable return for renewable energy. Lexology. Sanderson, C. (2020). Peru warned of potential icsid claims over covid-19 measures. Global Arbitration Review. Sanderson, C. (2020). icsid panel challenged over decision to hold virtual hearing. Global Arbitration Review. Sanderson, C. (2020). Mexico faces potential claims over pandemic response. Global Arbitration Review. Scherer, M. (2020). Remote Hearings in International Arbitration: An Analytical Framework. Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 3(4). Shirlow, E., & Gore, K. (2020). The usmca/cusma/t-mec’s Entry into Force: Evolution, Innovation, and Reform. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Simpson, C. (2020). Third-Party Funders’ Business is Booming During Pandemic. Law 360. Strong, G. (2020). Opportunities Abound in Latin America for Distressed Asset Investors. Forbes. Thomas, J. C. (2002). Reflections on Article 1105 of NAFTA: History, State Practice and the Influence of Commentators. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 17(1). United Nations UNCTAD (2020). Investment Policy Responses to the covid-19 Pandemic. Investment Policy Monitor. United Nations UNCTAD (2020). Investor-State Dispute Settlement Cases Pass the 1,000 Mark: Cases and Outcomes in 2019. IIA Issues Note. Voon, T. (2015). Evidentiary Challenges for Public Health Regulation in International Trade and Investment Law. Journal of International Economic Law, 18(4). Warren-Clem, A. (2015). pmi v. Uruguay: Public Health and Arbitration Intertwined and Undermined. Law and Business Review of the Americas, 21(4). Columbia Center on Sustainable Development (May 2020). Call for icsid Moratorium During covid-19 Crisis and Response. http://ccsi.columbia.edu/2020/05/05/isds-moratoriumduring-covid-19/. European Commission (October 2020). Coronavirus Response. https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response_en. FDA Insight: Drug Shortages and covid-19. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-insight/fda-insight-drug-shortages-and-covid-19. ICSID Caseload Statistics (Issue 2020-2). https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/publications/The%20ICSID%20Caseload%20Statistics%20%282020-2%20Edition%29%20EN G.pdf. ICSID, Mediations. https://icsid.worldbank.org/services-arbitration-investor-state-mediation.
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv	Munia El Harti Alonso, Sophia Herbst - 2021
dc.rights.accessrights.spa.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.spa.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Munia El Harti Alonso, Sophia Herbst - 2021 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Departamento de Derecho Económico
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/view/7399
institution	Universidad Externado de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/f30b6ab7-49e1-48ae-818f-b56805f7ffb3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	16ee5d133d073d32b39a9a924c352292
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Universidad Externado de Colombia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	metabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org
_version_	1814100489709551616
spelling	Harti Alonso, Munia El4c2ce57a-df47-45a5-991e-02fa38530b74Herbst, Sophia641ecc37-744f-4523-987b-592c4e50e4ba3002021-07-27 16:56:442022-09-08T13:47:38Z2021-07-27 16:56:442022-09-08T13:47:38Z2021-07-27La prominencia de Argentina en la historia del arreglo de diferencias relativas a inversiones internacionales (ISDS) permite un estudio de caso fundamental sobre la tensión entre las medidas estatales y la inversión extranjera directa (IED). Argentina, al igual que otros países latinoamericanos, ha adoptado un enfoque proactivo para mitigar la pandemia actual. En particular, estas decisiones de salud pública de emergencia pueden obstaculizar la IED, lo que conlleva a un aumento de las disputas de inversiones. Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar comparativamente la crisis argentina pasada, y los casos del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) relacionados con la salud publica, capitalizando sobre las lecciones aprendidas para proporcionar una guía en anticipación de las disputas de la covid-19. Para explorar este tema, una discusión sobre cuestiones jurisdiccionales y de procedimiento permite una aplicación moderna de cuestiones pasadas.Argentina’s prominence in the history of ISDS makes for a seminal case study of the tension between state measures and FDI. Argentina, like other Latin American countries, has taken a proactive approach to mitigating the current pandemic. Notably, these emergency public health decisions may hinder FDI, thus leading to an increase in investment disputes. This paper aims to comparatively analyze the past Argentinian crisis and health related NAFTA cases, using lessons learned to provide guidance in anticipation of covid-19 disputes. In order to explore this topic, a discussion of jurisdictional and procedural questions allow for a modern application of past issuesapplication/pdf10.18601/01236458.n56.052346-20780123-6458https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/handle/001/8422https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n56.05spaDepartamento de Derecho Económicohttps://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/download/7399/10097Núm. 56 , Año 2021 : Julio-Diciembre1005683Con-textoSheargold, M., & Mitchell, A. (2019). Public Health in International Investment Law and Arbitration.Titi, C. and Fach, K. (2019). Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes, OUP.Titi, C. (2014). The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law.Alcolea, L. C. (2020). The covid-19 Crisis: Core Investment Law Issues Revisited. Transnational Dispute Management.Alvarez, J. (2012). The Paradoxical Argentina Cases. World Arbitration and Mediation Review 6(3). Bakry, A. (2020). After 48 Years at icsid (1972-2020): An Overview of the Status of Egypt in icsid Arbitrations. Kluwer Arbitration Blog.Banifatemi, Y. (2015). The Long March Towards a Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment. Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of icsid, Kluwer.Benedettelli, M. (2020). Could covid-19 emergency measures give rise to investment claims? First reflections from Italy. Global Arbitration Review.Benítez, M., Velásco C., et al. (2020) Responses to covid-19 in five Latin American countries. Health Policy and Technology 9(4).Berg, N., Ward, D., Gregor, K. & Gilley, E. (2020). covid-19 Measures: Leveraging Investment Agreements to Protect Foreign Investments. Ropes & Gray Coronavirus Information and Updates.Bnamericas (2020). Coronavirus to worsen fallout from Chile’s power price freeze. Bnamericas.Brower, II C. (2006). Why the ftc Notes of Interpretation Constitute a Partial Amendment of nafta Article 1105. Virginia Journal of International Law.Burke-White, W. (2008). The Argentine Financial Crisis: State Liability Under bits and the Legitimacy of the icsid System. Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law.Cariola Díez Pérez-Cotapos (2020). Chile: New legal regulations related to working remotely. L&E Global.Chaisse, J. (2020). Both Possible and Improbable—Could covid-19 Measures Give Rise to Investor-State Disputes? Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13(1).ciar Global Editorial Staff (2020). Nuevos inversores de renovables abandonan arbitrajes contra España. ciar Global.Diamond, Nicholas, J. (2020). Pandemics, Emergency Measures, and isds. Kluwer Arbitration Blog.Echandi, R., & Kher, P. (2014). Can International Investor-State Disputes be Prevented? Empirical Evidence from Settlements in icsid Arbitration. icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 29(1).European Commission (November 2020). Building a European Health Union: Stronger crisis preparedness and response for Europe. Press Release.Gantz, D. (2019). The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Settlement of Disputes. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy Report.Gillaume, G. (2011). The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1).Gillespie, P. (2020). Argentina Freezes tv, Internet and Mobile Prices Until Year-End. Bloomberg News.Hodgson, M. (2020). The usmca/cusma/t-mec’s Entry into Force: usmca and U.S. Investors – A Reversal of Fortune? Kluwer Arbitration Blog.Hodgson, M. (2020). La pandemia del covid-19 y el impacto de las medidas de protección sobre las obligaciones internacionales de los Estados en materia de inversion. Jenner & Block: Arbitraje Internacional.Joshi, R. (2020). Force Majeure under the ilc Draft Articles on State Responsibility: Assessing its Viability Against covid-19 Claims. American Society of International Law Insights, 24(24).Katel, P. (2001). Argentina’s Crisis Explained. Time Magazine.Kaufmann-Kohler, G. (2011). Interpretive Powers of the Free Trade Commission and the Rule of Law. iia Series n.º 7.Kessedjian, C. et al. (2020). Mediation in Future Investor-State Dispute Settlement. Academic Forum on isds Concept Paper 2020/16.Korzun. V. (2017). The Right to Regulate in Investor State Arbitration: Slicing and Dicing Regulatory Carve-Outs. flash: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History 50.Lee, J. (2020). The Coronavirus Pandemic and International Investment Arbitration–Application of “Security Exceptions” Clauses in Investment Agreements. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13(1).Love, B. (Spring, 2020). Consideration of State responsibility for investment treaty violations during the covid-19 pandemic. Reed Smith International Arbitration Focus: Investor State Arbitration.Mann, H., & Readhead, A. (May 2020), Force Majeure and covid-19: Legal risks of a double edged-sword. International Institute for Sustainable Development.Mao-Wei, L. (2020). Legitimate Expectations in a Time of Pandemic: The Host State’s covid- 19 Measures, Its Obligations and Possible Defenses Under International Investment Agreements. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 13(1).Milan, L. (2020). covid-19 and the risk of foreign investor challenges. The Canadian Bar Association National Magazine.Moberg, A., & Hindelang, S. (2020). The art of casting political dissent in law: The eu’s framework for the screening of foreign direct investment. Common Market Law Review 57(5).Nitschke, F. (2020). icsid’s Role in Advancing Investor-State Mediation. Global Arbitration Review. Perez-Salido, P. (2019). Royal Decree-Law 17/2019: An Opportunity for Spain to Leave Behind the Renewable Energy Arbitrations? Kluwer Arbitration Blog.Rabson, M. (2017). nafta lawsuits target Canada most while U.S. hasn’t lost yet. The Canadian Press Financial Post.Reinisch, A. (2006). Necessity in International Investment Arbitration – An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent icsid Cases? Comments on cms v. Argentina and lg&e v. Argentina. Transnational Dispute Management.Riaño, M., Paz, I., Claviño I., & Ramón, J. (2019). Spain Approves Royal Decree-Law 17/2019, of 22 November, which establishes the new rate of reasonable return for renewable energy. Lexology.Sanderson, C. (2020). Peru warned of potential icsid claims over covid-19 measures. Global Arbitration Review.Sanderson, C. (2020). icsid panel challenged over decision to hold virtual hearing. Global Arbitration Review.Sanderson, C. (2020). Mexico faces potential claims over pandemic response. Global Arbitration Review.Scherer, M. (2020). Remote Hearings in International Arbitration: An Analytical Framework. Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 3(4).Shirlow, E., & Gore, K. (2020). The usmca/cusma/t-mec’s Entry into Force: Evolution, Innovation, and Reform. Kluwer Arbitration Blog.Simpson, C. (2020). Third-Party Funders’ Business is Booming During Pandemic. Law 360. Strong, G. (2020). Opportunities Abound in Latin America for Distressed Asset Investors. Forbes.Thomas, J. C. (2002). Reflections on Article 1105 of NAFTA: History, State Practice and the Influence of Commentators. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 17(1).United Nations UNCTAD (2020). Investment Policy Responses to the covid-19 Pandemic. Investment Policy Monitor.United Nations UNCTAD (2020). Investor-State Dispute Settlement Cases Pass the 1,000 Mark: Cases and Outcomes in 2019. IIA Issues Note.Voon, T. (2015). Evidentiary Challenges for Public Health Regulation in International Trade and Investment Law. Journal of International Economic Law, 18(4).Warren-Clem, A. (2015). pmi v. Uruguay: Public Health and Arbitration Intertwined and Undermined. Law and Business Review of the Americas, 21(4).Columbia Center on Sustainable Development (May 2020). Call for icsid Moratorium During covid-19 Crisis and Response. http://ccsi.columbia.edu/2020/05/05/isds-moratoriumduring-covid-19/.European Commission (October 2020). Coronavirus Response. https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response_en.FDA Insight: Drug Shortages and covid-19. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-insight/fda-insight-drug-shortages-and-covid-19.ICSID Caseload Statistics (Issue 2020-2). https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/publications/The%20ICSID%20Caseload%20Statistics%20%282020-2%20Edition%29%20EN G.pdf.ICSID, Mediations. https://icsid.worldbank.org/services-arbitration-investor-state-mediation.Munia El Harti Alonso, Sophia Herbst - 2021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/contexto/article/view/7399covid-19;NAFTA;Argentina;Latin America;Foreign Direct Investment/FDI;Arbitration;Public Health;Dispute Resolution;Emergency;Investment Disputescovid-19,nafta,Argentina,Inversión Extranjera Directa/IED,arbitraje,salud pública,resolución de conflictosemergencia,diferencias relativas a inversionesThe Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2708https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.co/bitstreams/f30b6ab7-49e1-48ae-818f-b56805f7ffb3/download16ee5d133d073d32b39a9a924c352292MD51001/8422oai:bdigital.uexternado.edu.co:001/84222023-08-14 15:26:01.807https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Munia El Harti Alonso, Sophia Herbst - 2021https://bdigital.uexternado.edu.coUniversidad Externado de Colombiametabiblioteca@metabiblioteca.org

The Rise of Investor-State Public Health Disputes: Lessons Learned from the Idiosyncrasy of Argentinian and NAFTA Cases in the Era of covid-19

Publicaciones similares