Frágil culpabilidad. El conflicto entre arrogancia moral y sabiduría trágica en Eurípides.
In Euripides the thesis of the human character of fault and punishment is found; turning the responsibility into an immanent subject to men s life in spite of the religious beliefs. In this sense the law; the human passions; rationality and faith get into a tension that has been continuing; taking p...
- Autores:
-
Lenis Castaño, John Fredy
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2012
- Institución:
- Universidad Sergio Arboleda
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/267
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.107
http://hdl.handle.net/11232/267
- Palabra clave:
- Culpa moral
Ética
Euripides - Crítica e interpretación
complejidad existencial
culpabilidad
sabiduría trágica
arrogancia moral
dionisismo
Eurípides
existential complexity
guiltiness
tragic wisdom
moral arrogance
dionisism
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
| Summary: | In Euripides the thesis of the human character of fault and punishment is found; turning the responsibility into an immanent subject to men s life in spite of the religious beliefs. In this sense the law; the human passions; rationality and faith get into a tension that has been continuing; taking place regardless of the moral renewal of modernity. This article will be structured following some fundamental moral themes of several of the aforementioned thinker s tragedies from a mainly genealogical and hermeneutical perspective; making an intra- and inter-textual analysis that allows to put into consideration the importance of the tragic wisdom for the instruction of a moral fallible and historic conscience. |
|---|