Reconocimiento mutuo como trabajo de traducción.

The paper exposed that mutual recognition could be approached as a translation work.The starting point is the “moving between worlds”, used by Boltanski and Thévenot to refer to the subjects’ capacity to live in different “orders of worth”, which Ricœur compared with the ability to translate. We examined five aspects of translation related to mutual recognition: a) its double meaning: translation between languages and trans-lation as interpretation; b) the relationship between fidelity and betrayal; c) the training process experienced by the translator; d) the transformation of the translator’s own lan-guage; and, e) the articulation between the universality of the language and the plurality of the languages evident in the translation work.

• Autores: Prada Londoño, Manuel
• Tipo de recurso: Article of investigation
• Fecha de publicación: 2019
• Institución: Universidad Sergio Arboleda
• Repositorio: Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/1355
• Acceso en línea: https://doi.org/10.22518/usergioa/jour/ccsh/2019.1/a01; http://hdl.handle.net/11232/1355
• Palabra clave: Filosofía del lenguaje; Lenguaje y lenguas; Reconocimiento mutuo; Philosophy of language; Language and languages; Mutual recognition; mutual recognition; orders of worth; translation work; Paul Ricœur; reconocimiento mutuo; escalas de grandeza; trabajo de traducción; Paul Ricœur
• Rights: openAccess
• License: Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)