El ser y su ser en Tomás de Aquino
Two prestigious philosophers, Enrico Berti and Anthony Kenny, assert that Thomas Aquinas expresses relevant doctrinal incoherencies, especially in his ipsum esse subsistens doctrine.In the context of this discussion, the current article intends to review themost outstanding texts where Aquinas consi...
- Autores:
-
Irizar, Liliana Beatríz
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2009
- Institución:
- Universidad Sergio Arboleda
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/197
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.735
http://hdl.handle.net/11232/197
- Palabra clave:
- Ontología
Filosofía
Tomás de Aquino Santo - Pensamiento filosófico
teología negativa
metafísica mínima
ser de Dios
Tomás de Aquino
ipsum esse subsistens
negative theology
minimum metaphyscis
being of God
Thomas Aquinas
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
Summary: | Two prestigious philosophers, Enrico Berti and Anthony Kenny, assert that Thomas Aquinas expresses relevant doctrinal incoherencies, especially in his ipsum esse subsistens doctrine.In the context of this discussion, the current article intends to review themost outstanding texts where Aquinas considers the being of God issue, and calls Him ipsum esse subsistens, as well for the passages in which hetalks about the being of God as his being (suum esse). The aforesaid, isaimed to establish if effectively is fair to identify the ipsum esse subsistens with the idea of God considered as the separated being from Platon icinspiration.This analysis will allow us to precise to what extent is valid to affirm thatthe Aquinas’ philosophy is a negative philosophy and his metaphysicsis minimum metaphysics. |
---|