Dificultades de la adopción de niños en Colombia a partir de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional entre 2011 y 2016.

This article aims to identify the administrative and judicial difficulties in the adoption process in Colombia, from the analysis of the Constitutional Court’s judgments during the years 2011 to 2016. Taking as a basis the socio-legal type research and using an analytical descriptive method based on...

Full description

Autores:
Estrada Jaramillo, Lina Marcela
Arango Orozco, Beatriz María
Carrasquilla Zuluaga, Daniela
Mesa González, Ángela María
Vergara Tobón, Carolina
Noreña González, Manuela
Tamayo Monsalve, Manuela
López Lopera, Daniela
Correa Barros, Julián Andrés
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Sergio Arboleda
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/1343
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.22518/usergioa/jour/ccsh/2018.2/a01
http://hdl.handle.net/11232/1343
Palabra clave:
Adopción (Derecho) - Colombia
Adopción - Jurisprudencia - Colombia - 2011-2016
Adoption (Law) - Colombia
Adoption - Jurisprudence - Colombia - 2011-2016
adoption process
institutionalization of children
restoration of rights
proceso de adopción
institucionalización de niños
restablecimiento de derechos
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
Description
Summary:This article aims to identify the administrative and judicial difficulties in the adoption process in Colombia, from the analysis of the Constitutional Court’s judgments during the years 2011 to 2016. Taking as a basis the socio-legal type research and using an analytical descriptive method based on the study of judgments, defined from questions oriented to the difficulties in the adoption process. This research identified the adoption as a mechanism oriented towards satisfying the best interests of children when the family does not guarantee the conditions for the realization and exercise of their rights. Finally, it showed that there is still a lack of precision and effectiveness in applying the regulations and principles set forth in the Convention on the Rights of the Child