Valoración de tierras de interés público y la toma de decisiones sobre uso eficiente en política pública

The purpose of this article is to explore some considerations based on the criterion of pure economic efficiency necessary to design efficient public policy for the allocation of public-interest environmentalassets. A version of the Fisher and Krutilla’s model is proposed to study the problem of natural resources’ optimal allocation under conflicts of use between conservation and development. The model is a tool to determine the best use of an urban natural environment in Bogota, Colombia. Under the scenarios ofconservation-passive use, conservation-active use and partial development, the major and the best use or the urban natural environment is the option of conservation-passive use. This option reports a cost benefit ratio of 3.44, estimated with the Contingent Valuation method of non-market values under thisoption. This information is useful for policy makers to choose the major and the best use for the urban natural environment.

• Autores: Mendieta López, Juan Carlos
• Tipo de recurso: Article of investigation
• Fecha de publicación: 2008
• Institución: Universidad Sergio Arboleda
• Repositorio: Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
• Idioma: spa
• OAI Identifier: oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/375
• Acceso en línea: https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.754; http://hdl.handle.net/11232/375
• Palabra clave: Inversiones públicas - Aspectos ambientales - Bogotá; Uso de la tierra - Aspectos ambientales - Bogotá; Economía urbana - Bogotá; Non-market Benefits; Optimal Allocation,; Conservation versus Development; Cost Benefit Analysisand the Environment; Beneficios no mercadeables
• Rights: openAccess
• License: Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)