Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.

In this article; I examine how gender parity is a viable mechanism to protect the capacity of transformation that characterizes democracy. Fundamentally; I contend that a democratic system needs to provide arenas of deliberation in order to contest gender relations and eradicate practices of dominat...

Full description

Autores:: Jaramillo Ruiz, Felipe

Tipo de recurso:: Article of investigation

Fecha de publicación:: 2013

Institución:: Universidad Sergio Arboleda

Repositorio:: Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda

Idioma:: spa

id	sergioarb2_3bd84d56fbad187d84f61844879f848a
oai_identifier_str	oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/291
network_acronym_str	sergioarb2
network_name_str	Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.
dc.title.translated.eng.fl_str_mv	Democracy, parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations.
title	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.
spellingShingle	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género. Participación de la mujer Mujeres en el desarrollo de la comunidad Mujeres - Actividad política gender relations democracy inclusion and power relaciones de género paridad democracia inclusión y poder
title_short	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.
title_full	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.
title_fullStr	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.
title_full_unstemmed	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.
title_sort	Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Jaramillo Ruiz, Felipe
dc.contributor.author.spa.fl_str_mv	Jaramillo Ruiz, Felipe
dc.subject.lemb.spa.fl_str_mv	Participación de la mujer Mujeres en el desarrollo de la comunidad Mujeres - Actividad política
topic	Participación de la mujer Mujeres en el desarrollo de la comunidad Mujeres - Actividad política gender relations democracy inclusion and power relaciones de género paridad democracia inclusión y poder
dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv	gender relations democracy inclusion and power
dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv	relaciones de género paridad democracia inclusión y poder
description	In this article; I examine how gender parity is a viable mechanism to protect the capacity of transformation that characterizes democracy. Fundamentally; I contend that a democratic system needs to provide arenas of deliberation in order to contest gender relations and eradicate practices of domination. Moreover; I argue that the exclusion and censorship of groups that question the predominant gender practices contradicts the spirit of democracy. Therefore; if women do not find institutional paths to express their ideas and to materialize their desires and beliefs; democratic institutions must be designed so as to enable these processes of inclusion.
publishDate	2013
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv	2013-07-01
dc.date.accessioned.spa.fl_str_mv	2015-07-22T21:13:54Z 2016-05-11T14:36:20Z 2017-05-16T17:07:59Z
dc.date.available.spa.fl_str_mv	2015-07-22T21:13:54Z 2016-05-11T14:36:20Z 2017-05-16T17:07:59Z
dc.date.spa.fl_str_mv	2013
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.local.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.citation.spa.fl_str_mv	Jaramillo Ruiz, F. (2013). Democracy, parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations. Civilizar: Ciencias Sociales Y Humanas, 13(25), 67-84
dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv	1657-8953
dc.identifier.doi.eng.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.129
dc.identifier.instname.spa.fl_str_mv	instname:Universidad Sergio Arboleda
dc.identifier.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv	reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboleda
dc.identifier.repourl.*.fl_str_mv	repourl:https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/
dc.identifier.url.eng.fl_str_mv	http://hdl.handle.net/11232/291
identifier_str_mv	Jaramillo Ruiz, F. (2013). Democracy, parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations. Civilizar: Ciencias Sociales Y Humanas, 13(25), 67-84 1657-8953 instname:Universidad Sergio Arboleda reponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboleda repourl:https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/
url	https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.129 http://hdl.handle.net/11232/291
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv	Revista Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas,vol. 13, núm 25 (2013)
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Adkins, L. (2008). From Retroactivation to Futurity: The End of the Sexual Contract?. NORA- Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 16(3), 182-201. doi: 10.1080/08038740802300954 Beer, C. (2009). Democracy and Gender Equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 212-227. doi: 10.1007/s12116-009-9043-2 Beitz, C. (1990). Political Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Bohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation. Cambridge: MIT Press. Boucher, J. (2003). Male Power and Contract Theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s ‘The Sexual Contract’. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 23-38. Bryce, J. (1923). Modern Democracies. London: Macmillan & Co. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: A. Hamlin, & P. Pettit (Eds.), The Good Polity, (pp. 143-151).London: Blackwell. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation.New Jersey: Erlbaum. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders. Psychological Review,109(3), 573-598. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punishment. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Foucault, M. (1980). The History of Sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction. London: Penguin. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry. 8(4), 777-795. Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. In: P. Rabinow (Ed.), TheEssential Works of Michel Foucault (pp. 281-302). New York: The New Press. Fuchs, G., & Hoecker, B. (2004). Without Women merely a Half-Democracy. European Politics. Recuperado de http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/02611.pdf. Goffman, E. (1977). The Arrangement Between the Sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301-331. Goodin, R. E. (1966). Inclusion and Exclusion. European Journal of Sociology, 37(2), 343-371. doi: 10.1017/S000397 5600007219 Haugaard, M. (2010). Democracy, political power, and authority. Social Research: An International Quarterly,77(4), 1049-1074. Haugaard, M. (2012). Power Over and Democracy: the four dimensions of power as a condition of possibility for democracy. Working Paper. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: MIT Press. Jónasdóttir, A. G. (1988). Does Sex Matter to Democracy?. Scandinavian Political Studies, 4, 299-322. Keating, C. (2007). Framing the Postcolonial Sexual Contract: Democracy, Fraternalism, and State Authority in India. Hypatia,22(4), 130-145. Lemke, T. (2010). Foucault’s Hypothesis: From the Critique of the Juridico-Discursive Concept of Power to an Analytics of Government. Parrhesia,9, 31-43. Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books. March, J. G., & Olsen J. P. (2005). Elaborating the “New Institutionalism”. Working Paper. Recuperado de http://www.cpp.amu.edu.pl/pdf/olsen2.pdf Noval, A. J. (2004). Hegemony after deconstruction: the consequences of undecidability. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(2), 139-157. doi: 10.1080/13569 310410001691187 Nussbaum, M. C. (1996). Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism. In: M. Nussbaum (Ed.). For love of Country? (pp. 3-20). Boston: Beacon Press Books. Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Capabilities and Human Rights. Fordham Law Review, 66(2), 273-300. Orwell, G. (1948). 1984. Recuperado de http://www.planetebook.com/ebooks/1984.pdf. Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing Citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. New York: Open University Press. Padgug, R. A. (1979). Sexual Matters: On Conceptualizing Sexuality In History. Radical History Review, 1979(20), 3-23. doi: 10.1215/01636545-1979-20-3 Parijs, P. M. (1996). Justice and Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(2), 101-117. Pateman, C. (1983). Feminism and Democracy. In: G. Duncan (Ed.), Democratic Theory and Practice (pp. 204-2017). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pateman, C. (1985). Women and Democratic Citizenship. In: The Jefferson Memorial Lectures at the University of California. Berkley. Unpublished manuscript. Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Patomäki, H. (2008). The Political Economy of Global Security: War, future crises and changes in global governance. New York: Routledge. Prokhovnik, R. (1998). Public and Private Citizenship: From Gender Invisibility to Feminist Inclusiveness. Feminist Review, 60, 84-104. Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R.M. (2008). The gender of representation: On democracy, equality, and parity. International Journal of Constitutional Law,6(2) 287-316. doi: 10.1093/icon/mon007 Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2009). Constitutional Justification of Parity Democracy. Alabama Law Review, 60(5), 1171-1195. Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2010). La democracia como democracia paritaria. En: D. Heim, & Encarna Bodelón González (Ed.), Derecho Género Igualdad: Cambios en las Estructuras Jurídicas Androcéntricas (pp. 299-315). Barcelona: Grupo Antígona. Rubio-Marín, R. (2012). A New European Parity-Democracy Sex Equality Model and why it won’t Fly in the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 60(1), 99-126 Schemiel,Y. (2000). Democracy Before Democracy?. International Political Science Review, 21(2), 99-120. doi: 10.1177/ 0192512100212001 Teivainen, T. (2011). Global democratization without hierarchy or leadership? The World Social Forum in the capitalist world. In S. Gill (Ed.), Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership, (pp. 181-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution.Osborne: McGraw Hill. Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges. In J Torfing, & D. Howarth (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: identity, policy and governance (pp.1-32). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Walby, S. (1994). Is Citizenship Gendered?. Sociology,28(2), 379-395. doi: 10.1177/0038038594028002002 Warren, M. (1996). What should we Expect from More Democracy? Radically Democratic Responses to Politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241-270. Waylen, G. (1994). Women and Democratization. World Politics, 45(3). 327-354. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.references.spa.fl_str_mv	Taylor, C. (1994). The Politics of Recognition. A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism (pp. 25-74). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv	Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
dc.relation.citationvolumen.spa.fl_str_mv	13
dc.relation.citationissue.spa.fl_str_mv	25
dc.relation.citationstartpage.spa.fl_str_mv	67
dc.relation.citationendpage.spa.fl_str_mv	84
dc.rights.license.*.fl_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv	Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.accesRights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.*.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO) Abierto (Texto Completo) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.extent.spa.fl_str_mv	18
dc.format.medium.spa.fl_str_mv	Digital
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.format.tipo.spa.fl_str_mv	documentos
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv	Universidad Sergio Arboleda
institution	Universidad Sergio Arboleda
dc.source.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	http://revistas.usergioarboleda.edu.co/index.php/ccsh/article/view/129/120
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/bitstream/11232/291/1/Democracy%20parity%20and%20change.%20An%20institutional%20space%20for%20gender%20relations.html
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	49cf72a351983b7de84a899ca5f5bce0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboleda
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	dspace-help@myu.edu
_version_	1814076311549771776
spelling	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)Abierto (Texto Completo)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Jaramillo Ruiz, Felipe20132015-07-22T21:13:54Z2016-05-11T14:36:20Z2017-05-16T17:07:59Z2015-07-22T21:13:54Z2016-05-11T14:36:20Z2017-05-16T17:07:59Z2013-07-01Jaramillo Ruiz, F. (2013). Democracy, parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations. Civilizar: Ciencias Sociales Y Humanas, 13(25), 67-841657-8953https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.129instname:Universidad Sergio Arboledareponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboledarepourl:https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/http://hdl.handle.net/11232/291In this article; I examine how gender parity is a viable mechanism to protect the capacity of transformation that characterizes democracy. Fundamentally; I contend that a democratic system needs to provide arenas of deliberation in order to contest gender relations and eradicate practices of domination. Moreover; I argue that the exclusion and censorship of groups that question the predominant gender practices contradicts the spirit of democracy. Therefore; if women do not find institutional paths to express their ideas and to materialize their desires and beliefs; democratic institutions must be designed so as to enable these processes of inclusion.El artículo examina cómo la paridad de género es un mecanismo viable para proteger la capacidad de transformación que caracteriza a la democracia. Fundamentalmente; se sostiene que un sistema democrático debe ofrecer espacios de deliberación con el fin de debatir las relaciones de género y erradicar las prácticas de dominación. Así; se argumenta que la exclusión y censura de los grupos que cuestionan las prácticas predominantes de género contradice el espíritu de la democracia. Por lo tanto; si las mujeres no encuentran caminos institucionales para expresar sus ideas y materializar sus deseos y creencias; se deben diseñar instituciones democráticas que permitan su mayor inclusión18Digitalapplication/pdfdocumentosspaUniversidad Sergio ArboledaRevista Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas,vol. 13, núm 25 (2013)Adkins, L. (2008). From Retroactivation to Futurity: The End of the Sexual Contract?. NORA- Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 16(3), 182-201. doi: 10.1080/08038740802300954Beer, C. (2009). Democracy and Gender Equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44, 212-227. doi: 10.1007/s12116-009-9043-2Beitz, C. (1990). Political Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Bohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Boucher, J. (2003). Male Power and Contract Theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s ‘The Sexual Contract’. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 23-38.Bryce, J. (1923). Modern Democracies. London: Macmillan & Co.Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In: A. Hamlin, & P. Pettit (Eds.), The Good Polity, (pp. 143-151).London: Blackwell.Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation.New Jersey: Erlbaum.Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders. Psychological Review,109(3), 573-598.Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punishment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Foucault, M. (1980). The History of Sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction. London: Penguin.Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry. 8(4), 777-795.Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. In: P. Rabinow (Ed.), TheEssential Works of Michel Foucault (pp. 281-302). New York: The New Press.Fuchs, G., & Hoecker, B. (2004). Without Women merely a Half-Democracy. European Politics. Recuperado de http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/02611.pdf.Goffman, E. (1977). The Arrangement Between the Sexes. Theory and Society, 4(3), 301-331.Goodin, R. E. (1966). Inclusion and Exclusion. European Journal of Sociology, 37(2), 343-371. doi: 10.1017/S000397 5600007219Haugaard, M. (2010). Democracy, political power, and authority. Social Research: An International Quarterly,77(4), 1049-1074.Haugaard, M. (2012). Power Over and Democracy: the four dimensions of power as a condition of possibility for democracy. Working Paper.Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Jónasdóttir, A. G. (1988). Does Sex Matter to Democracy?. Scandinavian Political Studies, 4, 299-322.Keating, C. (2007). Framing the Postcolonial Sexual Contract: Democracy, Fraternalism, and State Authority in India. Hypatia,22(4), 130-145.Lemke, T. (2010). Foucault’s Hypothesis: From the Critique of the Juridico-Discursive Concept of Power to an Analytics of Government. Parrhesia,9, 31-43.Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.March, J. G., & Olsen J. P. (2005). Elaborating the “New Institutionalism”. Working Paper. Recuperado de http://www.cpp.amu.edu.pl/pdf/olsen2.pdfNoval, A. J. (2004). Hegemony after deconstruction: the consequences of undecidability. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(2), 139-157. doi: 10.1080/13569 310410001691187Nussbaum, M. C. (1996). Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism. In: M. Nussbaum (Ed.). For love of Country? (pp. 3-20). Boston: Beacon Press Books.Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Capabilities and Human Rights. Fordham Law Review, 66(2), 273-300.Orwell, G. (1948). 1984. Recuperado de http://www.planetebook.com/ebooks/1984.pdf.Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing Citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. New York: Open University Press.Padgug, R. A. (1979). Sexual Matters: On Conceptualizing Sexuality In History. Radical History Review, 1979(20), 3-23. doi: 10.1215/01636545-1979-20-3Parijs, P. M. (1996). Justice and Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(2), 101-117.Pateman, C. (1983). Feminism and Democracy. In: G. Duncan (Ed.), Democratic Theory and Practice (pp. 204-2017). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Pateman, C. (1985). Women and Democratic Citizenship. In: The Jefferson Memorial Lectures at the University of California. Berkley. Unpublished manuscript.Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Patomäki, H. (2008). The Political Economy of Global Security: War, future crises and changes in global governance. New York: Routledge.Prokhovnik, R. (1998). Public and Private Citizenship: From Gender Invisibility to Feminist Inclusiveness. Feminist Review, 60, 84-104.Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R.M. (2008). The gender of representation: On democracy, equality, and parity. International Journal of Constitutional Law,6(2) 287-316. doi: 10.1093/icon/mon007Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2009). Constitutional Justification of Parity Democracy. Alabama Law Review, 60(5), 1171-1195.Rodríguez-Ruiz, B., & Rubio-Marin, R. (2010). La democracia como democracia paritaria. En: D. Heim, & Encarna Bodelón González (Ed.), Derecho Género Igualdad: Cambios en las Estructuras Jurídicas Androcéntricas (pp. 299-315). Barcelona: Grupo Antígona.Rubio-Marín, R. (2012). A New European Parity-Democracy Sex Equality Model and why it won’t Fly in the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 60(1), 99-126Schemiel,Y. (2000). Democracy Before Democracy?. International Political Science Review, 21(2), 99-120. doi: 10.1177/ 0192512100212001Teivainen, T. (2011). Global democratization without hierarchy or leadership? The World Social Forum in the capitalist world. In S. Gill (Ed.), Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership, (pp. 181-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution.Osborne: McGraw Hill.Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges. In J Torfing, & D. Howarth (Eds.), Discourse Theory in European Politics: identity, policy and governance (pp.1-32). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Walby, S. (1994). Is Citizenship Gendered?. Sociology,28(2), 379-395. doi: 10.1177/0038038594028002002Warren, M. (1996). What should we Expect from More Democracy? Radically Democratic Responses to Politics. Political Theory, 24(2), 241-270.Waylen, G. (1994). Women and Democratization. World Politics, 45(3). 327-354.Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford Oxford University Press.Taylor, C. (1994). The Politics of Recognition. A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism (pp. 25-74). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades13256784http://revistas.usergioarboleda.edu.co/index.php/ccsh/article/view/129/120Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.Democracy, parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations.Participación de la mujerMujeres en el desarrollo de la comunidadMujeres - Actividad políticagender relationsdemocracyinclusion and powerrelaciones de géneroparidaddemocraciainclusión y poderhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTArtículo de revistaORIGINALDemocracy parity and change. An institutional space for gender relations.htmltext/html233https://repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co/bitstream/11232/291/1/Democracy%20parity%20and%20change.%20An%20institutional%20space%20for%20gender%20relations.html49cf72a351983b7de84a899ca5f5bce0MD51open access11232/291oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/2912021-11-10 10:08:36.206open accessRepositorio Institucional Universidad Sergio Arboledadspace-help@myu.edu

Democracia; paridad de género y cambio. Un espacio institucional para las relaciones de género.

Publicaciones similares