Prueba empírica de un modelo de calidad de vida.
This work was proposed to establish a correlative model to discuss the importance of other variables in the investigation of the quality of life. Once the relationship between the factors derived from the literature review were specified, a crosssectional study was carried out with a nonrandom sampl...
- Autores:
-
García Estrada, Erle
Cruz García Lirios
Rosas Ferrusca, José Francisco
Castillo Escamilla, María Beatriz
Carreón Guillén, Javier
Hernández Valdés, Jorge
Rivera Varela, Bertha Leticia
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of investigation
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2015
- Institución:
- Universidad Sergio Arboleda
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/519
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.286
http://hdl.handle.net/11232/519
- Palabra clave:
- Calidad de vida - Investigaciones
normas grupales
disponibilidad de recursos
capacidades percibidas
perceived capabilities
calidad de vida
satisfacción vital
quality of life
life satisfaction
group norms
availability of resources
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
Summary: | This work was proposed to establish a correlative model to discuss the importance of other variables in the investigation of the quality of life. Once the relationship between the factors derived from the literature review were specified, a crosssectional study was carried out with a nonrandom sample of 245 students. When the validity and reliability of the instrument measured was obtained: life satisfaction, expected capacities, expectations of opportunity, trust relationships, perceptions of fairness, valuing the environment, rules of context and perceived resources, a structural model was contrasted [X2 = 12,35 (12 gl) p = 0.000; GFI = 0.975; RMR = 0.000] in which the perceived availability of resources indirectly correlated to life satisfaction through context rules (γ = 0.52). The results were compared with the findings reported in the state of knowledge. |
---|