Prueba empírica de un modelo de calidad de vida.

This work was proposed to establish a correlative model to discuss the importance of other variables in the investigation of the quality of life. Once the relationship between the factors derived from the literature review were specified, a crosssectional study was carried out with a nonrandom sampl...

Full description

Autores:
García Estrada, Erle
Cruz García Lirios
Rosas Ferrusca, José Francisco
Castillo Escamilla, María Beatriz
Carreón Guillén, Javier
Hernández Valdés, Jorge
Rivera Varela, Bertha Leticia
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2015
Institución:
Universidad Sergio Arboleda
Repositorio:
Repositorio U. Sergio Arboleda
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.usergioarboleda.edu.co:11232/519
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.22518/16578953.286
http://hdl.handle.net/11232/519
Palabra clave:
Calidad de vida - Investigaciones
normas grupales
disponibilidad de recursos
capacidades percibidas
perceived capabilities
calidad de vida
satisfacción vital
quality of life
life satisfaction
group norms
availability of resources
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia (CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 CO)
Description
Summary:This work was proposed to establish a correlative model to discuss the importance of other variables in the investigation of the quality of life. Once the relationship between the factors derived from the literature review were specified, a crosssectional study was carried out with a nonrandom sample of 245 students. When the validity and reliability of the instrument measured was obtained: life satisfaction, expected capacities, expectations of opportunity, trust relationships, perceptions of fairness, valuing the environment, rules of context and perceived resources, a structural model was contrasted [X2 = 12,35 (12 gl) p = 0.000; GFI = 0.975; RMR = 0.000] in which the perceived availability of resources indirectly correlated to life satisfaction through context rules (γ = 0.52). The results were compared with the findings reported in the state of knowledge.